Kristian M. Forbes
University of Helsinki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kristian M. Forbes.
Biology Letters | 2016
Kristian M. Forbes; Tapio Mappes; Tarja Sironen; Tomas Strandin; Peter Stuart; Seppo Meri; Olli Vapalahti; Heikki Henttonen; Otso Huitu
Trade-offs in the allocation of finite-energy resources among immunological defences and other physiological processes are believed to influence infection risk and disease severity in food-limited wildlife populations. However, this prediction has received little experimental investigation. Here we test the hypothesis that food limitation impairs the ability of wild field voles (Microtus agrestis) to mount an immune response against parasite infections. We conducted a replicated experiment on vole populations maintained in large outdoor enclosures during boreal winter, using food supplementation and anthelmintic treatment of intestinal nematodes. Innate immune responses against intestinal parasite infections were compared between food-supplemented and non-supplemented voles. Voles with high food availability mounted stronger immune responses against intestinal nematode infections than food-limited voles. No food effects were seen in immune responses to intracellular coccidian parasites, possibly owing to their ability to avoid activation of innate immune pathways. Our findings demonstrate that food availability constrains vole immune responses against nematode infections, and support the concept that spatio-temporal heterogeneity in food availability creates variation in infectious disease susceptibility.
Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases | 2014
Kristian M. Forbes; Liina Voutilainen; Anne J. Jääskeläinen; Tarja Sironen; Paula M. Kinnunen; Peter Daniel Stuart; Olli Vapalahti; Heikki Henttonen; Otso Huitu
In northern Europe, rodent populations display cyclic density fluctuations that can be correlated with the human incidence of zoonotic diseases they spread. During density peaks, field voles (Microtus agrestis) become one of the most abundant rodent species in northern Europe, yet little is known of the viruses they host. We screened 709 field voles, trapped from 14 sites over 3 years, for antibodies against four rodent-borne, potentially zoonotic viruses or virus groups-hantaviruses, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), Ljungan virus (LV), and orthopoxviruses (OPV). Antibodies against all four viruses were detected. However, seroprevalence of hantaviruses, LV, and LCMV was low. OPV antibodies (most likely cowpox) were more common but restricted geographically to southeastern Finland. Within these sites, antibody prevalence showed delayed density dependence in spring and direct density dependence in fall. Higher seroprevalence was found in spring than fall. These results substantially increase knowledge of the presence and distribution of viruses of field voles in Finland, as well as CPXV infection dynamics.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2018
Tomas Strandin; Simon A. Babayan; Kristian M. Forbes
While urban expansion increasingly encroaches on natural habitats, many wildlife species capitalize on anthropogenic food resources, which have the potential to both positively and negatively influence their responses to infection. Here we examine how food availability and key nutrients have been reported to shape innate and adaptive immunity in wildlife by drawing from field-based studies, as well as captive and food restriction studies with wildlife species. Examples of food provisioning and key nutrients enhancing immune function were seen across the three study type distinctions, as were cases of trace metals and pharmaceuticals impairing the immunity of wildlife species. More generally, food provisioning in field studies tended to increase innate and adaptive responses to certain immune challenges, whereas patterns were less clear in captive studies. Mild food restriction often enhanced, whereas severe food restriction frequently impaired immunity. However, to enable stronger conclusions we stress a need for further research, especially field studies, and highlight the importance of integrating nutritional manipulation, immune challenge, and functional outcomes. Despite current gaps in research on this topic, modern high throughput molecular approaches are increasingly feasible for wildlife studies and offer great opportunities to better understand human influences on wildlife health. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host–parasite dynamics in wildlife’.
