Kosuke Fujimoto
Canon Inc.
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kosuke Fujimoto.
Medical Physics | 2016
Nobuhiko Hata; Sang-Eun Song; Olutayo Olubiyi; Yasumichi Arimitsu; Kosuke Fujimoto; Takahisa Kato; Kemal Tuncali; Soichiro Tani; Junichi Tokuda
PURPOSEnImage-guided cryotherapy of renal cancer is an emerging alternative to surgical nephrectomy, particularly for those who cannot sustain the physical burden of surgery. It is well known that the outcome of this therapy depends on the accurate placement of the cryotherapy probe. Therefore, a robotic instrument guide may help physicians aim the cryotherapy probe precisely to maximize the efficacy of the treatment and avoid damage to critical surrounding structures. The objective of this paper was to propose a robotic instrument guide for orienting cryotherapy probes in image-guided cryotherapy of renal cancers. The authors propose a body-mounted robotic guide that is expected to be less susceptible to guidance errors caused by the patients whole body motion.nnnMETHODSnKeeping the devices minimal footprint in mind, the authors developed and validated a body-mounted, robotic instrument guide that can maintain the geometrical relationship between the device and the patients body, even in the presence of the patients frequent body motions. The guide can orient the cryotherapy probe with the skin incision point as the remote-center-of-motion. The authors validation studies included an evaluation of the mechanical accuracy and position repeatability of the robotic instrument guide. The authors also performed a mock MRI-guided cryotherapy procedure with a phantom to compare the advantage of robotically assisted probe replacements over a free-hand approach, by introducing organ motions to investigate their effects on the accurate placement of the cryotherapy probe. Measurements collected for performance analysis included accuracy and time taken for probe placements. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess if either or both organ motion and the robotic guide impacted these measurements.nnnRESULTSnThe mechanical accuracy and position repeatability of the probe placement using the robotic instrument guide were 0.3 and 0.1 mm, respectively, at a depth of 80 mm. The phantom test indicated that the accuracy of probe placement was significantly better with the robotic instrument guide (4.1 mm) than without the guide (6.3 mm, p<0.001), even in the presence of body motion. When independent organ motion was artificially added, in addition to body motion, the advantage of accurate probe placement using the robotic instrument guide disappeared statistically [i.e., 6.0 mm with the robotic guide and 5.9 mm without the robotic guide (p = 0.906)]. When the robotic instrument guide was used, the total time required to complete the procedure was reduced from 19.6 to 12.7 min (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis indicated that the robotic instrument guide, not the organ motion, was the cause of statistical significance. The statistical power the authors obtained was 88% in accuracy assessment and 99% higher in duration measurement.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe body-mounted robotic instrument guide allows positioning of the probe during image-guided cryotherapy of renal cancer and was done in fewer attempts and in less time than the free-hand approach. The accuracy of the placement of the cryotherapy probe was better using the robotic instrument guide than without the guide when no organ motion was present. The accuracy between the robotic and free-hand approach becomes comparable when organ motion was present.
Archive | 2006
Kosuke Fujimoto; 幸輔 藤本
Archive | 2004
Kosuke Fujimoto; Kenichi Kataoka
Archive | 1999
Kosuke Fujimoto
Archive | 2007
Kosuke Fujimoto
Archive | 2000
Kosuke Fujimoto
Archive | 2006
Kosuke Fujimoto
Archive | 2006
Kosuke Fujimoto; 幸輔 藤本
Archive | 2004
Hiroyuki Seki; Kosuke Fujimoto
Archive | 2008
Ichiro Okumura; Makoto Shihoh; Yasushi Murayama; Kosuke Fujimoto; Isao Hayashi; Yoshihiro Shigemura; Katsumasa Nishikawa; Masaaki Naoi; Shinji Yamamoto; Hiroshi Ito