Klaas Kok

Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is increasingly utilized for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Performing CMA and G-banded karyotyping on every patient substantially increases the total cost of genetic testing. The International Standard Cytogenomic Array (ISCA) Consortium held two international workshops and conducted a literature review of 33 studies, including 21,698 patients tested by CMA. We provide an evidence-based summary of clinical cytogenetic testing comparing CMA to G-banded karyotyping with respect to technical advantages and limitations, diagnostic yield for various types of chromosomal aberrations, and issues that affect test interpretation. CMA offers a much higher diagnostic yield (15%-20%) for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained DD/ID, ASD, or MCA than a G-banded karyotype ( approximately 3%, excluding Down syndrome and other recognizable chromosomal syndromes), primarily because of its higher sensitivity for submicroscopic deletions and duplications. Truly balanced rearrangements and low-level mosaicism are generally not detectable by arrays, but these are relatively infrequent causes of abnormal phenotypes in this population (<1%). Available evidence strongly supports the use of CMA in place of G-banded karyotyping as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for patients with DD/ID, ASD, or MCA. G-banded karyotype analysis should be reserved for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome), a family history of chromosomal rearrangement, or a history of multiple miscarriages.

Deletions of the Short Arm of Chromosome 3 in Solid Tumors and the Search for Suppressor Genes

The concept that cells can become malignant upon the elimination of parts of chromosomes inhibiting cell division dates back to Boveri in 1914. Deletions occurring in tumor cells are therefore considered a first indication of possible locations of tumor suppressor gene. Approaches used to localize and identify the paradigm of tumor suppressors, RB1, have also been applied to localize tumor suppressor genes on 3p, the short arm of chromosome 3. This review discusses the methodological advantages and limitations of the various approaches. From a review of the literature on losses of 3p in different types of solid tumors it appears that some tumor types show involvement of the same region, while between others the regions involved clearly differ. Also discussed are results of functional assays of tumor suppression by transfer of part of chromosome 3 into tumor cell lines. The likelihood that a common region of deletions would contain a tumor suppressor is strongly enhanced by coincidence of that region with a chromosome fragment suppressing tumorigenicity upon introduction in tumor cells. Such a situation exists for a region in 3p21.3 as well as for one or more in 3p12-p14. The former region is considered the location of a lung cancer suppressor. The same gene or a different one in the same region may also play a role in the development of other cancers including renal cell cancer. In the latter cancer, there may be additional roles of the VHL region and/or a 3p12-p14 region. The breakpoint region of a t(3;8) originally found to be constitutively present in a family with hereditary renal cell cancer now seems to be excluded from such a role. Specific genes on 3p have been suggested to act as suppressor genes based on either their location in a common deletion region, a markedly reduced expression or presence of aberrant transcripts, their capacity to suppress tumorigenicity upon transfection in to tumor cells, the presumed function of the gene product, or a combination of several of these criteria. A number of genes are evaluated for their possible role as a tumor suppressor according to these criteria. General agreement on such a role seems to exist only for VHL. Though hMLH1 plays an obvious role in the development of specific mismatch repair-deficient cancers, it cannot revert the tumor phenotype and therefore cannot be considered a proper tumor suppressor. The involvement of VHL and MLH1 also in some specific hereditary cancers allowed to successfully apply linkage analysis for their localization. TGFBR2 might well have a tumor suppressor function. It does reduce tumorigenicity upon transfection. Other 3p genes coding for receptor proteins THRB and RARB, are unlikely candidates for tumor suppression. Present observations on a possible association of FHIT with tumor development leave a number of questions unanswered, so that provisionally it cannot be considered a tumor suppressor. Regions that have been identified as crucial in solid tumor development appear to be at the edge of synteny blocks that have been rearranged through the chromosome evolution which led to the formation of human chromosome 3. Although this may merely represent a chance occurrence, it might also reflect areas of genomic instability.

Nine patients with a microdeletion 15q11.2 between breakpoints 1 and 2 of the Prader–Willi critical region, possibly associated with behavioural disturbances

Behavioural differences have been described in patients with type I deletions (between breakpoints 1 and 3 (BP1-BP3)) or type II deletions (between breakpoints 2 and 3) of the 15q11.2 Prader-Willi/Angelman region. The larger type I deletions appear to coincide with more severe behavioural problems (autism, ADHD, obsessive-compulsive disorder). The non-imprinted chromosomal segment between breakpoints 1 and 2 involves four highly conserved genes, TUBGCP5, NIPA1, NIPA2, and CYFIP1; the latter three are widely expressed in the central nervous system, while TUBGCP5 is expressed in the subthalamic nuclei. These genes might explain the more severe behavioural problems seen in type I deletions. We describe nine cases with a microdeletion at 15q11.2 between BP1-BP2, thus having a haploinsufficiency for TUBGCP5, NIPA1, NIPA2, and CYFIP1 without Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome. The clinical significance of a pure BP1-BP2 microdeletion has been debated, however, our patients shared several clinical features, including delayed motor and speech development, dysmorphisms and behavioural problems (ADHD, autism, obsessive-compulsive behaviour). Although the deletion often appeared to be inherited from a normal or mildly affected parent, it was de novo in two cases and we did not find it in 350 healthy unrelated controls. Our results suggest a pathogenic nature for the BP1-BP2 microdeletion and, although there obviously is an incomplete penetrance, they support the existence of a novel microdeletion syndrome in 15q11.2.

