Kojiro Matsumoto

Transcriptional Regulation of Cidea, Mitochondrial Cell Death-inducing DNA Fragmentation Factor α-Like Effector A, in Mouse Liver by Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α and γ

Cidea (cell death-inducing DNA fragmentation factor α-like effector A), a member of a novel family of proapoptotic proteins, is expressed abundantly in the brown adipose tissue of the mouse. Although Cidea mRNA is not detectable in the mouse liver, we now show that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α ligands Wy-14,643 and ciprofibrate increase the Cidea mRNA level in a PPARα-dependent manner, whereas Cidea induction in liver by PPARγ overexpression is PPARα independent. Increase in Cidea mRNA content in liver did not alter the expression of uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1) gene, which regulates thermogenesis, lipolysis, and conservation of energy. Although Cidea is considered to be a proapoptotic factor, Cidea induction in liver did not result in increased apoptosis. To elucidate the mechanism by which PPARα and PPARγ regulate Cidea gene expression in the liver, we analyzed the promoter region of the Cidea gene. Three putative peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs) are found in the Cidea gene promoter. Transactivation, gel-shift, and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that the proximal PPRE in Cidea gene (Cidea-PPRE1 at -680/-668) is functional for both PPARα and -γ. We conclude that Cidea is a novel target gene for both PPARα and -γ in the liver where these two transcription factors utilize the same PPRE region for dual regulation. The induction of Cidea in liver with these PPARα and -γ agonists suggests a possible role for Cidea in energy metabolism and a less likely role in hepatocyte apoptosis.

Critical Role for Transcription Coactivator Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR)-binding Protein/TRAP220 in Liver Regeneration and PPARα Ligand-induced Liver Tumor Development

Disruption of the gene encoding for the transcription coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-binding protein (PBP/TRAP220/DRIP205/Med1) in the mouse results in embryonic lethality. Here, we have reported that targeted disruption of the Pbp/Pparbp gene in hepatocytes (PbpΔLiv) impairs liver regeneration with low survival after partial hepatectomy. Analysis of cell cycle progression suggests a defective exit from quiescence, reduced BrdUrd incorporation, and diminished entry into G2/M phase in PbpΔLiv hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy. PbpΔLiv hepatocytes failed to respond to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, implying that hepatic PBP deficiency affects c-met signaling. Pbp gene disruption also abolishes primary mitogen-induced liver cell proliferative response. Striking abrogation of CCl4-induced hepatocellular proliferation and hepatotoxicity occurred in PbpΔLiv mice pretreated with phenobarbital due to lack of expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes necessary for CCl4 activation. PbpΔLiv mice, chronically exposed to Wy-14,643, a PPARα ligand, revealed a striking proliferative response and clonal expansion of a few Pbpfl/fl hepatocytes that escaped Cre-mediated gene deletion in PbpΔLiv livers, but no proliferative expansion of PBP null hepatocytes was observed. In these PbpΔLiv mice, none of the Wy-14,643-induced hepatic adenomas and hepatocellular carcinomas was derived from PBPΔLiv hepatocytes; all liver tumors developing in PbpΔLiv mice maintained non-recombinant Pbp alleles and retained PBP expression. These studies provide direct evidence in support of a critical role of PBP/TRAP220 in liver regeneration, induction of hepatotoxicity, and hepatocarcinogenesis.

Functional significance of the two ACOX1 isoforms and their crosstalks with PPARα and RXRα

Disruption of the peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (Acox1) gene in the mouse results in the development of severe microvesicular hepatic steatosis and sustained activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha). These mice manifest spontaneous massive peroxisome proliferation in regenerating hepatocytes and eventually develop hepatocellular carcinomas. Human ACOX1, the first and rate-limiting enzyme of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation pathway, has two isoforms including ACOX1a and ACOX1b, transcribed from a single gene. As ACOX1a shows reduced activity toward palmitoyl-CoA as compared with ACOX1b, we used adenovirally driven ACOX1a and ACOX1b to investigate their efficacy in the reversal of hepatic phenotype in Acox1(-/-) mice. In this study, we show that human ACOX1b is markedly effective in reversing the ACOX1 null phenotype in the mouse. In addition, expression of human ACOX1b was found to restore the production of nervonic (24:1) acid and had a negative impact on the recruitment of coactivators to the PPARalpha-response unit, which suggests that nervonic acid might well be an endogenous PPARalpha antagonist, with nervonoyl-CoA probably being the active form of nervonic acid. In contrast, restoration of docosahexaenoic (22:6) acid level, a retinoid-X-receptor (RXRalpha) agonist, was dependent on the concomitant hepatic expression of both ACOX1a and ACOX1b isoforms. This is accompanied by a specific recruitment of RXRalpha and coactivators to the PPARalpha-response unit. The human ACOX1b isoform is more effective than the ACOX1a isoform in reversing the Acox1 null phenotype in the mouse. Substrate utilization differences between the two ACOX1 isoforms may explain the reason why ACOX1b is more effective in metabolizing PPARalpha ligands.Disruption of the peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (Acox1) gene in the mouse results in the development of severe microvesicular hepatic steatosis and sustained activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα). These mice manifest spontaneous massive peroxisome proliferation in regenerating hepatocytes and eventually develop hepatocellular carcinomas. Human ACOX1, the first and rate-limiting enzyme of the peroxisomal β-oxidation pathway, has two isoforms including ACOX1a and ACOX1b, transcribed from a single gene. As ACOX1a shows reduced activity toward palmitoyl-CoA as compared with ACOX1b, we used adenovirally driven ACOX1a and ACOX1b to investigate their efficacy in the reversal of hepatic phenotype in Acox1(−/−) mice. In this study, we show that human ACOX1b is markedly effective in reversing the ACOX1 null phenotype in the mouse. In addition, expression of human ACOX1b was found to restore the production of nervonic (24:1) acid and had a negative impact on the recruitment of coactivators to the PPARα-response unit, which suggests that nervonic acid might well be an endogenous PPARα antagonist, with nervonoyl-CoA probably being the active form of nervonic acid. In contrast, restoration of docosahexaenoic (22:6) acid level, a retinoid-X-receptor (RXRα) agonist, was dependent on the concomitant hepatic expression of both ACOX1a and ACOX1b isoforms. This is accompanied by a specific recruitment of RXRα and coactivators to the PPARα-response unit. The human ACOX1b isoform is more effective than the ACOX1a isoform in reversing the Acox1 null phenotype in the mouse. Substrate utilization differences between the two ACOX1 isoforms may explain the reason why ACOX1b is more effective in metabolizing PPARα ligands.

