Krzysztof Dudek

Vascular complications after liver transplantation

Vascular complications following liver transplantation is reviewed based upon literature data and our own results. Our study conclusions are mostly based on literature data, because our center does not have the liver transplantation experience of other centers worldwide. Thus, we may conclude, that the number and character of complications does not differ from those reported by other centers. The enbloc technique used in liver harvesting minimizes the risk of arterial damage in case of vascular anomalies. Recipient retransplantation is the most effective treatment method in cases of hepatic arterial occlusion. Doppler ultrasound examinations are effective to monitor vascular blood flow in the transplanted liver.

Impact of Tumor Characteristic on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a well-established treatment for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who meet the Milan criteria. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of survival among 65 patients with HCC in cirrhotic livers who underwent liver transplantation (OLT). METHODS From January 2001 to December 2008, we performed 655 OLT in 615 patients. HCC was diagnosed in 58 patients before OLT and in 65 by histological examination of the explanted livers; 74% of the patients met Milan criteria by histological examination. RESULTS The median follow-up was 27 months (range = 1-96). We analyzed patient age and gender, etiology of liver disease, Child score at transplantation, rejection episodes, tumor number/size, vascular invasion, and differentiation grade. There was no significant difference in survival among patients grouped according to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease staging system for HCC. The 5-year survival of patients with low differentiated (G3) HCC was significantly worse than that of those with moderately differentiated (G2) or well-differentiated (G1) HCC: 50%, 81%, and 86% respectively, (P < .01). Patients with microvascular invasion displayed a worse 5-year survival than those without vascular invasion (42% vs 80%; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The analysis indicated that the histological grade of the tumors and evidences of microscopic vascular invasion were the most useful predictive factors for overall survival among patients with cirrhosis after liver transplantation for HCC.

1000 liver transplantations at the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw--analysis of indications and results.

THE AIM OF THE STUDY was to analyze indications and results of the first one thousand liver transplantations at Chair and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 1000 transplantations (944 patients) performed at Chair and Clinic of General, Transplantation and Liver Surgery between 1994 and 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. These included 943 first transplantations and 55 retransplantations and 2 re-retransplantations. Frequency of particular indications for first transplantation and retransplantations was established. Perioperative mortality was defined as death within 30 days after the transplantation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate 5-year patient and graft survival. RESULTS The most common indications for first transplantation included: liver failure caused by hepatitis C infection (27.8%) and hepatitis B infection (18%) and alcoholic liver disease (17.7%). Early (< 6 months) and late (> 6 months) retransplantations were dominated by hepatic artery thrombosis (54.3%) and recurrence of the underlying disease (45%). Perioperative mortality rate was 8.9% for first transplantations and 34.5% for retransplantations. Five-year patient and graft survival rate was 74.3% and 71%, respectively, after first transplantations and 54.7% and 52.9%, respectively, after retransplantations. CONCLUSIONS Development of liver transplantation program provided more than 1000 transplantations and excellent long-term results. Liver failure caused by hepatitis C and B infections remains the most common cause of liver transplantation and structure of other indications is consistent with European data.

Choice of Transplantation Techniques and Indications for Liver Transplantation in Polycystic Liver Disease in Patients With No Signs of End-Stage Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE Since the initiation of the Liver Transplant Program, 500 liver procedures have been performed. Polycystic liver disease (PLD) and polycystic kidney-liver disease (PKLD) have been rare indications for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Only 7 patients (1.4%) underwent transplantation due to PLD and PKLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS The group consisted of 4 patients who underwent OLT (0.8%) and 3 patients who received simultaneous liver kidney transplantation (LKT; 0.6%). Our objective was to analyze the indications for either OLT or combined LKT as well as indications for surgical techniques during OLT among patients with PLD or PKLD. RESULTS The main indication for OLT was massive hepatomegaly causing severe physical handicaps, fatigue, and clinically advanced malnutrition. All 3 patients with indications for combined LKT were dialysis-dependent. None of the patients had symptoms of end-stage liver disease and/or hepatic failure. In 4 cases, a portal bypass was applied, and the piggy-back method used in the other 3 cases. The hepatectomy caused no uncommon difficulty. In cases of simultaneous transplantations, the kidney was implanted separately after OLT. All patients are alive following the transplantation; major surgical complications have occurred. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PLD can undergo OLT safely with good results. They benefit from the relief of abdominal distension and anorexia. Patients with PKLD who are dialysis-dependent should undergo simultaneous LKT. The surgical technique was solely dependent on the intraoperative conditions determined during the dissection phase.

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the liver as a rare indication for liver transplantation.

AIM To investigate the indications and outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE). METHODS Between 1989 and August 2013, in the Department of General, Transplant, and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1306 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTx) were performed, including 72 retransplantations. Unresectable HEHE was an indication for OLTx in 10 patients (0.8% of primary OLTx), the mean age of the patients was 40.5 ± 13.3 years (range 23-65 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 2:8. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in HEHE, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and other OLTx recipients groups was performed. The differences in mortality were compared using the χ(2) test. A P-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS No concomitant liver disease was found in any patient. There was no neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Liver function test results were normal in most of the patients. The levels of alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were normal. In immunohistochemical staining, the neoplastic cells were positive for factor VIII-related antigen, CD31, and CD34, which are endothelial cell markers, and negative for cytokeratin 19, cytokeratin 7, and HepPar-1. Nine patients were alive without tumor recurrence. One patient died 2 mo after OLTx due to septic complications. No morbidity was observed. Maximum follow-up was 11.4 years, with a minimum of 1 mo. The cumulative survival rate at the end of follow-up in HEHE patients was 87.5% compared with 54.3% in the HCC group and 76.3% in the other OLTx recipients group (χ(2) test = 1.784, df = 2, P = 0.409). CONCLUSION Unresectable HEHE, without extrahepatic metastases is an excellent indication for liver transplantation. Long-term survival is very good and much better than in HCC patients and the entire group of OLTx patients.