Genotype–phenotype correlation in 21 patients with Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome using high resolution array comparative genome hybridisation (CGH)

Background: The Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is usually caused by terminal deletions of the short arm of chromosome 4 and is phenotypically defined by growth and mental retardation, seizures, and specific craniofacial manifestations. Large variation is observed in phenotypic expression of these features. In order to compare the phenotype with the genotype, we localised the breakpoints of the 4pter aberrations using a chromosome 4 specific tiling BAC/PAC array. Methods: In total, DNA from 21 patients was analysed, of which 8 had a cytogenetic visible and 13 a submicroscopic deletion. Results and conclusion: In addition to classical terminal deletions sized between 1.9 and 30 Mb, we observed the smallest terminal deletion (1.4 Mb) ever reported in a patient with mild WHS stigmata. In addition, we identified and mapped interstitial deletions in four patients. This study positions the genes causing microcephaly, intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation between 0.3 and 1.4 Mb and further refines the regions causing congenital heart disease, cleft lip and/or palate, oligodontia, and hypospadias.

A high throughput experimental approach to identify miRNA targets in human cells

The study of human microRNAs is seriously hampered by the lack of proper tools allowing genome-wide identification of miRNA targets. We performed Ribonucleoprotein ImmunoPrecipitation—gene Chip (RIP-Chip) using antibodies against wild-type human Ago2 in untreated Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cell lines. Ten to thirty percent of the gene transcripts from the genome were enriched in the Ago2-IP fraction of untreated cells, representing the HL miRNA-targetome. In silico analysis indicated that ∼40% of these gene transcripts represent targets of the abundantly co-expressed miRNAs. To identify targets of miR-17/20/93/106, RIP-Chip with anti-miR-17/20/93/106 treated cells was performed and 1189 gene transcripts were identified. These genes were analyzed for miR-17/20/93/106 target sites in the 5′-UTRs, coding regions and 3′-UTRs. Fifty-one percent of them had miR-17/20/93/106 target sites in the 3′-UTR while 19% of them were predicted miR-17/20/93/106 targets by TargetScan. Luciferase reporter assay confirmed targeting of miR-17/20/93/106 to the 3′-UTRs of 8 out of 10 genes. In conclusion, we report a method which can establish the miRNA-targetome in untreated human cells and identify miRNA specific targets in a high throughput manner. This approach is applicable to identify miRNA targets in any human tissue sample or purified cell population in an unbiased and physiologically relevant manner.

Gene amplification as double minutes or homogeneously staining regions in solid tumors: Origin and structure

Double minutes (dmin) and homogeneously staining regions (hsr) are the cytogenetic hallmarks of genomic amplification in cancer. Different mechanisms have been proposed to explain their genesis. Recently, our group showed that the MYC-containing dmin in leukemia cases arise by excision and amplification (episome model). In the present paper we investigated 10 cell lines from solid tumors showing MYCN amplification as dmin or hsr. Particularly revealing results were provided by the two subclones of the neuroblastoma cell line STA-NB-10, one showing dmin-only and the second hsr-only amplification. Both subclones showed a deletion, at 2p24.3, whose extension matched the amplicon extension. Additionally, the amplicon structure of the dmin and hsr forms was identical. This strongly argues that the episome model, already demonstrated in leukemias, applies to solid tumors as well, and that dmin and hsr are two faces of the same coin. The organization of the duplicated segments varied from very simple (no apparent changes from the normal sequence) to very complex. MYCN was always overexpressed (significantly overexpressed in three cases). The fusion junctions, always mediated by nonhomologous end joining, occasionally juxtaposed truncated genes in the same transcriptional orientation. Fusion transcripts involving NBAS (also known as NAG), FAM49A, BC035112 (also known as NCRNA00276), and SMC6 genes were indeed detected, although their role in the context of the tumor is not clear.

Amplicon Mapping and Expression Profiling Identify the Fas-Associated Death Domain Gene as a New Driver in the 11q13.3 Amplicon in Laryngeal/Pharyngeal Cancer

Purpose: Amplification of the 11q13 region is a frequent event in human cancer. The highest incidence (36%) is found in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Recently, we reported that the amplicon size in 30 laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinomas with 11q13 amplification is determined by unique genomic structures, resulting in the amplification of a set of genes rather than a single gene. Experimental Design: To investigate which gene(s) drive the 11q13 amplicon, we determined the smallest region of overlap with amplification and the expression levels of all genes within this amplicon. Results: Using array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis, we detected a region of ∼1.7 Mb containing 13 amplified genes in more than 25 of the 29 carcinomas. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR revealed that overexpression of 8 potential driver genes including, cyclin D1, cortactin, and Fas-associated death domain (FADD), correlated significantly with DNA amplification. FADD protein levels correlated well with DNA amplification, implicating that FADD is also a candidate driver gene in the 11q13 amplicon. Analysis of 167 laryngeal carcinomas showed that increased expression of FADD (P = 0.007) and Ser194 phosphorylated FADD (P = 0.011) were associated with a worse disease-specific survival. FADD was recently reported to be involved in cell cycle regulation, and cancer cells expressing high levels of the Ser194 phosphorylated isoform of FADD proved to be more sensitive to Taxol-induced cell cycle arrest. Conclusion: Because of the frequent amplification of the 11q13 region and concomitant overexpression of FADD in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, we hypothesize that FADD is a marker to select patients that might benefit from Taxol-based chemoradiotherapy.