Induction of nuclear translocation of constitutive androstane receptor by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α synthetic ligands in mouse liver

Peroxisome proliferators activate nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and enhance the transcription of several genes in liver. We report here that synthetic PPARα ligands Wy-14,643, ciprofibrate, clofibrate, and others induce the nuclear translocation of constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in mouse liver cells in vivo. Adenoviral-enhanced green fluorescent protein-CAR expression demonstrated that PPARα synthetic ligands drive CAR into the hepatocyte nucleus in a PPARα- and PPARβ-independent manner. This translocation is dependent on the transcription coactivator PPAR-binding protein but independent of coactivators PRIP and SRC-1. PPARα ligand-induced nuclear translocation of CAR is not associated with induction of Cyp2b10 mRNA in mouse liver. PPARα ligands interfered with coactivator recruitment to the CAR ligand binding domain and reduced the constitutive transactivation of CAR. Both Wy-14,643 and ciprofibrate occupied the ligand binding pocket of CAR and adapted a binding mode similar to that of the CAR inverse agonist androstenol. These observations, therefore, provide information for the first time to indicate that PPARα ligands not only serve as PPARα agonists but possibly act as CAR antagonists.

Transcription coactivator PBP/MED1 deficient hepatocytes are not susceptible to diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in the mouse

Nuclear receptor coactivator [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-binding protein (PBP)/mediator subunit 1 (MED1)] is a critical component of the mediator transcription complex. Disruption of this gene in the mouse results in embryonic lethality. Using the PBP/MED1 liver conditional null (PBP/MED1ΔLiv) mice, we reported that PBP/MED1 is essential for liver regeneration and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α ligand Wy-14,643-induced receptor-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis. We now examined the role of PBP/MED1 in genotoxic chemical carcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced and phenobarbital-promoted hepatocarcinogenesis. The carcinogenic process was initiated by a single intraperitoneal injection of DEN at 14 days of age and initiated cells were promoted with phenobarbital (PB) (0.05%) in drinking water. PBP/MED1ΔLiv mice, killed at 1, 4 and 12 weeks, revealed a striking proliferative response of few residual PBP/MED1-positive hepatocytes that escaped Cre-mediated deletion of PBP/MED1 gene. No proliferative expansion of PBP/MED1 null hepatocytes was noted in the PBP/MED1ΔLiv mouse livers. Multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) developed in the DEN-initiated PBP/MED1fl/fl and PBP/MED1ΔLiv mice, 1 year after the PB promotion. Of interest is that all HCC developing in PBP/MED1ΔLiv mice were PBP/MED1 positive. None of the tumors was PBP/MED1 negative implying that hepatocytes deficient in PBP/MED1 are not susceptible to neoplastic conversion. HCC that developed in PBP/MED1ΔLiv mouse livers were transplantable in athymic nude mice and these maintained PBP/MED1fl/fl genotype. PBP/MED1fl/fl HCC cell line derived from these tumors expressed PBP/MED1 and deletion of PBP/MED1fl/fl allele by adeno-Cre injection into tumors caused necrosis of tumor cells. These results indicate that PBP/MED1 is essential for the development of HCC in the mouse.

Erratum: Functional significance of the two ACOX1 isoforms and their crosstalks with PPARα and RXRα (Laboratory Investigation (2010) 90 (696-708) DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.46)

Correction to: Laboratory Investigation (2010) 90, 696–708 (this issue); advance online publication, 1 March 2010; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2010.46 In this article, published online on 1 March 2010 and in this issue, both the title and running title are incorrect; the correct title and running title are listed below. Title: Reversal of mouse Acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1) Null Phenotype by human ACOX1b isoform Running title: Reversal of mouse ACOX1 Null Phenotype by human ACOX1b Laboratory Investigation (2010) 90, 808 & 2010 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0023-6837/10

Redundant enhancement of mouse constitutive androstane receptor transactivation by p160 coactivator family members

32.00