Kristine T. Hanson

Safety of Overlapping Surgery at a High-volume Referral Center

Objective: To compare safety profiles of overlapping and nonoverlapping surgical procedures at a large tertiary-referral center where overlapping surgery is performed. Background: Surgical procedures are frequently performed as overlapping, wherein one surgeon is responsible for 2 procedures occurring at the same time, but critical portions are not coincident. The safety of this practice has not been characterized. Methods: Primary analyses included elective, adult, inpatient surgical procedures from January 2013 to September 2015 available through University HealthSystem Consortium. Overlapping and nonoverlapping procedures were matched in an unbalanced manner (m:n) by procedure type. Confirmatory analyses from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program investigated elective surgical procedures from January 2011 to December 2014. We compared outcomes mortality and length of stay after adjustment for registry-predicted risk, case-mix, and surgeon using mixed models. Results: The University HealthSystem Consortium sample included 10,765 overlapping cases, of which 10,614 (98.6%) were matched to 16,111 nonoverlapping procedures. Adjusted odds ratio for inpatient mortality was greater for nonoverlapping procedures (adjusted odds ratio, OR = 2.14 vs overlapping procedures; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.23–3.73; P = 0.007) and length of stay was no different (+1% for nonoverlapping cases; 95% CI, −1% to +2%; P = 0.50). In confirmatory analyses, 93.7% (3712/3961) of overlapping procedures matched to 5,637 nonoverlapping procedures. The 30-day mortality (adjusted OR = 0.69 nonoverlapping vs overlapping procedures; 95% CI, 0.13–3.57; P = 0.65), morbidity (adjusted OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.92–1.35; P = 0.27) and length of stay (−4% for nonoverlapping; 95% CI, −4% to −3%; P < 0.001) were not clinically different. Conclusions: These findings from administrative and clinical registries support the safety of overlapping surgical procedures at this center but may not extrapolate to other centers.

Wide Variation and Overprescription of Opioids after Elective Surgery

Objective: We aimed to identify opioid prescribing practices across surgical specialties and institutions. Background: In an effort to minimize the contribution of prescription narcotics to the nationwide opioid epidemic, reductions in postoperative opioid prescribing have been proposed. It has been suggested that a maximum of 7 days, or 200 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME), should be prescribed at discharge in opioid-naïve patients. Methods: Adults undergoing 25 common elective procedures from 2013 to 2015 were identified from American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 3 academic centers in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. Opioids prescribed at discharge were abstracted from pharmacy data and converted into OME. Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests assessed variations. Results: Of 7651 patients, 93.9% received opioid prescriptions at discharge. Of 7181 patients who received opioid prescriptions, a median of 375 OME (interquartile range 225–750) were prescribed. Median OME varied by sex (375 men vs 390 women, P = 0.002) and increased with age (375 age 18–39 to 425 age 80+, P < 0.001). Patients with obesity and patients with non-cancer diagnoses received more opioids (both P < 0.001). Subset analysis of the 5756 (75.2%) opioid-naïve patients showed the majority received >200 OME (80.9%). Significant variations in opioid prescribing practices were seen within each procedure and between the 3 medical centers. Conclusions: The majority of patients were overprescribed opioids. Significant prescribing variation exists that was not explained by patient factors. These data will guide practices to optimize opioid prescribing after surgery.

Effect of Hospital Case Mix on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Star Scores: Are All Stars the Same?