Major role for a 3p21 region and lack of involvement of the t(3;8) breakpoint region in the development of renal cell carcinoma suggested by loss of heterozygosity analysis

In a loss of heterozygosity analysis of 3p, we examined 44 sporadic cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and matched normal tissue with 18 markers distributed over the whole p‐arm. The majority of these markers clustered in three regions that have been suggested to be involved in the development of RCC, namely the p25 region, where the Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene is located; the p21 region, which has been identified as a common region of overlap (SRO) of heterozygous deletions; and the p14 region, which is the location of the constitutional t(3;8) breakpoint occurring in an RCC family. Thirty‐one out of these 44 tumors were analyzed with 9 additional markers from the 3p12‐14 region to further delimit the SRO in this region. Our analysis shows that when deletions were detected the 3p21 region was always included. The 3p21 markers D3F1552 and UBEIL were always contained within these 3p21 deletions. The t(3;8) breakpoint region showed the lowest percentage of loss of heterozygosity. Moreover, in three cases the t(3;8) breakpoint region retained heterozygosity, whereas a region more proximal to the breakpoint showed allelic losses. This supports exclusion of the t(3;8) region from a role in the development of sporadic RCC. In a number of tumors, two or three 3p regions with allelic losses were present separated by a region of retention of heterozygosity. In these tumors deletions at 3p21 occurred in combination with deletions of either the VHL region, or the region proximal to the t(3;8), or both, suggestive of multiple gene involvement in the development of sporadic RCC with a primary role of the 3p21 region. Genes Chromosom Cancer 14:00–00 (1995).

Targeted exome sequencing in clear cell renal cell carcinoma tumors suggests aberrant chromatin regulation as a crucial step in ccRCC development

Clear cell renal cell carcinomas are characterized by 3p loss, and by inactivation of Von Hippel Lindau (VHL), a tumorsuppressor gene located at 3p25. Recently, SETD2, located at 3p21, was identified as a new candidate ccRCC tumor‐suppressor gene. The combined mutational frequency in ccRCC tumors of VHL and SETD2 suggests that there are still undiscovered tumor‐suppressor genes on 3p. We screened all genes on 3p for mutations in 10 primary ccRCC tumors using exome‐sequencing. We identified inactivating mutations in VHL, PBRM1, and BAP1. Sequencing of PBRM1 in ccRCC‐derived cell lines confirmed its frequent inactivation in ccRCC. PBRM1 encodes for BAF180, the chromatin targeting subunit of the SWI/SNF complex. BAP1 encodes for BRCA1 associated protein‐1, involved in histone deubiquitination. Taken together, the accumulating data suggest an important role for aberrant chromatin regulation in ccRCC development. Hum Mutat 33:1059–1062, 2012.

Towards Sustained Silencing of HER2/neu in Cancer By Epigenetic Editing

The human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/neu/ERBB2) is overexpressed in several cancer types. Although therapies targeting the HER2/neu protein result in inhibition of cell proliferation, the anticancer effect might be further optimized by limiting HER2/neu expression at the DNA level. Towards this aim, epigenetic editing was performed to suppress HER2/neu expression by inducing epigenetic silencing marks on the HER2/neu promoter.HER2/neu expression and HER2/neu promoter epigenetic modification status were determined in a panel of ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. HER2/neu-overexpressing cancer cells were transduced to express a zinc finger protein (ZFP), targeting the HER2/neugene, fused to histone methyltransferases (G9a, SUV39-H1)/super KRAB domain (SKD). Epigenetic assessment of the HER2/neu promoter showed that HER2/neu-ZFP fused to G9a efficiently induced the intended silencing histone methylation mark (H3K9me2). Importantly, H3K9me2 induction was associated with a dramatic downregulation of HER2/neu expression in HER2/neu- overexpressing cells. Downregulation by SKD, traditionally considered transient in nature, was associated with removal of the histone acetylation mark (H3ac). The downregulation of HER2/neu by induced H3K9 methylation and/or reduced H3 acetylation was sufficient to effectively inhibit cellular metabolic activity and clonogenicity. Furthermore, genome-wide analysis indicated preferential binding of the ZFP to its target sequence. These results not only show that H3K9 methylation can be induced but also that this epigenetic mark was instructive in promoting downregulation of HER2/neu expression. Implications: Epigenetic editing provides a novel (synergistic) approach to modulate expression of oncogenes. Mol Cancer Res; 11(9); 1029–39. ©2013 AACR.