Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Koen Willekens is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Koen Willekens.


Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | 2012

Fertilizing soil with selenium fertilizers: impact on concentration, speciation, and bioaccessibility of selenium in leek (Allium ampeloprasum).

Rama V. Srikanth Lavu; Gijs Du Laing; Tom Van de Wiele; Varalakshmi Lalithya Pratti; Koen Willekens; Bart Vandecasteele; Filip Tack

Leek was fertilized with sodium selenite (Na(2)SeO(3)) and sodium selenate (Na(2)SeO(4)) in a green house to assess the impact of selenium (Se) fertilization on Se uptake by the crop and its speciation in the crop. The bioaccessibility of Se in the Se-enriched leek was assessed using an in vitro extraction protocol mimicking the human gastrointestinal tract (stomach, small intestine, and colon). The lowest Se uptake was observed when Na(2)SeO(3) was used as a fertilizer, which results in a higher risk for Se accumulation in the soil on a longer term. When soil was amended with Na(2)SeO(4), 55 ± 5% of total Se in the leek occurred in an inorganic form, while only 21 ± 8% was inorganic when Na(2)SeO(3) was applied. Se-methylselenocysteine and selenomethione were the major organic species in both treatments. However, concentrations of Se-methylselenocysteine and γ-glutamyl-Se-methyl-selenocysteine, which were previously reported to induce positive health effects, were lower as compared to other Allium species. The majority of the Se in the leek was found to be bioaccessible in the stomach (around 60%) and small intestine (around 80%). However, a significant fraction also has good chances to reach the colon, where it seems to be taken up by the microbial community and may also induce positive health effects.


Compost Science & Utilization | 2012

Farm Compost Application: Effects on Crop Performance

Tommy D'Hose; Mathias Cougnon; A. de Vliegher; Koen Willekens; E. Van Bockstaele; Dirk Reheul

Compost application can contribute to agricultural sustainability. Municipal solid waste compost has been the subject of most of the research done so far. Farm compost (FC) has a different composition. It is made of varying ingredients available on the farm, e.g., wood chips and bark, manure, straw, crop residues and surplus grass and soil. Information is currently lacking on the agronomic value and environmental impact of FC. Therefore, a long-term field experiment was established to quantify the effect of FC application on crop performance and soil quality in a crop rotation of potatoes, fodder beet, forage maize and Brussels sprouts. This paper presents the results of the first four years of the ongoing field trial. In the fourth year of the experiment, the annual FC amendment resulted in a significant increase in dry matter yield for all four crops. Our results suggested that the positive effect of continual FC application was based on a combination of a slow release of nitrogen and providing better growing opportunities to the crops. Results on the effect of FC on the residual nitrate content in the soil, disease suppression and DM content of the crops are not yet decisive.


Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems | 2016

How organic farmers practice conservation agriculture in Europe

Joséphine Peigné; Marion Casagrande; Vincent Payet; Christophe David; F. Xavier Sans; José M. Blanco-Moreno; Julia Cooper; Kate Gascoyne; Daniele Antichi; P. Barberi; F. Bigongiali; Andreas Surböck; Andreas Kranzler; Annelies Beeckman; Koen Willekens; Anne Luik; Darja Matt; Meike Grosse; Juergen Heß; Maurice Clerc; Hansueli Dierauer; Paul Mäder

The interest of organic farmers in adopting conservation agriculture principles, including minimal soil disturbance, permanent soil cover and crop rotation has been growing since the early 2000s. However, currently there is no network for organic farmers practicing conservation agriculture, and a lack of knowledge on how organic farmers implement conservation agriculture in practice. Consequently, few technical references are available for organic farmers when they start applying conservation agriculture practices, in particular on controlling weeds without the use of herbicides. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to explore the diversity of conservation agriculture techniques (i.e., reduced tillage, no-tillage and green manures) practiced among European farmers, and (2) to identify farmers’ main strategies for implementing conservation agriculture and the agronomic and environmental factors that determine these strategies. Strategies were identified by analyzing survey results on: (1) the type and degree of use of conservation agriculture practices by farmers, and (2) the effects it produces in terms of soil disturbance and soil cover (low, medium and high). We carried out a survey of 159 European organic farmers and collected 125 data sets on management of winter-sown crops. Among the conservation agriculture practices, reduced tillage was used by 89%, no-tillage by 27% and green manure by 74% of the 159 interviewed farmers. Green manures were more frequently used in northern Europe than in the south (below 45°N). Most of the farmers used crop rotations, with a mean duration of 6 years. A wide diversity of conservation agriculture practices were used, with farmers rarely using all three techniques (no-till, reduced till and green manures) within one system. The range of practices was grouped into five strategies ranging from intensive non-inversion tillage without soil cover to very innovative techniques with no-tillage and intercrops. The five strategies for conservation agriculture could be grouped into two larger categories based on weed control approach: (1) intensification of the mechanical work without soil inversion or (2) biological regulation of weeds with cover crops. The diversity of strategies identified in this study shows that organic farmers use innovative approaches to implement conservation agriculture without herbicides. This studys findings will help organic farmers to experiment with innovative practices based on conservation agriculture principles and also benefit conventional farmers who use conservation agriculture practices and would like to reduce or eliminate the use of herbicides.