Objective: We aimed to evaluate variations in patient experience measures across different surgical specialties and to assess the impact of further case-mix adjustment. Background: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) is a publicly reported survey of patients’ hospital experiences that directly influence Medicare reimbursement. Methods: All adult surgical inpatients meeting criteria for HCAHPS sampling from 2013 to 2014 at a single academic center were identified. HCAHPS measures were analyzed according to published top-box and Star-rating methodologies, and were dichotomized (“high” vs “low”). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent associations of high patient scores on various HCAHPS measures with specialty, diagnosis-related group complexity, cancer diagnosis, sex, and emergency admission after adjusting for HCAHPS case-mix adjusters (education, overall health status, language, and age). Results: We identified 36,551 eligible patients, of which 30.8% (n = 11,273) completed HCAHPS. Women [odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.85, P < 0.001], complex cases (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82–0.99, P = 0.02), and emergency admissions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.82, P < 0.001) had lesser Star scores on adjusted analysis, whereas patients with a cancer diagnosis had greater Star scores (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03–1.29, P = 0.01). Using general surgery as the reference, the Star scores varied significantly across 12 specialties (range OR 0.65 for plastics to 1.29 for transplant surgery). Patient responses to individual composite scores (pain, care transition, physician, and nurse) varied by specialty. Conclusions: HCAHPS case-mix adjustment does not include adjustment for specialty or diagnosis, which may result in artificially lower scores for centers that provide a high level of complex care. Further research is needed to ensure that the HCAHPS is an unbiased comparison tool.

Disparities in treatment and survival for women with endometrial cancer: A contemporary national cancer database registry analysis

PURPOSE The study aim was to identify contemporary socioeconomic, racial, ethnic, and facility-related factors associated with stage at diagnosis, receipt of cancer treatment, and survival in women with endometrial cancer (EC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Women diagnosed with EC between 1998 and 2010 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Variables associated with the outcomes of interest were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. RESULTS Among 228,511 women identified, the percentage of blacks with stage IIIC/IV disease at diagnosis was nearly twice that of non-Hispanic whites (17.8% vs 9.8%; P<0.001). Patients with advanced disease who were insured with Medicare were less likely to receive standard-of-care postoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy than those with private insurance (odds ratio: OR 0.80, P<0.001), as were those residing in the South (reference) in comparison to the Northeast, Atlantic, Great Lakes, and Midwest regions (OR 1.3-1.7, all P<0.001). Those residing in the Mountain region were even less likely to receive appropriate treatment (OR 0.7, P<0.001). Five-year stage IIIC/IV survival was 42.8% for non-Hispanic whites vs 24.6% for blacks (hazard ratio 1.3, P<0.001). Other factors associated with inferior 5-year survival included payer status (not insured, Medicaid, Medicare, vs private, ORs 1.2-1.3, all P<0.01), and treatment at low-volume centers (<5 vs ≥30cases/year, HR 1.3, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Socioeconomic, geographic and facility-related factors predict advanced endometrial cancer stage, failure to receive cancer care, and shorter survival. Black women had especially poor survival. Nationwide standardization and concentration of treatment at high-volume centers may improve outcomes.

Characterization of perioperative infection risk among patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Results from the national surgical quality improvement program.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and timing of infections following radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried to identify patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer from 2006 to 2013. Characteristics including year of surgery, age, sex body mass index, diabetes, smoking, renal function, steroid usage, preoperative albumin, preoperative hematocrit, perioperative blood transfusion (PBT), and operative time were assessed for association with the risk of infection within 30 days of RC using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 3,187 patients who had undergone RC were identified, of whom 766 (24.0%) were diagnosed with a postoperative infection, at a median of 13 days (interquartile ranges 8-19) after RC. Infections included surgical site infection (SSI) (404; 12.7%), sepsis/septic shock (405; 12.7%), and urinary tract infection (UTI) (309; 9.7%). On multivariable analysis, body mass index≥30kg/m2 (odds ratios [OR] = 1.52; P<0.01), receipt of a PBT (OR = 1.27; P<0.01), and operative time≥480 minutes (OR = 1.72; P<0.01) were significantly associated with the risk of infection. When the outcomes of UTI, SSI, and sepsis were analyzed separately, operative time≥480 minutes remained independently associated with increased infection risk in each model (OR = 2.11 for UTI, OR = 1.63 for SSI, and OR = 1.80 for sepsis/septic shock; all P<0.05), whereas PBT was associated with SSI and sepsis/septic shock (OR = 1.33 and OR = 1.29, respectively; both P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 25% of patients undergoing RC experience an infection within 30 days of surgery. Several potentially modifiable risk factors for infection were identified, specifically PBT and prolonged operative time, which may represent opportunities for future care improvement.

Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation

Importance In November 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning against the use of power morcellation for excision of uterine fibroids to decrease the risk of disseminating malignant cells and worsening survival outcomes of patients with unexpected malignant neoplasms. After the FDA statement was issued, studies showed decreased rates of minimally invasive surgery and increased rates of open abdominal hysterectomy. However, there are limited and controversial data on the association of these changed rates with 30-day hysterectomy complications. Objective To assess changes in the rates of 30-day major and minor complications of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications following the FDA-issued statement. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and included 603 hospitals participating between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Thirty-day posthysterectomy complications were compared before and after the FDA-issued warning. Women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications (n = 75 487), including hysterectomies with indication of uterine fibroids (n = 25 571), were included. Complication rates and procedure distributions between the periods were compared with &khgr;2 tests and multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient and operative factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Major and minor 30-day complication rates before (from 2013 through the first quarter of 2014) and after (from the fourth quarter of 2014 through 2015) the FDA-issued warning. Results Of 75 487 women (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [10.7] years) who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications, 32 186 (42.6%) were treated before and 43 301 (57.4%) after the FDA-issued warning. Non-Hispanic white women comprised most (59.4%) of the total population, followed by African American women (15.1%). Overall, major and minor complications remained stable before and after the FDA-issued warning. By contrast, among a subset of 25 571 women (33.9%) who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids, major complications significantly increased after the FDA-issued warning from 1.9% to 2.4% (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47; P = .02), and minor complications significantly increased from 2.7% to 3.3% (adjusted OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; P = .01). In this subgroup, the rate of open abdominal surgery increased from 37.2% to 43.0%, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) decreased from 56.1% to 49.7% (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Major and minor 30-day complication rates among women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine fibroids increased following the FDA-issued statement. This increased risk corresponding with a decreased use of minimally invasive surgery should be balanced against the potential harms of morcellation during a shared decision-making process between clinician and patient. Regulatory bodies and medical societies should consider these findings when issuing relevant communications.

From Data to Practice: Increasing Awareness of Opioid Prescribing Data Changes Practice

&NA; We hypothesized that the recent attention to the opioid epidemic, combined with internal dissemination of data on prescribing practices, impacted our institutions opioid prescribing at discharge from elective surgery. We reviewed our recent practice to assess whether this increasing awareness resulted in reductions of opioid prescriptions for patients with acute pain. Data on prescribing for patients undergoing elective surgery between 2016 and early 2017 demonstrated that opioid prescribing practices have improved in the recent era without an observed increase in refill rates. Although additional work is needed to further improve standardization and reduce opioid prescribing, these data suggest that increased awareness may be an important first step in improving opioid prescribing practices.

The impact of spine disease, relative to cranial disease, on perception of health and care experience: an analysis of 1484 patients in a tertiary center

OBJECTIVEPatient-reported outcomes have been increasingly mandated by regulators and payers to evaluate hospital and physician performance. The purpose of this study is to delineate the differences in patient-reported experience of hospital care for cranial and spinal operations.METHODSThe authors selected all patients who underwent inpatient, elective cranial or spinal procedures and completed the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey at a single, high-volume, tertiary care institution between October 2012 and September 2015. The association of the surgical procedure and diagnosis with various HCAHPS composite measures, calculated across 9 domains using standard top-box methodology, was investigated. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted for outcomes that were significant with procedure type and diagnosis group on univariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex, case complexity, overall health rating, and education level.RESULTSA total of 1484 patients met criteria and returned an HCAHPS survey. Overall, patients undergoing a cranial procedure gave top-box (most favorable) scores more often in pain management measure (66.3% vs 59.6%, p = 0.01) compared with those undergoing spine surgery. Furthermore, despite better discharge scores (93.1% vs 87.1%, p < 0.001), spinal patients were less likely to report excellent health (7.4% vs 12.7%). Lastly, patients with a primary diagnosis of brain or spinal tumor compared with those with degenerative spinal disease and those with other neurosurgical diagnoses provided top-box scores more often regarding communication with doctors (82.7% vs 76.4% vs 75.2%, p = 0.04), pain management (71.8% vs 60.9% vs 59.1%, p = 0.002), and global rating (90.4% vs 84.0% vs 87.3%, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, spinal patients had significantly lower odds of reporting top-box scores in pain management (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001), staff responsiveness (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87; p = 0.002), and global rating (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.82; p = 0.002), and significantly higher odds of top-box scoring in discharge information (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.45-3.18; p < 0.001) than cranial patients. Similarly, brain tumor cases were associated with significantly higher odds of top-box scoring in communication with doctors (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.01-2.12; p = 0.04), pain management (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.29-2.55; p < 0.001), staff responsiveness (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.33-2.66; p < 0.001), and global rating (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26-3.17; p = 0.003) compared with degenerative spine cases.CONCLUSIONSSignificant differences in patient-reported experience with hospital care exist across different cranial and spine surgery patient populations. Overall, spinal patients, particularly those with degenerative spine disease, rated their health and their hospital experience lower relative to cranial patients. Identifying weaker areas of hospital performance in target populations can stimulate quality initiatives that aim to increase the overall hospital score.