FEMS Microbiology Ecology | 2017
Rachael E Antwis; Sarah M. Griffiths; Xavier A. Harrison; Paz Aranega-Bou; Andres N. Arce; Aimee S Bettridge; Francesca L Brailsford; Alexandre B. de Menezes; Andrew Devaynes; Kristian M. Forbes; Ellen L. Fry; Ian Goodhead; Erin Haskell; Chloe Heys; Chloe E. James; Sarah R. Johnston; Gillian R Lewis; Zenobia Lewis; Michael Christopher Macey; Alan J. McCarthy; James E. McDonald; Nasmille L Mejia-Florez; David O'Brien; Chloe Orland; Marco Pautasso; William Dk Reid; Heather A. Robinson; Kenneth Wilson; William J. Sutherland
Abstract Microbial ecology provides insights into the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of microbial communities underpinning every ecosystem on Earth. Microbial communities can now be investigated in unprecedented detail, although there is still a wealth of open questions to be tackled. Here we identify 50 research questions of fundamental importance to the science or application of microbial ecology, with the intention of summarising the field and bringing focus to new research avenues. Questions are categorised into seven themes: host‐microbiome interactions; health and infectious diseases; human health and food security; microbial ecology in a changing world; environmental processes; functional diversity; and evolutionary processes. Many questions recognise that microbes provide an extraordinary array of functional diversity that can be harnessed to solve real‐world problems. Our limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variation in microbial diversity and function is also reflected, as is the need to integrate micro‐ and macro‐ecological concepts, and knowledge derived from studies with humans and other diverse organisms. Although not exhaustive, the questions presented are intended to stimulate discussion and provide focus for researchers, funders and policy makers, informing the future research agenda in microbial ecology.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2018
Sonia Altizer; Daniel J. Becker; Jonathan H. Epstein; Kristian M. Forbes; Thomas R. Gillespie; Richard J. Hall; Dana M. Hawley; Sonia M. Hernandez; Lynn B. Martin; Raina K. Plowright; Dara A. Satterfield; Daniel G. Streicker
Human-provided resource subsidies for wildlife are diverse, common and have profound consequences for wildlife–pathogen interactions, as demonstrated by papers in this themed issue spanning empirical, theoretical and management perspectives from a range of study systems. Contributions cut across scales of organization, from the within-host dynamics of immune function, to population-level impacts on parasite transmission, to landscape- and regional-scale patterns of infection. In this concluding paper, we identify common threads and key findings from author contributions, including the consequences of resource subsidies for (i) host immunity; (ii) animal aggregation and contact rates; (iii) host movement and landscape-level infection patterns; and (iv) interspecific contacts and cross-species transmission. Exciting avenues for future work include studies that integrate mechanistic modelling and empirical approaches to better explore cross-scale processes, and experimental manipulations of food resources to quantify host and pathogen responses. Work is also needed to examine evolutionary responses to provisioning, and ask how diet-altered changes to the host microbiome influence infection processes. Given the massive public health and conservation implications of anthropogenic resource shifts, we end by underscoring the need for practical recommendations to manage supplemental feeding practices, limit human–wildlife conflicts over shared food resources and reduce cross-species transmission risks, including to humans. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host–parasite dynamics in wildlife’.
Journal of Microbiological Methods | 2015
Markos Mölsä; Heidi Hemmilä; Anna Katz; Jukka Niemimaa; Kristian M. Forbes; Otso Huitu; Peter Daniel Stuart; Heikki Henttonen; Simo Nikkari
In the event of suspected releases or natural outbreaks of contagious pathogens, rapid identification of the infectious agent is essential for appropriate medical intervention and disease containment. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of a novel portable real-time PCR thermocycler, PikoReal™, to the standard real-time PCR thermocycler, Applied Biosystems® 7300 (ABI 7300), for the detection of three high-risk biothreat bacterial pathogens: Francisella tularensis, Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis. In addition, a novel confirmatory real-time PCR assay for the detection of F. tularensis is presented and validated. The results show that sensitivity of the assays, based on a dilution series, for the three infectious agents ranged from 1 to 100 fg of target DNA with both instruments. No cross-reactivity was revealed in specificity testing. Duration of the assays with the PikoReal and ABI 7300 systems were 50 and 100 min, respectively. In field testing for F. tularensis, results were obtained with the PikoReal system in 95 min, as the pre-PCR preparation, including DNA extraction, required an additional 45 min. We conclude that the PikoReal system enables highly sensitive and rapid on-site detection of biothreat agents under field conditions, and may be a more efficient alternative to conventional diagnostic methods.