Waste Management | 2016

Opportunities and barriers to on-farm composting and compost application: A case study from northwestern Europe.

Jacques Viaene; J. Van Lancker; Bart Vandecasteele; Koen Willekens; Jo Bijttebier; Greet Ruysschaert; S. De Neve; Bert Reubens

Maintaining and increasing soil quality and fertility in a sustainable way is an important challenge for modern agriculture. The burgeoning bioeconomy is likely to put further pressure on soil resources unless they are managed carefully. Compost has the potential to be an effective soil improver because of its multiple beneficial effects on soil quality. Additionally, it fits within the bioeconomy vision because it can valorize biomass from prior biomass processing or valorize biomass unsuitable for other processes. However, compost is rarely used in intensive agriculture, especially in regions with high manure surpluses. The aim of this research is to identify the barriers to on-farm composting and the application of compost in agriculture, using a mixed method approach for the case of Flanders. The significance of the 28 identified barriers is analyzed and they are categorized as market and financial, policy and institutional, scientific and technological and informational and behavioral barriers. More specifically, the shortage of woody biomass, strict regulation, considerable financial and time investment, and lack of experience and knowledge are hindering on-farm composting. The complex regulation, manure surplus, variable availability and transport of compost, and variable compost quality and composition are barriers to apply compost. In conclusion, five recommendations are suggested that could alleviate certain hindering factors and thus increase attractiveness of compost use in agriculture.


Waste Management | 2013

Effect of composting on the Cd, Zn and Mn content and fractionation in feedstock mixtures with wood chips from a short-rotation coppice and bark.

Bart Vandecasteele; Koen Willekens; Ann Zwertvaegher; L. Degrande; Filip Tack; G. Du Laing

Micronutrient content and availability in composts may be affected by the addition of wood chips or tree bark as a bulking agent in the compost feedstock. In the first part of this study, micronutrient levels were assessed in bark and wood of poplar and willow clones in a short-rotation coppice. Large differences between species were observed in bark concentrations for Cd, Zn and Mn. In the second part of the study, we aimed to determine the effect of feedstock composition and composting on Cd, Zn and Mn concentrations and availability. By means of three composting experiments we examined the effect of (a) bark of different tree species, (b) the amount of bark, and (c) the use of bark versus wood chips. In general, compost characteristics such as pH, organic matter and nutrient content varied due to differences in feedstock mixture and composting process. During the composting process, the availability of Cd, Zn and Mn decreased, although the use of willow and poplar bark or wood chips resulted in elevated total Cd, Zn or Mn concentrations in the compost. Cd concentrations in some composts even exceeded legal criteria. Cd and Zn were mainly bound in the reducible fraction extracted with 0.5M NH2OH⋅HCl. A higher acid-extractable fraction for Mn than for Cd and Zn was found. Higher Cd concentrations in the compost due to the use of bark or wood chips did not result in higher risk of Cd leaching. The results of the pH-stat experiment with gradual acidification of composts illustrated that only a strong pH decline in the compost results in higher availability of Cd, Zn and Mn.


Organic agriculture | 2016

Organic farmers’ motivations and challenges for adopting conservation agriculture in Europe

Marion Casagrande; Joséphine Peigné; Vincent Payet; Paul Mäder; F. Xavier Sans; José M. Blanco-Moreno; Daniele Antichi; P. Barberi; Annelies Beeckman; F. Bigongiali; Julia Cooper; Hansueli Dierauer; Kate Gascoyne; Meike Grosse; Juergen Heß; Andreas Kranzler; Anne Luik; Elen Peetsmann; Andreas Surböck; Koen Willekens; Christophe David

