Kounosuke Tomori

Comparison of occupation-based and impairment-based occupational therapy for subacute stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility study

Objective: To compare occupation-based and impairment-based approaches in occupational therapy and determine the feasibility of patient recruitment and retention. Design: A multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial with a single blind assessor. Setting: Ten subacute rehabilitation units in Japan. Participants: Fifty-four patients with subacute stroke. Interventions: The experimental group used the iPad application, Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice, to establish occupation-based goals, and evaluation and intervention were conducted mainly through real occupations. The control group was evaluated according to patients’ generic abilities and activities of daily living (ADL), and the intervention mainly involved the impairment-based approach. Main outcome measures: Short Form-36, Functional Independence Measure, Brunnstrom recovery stages, The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, and length of hospital stay. Results: Of the 1465 potential participants, 54 (3%) subacute stroke patients were enrolled over 16 months and 68% (n = 36) were retained to the 2-month assessment: experimental group (n = 16); control group (n = 21). Although there was no significant intergroup difference for any outcomes, the experimental group had a small effect size advantage on the Short Form-36 “General health” (d = 0.42) and “Role emotional” (d = 0.43) subscales relative to the control group. A sample of 118 subacute stroke patients per group would be required for a lager study. Conclusions: Results suggest that the occupation-based approach has more potential to improve “General health” and “Role emotional” scores on the Short Form-36 than the impairment-based approach. Further investigation of study protocol with interventions and recruiting is needed prior to a larger trial.

Reliability and validity of individualized satisfaction score in aid for decision-making in occupation choice

Purpose: The iPad application aid for decision-making in occupation choice (ADOC) was developed to measure the client’s satisfaction with individualized occupational performance of meaningful and purposeful activities. The present study examined the reliability and validity of individualized satisfaction measurement using the ADOC. Method: The Japanese version of the ADOC was used by 36 occupational therapists on 92 of their clients (44 males, 48 females, mean age 66.4 ± 17.8 years). Convergent and discriminant validity were examined using Pearson’s correlation between ADOC satisfaction score and the Life Satisfaction Index K (LSIK) factors: Factor 1 (satisfaction with life), Factor 2 (optimistic and positive disposition) and Factor 3 (evaluation of own aging). Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Ninety-two clients completed the validation study. Satisfaction with ADOC significantly correlated with LSIK Factor 1 (r = 0.297, p < 0.01), but not with Factors 2 or 3 (r = −0.045 and −0.089, respectively). Of the 92 clients, 78 participated in the test–retest reliability study. Good to moderate correlation was revealed (ICC = 0.712, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Japanese version of the ADOC is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring client satisfaction with individualized occupational performance. Implications for Rehabilitation The iPad application, aid for decision-making in occupation choice (ADOC), was developed to promote shared decision-making during rehabilitation goal-setting. ADOC involves choosing from 95 illustrations related to the item “activities and participation” in International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. The Japanese version of ADOC makes it easy to identify and share the meaningful occupation for client, and a valid and reliable tool on measuring client satisfaction with occupation.

Examination of a cut-off score to express the meaningful activity of people with dementia using iPad application (ADOC).

Abstract Purpose: To determine a quantifiable measure to identify patients with dementia who can choose an illustration of meaningful activity using an iPad application, Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice (ADOC). Method: We recruited 116 patients from 5 institutions in Japan. Occupational therapists interviewed patients with dementia to determine meaningful activities using ADOC. The most meaningful activity was confirmed by their primary caregivers. The cut-off was estimated from Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that an MMSE score of 8 was the cut-off for choosing meaningful activities using ADOC. Sensitivity and specificity was 91.0% and 74.1%, respectively, and the area under the curve value was 0.89. Conclusion: ADOC can provide individualized information regarding meaningful activities for patients with moderate dementia. Implications for Rehabilitation As dementia progresses, difficulty in expressing needs or desires regarding meaningful activity may increase. The iPad application (Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice; ADOC) can be useful to promote shared decision-making through a systematic goal-setting process involving a choice of 95 illustrations describing daily activities. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 8 points is required to use the ADOC to choose most meaningful activities. ADOC provides individual information regarding meaningful activities for patients with moderate dementia.

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Occupation-Based Occupational Therapy Using the Aid for Decision Making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) for Older Residents: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Care-home residents are mostly inactive, have little interaction with staff, and are dependent on staff to engage in daily occupations. We recently developed an iPad application called the Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice (ADOC) to promote shared decision-making in activities and occupation-based goal setting by choosing from illustrations describing daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate if interventions based on occupation-based goal setting using the ADOC could focus on meaningful activities to improve quality of life and independent activities of daily living, with greater cost-effectiveness than an impairment-based approach as well as to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large cluster, randomized controlled trial. Method In this single (assessor)-blind pilot cluster randomized controlled trial, the intervention group (ADOC group) received occupational therapy based on occupation-based goal setting using the ADOC, and the interventions were focused on meaningful occupations. The control group underwent an impairment-based approach focused on restoring capacities, without goal setting tools. In both groups, the 20-minute individualized intervention sessions were conducted twice a week for 4 months. Main Outcome Measures Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, SF-6D utility score, quality adjusted life years (QALY), Barthel Index, and total care cost. Results We randomized and analyzed 12 facilities (44 participants, 18.5% drop-out rate), with 6 facilities each allocated to the ADOC (n = 23) and control (n = 21) groups. After the 4-month intervention, the ADOC group had a significantly greater change in the BI score, with improved scores (P = 0.027, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.87, intracluster correlation coefficient = 0.14). No other outcome was significantly different. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated using the change in BI score, was

Cost-effectiveness of Occupational Therapy in Older People: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

63.1. Conclusion The results suggest that occupational therapy using the ADOC for older residents might be effective and cost-effective. We also found that conducting an RCT in the occupational therapy setting is feasible. Trial Registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000012994

The Effect of Visual and Auditory Enhancements on Excitability of the Primary Motor Cortex during Motor Imagery: A Pilot Study.

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy for older people was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, OT seeker and unpublished trials registers were searched. Reference lists of all potentially eligible studies were searched with no language restrictions. We included trial-based full economic evaluations that considered both costs and outcomes in occupational therapy for older people compared with standard care (i.e. other therapy) or no intervention. We reviewed each trial for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed the quality of economic evaluations using a Drummond checklist. In the results of this review, we included five eligible studies (1-5) that were randomized controlled trials with high-quality economic evaluation. Two studies were full economic evaluations of interventions for fall prevention (1 and 2); two studies were full economic evaluations of preventive occupational therapy interventions (3 and 4; one was a comparison of an occupational therapy group with a social work group); one study was a full economic evaluation of occupational therapy for individuals with dementia (5). Two of the studies (one was preventive occupational therapy [3] and the other was occupational therapy for dementia [5]) found a significant effect and confirmed the cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy for older people compared with the control group. These studies found that occupational therapy for older people was clinically effective and cost-effective in comparison with standard care or other therapies. With reference to their clinical implication, these intervention studies (using a client-centred approach) suggested potentially cost-effective means to motivate clients to maintain their own health. However, this review has limitations because of the high heterogeneity of the reviewed studies on full economic evaluations of occupational therapy for older people. Future studies on the cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy in older people are strongly warranted. Copyright

Development of a tool to facilitate real life activity retraining in hand and arm therapy

The effect of visual and auditory enhancements of finger movement on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery (MI) was investigated using the transcranial magnetic stimulation technique. Motor-evoked potentials were elicited from the abductor digit minimi muscle during MI with auditory, visual and, auditory and visual information, and no information. Ten healthy participants were instructed to imagine repetitive abduction and adduction of the fifth finger. After each condition, the extent of vividness of MI was rated using a visual analogue scale. The results showed that the mean visual analogue scale score and motor-evoked potentials amplitude for the auditory and visual condition were higher than those of other conditions, indicating an enhanced excitability of the primary motor cortex with a clearer image of motor action during MI.

Utilization of the iPad application: Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice.

Introduction Successful recovery of upper extremity function after stroke is more likely when the affected limb is used regularly in daily life. We developed an iPad (Apple) application called the ‘Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand’ to facilitate daily upper extremity use. This study examined the suitability of items and pictures in the Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand, and tested a paper prototype of the application (which has since been produced). Method We used a Delphi method with 10 expert occupational therapists to refine the items in the aid. Next, we prepared pictures of items in the aid and confirmed their suitability by testing them with 10 patients (seven stroke, three cervical spondylotic myelopathy). Nine occupational therapists conducted field tests with a paper prototype of the aid in clinical practice to examine its utility. Results After four Delphi rounds, we selected 130 items representing activities of daily living, organized into 16 categories. Of 130 pictures, 128 were recognizable to patients as representing the intended activities. Based on testing of the paper prototype, we found the Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand process was suitable for clinical practice, and could be organized into six steps. Conclusion The Aid for Decision-Making in Occupation Choice for Hand process may promote daily upper extremity use. This application, since developed, now needs to be clinically tested in its digital form.