Kristian Tveten

Interaction between the ligand-binding domain of the LDL receptor and the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 is required for PCSK9 to remain bound to the LDL receptor during endosomal acidification

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the epidermal growth factor homology domain repeat A of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) at the cell surface and disrupts recycling of the internalized LDLR. As a consequence, the LDLR is rerouted to the lysosomes for degradation. Although PCSK9 may bind to an LDLR lacking the ligand-binding domain, at least three ligand-binding repeats of the ligand-binding domain are required for PCSK9 to reroute the LDLR to the lysosomes. In this study, we have studied the binding of PCSK9 to an LDLR with or without the ligand-binding domain at increasingly acidic conditions in order to mimic the milieu of the LDLR:PCSK9 complex as it translocates from the cell membrane to the sorting endosomes. These studies have shown that PCSK9 is rapidly released from an LDLR lacking the ligand-binding domain at pH in the range of 6.9-6.1. A similar pattern of release at acidic pH was also observed for the binding to the normal LDLR of mutant PCSK9 lacking the C-terminal domain. Together these data indicate that an interaction between the negatively charged ligand-binding domain of the LDLR and the positively charged C-terminal domain of PCSK9 is required for PCSK9 to remain bound to the LDLR during the early phase of endosomal acidification as the LDLR translocates from the cell membrane to the sorting endosome.

Role of the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 in degradation of the LDL receptors.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) at the cell surface and disrupts the normal recycling of the LDLR. In this study, we investigated the role of the C-terminal domain for the activity of PCSK9. Experiments in which conserved residues and histidines on the surface of the C-terminal domain were mutated indicated that no specific residues of the C-terminal domain, apart from those responsible for maintaining the overall structure, are required for the activity of PCSK9. Rather, the net charge of the C-terminal domain is important. The more positively charged the C-terminal domain, the higher the activity toward the LDLR. Moreover, replacement of the C-terminal domain with an unrelated protein of comparable size led to significant activity of the chimeric protein.We conclude that the role of the evolutionary, poorly conserved C-terminal domain for the activity of PCSK9 reflects its overall positive charge and size and not the presence of specific residues involved in protein-protein interactions.

Disrupted recycling of the low density lipoprotein receptor by PCSK9 is not mediated by residues of the cytoplasmic domain.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) post-translationally regulates the number of cell-surface low density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR). This is accomplished by the ability of PCSK9 to mediate degradation of the LDLR. The underlying mechanism involves binding of secreted PCSK9 to the epidermal growth factor-like repeat A of the extracellular domain of the LDLR at the cell surface, followed by lysosomal degradation of the internalized LDLR:PCSK9 complex. However, the mechanism by which the normal recycling of the LDLR is disrupted by PCSK9, remains to be determined. In this study we have investigated the role of the cytoplasmic domain of the LDLR for this process. This has been done by studying the ability of a mutant LDLR (K811X-LDLR) which lacks the cytoplasmic domain, to be degraded by PCSK9. We show that this mutant receptor is degraded by PCSK9. Thus, the machinery which directs the LDLR:PCSK9 complex to the lysosomes for degradation, does not interact with the cytoplasmic domain of the LDLR.

PCSK9-mediated degradation of the LDL receptor generates a 17 kDa C-terminal LDL receptor fragment

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the LDL receptor (LDLR) at the cell surface and reroutes the internalized LDLR to intracellular degradation. In this study, we have shown that PCSK9-mediated degradation of the full-length 160 kDa LDLR generates a 17 kDa C-terminal LDLR fragment. This fragment was not generated from mutant LDLRs resistant to PCSK9-mediated degradation or when degradation was prevented by chemicals such as ammonium chloride or the cysteine cathepsin inhibitor E64d. The observation that the 17 kDa fragment was only detected when the cells were cultured in the presence of the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT indicates that this 17 kDa fragment undergoes γ-secretase cleavage within the transmembrane domain. The failure to detect the complementary 143 kDa ectodomain fragment is likely to be due to its rapid degradation in the endosomal lumen. The 17 kDa C-terminal LDLR fragment was also generated from a Class 5 mutant LDLR undergoing intracellular degradation. Thus, one may speculate that an LDLR with bound PCSK9 and a Class 5 LDLR with bound LDL are degraded by a similar mechanism that could involve ectodomain cleavage in the endosome.