Conservation agriculture and organic farming are considered as promising sustainable agricultural system for producing food, while minimizing environmental impacts. Despite an increasing number of experimental data on organic conservation practices and various studies dealing with the adoption of conservation agriculture by farmers, none of those studies have specifically addressed conservation agriculture adoption under organic conditions in Europe. We carried out a survey with 159 farmers located in 10 European countries. These farmers had applied at least two of the following conservation practices: (i) no-tillage, (ii) reduced tillage and (iii) green manures. Each farmer assessed socio-economic, agronomic and environmental motivations and problems for each conservation practice, using a Likert scale. For each conservation practice, we ranked motivations and problems and carried out a principal component analysis, followed by clustering to identify groups of farmers. Independent of the conservation practices, the most important motivations were related to soil fertility preservation and challenges were mainly linked to crop management, machinery and yield performances. For all conservation practices, we identify three groups of farmers that shared the same type of motivations and challenges across Europe: “soil conservationists,” “agro-technically challenged farmers,” and “indifferent farmers.” Soil conservationist farmers were strongly motivated by soil preservation and minimizing environmental impacts. Agro-technically challenged farmers mainly expressed agronomic problems and challenges. There were no clear effects of location or farm characteristics explaining these attitudes, but they depended on farmers’ environmental concerns and beliefs. The study demonstrated that research priorities should address agronomic problems caused by the adoption of conservation practices in organic farming, weed control in particular.


Journal of Environmental Management | 2017

Potential of chopped heath biomass and spent growth media to replace wood chips as bulking agent for composting high N-containing residues

Jacques Viaene; Bert Reubens; Koen Willekens; C. Van Waes; S. De Neve; Bart Vandecasteele

We investigated the potential of C-rich byproducts to replace wood chips as bulking agent (BA) during composting. The impact of these alternatives on the composting process and on compost stability and characteristics was assessed. Three BA (chopped heath biomass and spent growth media used in strawberry and tomato cultivation) were used for processing leek residues in windrow composting. All BA resulted in stable composts with an organic matter (OM) content suitable for use as soil amendment. Using chopped heath biomass led to high pile temperatures and OM degradation and a nutrient-poor compost with high C/P ratio appropriate for increasing soil organic carbon content in P-rich soils. Spent substrates can replace wood chips, however, due to their dense structure and lower biodegradation potential, adding a more coarse BA is required. Generally, the nutrient content of the composts with growth media was higher than the composts with wood chips and chopped heath biomass.


Animal Production Science | 2017

Field storage conditions for cattle manure to limit nitrogen losses and optimise fertiliser value

Jacques Viaene; Victoria Nelissen; Bart Vandecasteele; Koen Willekens; S. De Neve; Bert Reubens

Storage and application of cattle farmyard manure (CFM) can cause considerable environmental problems through nutrient losses to soil, water and air, if not properly handled. We investigated different storage conditions of CFM at field scale to reduce nitrogen (N) losses to the soil, meanwhile optimising the agronomical quality of the CFM. The treatments differed in terms of storage method (stockpiling, extensive composting or co-composting with bulking agents) and coverage (no cover, plastic or geotextile cover). Over the different treatments, the ammonium-N concentrations under the piles in the 0–90 cm soil layer amounted to a maximum of 4.2% of the initial manure N content. We were able to assess the relative importance of each of the two processes resulting in a higher mineral N concentration under the piles, i.e. direct leaching from the CFM to the soil on the one hand, and a smaller indirect effect of elevated soil temperatures (up to 37°C) under the piles resulting in higher N mineralisation in the top soil on the other hand. NH4+-N was the most important component of mineral N under all heaps due to limited oxygen diffusion to the soil. N leaching and end-product quality were affected by a combination of treatment option (i.e. storage and cover) and initial manure characteristics. When CFM was characterised by a low volumetric moisture content and high C : N ratio, so in case of straw-rich CFM or CFM with added bulking agents, composting led to the least N leaching and most stable end product. When CFM was characterised by a high volumetric moisture content and low C : N ratio, stockpiling and covering (plastic or geotextile) resulted in lower N leaching to the soil. Stockpiling and covering the CFM with a geotextile resulted in a more stable end product than did covering with a plastic.


Waste Management | 2017

Improving the product stability and fertilizer value of cattle slurry solid fraction through co-composting or co-ensiling

Jarinda Viaene; Victoria Nelissen; Bert Reubens; Koen Willekens; Frank Driehuis; Stefaan De Neve; Bart Vandecasteele

Separating dairy cattle slurry in a liquid and solid fraction (SF) is gaining more interest, since it enables a more targeted use of both fractions. However, the valorization of the SF is limited on P-rich soils, due to its high P content, and the export or use as bedding material requires sanitation. Therefore, we investigated the influence of composting or ensiling the SF, whether or not mixed with bulking agents, on the product quality in terms of fertilizer value, sanitation and stability. Ensiling can be considered as a controlled storage method for conserving C and nutrients. Soil amendment with co-ensiled SF resulted in a higher N mineralization and crop growth compared to amendment of co-composted SF. Co-composting SF with structure-rich feedstock materials optimized the composting process and sanitation when compared with composting pure SF and did not increase the risk for extreme-heat-resistant spores of thermophilic aerobic spore-forming bacteria (X-TAS). Further, the composts contained more P per unit of fresh weight than the silages, beneficial for the export of the composted SF. The oxygen uptake rate was found to be less powerful to determine the stability of fresh, composted and ensiled SF.


