Kristin O. Prien

Employee Responses to Performance Feedback from the Task: A Field Study of the Moderating Effects of Global Self-Esteem

A large body of research has examined the effects of feedback on work attitudes and behaviors. However, the role of individual differences in feedback-response relations has not been as thoroughly examined. In this field study, the moderating effects of global self-esteem (SE) on the relationship between performance feedback from the task and several work attitudes and behaviors were examined. As predicted, SE interacted with the frequency of performance feedback from the task to account for significant amounts of additional variance in job performance, general job satisfaction, absenteeism, and job search intentions. Specifically, low SEs had lower performance, absenteeism, and job search intentions than high SEs in relation to frequent performance feedback from the task. High SEs reported greater job satisfaction than low SEs in response to frequent task-derived performance feedback. The discussion centers on the implications the findings have for future research and for human resource management.

Interrater Reliability in Job Analysis: Differences in Strategy and Perspective

In spite of the increasing use of the content validity model for employee selection, there has been little focused research on the psychometric properties of the job analysis ratings used to determine job content. Sources of systematic variance include differences in job performance strategies and differences in perspectives on the job. In the current study, task importance ratings for a single job (social worker) are examined to determine whether rater experience and race will have significant effects on job performance strategy and job perspectives, as measured by job analysis ratings.