PCSK9 acts as a chaperone for the LDL receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum

PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) binds to the LDLR (low-density lipoprotein receptor) at the cell surface and disrupts recycling of the LDLR. However, PCSK9 also interacts with the LDLR in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum). In the present study we have investigated the role of PCSK9 for the transport of the LDLR from the ER to the cell membrane. A truncated LDLR consisting of the ectodomain (ED-LDLR) was used for these studies to avoid PCSK9-mediated degradation of the LDLR. The amount of secreted ED-LDLR was used as a measure of the amount of ED-LDLR transported from the ER. From co-transfection experiments of various PCSK9 and ED-LDLR plasmids, PCSK9 increased the amount of WT (wild-type) ED-LDLR in the medium, but not of an ED-LDLR lacking the EGF (epidermal growth factor)-A repeat or of a Class 2a mutant ED-LDLR which fails to exit the ER. Mutant PCSK9s which failed to undergo autocatalytic cleavage or failed to exit the ER, failed to increase the amount of WT-ED-LDLR in the medium. These mutants also reduced the amount of WT-ED-LDLR intracellularly, which could partly be prevented by the proteasome inhibitor lactacystine. WT-ED-LDLR promoted autocatalytic cleavage of pro-PCSK9. The findings of the present study indicate that the binding of WT-ED-LDLR to pro-PCSK9 in the ER promotes autocatalytic cleavage of PCSK9, and autocatalytically cleaved PCSK9 acts as a chaperone to promote the exit of WT-ED-LDLR from the ER.

Removal of acidic residues of the prodomain of PCSK9 increases its activity towards the LDL receptor.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) binds to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) at the cell surface and mediates intracellular degradation of the LDLR. The amino-terminus of mature PCSK9, residues 31-53 of the prodomain, has an inhibitory effect on this function of PCSK9, but the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. In this study, we have identified two highly conserved negatively charged segments (residues 32-40 and 48-50, respectively) within this part of the prodomain and performed deletions and substitutions to study their importance for degradation of the LDLRs. Deletion of the acidic residues of the longest negatively charged segment increased PCSK9s ability to degrade the LDLR by 31%, whereas a modest 8% increase was observed when these residues were mutated to uncharged amino acids. Thus, both the length and the charge of this part of the prodomain were important for its inhibitory effect. Deletion of the residues of the shorter second negatively charged segment only increased PCSK9s activity by 8%. Substitution of the amino acids of both charged segments to uncharged residues increased PCSK9s activity by 36%. These findings indicate that the inhibitory effect of residues 31-53 of the prodomain is due to the negative charge of this segment. The underlying mechanism could involve the binding of this peptide segment to positively charged structures which are important for PCSK9s activity. One possible candidate could be the histidine-rich C-terminal domain of PCSK9.

Characterization of a naturally occurring degradation product of the LDL receptor.

In this study we have characterized a naturally occurring truncated form of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). Western blot analysis of transfected cells indicated that the truncated form (∆N-LDLR) is a degradation product of the full-length LDLR generated by cleavage in the linker region between ligand-binding repeats 4 and 5 of the ligand-binding domain. The cleavage of the linker was not caused by components of the culture media, as heat inactivation of the media did not prevent cleavage. Rather, it is assumed that cleavage was caused by an enzyme secreted from the cells. Biotinylation experiments showed that ∆N-LDLR is located on the cell surface and is detectable approximately 5 h after synthesis of the full-length LDLR. Flow cytometric analysis showed that ∆N-LDLR was not able to bind and internalize low density lipoprotein (LDL). ∆N-LDLR appeared to be equally stable as the full-length LDLR. Thus, generation of ∆N-LDLR does not appear to be the first signal for degradation of the LDLR. The existence of two functionally different populations of LDLRs on the cell surface, of which ∆N-LDLR constitutes 28%, must be taken into account when interpreting results of experiments to study LDLRs on the cell surface. Furthermore, if the cleavage of the linker between ligand-binding repeats 4 and 5 could be prevented by an enzyme inhibitor, this could represent a novel therapeutic strategy to increase the number of functioning LDLRs and thereby decrease the levels of plasma LDL cholesterol.