Journal of Clinical Virology | 2016
Cristina Fevola; Kristian M. Forbes; Satu Mäkelä; Niina Putkuri; Heidi C. Hauffe; Hannimari Kallio-Kokko; Jukka Mustonen; Anne J. Jääskeläinen; Antti Vaheri
BACKGROUND The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic and vector-borne diseases are increasing in Europe. Prominent rodent-borne zoonotic viruses include Puumala hantavirus (PUUV; the causative agent of nephropathia epidemica, NE), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), and orthopoxviruses (OPV). In addition, Ljungan virus (LV) is considered a potentially zoonotic virus. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare clinical picture between acute PUUV patients with and without additional rodent-borne viral infections, to investigate if concurrent infections influence disease severity. STUDY DESIGN We evaluated seroprevalence of and seroconversions to LCMV, LV and OPV in 116 patients hospitalized for NE. Clinical and laboratory variables were closely monitored during hospital care. RESULTS A total of five LCMV, 15 LV, and one OPV seroconversions occurred. NE patients with LCMV seroconversions were younger, and had lower plasma creatinine concentrations and platelet counts than patients without LCMV seroconversions. No differences occurred in clinical or laboratory findings between patients with and without seroconversions to LV and OPV. We report, for the first time, LCMV seroprevalence in Finland, with 8.5% of NE patients seropositive for this virus. Seroprevalences for LV and OPV were 47.8% and 32.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION Cases with LCMV seroconversions were statistically younger, had milder acute kidney injury and more severe thrombocytopenia than patients without LCMV. However, the low number of seroconversion cases precludes firm conclusions. Concurrent LV or OPV infections do not appear to influence clinical picture for NE patients.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2018
Daniel J. Becker; Richard J. Hall; Kristian M. Forbes; Raina K. Plowright; Sonia Altizer
For a wide range of wildlife, anthropogenic change and human activities modify the abundance, distribution and timing of food resources [1,2]. Although activities such as deforestation and overfishing deplete resources for many wildlife species, in other cases, urbanization, agriculture and supplemental feeding can provide wildlife with abundant and predictable food [3–8]. As a result, many wildlife have adapted their foraging behaviour to capitalize on these resources [9,10], leading to subsidized populations that are often larger, more aggregated and better fed than their naturally foraging counterparts [11–13]. Importantly, novel assemblages of species can form around anthropogenic resources [14,15], which could facilitate the cross-species transmission of pathogens among wildlife, humans and domestic animals [16]. For example, bird feeders have been implicated in the emergence of virulent pathogens such as Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Trichomonas gallinae in songbirds [17,18]. The 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa and 1998 emergence of Nipah virus in Malaysia also underscore the importance of understanding how anthropogenic resources can bring wildlife reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens into close proximity with humans and domesticated species [19–21]. Predicting how anthropogenic resources will impact host–parasite interactions is challenging owing to multiple underlying mechanisms with potentially opposing effects [22,23]. Although energy and nutrients from supplemental food can support robust immune function needed to resist and recover from infections [24], anthropogenic food containing toxins or lacking nutrients could reduce host immunity and increase susceptibility to infection and pathogen shedding [25–27]. Moreover, aggregation around food sources can increase contact rates and facilitate pathogen transmission [28–30]. These individual-scale effects and local interactions are …
Frontiers in Plant Science | 2017
Riikka Linnakoski; Kristian M. Forbes; Michael J. Wingfield; Pertti Pulkkinen; Fred O. Asiegbu
Climate changes, exemplified by increased temperatures and CO2 concentration, pose a global threat to forest health. Of particular concern are pests and pathogens, with a warming climate altering their distributions and evolutionary capacity, while impairing the ability of some plants to respond to infections. Progress in understanding and mitigating such effects is currently hindered by a lack of empirical research. Norway spruce (Picea abies) is one of the most economically important tree species in northern Europe, and is considered highly vulnerable to changes in climate. It is commonly infected by the fungus Endoconidiophora polonica, and we hypothesized that damage caused to trees will increase under future climate change predictions. To test this hypothesis an in vivo greenhouse experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of a changed growing environment on E. polonica infected Norway spruce seedlings, comparing ambient conditions to predicted temperatures and CO2 levels in Finland for the years 2030 and 2100. In total, 450 seedlings were randomized amongst the three treatments, with 25 seedlings from each allocated to inoculation with one of five different fungal strains or mock-inoculation. Seedlings were monitored throughout the thermal growing season for mortality, and lesion length and depth indices were measured at the experiment conclusion. Disease severity (mortality and lesions) was consistently greater in fungal-inoculated than mock-inoculated seedlings. However, substantial differences were observed among fungal strains in response to climate scenarios. For example, although overall seedling mortality was highest under the most distant (and severe) climate change expectations, of the two fungal strains with the highest mortality counts (referred to as F4 and F5), one produced greater mortality under the 2030 and 2100 scenarios than ambient conditions, whereas climate scenario had no effect on the other. This study contributes to a limited body of empirical research on the effects of projected climate changes on forestry pathosystems, and is the first to investigate interactions between Norway spruce and E. polonica. The results indicate the potential for future climate changes to alter the impact of forest pathogens with implications for productivity, while highlighting the need for a strain-specific level of understanding of the disease agents.
Current Opinion in Virology | 2018
Kristian M. Forbes; Tarja Sironen; Alexander Plyusnin
Hantaviruses are primarily hosted by mammalian species of the orders Rodentia, Eulipotyphla and Chiroptera. Spillover to humans is common, and understanding hantavirus maintenance and transmission in reservoir host populations is important for efforts to curtail human disease. Recent field research challenges traditional phases of virus shedding kinetics derived from laboratory rodent infection experiments. Organ infection sites in non-rodent hosts suggest similar transmission routes to rodents, but require direct assessment. Further advances have also been made in understanding virus persistence (and fadeouts) in fluctuating host populations, as well as occupational, recreational and environmental risk factors associated with spillover to humans. However, despite relevance for both intra-species and inter-species transmission, our understanding of the longevity of hantaviruses in natural environments remains limited.