Klaus Keuler

COSMO-CLM (CCLM) climate simulations over CORDEX-Africa domain: analysis of the ERA-Interim driven simulations at 0.44° and 0.22° resolution

We present the results of the application of the COSMO-CLM Regional Climate Model (CCLM) over the CORDEX-Africa domain. Two simulations were performed driven by the ERA-Interim reanalysis (1989–2008): the first one with the standard CORDEX spatial resolution (0.44°), and the second one with an unprecedented high resolution (0.22°). Low-level circulation and its vertical structure, the geographical and temporal evolution of temperature and precipitation are critically evaluated, together with the radiation budget and surface energy fluxes. CCLM is generally able to reproduce the overall features of the African climate, although some deficiencies are evident. Flow circulation is generally well simulated, but an excessive pressure gradient is present between the Gulf of Guinea and the Sahara, related to a marked warm bias over the Sahara and a cold bias over southern Sahel. CCLM underestimates the rainfall peak in the regions affected by the passage of the monsoon. This dry bias may be a consequence of two factors, the misplacement of the monsoon centre and the underestimation of its intensity. The former is related to the northern shift of the West African Heat Low. On the other hand, the underestimation of precipitation intensity may be related to the underestimation of the surface short-wave radiation and latent heat flux. The increase of the model resolution does not bring evident improvements to the results for monthly means statistics. As a result, it appears that 0.44° is a suitable compromise between model performances and computational constrains.

Evaluation of the precipitation for South-western Germany from high resolution simulations with regional climate models

Precipitation data from long-term high-resolution simulations with two regional climate models (CLM and REMO) are evaluated using a climatology based on observations for south-western Germany. Both models are driven by a present day climate forcing scenario from the global climate model ECHAM5. The climatological evaluation shows a strong seasonal dependence of the model deficiencies. In spring and summer there are relatively small differences between simulation results and observations. But during winter both the regional models and ECHAM5 strongly overestimate the precipitation. The frequency distributions of the model results agree well with observed data. An overestimation of the precipitation at the upwind sides of mountainous areas occurs in the regional simulations. We found that the coupling of the regional models to the driving model is stronger in winter than in summer. Therefore, in winter the large scale model have a larger impact on the performance of the regional simulations. During summer the benefit of regional climate simulations is higher.

Precipitation in the EURO-CORDEX 0.11° and 0.44° simulations: high resolution, high benefits ?

In the framework of the EURO-CORDEX initiative an ensemble of European-wide high-resolution regional climate simulations on a 0.11∘(∼12.5km)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}

Determination of precipitation return values in complex terrain and their evaluation.

0.11^{\circ }\,({\sim}12.5\,\hbox {km})

Quality of a climate reconstruction for the CADSES regions

\end{document} grid has been generated. This study investigates whether the fine-gridded regional climate models are found to add value to the simulated mean and extreme daily and sub-daily precipitation compared to their coarser-gridded 0.44∘(∼50km)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}

Obtaining the correct sea surface temperature: bias correction of regional climate model data for the Mediterranean Sea

0.44^{\circ }\,({\sim}50\,\hbox {km})