Klaus Dugi

2-year efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND Addition of a sulphonylurea to metformin improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, but is associated with hypoglycaemia and weight gain. We aimed to compare a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) against a commonly used sulphonylurea (glimepiride). METHODS In this 2-year, parallel-group, non-inferiority double-blind trial, outpatients with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) 6·5-10·0% on stable metformin alone or with one additional oral antidiabetic drug (washed out during screening) were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random sequence via a voice or web response system to linagliptin (5 mg) or glimepiride (1-4 mg) orally once daily. Study investigators and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to week 104. Analyses included all patients randomly assigned to treatment groups who received at least one dose of treatment, had a baseline HbA(1c) measurement, and had at least one on-treatment HbA(1c) measurement. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00622284. FINDINGS 777 patients were randomly assigned to linagliptin and 775 to glimepiride; 764 and 755 were included in analysis of the primary endpoint. Reductions in adjusted mean HbA(1c) (baseline 7·69% [SE 0·03] in both groups) were similar in the linagliptin (-0·16% [SE 0·03]) and glimepiride groups (-0·36% [0·03]; difference 0·20%, 97·5% CI 0·09-0·30), meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion of 0·35%. Fewer participants had hypoglycaemia (58 [7%] of 776 vs 280 [36%] of 775 patients, p<0·0001) or severe hypoglycaemia (1 [<1%] vs 12 [2%]) with linagliptin compared with glimepiride. Linagliptin was associated with significantly fewer cardiovascular events (12 vs 26 patients; relative risk 0·46, 95% CI 0·23-0·91, p=0·0213). INTERPRETATION The results of this long-term randomised active-controlled trial advance the clinical evidence and comparative effectiveness bases for treatment options available to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The findings could improve decision making for clinical treatment when metformin alone is insufficient. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.

Safety and efficacy of linagliptin as add‐on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor linagliptin administered as add‐on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control.

Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of β-cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of the potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor linagliptin 5 mg when given for 24 weeks to patients with type 2 diabetes who were either treatment‐naive or who had received one oral antidiabetes drug (OAD).

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of multiple oral doses of linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor in male type 2 diabetes patients

Aims:  To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of multiple oral doses of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitor linagliptin (BI 1356) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with linagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Aims: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of linagliptin or placebo administered for 24 weeks in combination with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) exhibiting insufficient glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.5–11.0%).

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Single Oral Doses of BI 1356, an Inhibitor of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4, in Healthy Male Volunteers

This randomized, double‐blind, parallel, placebo‐controlled, single rising‐dose study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of BI 1356 (once‐daily, given orally) in healthy men. BI 1356 was well tolerated and safe up to and including a dose of 600 mg. The incidence of drug‐related adverse events was equal in subjects receiving BI 1356 (30%) or placebo (31%). No clinically relevant deviations in laboratory or ECG parameters were reported. Exposure of BI 1356 increased less than proportionally from 2.5 mg to 5 mg, more than proportionally from 25 mg to 100 mg and approximately proportionally for doses from 100 mg to 600 mg. The geometric mean terminal half‐life was up to 184 hours. Renal excretion was low. All doses of BI 1356 inhibited plasma dipeptidyl peptidase 4 activity. Single doses of 2.5 mg and 5 mg inhibited dipeptidyl peptidase 4 activity by 72.7% and 86.1% from baseline, respectively. The time to achieve maximum inhibition shifted with increasing doses from 3 hours (2.5 mg) to <0.7 hours (≥200 mg). Within the dose range tested, a direct pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship was observed. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile results demonstrate the potency and full 24‐hour duration of action of BI 1356. Based on an estimated therapeutic dose of 5 mg, the therapeutic window of BI 1356 is expected to be >100‐fold.

