Koenraad F. Beckers
Cornell University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Koenraad F. Beckers.
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy | 2014
Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski; Brian J. Anderson; Michal C. Moore; Jefferson W. Tester
GEOPHIRES (GEOthermal energy for the Production of Heat and Electricity (“IR”) Economically Simulated) is a software tool that combines reservoir, wellbore, and power plant models with capital and operating cost correlations and financial levelized cost models to assess the technical and economic performance of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). It is an upgrade and expansion of the “MIT-EGS” program used in the 2006 “Future of Geothermal Energy” study. GEOPHIRES includes updated cost correlations for well drilling and completion, resource exploration, and Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and flash power plants. It also has new power plant efficiency correlations based on AspenPlus and MATLAB simulations. The structure of GEOPHIRES enables feasibility studies of using geothermal resources not only for electricity generation but also for direct-use heating, and combined heat and power (CHP) applications. Full documentation on GEOPHIRES is provided in the supplementary material. Using GEOPHIRES, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and the levelized cost of heat (LCOH) have been estimated for 3 cases of resource grade (low-, medium-, and high-grade resource corresponding to a geothermal gradient of 30, 50, and 70 °C/km) in combination with 3 levels of technological maturity (todays, mid-term, and commercially mature technology corresponding to a productivity of 30, 50, and 70 kg/s per production well and thermal drawdown rate of 2%, 1.5%, and 1%). The results for the LCOE range from 4.6 to 57 ¢/kWhe and for the LCOH from 3.5 to 14
Advanced District Heating and Cooling (DHC) Systems | 2016
Jeff Tester; Timothy J. Reber; Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski
/MMBTU (1.2 to 4.8 ¢/kWhth). The results for the base-case scenario (medium-grade resource and mid-term technology) are 11 ¢/kWhe and 5
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science | 2015
Koenraad F. Beckers; Donald L. Koch; Jefferson W. Tester
/MMBTU (1.7 ¢/kWhth), respectively. To account for parameter uncertainty, a sensitivity analysis has been included. The results for the LCOE and LCOH have been compared with values found in literature for EGS as well as other energy technologies. The key findings suggest that given todays technology maturity, electricity and direct-use heat from EGS are not economically competitive under current market conditions with other energy technologies. However, with moderate technological improvements, electricity from EGS is predicted to become cost-effective with respect to other renewable and non-renewable energy sources for medium- and high-grade geothermal resources. Direct-use heat from EGS is calculated to become cost-effective even for low-grade resources. This emphasizes that EGS for direct-use heat may not be neglected in future EGS development.
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering | 2014
Maciej Z. Lukawski; Brian J. Anderson; Chad Augustine; Louis E. Capuano; Koenraad F. Beckers; Bill Livesay; Jefferson W. Tester
In this chapter, utilization of deep geothermal energy as an economically viable source of energy for district heating (DH) systems is discussed. An overview of enhanced geothermal system (EGS) technology is presented first, focusing on the technology, economics, and challenges and advantages of using EGS for DH systems. This is followed by several case studies, of both real and modeled systems, to illustrate the current and future state of geothermal district heating (GDH).
Geothermics | 2013
Don B. Fox; Daniel Sutter; Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski; Donald L. Koch; Brian J. Anderson; Jefferson W. Tester
Slender-body theory (SBT) for transient heat transfer from bodies whose lengths are much larger than their radius into a conductive medium is derived. SBT uses matched asymptotic expansions of inner and outer solutions. An analytical inner solution for heat transfer from a circular cross section is matched to an outer solution obtained using Green’s functions. An efficient numerical implementation is obtained based on a judicious choice of the discrete elements used to represent the body and implementation of the fast multipole method (FMM). The SBT requires a one-dimensional spatial discretization only along the axis of the body in contrast to the three-dimensional discretization for finite-element models. Two case studies, heat transfer from two parallel cylinders and heat transfer from a slinky-coil heat exchanger, are used to show the speed and accuracy of the SBT model and its ability to model interacting slender bodies of finite length and bodies with centreline curvature and internal advective heat flow.
Energy Policy | 2014
Timothy J. Reber; Koenraad F. Beckers; Jefferson W. Tester
PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering | 2013
Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski; Timothy J. Reber; Brian J. Anderson; Michal C. Moore; Jefferson W. Tester
Archive | 2013
Maciej Z. Lukawski; Konstantinos Vilaetis; Lizeta Gkogka; Koenraad F. Beckers; Brian J. Anderson; Jefferson W. Tester
Archive | 2015
Jeff Tester; Tim Reber; Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski; Erin Camp; Gloria Andrea Aguirre; Terry Jordan; Frank Horowitz
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy | 2014
Koenraad F. Beckers; Maciej Z. Lukawski; Brian J. Anderson; Michal C. Moore; Jefferson W. Tester