Krisztina I. Forward

Long-Term Effects of Intravitreal Injection of GMP-Grade Bone-Marrow–Derived CD34+ Cells in NOD-SCID Mice with Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

PURPOSE To determine long-term safety of intravitreal administration of good manufacturing practice (GMP)-grade human bone-marrow-derived CD34(+) cells in NOD-SCID (nonobese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency) mice with acute retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury, a model for retinal vasculopathy. METHOD Acute ischemia-reperfusion injury was induced in the right eye of adult NOD-SCID mice (n = 23) by transient elevation of intraocular pressure. Seven days later, 12 injured eyes and 5 normal contralateral eyes were injected each intravitreally with 5 × 10(4) CD34(+) cells isolated under GMP conditions from a healthy human donor bone marrow using an immunomagnetic cell isolation system. The remaining 11 injured eyes were not treated and served as controls. Mice were euthanized 1 day, 4 months, and 8 months later. Both eyes were enucleated and examined by immunohistochemical analysis and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Among mice followed for 8 months, electroretinography (ERG) was performed on both eyes before euthanization. All major organs were examined grossly and histologically after serial sectioning. RESULTS Immunohistochemical staining 4 months after injection showed detectable CD34(+) cells in the retinal vasculature. ERG at 8 months after CD34(+) cell injection showed signals that were similar in untreated eyes. Histology of the enucleated eyes injected with CD34(+) cells showed no intraocular tumor or abnormal tissue growth after 8 months. Histologic analysis of all major organs showed no abnormal proliferation of human cells. CONCLUSIONS Intravitreal administration of GMP-grade human bone-marrow-derived CD34(+) cells appears to be well tolerated long-term in eyes with acute retinal ischemic injury. A clinical trial will start to further explore this therapy.

Epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) and experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Purpose: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is believed to result in part from de-differentiation of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with cellular migration in the vitreous cavity, membrane formation, and contraction in an aberrant wound-healing strategy. In an in vitro collagen-gel contraction assay, epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) controls contraction through activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in a RPE cell line (ARPE-19). The purpose of this study was to investigate how blocking or altering the level of EMP2 expression changed clinical PVR in an in vivo model. Methods: Using the ARPE-19 cell line, the levels of EMP2 modulated through stable transfections of an EMP2 overexpressing construct, EMP2 ribozyme, or vector alone. These transfected cell lines were used in a rabbit model of PVR. The severity of PVR was classified by two masked observers. An EMP2 blocking antibody was also used to decrease functional EMP2 in the PVR model. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate EMP2 expression in vivo. Results: The transfectants with lower levels of EMP2 had significantly less PVR severity than the degree of PVR induced by wild-type cells (p = 0.05). Also, the transfectants with a low-level of EMP2 expression showed a strong trend of less PVR severity than the high-levels EMP2 transfectants (p = 0.06). Blocking EMP2 with a specific polyclonal antibody significantly decreased the level of PVR severity (p = 0.02). PVR membranes were found to be positive for EMP2 expression. Conclusions: These in vivo studies support a direct correlation between EMP2 expression and severity of PVR. These results validate the potential for controlling RPE biology through a change in EMP2 expression, and provide a potential therapeutic target for this disease.

Epithelial Membrane Protein 2 Controls VEGF Expression in ARPE-19 Cells

PURPOSE VEGF production by RPE cells has been shown to be important in regulating aberrant angiogenesis in the retina, which is responsible for multiple types of ocular pathology. EMP2 is highly expressed in the RPE and has been shown to regulate FAK activation, which is implicated in VEGF expression in other cell lines. The purpose of this study was to determine whether EMP2 regulates VEGF expression in the RPE cell line, ARPE-19. METHODS ARPE-19 cells were engineered to overexpress EMP2. EMP2 siRNA was used to decrease EMP2 expression. The small molecule inhibitor PP2 was used to inhibit FAK activation. VEGF levels were measured by Western blot and ELISA. Functional differences in secreted VEGF were assayed using HUVEC migration. RESULTS VEGF expression levels correlated with levels of EMP2. An increase of VEGF by 150% was observed in EMP2 overexpressing cells as compared with ARPE-19 cells. Concordantly, EMP2 knockdown resulted in a 57% decrease in VEGF expression. HUVEC migration (P = 0.01) and vessel tube formation (P < 0.01) were significantly increased when exposed to cell culture supernatants from EMP2 overexpressing cells. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes a novel connection between EMP2 and VEGF and may reflect either a direct effect through the tetraspan web or an indirect change through FAK activation. This connection is functionally significant. In addition to the direct use of anti-VEGF antibodies, modulation of EMP2 with impact on VEGF is potentially a distinct therapeutic target for the treatment of neovascularization associated with retinal diseases that involve pathologic angiogenesis.

Epithelial membrane protein-2 in human proliferative vitreoretinopathy and epiretinal membranes

Purpose To determine the level of epithelial membrane protein-2 (EMP2) expression in preretinal membranes from surgical patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) or epiretinal membranes (ERMs). EMP2, an integrin regulator, is expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium and understanding EMP2 expression in human retinal disease may help determine whether EMP2 is a potential therapeutic target. Methods Preretinal membranes were collected during surgical vitrectomies after obtaining consents. The membranes were fixed, processed, sectioned, and protein expression of EMP2 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The staining intensity (SI) and percentage of positive cells (PP) in membranes were compared by masked observers. Membranes were categorized by their cause and type including inflammatory and traumatic. Results All of the membranes stained positive for EMP2. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy–induced membranes (all causes) showed greater expression of EMP2 than ERMs with higher SI (1.81 vs. 1.38; P = 0.07) and PP (2.08 vs. 1.54; P = 0.09). However all the PVR subgroups had similar levels of EMP2 expression without statistically significant differences by Kruskal-Wallis test. Inflammatory PVR had higher expression of EMP2 than ERMs (SI of 2.58 vs. 1.38); however, this was not statistically significant. No correlation was found between duration of PVR membrane and EMP2 expression. EMP2 was detected by RT-PCR in all samples (n = 6) tested. Conclusions All studied ERMs and PVR membranes express EMP2. Levels of EMP2 trended higher in all PVR subgroups than in ERMs, especially in inflammatory and traumatic PVR. Future studies are needed to determine the role of EMP2 in the pathogenesis and treatment of various retinal conditions including PVR.