4th ISOFAR Scientific Conference at the Organic World Congress 2014 | 2014

Organic farmers in Europe: motivations and problems for using conservation agriculture practices

Marion Casagrande; Joséphine Peigné; Christophe David; F.X. Sans; José M. Blanco-Moreno; Julia Cooper; Kate Gascoyne; Daniele Antichi; P. Barberi; F. Bigongiali; Andreas Surböck; Andreas Kranzler; Annelies Beeckman; Koen Willekens; Anne Luik; E. Peetsman; Meike Grosse; Juergen Heß; Maurice Clerc; Hansueli Dierauer; Paul Mäder

The interest of organic farmers for adopting conservation agriculture practices is currently growing. But, there are few technical and scientific references available for organic farmers when they start applying conservation agriculture practices. The main objectives of this study are (1) to explore the diversity of crop management practices using conservation agriculture methods among European farmers, and (2) to identify main farmers’ strategies. We carried out a survey of 159 farmers located in 10 European countries. Data were analysis to identify groups of farmers that share the same type of spring and winter crop managements. Organic farmers in Europe show very diverse crop management. The high diversity of crop management can be described by two main strategies: ‘low soil cover’ and ‘soil conservation’ strategy. Distinct geographical distribution of both strategies suggests that applicability of conservation agriculture practices is strongly context oriented.Conserving and improving the fertility and quality of the limited soil resource to produce food, feed and fibre has always been the key to organic farmers’ management practices. This issue is also addressed in conservation agriculture systems that give up on soil tillage (no-tillage) or reduce tillage intensity, but often build on the extensive use of herbicides and mineral fertilizers. Both systems show advantages for soil quality (Holland, 2004; Mader et al., 2002) and therefore their combination is promising and may provide better soil quality. Challenges of introducing noor reduced tillage systems into organic farming are increased weed pressure, retarded mineralization of nutrients that both may lead to reduced crop yield (Peigne et al., 2007). Pioneer farmers have developed solutions and new machinery to be applicable in organic farming systems. Comparisons of reduced tillage to the traditional plough system have started on farms and systematic research started a decade ago. It was the aim of our research activities, accomplished within the frame of the European network TILMAN-ORG (www.tilman-org.net), to evaluate changes in soil carbon stocks and biological soil fertility parameters in soils from European field trials that compared reduced primary soil tillage options with standard procedures (mainly plough). The selected sites represent a geoclimatic gradient from the North-East to the South-West. The hypothesis was that reduced tillage is enhancing the stratification of soil organic matter, soil microbial biomass and activity, and is changing microbial community structure and microbial functions.Conservation agriculture and organic farming are currently considered as environmentally friendly options for producing food. This study explores the motivations and problems of organic European farmers that apply at least two conservation techniques: (i) no-tillage, (ii) reduced tillage and/or (iii) green manure. We carried out a survey with 159 farmers located in 10 European countries. Data were analysed with a principal component analysis followed by clustering to identify groups of farmers with similar motivations and problems. The most important motivations are related to soil preservation and problems are mainly linked to agronomic conditions and crop management. There are three groups of farmers that share the same type of attitude: “atypical farmers”, “soil conservationists” and “agro-technically challenged farmers”. Further research may address in priority agronomic problems, such as weed infestation, caused by adoption of conservation agriculture in organic agriculture.Environmental concerns are pushing organic farmers to substitute ploughing with reduced tillage but weed management under reduced tillage can be troublesome. One objective of the TILMAN-ORG Project is to improve weed management with reduced tillage ± cover crops without reducing weed community diversity. This paper reports results obtained in 2012 in 13 long-, mid-, and short-term trials scattered across Europe including winter cereals, maize, grain pea, potato, sunflower and grass/clover or legume leys. Longand midterm experiments showed higher weed abundance under reduced tillage but usually without reduced crop yield. Short-term trials showed that reduced tillage system may be troublesome to manage right after the conversion from ploughing, due to higher abundance of weeds and volunteer crops and reduced yield. Interestingly, there was no overall consistent relationship between weed diversity, always higher under reduced tillage, and crop yield.

Collaboration


Dive into the Koen Willekens's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Mäder

Research Institute of Organic Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Barberi

Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Kranzler

Research Institute of Organic Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Surböck

Research Institute of Organic Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hansueli Dierauer

Research Institute of Organic Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge