Kristian Kleinke
Bielefeld University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kristian Kleinke.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics | 2017
Kristian Kleinke
Predictive mean matching (PMM) is a standard technique for the imputation of incomplete continuous data. PMM imputes an actual observed value, whose predicted value is among a set of k ≥ 1 values (the so-called donor pool), which are closest to the one predicted for the missing case. PMM is usually better able to preserve the original distribution of the empirical data than fully parametric multiple imputation (MI) approaches, when empirical data deviate from their distributional assumptions. Use of PMM is therefore especially worthwhile in situations where model assumptions of fully parametric MI procedures are violated and where fully parametric procedures would yield highly implausible estimates. Unfortunately, today there are only a handful of studies that systematically tested the robustness of PMM and it is still widely unknown where exactly the limits of this procedure lie. I examined the performance of PMM in situations where data were skewed to varying degrees, under different sample sizes, missing data percentages, and using different settings of the PMM approach. It was found that small donor pools overall yielded better results than large donor pools and that PMM generally worked well, unless data were highly skewed and more than about 20% to 30% of the data had to be imputed. Also, PMM generally performed better when sample size was sufficiently large.
Methodology | 2018
Kristian Kleinke
Predictive mean matching (PMM) is a state-of-the-art hot deck multiple imputation (MI) procedure. The quality of its results depends, inter alia, on the availability of suitable donor cases. Applying PMM in small sample scenarios often found in psychological or medical research could be problematic, as there might not be many (or any) suitable donor cases in the data set. So far, there has not been any systematic research that examined the performance of PMM, when sample size is small. The present study evaluated PMM in various multiple regression scenarios, where sample size, missing data percentages, the size of the regression coefficients, and PMM’s donor selection strategy were systematically varied. Results show that PMM could be used in most scenarios, however results depended on the donor selection strategy: overall, PMM using either automatic distance-aided selection of donors (Gaffert, Meinfelder, & Bosch, 2016) or using the nearest neighbor produced the best results.
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis | 2011
Kristian Kleinke; Mark Stemmler; Jost Reinecke; Friedrich Lösel
Statistica Neerlandica | 2013
Kristian Kleinke; Jost Reinecke
Archive | 2011
Kristian Kleinke; Jost Reinecke
Survey Measurements. Techniques, Data Quality and Sources of Error | 2015
Kristian Kleinke; Jost Reinecke
Archive | 2015
Kristian Kleinke
Improving Survey Methods. Lessons from Recent Research | 2015
Kristian Kleinke; Jost Reinecke
Archive | 2014
Kristian Kleinke; Jost Reinecke
Archive | 2013
Kristian Kleinke