Mutations in the SORT1 gene are unlikely to cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE To study whether mutations in the SORT1 gene could be a cause of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia and to study the effect of sortilin on the binding and internalization of low density lipoprotein (LDL). METHODS 842 unrelated hypercholesterolemic subjects without mutations in genes known to cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia, were screened for mutations in the SORT1 gene by DNA sequencing. Transfections of wild-type or mutant SORT1 plasmids in HeLa T-REx cells and the use of siRNA were used to study the effect of sortilin on the number of cell-surface LDL receptors and on the binding and internalization of LDL. RESULTS A total of 45 mutations in the SORT1 gene were identified of which 15 were missense mutations. Eight of these were selected for in vitro studies, of which none had a major impact on the amount of LDL bound to the cell surface. There was a positive correlation between the amount of sortilin on the cell surface and the amount of LDL bound. The observation that a mutant sortilin which is predominantly found on the cell surface rather than in post-Golgi compartments, bound very high amounts of LDL, indicates that sortilin does not increase the binding of LDL through an intracellular mechanism. Rather, our data indicate that sortilin binds LDL on the cell surface. CONCLUSION Even though sortilin binds and internalizes LDL by receptor-mediated endocytosis, mutations in the SORT1 gene are unlikely to cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia and may only have a marginal effect on plasma LDL cholesterol levels.

Mutation G805R in the transmembrane domain of the LDL receptor gene causes familial hypercholesterolemia by inducing ectodomain cleavage of the LDL receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum.

More than 1700 mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene have been found to cause familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). These are commonly divided into five classes based upon their effects on the structure and function of the LDLR. However, little is known about the mechanism by which mutations in the transmembrane domain of the LDLR gene cause FH. We have studied how the transmembrane mutation G805R affects the function of the LDLR. Based upon Western blot analyses of transfected HepG2 cells, mutation G805R reduced the amounts of the 120 kDa precursor LDLR in the endoplasmic reticulum. This led to reduced amounts of the mature 160 kDa LDLR at the cell surface. However, significant amounts of a secreted 140 kDa G805R‐LDLR ectodomain fragment was observed in the culture media. Treatment of the cells with the metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat largely restored the amounts of the 120 and 160 kDa forms in cell lysates, and prevented secretion of the 140 kDa ectodomain fragment. Together, these data indicate that a metalloproteinase cleaved the ectodomain of the 120 kDa precursor G805R‐LDLR in the endoplasmic reticulum. It was the presence of the polar Arg805 and not the lack of Gly805 which led to ectodomain cleavage. Arg805 also prevented γ‐secretase cleavage within the transmembrane domain. It is conceivable that introducing a charged residue within the hydrophobic membrane lipid bilayer, results in less efficient incorporation of the 120 kDa G805R‐LDLR in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and makes it a substrate for metalloproteinase cleavage.

The cytoplasmic domain is not involved in directing Class 5 mutant LDL receptors to lysosomal degradation.

The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) binds and internalizes low density lipoprotein (LDL). At the mildly acidic pH of the sorting endosomes, LDL is released from the receptor and the receptor recycles back to the cell membrane. Mutations in the LDLR gene may disrupt the normal function of the LDLR in different ways. Class 5 mutations result in receptors that are able to bind and internalize LDL, but they fail to release LDL in the sorting endosomes and fail to recycle. Instead they are rerouted to the lysosomes for degradation. However, the underlying mechanism remains to be determined. To study the role of the cytoplasmic domain of the LDLR for rerouting Class 5 mutants to the lysosomes, we have performed studies to determine whether Class 5 mutants caused by mutations E387K or V408M are degraded when the cytoplasmic domain has been altered or deleted. As determined by confocal laser-scanning microscopy, these mutant LDLR were inserted into the cell membrane and were able to internalize LDL. As determined by Western blot analysis, Class 5 mutants without a cytoplasmic domain still were degraded after binding LDL. Thus, the cytoplasmic domain does not play a role in rerouting Class 5 mutant LDLR to the lysosomes. Rather, one may speculate that sterical hindrance may prevent Class 5 mutants with bound LDL from entering the narrow recycling tubules of the sorting endosome.