Comparison of the results of liver transplantation for elective versus urgent indications.

The authors present an analysis of early and remote liver transplantation outcomes related to the presence of emergent indications among 196 of the 209 operations performed from 1989 to April 2003; namely 178 elective and 18 emergent transplantations. Perioperative mortality was 15%. The survival rate during the first 12 months was 79.8% and within 3 years 73.5% among patients operated on an elective basis (UNOS 3 and 2B). In contrast, patients with acute liver failure (UNOS 1 and 2A) showed rates of 45%, 50%, and 47%, respectively. Liver transplant outcomes depend primarily on the urgency of an operation. Longterm results are much better among patients operated on electively. Liver transplantation in patients with acute hepatic insufficiency is burdened with a high 45% mortality.

Evolution Of The Results Of 1500 Liver Transplantations Performed In The Department Of General, Transplant And Liver Surgery Medical University Of Warsaw.

UNLABELLED Liver transplantation is a well-established treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease and selected liver tumors. Remarkable progress has been made over the last years concerning nearly all of its aspects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of long-term outcomes after liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery (Medical University of Warsaw). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 1500 liver transplantations performed between 1989 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Transplantations were divided into 3 groups: group 1 including first 500 operations, group 2 including subsequent 500, and group 3 comprising the most recent 500. Five year overall and graft survival were set as outcome measures. RESULTS Increased number of transplantations performed at the site was associated with increased age of the recipients (p<0.001) and donors (p<0.001), increased rate of male recipients (p<0.001), and increased rate of piggyback operations (p<0.001), and decreased MELD (p<0.001), as well as decreased blood (p=0.006) and plasma (p<0.001) transfusions. Overall survival was 71.6% at 5 years in group 1, 74.5% at 5 years in group 2, and 85% at 2.9 years in group 3 (p=0.008). Improvement of overall survival was particularly observed for primary transplantations (p=0.004). Increased graft survival rates did not reach the level of significance (p=0.136). CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes after liver transplantations performed in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery are comparable to those achieved in the largest transplant centers worldwide and are continuously improving despite increasing recipient age and wider utilization of organs procured from older donors.

The impact of experience of a transplantation center on the outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation

The so-called learning factor has been disregarded for many years in analyzing the causes of surgical complications and post-operative mortality; it is also the case for OLT. In our center until April 2003, 209 OLT were performed in 196 patients. We evaluated the impact of experience of the transplantation team on the outcomes of liver transplantation. Thirty-four patients died (mortality rate, 16%) and 1-year survival rate, 64%. Mortality rates varied during different periods of observation due to increasing experience of the transplantation team. The causes of mortality were assessed for a series of 34 patients: it was 75% at the beginning of transplantation procedures while recent deaths have not recently exceeded 10% of cases.

Influence of Selected Factors on Survival After Liver Retransplantation

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the survival of adult liver retransplant recipients depending on selected factors: time from the primary transplantation, cold ischemia time, indications for retransplantation, patient age and United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1989 and March 2011, we performed 43 orthotopic liver retransplantations (re-OLTs) among patients aged 20-62 years including 24 women and 19 men. The cold ischemia time was 250-820 minutes. UNOS status before re-OLT: UNOS 1 (n=19; 44%) UNOS 2A (n=15; 35%), and UNOS 2B (n=4; 9%). The time from OLT to re-OLT was 1-2, 146 days. The indications for re-OLT were arterial thrombosis (n=14; 33%), anastomotic biliary complication (n=3; 7%), recurrence of the original disease (n=9; 21%), hepatic vein thrombosis (n=1; 2%), primary nonfunction (PNF) dysfunction (n=2; [5%] /6 [14%]), de novo hepatitis C cirrhosis (n=2; 5%) and other etiologies (n=6; 14%). RESULTS The 6-year survival among the primary OLT group was 80% compared with 58% among the re-OLT group (P=.0001). One-year survivals in the re-OLT group according to UNOS status 1, 2A, and 2B were 47%, 60%, and 75%, respectively (P=.475). There was a low negative correlation between survival time and time between OLT and re-OLT. There was a low positive correlation between survival time and cold ischemia time. There was a low negative correlation between survival time and patient age. CONCLUSIONS There was a significant difference in survival between OLT and re-OLT. There was a correlation between survival time and time to re-OLTx; a shorter time corresponded to longer survival. There was a poor correlation between survival time and patient age. UNOS status before re-OLT and indication for re-OLTx influenced survival.

Hepatic abscess: a rare complication after liver transplant.

This study was conducted to evaluate the predisposing factors, microbiology, treatment, and outcomes associated with hepatic abscess, a rare but serious complication which may accur after an orthotopic liver transplant (OLT).