Linagliptin monotherapy provides superior glycaemic control versus placebo or voglibose with comparable safety in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo and active comparator-controlled, double-blind study

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin 5 and 10 mg vs. placebo and voglibose in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Empagliflozin (BI 10773), a Potent and Selective SGLT2 Inhibitor, Induces Dose-Dependent Glucosuria in Healthy Subjects

Empagliflozin is an orally available, selective inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter 2. In this study, single oral doses of empagliflozin from 0.5 to 800 mg were not associated with any clinically significant safety concerns in healthy male volunteers. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in subjects receiving placebo (22.2%) or empagliflozin (25.0%) in the single rising dose part of the study and after 50 mg empagliflozin under fed (28.6%) or fasted (28.6%) conditions. The most frequent AE was headache. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory or electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were observed. Single oral doses of empagliflozin were rapidly absorbed, reaching peak levels after 1.0–2.1 hours. Increases in empagliflozin exposure were roughly dose‐proportional and a dose‐dependent increase in urinary glucose excretion was observed for empagliflozin doses up to 100 mg. After ingestion of 50 mg empagliflozin in conjunction with a high‐fat, high‐calorie meal, no clinically relevant changes in exposure were found, indicating that empagliflozin can be administered independent of food. Empagliflozin up to 800 mg did not generate clinically significant safety concerns in healthy male subjects. The pharmacokinetic properties of empagliflozin support once daily administration independent of food.

The oral DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin significantly lowers HbA1c after 4 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Aim: To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Linagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor in Development for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Single and Multiple Escalating Doses in Healthy Adult Male Japanese Subjects

BACKGROUND The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor linagliptin is in clinical development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In previous studies in non-Japanese populations, linagliptin showed potential as a once-daily oral antidiabetic drug. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of linagliptin in healthy adult male Japanese volunteers, in compliance with Japanese regulatory requirements for new drugs intended for use in humans. METHODS This was a Phase I, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Linagliptin or placebo was administered as single escalating doses of 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, or as multiple escalating doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg once daily for 12 days. Three quarters of subjects in each dose group were randomized to active drug and one quarter to placebo. Blood and urine samples for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained before administration of the first dose of study drug and at regular time points after administration, with more frequent blood sampling on days 1 and 12 in subjects receiving multiple doses. Inhibition of DPP-4 activity and plasma concentrations of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose were also determined. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study based on physical examinations, 12-lead ECGs, and standard laboratory tests. RESULTS Eight subjects were enrolled in each dose group, 6 receiving active drug and 2 receiving placebo. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable in the single-dose groups (mean [SD] age, 24.5 [3.6] years; mean weight, 61.2 [6.2] kg; mean height, 171.5 [5.3] cm) and multiple-dose groups (mean age, 25.4 [3.7] years; mean weight, 61.6 [5.2] kg; mean height, 170.9 [4.9] cm). Linagliptin displayed nonlinear pharmacokinetics. Total systemic exposure (AUC and C(max)) increased in a manner that was less than dose proportional. T(max) ranged from 1.50 to 6.00 hours, and elimination t((1/2)) ranged from 96.9 to 175.0 hours. Total CL increased with increasing dose (from 140 mL/min in the 1-mg group to 314 mL/min in the 10-mg group), as did apparent V(d) (from 1260 to 3060 L with doses up to 10 mg). Steady state was attained within 2 to 3 days. The accumulation t((1/2)) ranged from approximately 10 to 15 hours. The accumulation ratio with multiple dosing was <1.5 and decreased with increasing dose (approximately 1.2 in the 10-mg dose). Urinary excretion increased with increasing dose and over time in all dose groups, although it did not exceed 7% in any dose group on day 12. Linagliptin inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity in a dose-dependent manner. Mean DPP-4 inhibition was >or=80% over 24 hours after a single dose of 10 mg and after multiple doses of 5 and 10 mg for 12 days. Postprandial plasma GLP-1 concentrations increased from preprandial concentrations by 2- to 4-fold after administration of single doses and by 2- to 2.5-fold on day 12 after administration of multiple doses. Baseline (premeal) plasma GLP-1 concentrations were higher on day 12 than on day 1 in all linagliptin groups. A total of 3 adverse events were reported in 1 subject each: an increase in histamine concentration in a subject receiving a single dose of linagliptin 5 mg, vasovagal syncope in a subject receiving a single dose of linagliptin 10 mg, and pharyngitis in a subject receiving multiple doses of linagliptin 10 mg. None of these events was considered drug related. No episodes of hypoglycemia occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS In this short-term study in healthy adult male Japanese volunteers, multiple oral doses of linagliptin inhibited plasma DPP-4 activity and elevated active GLP-1 concentrations in a dose-dependent manner, with no episodes of hypoglycemia. Multiple dosing of linagliptin for 12 days was well tolerated and exhibited a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile consistent with a once-daily regimen. Clinical studies in Japanese patients with T2DM appear to be warranted.