Early extubation is associated with reduced length of stay and improved outcomes after elective aortic surgery in the Vascular Quality Initiative

Objective: Timing of extubation after open aortic procedures varies across hospitals. This study was designed to examine extubation timing and determine its effect on length of stay (LOS) and respiratory complications after elective open aortic surgery. Methods: We studied extubation timing for 7171 patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (2687 [37.5%]) or suprainguinal bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease (4484 [62.5%]) from October 2010 to April 2015 in hospitals participating in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Our primary outcome was prolonged LOS (>7 days), and the secondary outcome was respiratory complications (pneumonia or reintubation). The association between extubation timing and outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression mixed‐effects models that adjusted for confounding factors at the patient and procedure level. A variable importance analysis was conducted using a chi‐pie framework to identify factors contributing to the variability of extubation timing. Results: The 7171 patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery were a mean age of 65.4 (standard deviation, 10.2) years, and 63% were male. Extubation occurred (1) in the operating room (76.3%), (2) <12 hours (10.9%), (3) 12 to 24 hours (7.2%), or (4) >24 hours (5.6%) after surgery. Hospitals in the top quartile for case volume had the highest percentage of patients extubated in the operating room (82.8%). Patients least likely to be extubated in the operating room were older, more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, require vasopressors, have higher estimated blood loss (EBL), and longer procedure times. After adjustment for patient, procedure, and institutional factors, delayed extubation was associated with prolonged LOS (<12 hours: odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2‐1.7; 12‐24 hours: OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7‐2.7; >24 hours: OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 4.0‐6.9), and pulmonary complications (<12 hours: OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4‐2.6; 12‐24 hours: OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8‐3.6; >24 hours: OR, 9.6; 95% CI, 7.1‐13.0) compared with those extubated in the operating room. Subset analysis of patients extubated in the operating room or <12 hours showed that extubation out of the operating room was associated with prolonged LOS (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2‐1.7) and pulmonary complications (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3‐2.5). The variable importance analysis demonstrated that EBL (26%) and procedure time (24%) accounted for half of the variation in extubation timing. Conclusions: Extubation in the operating room is associated with shorter LOS and morbidity after open aortic surgery. EBL, procedure time, and center variation account for variability in extubation timing. These data advocate for standardized perioperative respiratory care to reduce variation, improve outcomes, and reduce LOS.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Experiences of Hospital Care and the July Phenomenon

Assessment of Patient-Reported Experiences of Hospital Care and the July Phenomenon A recent article1 suggested that the influx of new surgical residents at the beginning of the academic year is not associated with worse outcomes among patients undergoing emergency general surgery, contrary to the widely believed July phenomenon. In the modern era of surgical education, other studies have also supported the authors’ findings across other specialties including orthopedics,2 neurosurgery,3 and acute care surgery.4 We hypothesized that patient-centered outcomes are also not associated with the known influx of new surgical residents in July and August.