Krzysztof Ozierański

Influence of beta-blockers on endothelial function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND Endothelial dysfunction (ED) frequently precedes cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and is a well-established risk factor of major adverse cardiac events. Beta-blockers are the fundamental drugs used in CVD treatment. METHODS A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials investigating influence of beta-blockers on endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was performed in the PubMed and Cochrane Databases. RESULTS Sixteen full-text studies involving a total of 1,273 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age of participating patients ranged from 44.9 to 63.2 years, the follow-up duration from 1 to 12 months. The comparison of FMD change between the beta-blockers and placebo groups showed a statistically significant effect of beta-blockers on endothelial function (mean difference [MD] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-1.55; p = 0.02). Third generation beta-blockers improved FMD in a statistically significant manner compared with second generation beta-blockers (MD 1.65; 95% CI 0.17-3.11; p = 0.03). Beta-blockers gave an FMD change similar to that obtained with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB) or hydrochlorothiazide. The FMD value in the beta-blocker group was significantly lower compared with the group treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) (MD -0.79; 95% CI -1.37-(-0.21); p = 0.008) and higher than in the ivabradine group (1.6 ± 3.61 vs -0.3 ± 1.66; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Beta-blockers improve the endothelial function compared with placebo. More-over, third generation beta-blockers improve FMD values significantly better than the second generation ones. Beta-blockers had similar effect on endothelial function as did ARB, CCB or diuretics. However, the beneficial effect of beta-blockers was lower when confronted with ACEI.

Clinical characteristics and predictors of one-year outcome of heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation compared to heart failure patients in sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently coexists with heart failure (HF). AIM To assess clinical characteristics and to identify predictors of one-year outcome of patients hospitalised for HF, depending on whether they were in sinus rhythm (SR) or had AF. METHODS The study included Polish patients hospitalised for HF, participating in the Heart Failure Pilot Survey of the European Society of Cardiology, who were followed for 12 months after discharge. Patients with paced heart rhythm were excluded from the study. The primary endpoint was all-cause death at 12 months. RESULTS The final analysis included 587 patients. AF occurred in 215 (36.6%) patients. Compared to patients in SR, patients with AF were older, more often had a history of previous HF hospitalisation, were characterised by a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, higher heart rate, and lower diastolic blood pressure at hospital admission, and had higher serum creatinine and lower haemoglobin concentration at admission. In-hospital mortality was higher in AF patients compared to SR patients (5.1% vs. 2.4%, respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). The primary endpoint occurred in 41 of 215 AF patients (19.1%) and in 40 of 372 SR patients (10.8%; p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, predictors of the primary endpoint in AF patients were: higher NYHA class at hospital admission (p = 0.02), higher admission heart rate (p = 0.04), lower admission serum sodium concentration (p = 0.0001), and higher heart rate at discharge (p = 0.01). In patients with SR, independent predictors of the primary endpoint included: older age (p = 0.007), lower serum sodium concentration at admission (p = 0.0006), and higher heart rate at discharge (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Patients with HF and concomitant AF differ significantly from HF patients in SR. In the studied group of real-world HF patients, serum sodium concentration at hospital admission and heart rate at hospital discharge were independent prognostic factors in patients with AF and in patients in SR. In contrast to SR patients, heart rate at hospital admission in AF patients was also predictive of long-term mortality.

Predictors of one-year outcome in patients hospitalised for heart failure: results from the Polish part of the Heart Failure Pilot Survey of the European Society of Cardiology.

BACKGROUND Over the last few decades, the incidence and prevalence of chronic heart failure (HF) have been constantly increasing. AIM To identify predictors of one-year mortality and hospital readmissions in patients discharged after hospitalisation for HF. METHODS The study included Polish patients who agreed to participate in the Heart Failure Pilot Survey of the European Society of Cardiology and were followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and readmission for cardiac causes at 12 months. RESULTS The final analysis included 629 patients. The primary end point occurred in 68 of 629 patients (10.8%). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of one-year mortality were: higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.59; p = 0.0478), inotropic support during hospitalisation (OR 3.95; 95% CI 1.49-10.47; p = 0.0056), and lower glomerular filtration rate at discharge (OR 0.978; 95% CI 0.961-0.995; p = 0.0117). The secondary endpoint occurred in 278 of 503 patients (55.3%). In multivariate analysis, predictors of secondary endpoint were a history of previous coronary revascularisation (OR 2.403; 95% CI 1.221-4.701; p = 0.002) and inotropic support during hospitalisation (OR 2.521; 95% CI 1.062-5.651; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Patients discharged after hospitalisation for HF remained at high risk of death and hospital readmission. A previous history of coronary revascularisation, decreased renal function, and worse clinical status at admission with the need for inotropic support were predictors of one-year outcome in Polish patients hospitalised for HF.

Resting heart rate at hospital admission and its relation to hospital outcome in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND Resting heart rate (HR) has been proven to influence long-term prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between resting HR at hospital admission and hospital outcome in patients with HF. METHODS The study included Polish patients admitted to hospital due to HF who agreed to participate in Heart Failure Pilot Survey of the European Society of Cardiology. RESULTS The final analysis included 598 patients. Median HR at hospital admission was 80 bpm. In univariate analyses, higher HR at admission was associated with more frequent use of inotropic support (p = 0.0462) and diuretics (p = 0.0426), worse clinical (New York Heart Association - NYHA) status at discharge (p = 0.0483), longer hospital stay (p = 0.0303) and higher in-hospital mortality (p = 0.003). Compared to patients who survived, patients who died during hospitalization (n = 21; 3.5%) were older, more often had a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack and were characterized by higher NYHA class, higher HR at admission, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure at admission, lower ejection fraction, lower glomerular filtration rate, and lower natrium and hemoglobin concentrations at hospital admission. In multivariate analysis, higher HR at admission (OR 1.594 [per 10 bpm]; 95% CI 1.061-2.395; p = 0.0248) and lower natrium concentration at admission (OR 0.767 [per 1 mmol/L]; 95% CI 0.618-0.952; p = 0.0162) were the only independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS In patients with HF, higher resting HR at hospital admission is associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Study design and rationale for biomedical shirt-based electrocardiography monitoring in relevant clinical situations: ECG-shirt study

BACKGROUND Today, the main challenge for researchers is to develop new technologies which may help to improve the diagnoses of cardiovascular disease (CVD), thereby reducing healthcare costs and improving the quality of life for patients. This study aims to show the utility of biomedical shirt-based electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring of patients with CVD in different clinical situations using the Nuubo® ECG (nECG) system. METHODS An investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective observational study was carried out in a cardiology (adult and pediatric) and cardiac rehabilitation wards. ECG monitoring was used with the biomedical shirt in the following four independent groups of patients: 1) 30 patients after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), 2) 30 cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients, 3) 120 patients during cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction, and 4) 40 pediatric patients with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) before electrophysiology study. Approval for all study groups was obtained from the institutional review board. The biomedical shirt captures the electrocardiographic signal via textile electrodes integrated into a garment. The software allows the visualization and analysis of data such as ECG, heart rate, arrhythmia detecting algorithm and relative position of the body is captured by an electronic device. DISCUSSION The major advantages of the nECG system are continuous ECG monitoring during daily activities, high quality of ECG recordings, as well as assurance of a proper adherence due to adequate comfort while wearing the shirt. There are only a few studies that have examined wearable systems, especially in pediatric populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier NCT03068169. (Cardiol J 2018; 25, 1: 52-59).

Do β-blockers improve one-year survival in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from the ESC-HF Registry

Introduction The positive effect of β-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been questioned. Objectives We aimed to assess the effect of β-blockers and heart rate (HR) control on 1-year outcomes in patients with HF and AF. Patients and methods Of the 2019 Polish patients enrolled in ESC-HF Pilot and ESC-HF Long-Term Registry, 797 patients with HF and AF were classified into 2 groups depending on β-blocker use. Additionally, patient survival was compared between 3 groups classified according to HR: lower than 80 bpm, between 80 and 109 bpm, and of 110 bpm or higher. The primary endpoint was all-cause death and the secondary endpoint was all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Results In patients treated with β-blockers, the primary and secondary endpoints were less frequent than in patients not using β-blockers (10.9% vs 25.6%, P = 0.001 and 30.6% vs 44.2%, P = 0.02, respectively). Absence of β-blocker treatment was a predictor of both endpoints in a univariate analysis but remained an independent predictor only of the primary endpoint in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio for β-blocker use, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.89; P = 0.02). The primary and secondary endpoints were more frequent in patients with a HR of 110 bpm or higher, but the HR itself did not predict the study endpoints in the univariate analysis. Conclusions β-blocker use might decrease mortality in patients with HF and AF, but it seems to have no impact on the risk of HF hospitalization. An HR of 110 bpm or higher may be related to worse survival in these patients.

Comparison of clinical characteristics of real-life atrial fibrillation patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban: results from the CRAFT study

BACKGROUND The first-line drugs for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) are non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which are preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). There is some evidence that there are dis-crepancies between everyday clinical practice and the guidelines. AIM The study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients on VKAs, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in everyday practice (i.e. baseline characteristics, drug doses, risk factors for bleeding and thromboembolic events). Additionally, we assessed the frequency of prescription of different oral anticoagulants (OACs) in recent years. METHODS This study consisted of data from the multicentre CRAFT (MultiCentre expeRience in AFib patients Treated with OAC) study (NCT02987062). This was a retrospective analysis of hospital records of AF patients (hospitalised in the years 2011-2016) treated with VKAs (acenocoumarol, warfarin) and NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban). A total of 3528 patients with non-valvular AF were enrolled in the CRAFT study. RESULTS The total cohort consisted of 1973 patients on VKA, 504 patients on dabigatran, and 1051 patients on rivaroxaban. Patients on rivaroxaban were older (70.5 ± 13.1 years) and more often female (47.9%), compared with those on VKAs (67.0 ± 12.8 years, p < 0.001; 35.5%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (66.0 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.001; 38.9%, p = 0.001). Among NOACs, patients with persistent and permanent AF were more likely to receive rivaroxaban (54.7% and 73.4%, re-spectively) than dabigatran (45.3%, p < 0.001 and 26.6%, p = 0.002, respectively). Patients on rivaroxaban had higher risk of thromboembolic events (CHA2DS2VASc 3.9 ± 2.0, CHADS2 2.2 ± 1.4) than those on VKAs (3.3 ± 2.0, 1.9 ± 1.3) and on dabigatran (3.1 ± 2.0, 1.8 ± 1.3). Patients on rivaroxaban had also a higher rate of prior major bleeding (11.2%) than those on VKAs (6.7%, p < 0.001) and on dabigatran (7.3%, p = 0.02). Patients on lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Use of VKAs in the year 2011 was reported in over 96% of patients on OACs, but this proportion decreased to 34.6% in 2016. In the last analysed year (2016) AF patients were treated mainly with NOACs - dabigatran (24.2%) and rivaroxaban (41.3%). CONCLUSIONS The prescription of VKAs declined significantly after the introduction of NOACs. Patients treated with different OACs demonstrated a distinct baseline clinical profile. The highest risk of thromboembolic events and incidence of major bleedings was observed in patients on rivaroxaban, in comparison to patients on VKAs and dabigatran. Among NOACs, patients treated with lower doses of dabigatran and rivaroxaban were older and had a significantly higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events.

Appropriate and effective interventions of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD): single-academic-centre experience

Address for correspondence: Agata Tymińska, MD, 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02–097 Warszawa, Poland, e-mail: tyminska.agata@gmail.com Conflict of interest: Marcin Michalak, Marcin Grabowski — Boston consultants Kardiologia Polska Copyright

Niedokrwistość i niedobór żelaza u chorych z niewydolnością serca — postępowanie diagnostyczne i terapeutyczne

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a growing problem of highly developed countries. The latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) on HF have stressed the need for diagnosis and treatment of risk factors and comorbidities that aggravate HF course and affect prognosis. Recently, the subject of numerous studies has included anemia and iron deficiency, which are highly prevalent in patients with HF. By definition, anemia is diagnosed at hemoglobin below 13.0 g/dL in men and 12.0 g/dL in women. In the course of HF many factors can lead to the development of anemia. While iron deficiency may occur independently of the presence of anemia, and independently may deteriorate the prognosis of HF patients. According to the ESC guidelines, iron deficiency in patients with HF is reported with serum ferritin below 100 μg/L or ferritin 100–299 μg/L with iron transferrin saturation below 20%. This article discusses the incidence of anemia, causes of its occurrence in HF, the importance of prognosis, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic options. Currently there are several forms of treatment for anemia. However, the only treatment with proven efficacy and safety is intravenous iron supplementation in symptomatic HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction associated with iron deficiency.

Epidemiology of arterial hypertension in patients scheduled for elective hip replacement

Background: Assessment of blood pressure values and early diagnosis of hypertension are especially important in high-risk group, including patients in preoperative and postoperative period. The aim of the current study was the assessment of blood pressure values and prevalence of hypertension in patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery — an orthopedic procedure associated with one of the highest cardiovascular complication rate. Material and methods: Two hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients admitted for elective hip replacement surgery were screened for arterial hypertension. All patients had their medical records reviewed for prior diagnosis and had their blood pressure measured on admission by a qualified physician prior to the procedure, according to the current guidelines. Results: The mean age of the study population was 62.2 ± 13.9 years and 42.7% of the patients were male. The body mass index (BMI) in the study population was 27.0 ± 4.2 kg/m 2 . Fifty-eight point two percent of patients were diagnosed with arterial hypertension previously. Mean blood pressure values on admission for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 134.5 ± 20.4 and 78.6 ± 13.1 mm Hg, respectively. In 43.2% of patients, the on admission blood pressure values exceeded the threshold of ≥ 140 and/or 90 mm Hg. Arterial hypertension was diagnosed de novo in 33 (15.0%) patients. Patients with the disease were older (67.5 ± 12.3 vs. 54.4 ± 13.9 years; p < 0.0001), and had higher BMI (27.6 ± 4.3 vs. 26.2 ± 3.8 kg/m 2 ; p = 0.05) than patients without the diagnosed disease. Diabetes mellitus was more often found in hypertensive patients (13.3% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.02), they also more often had history of myocardial infarction (p = 0.02), stable coronary artery disease (p = 0.001) and heart failure (p = 0.006) compared to patients without the diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority of patients scheduled for elective hip replacement surgery is diagnosed with arterial hypertension. The disease is also diagnosed de novo in 15% of these patients. Screening for arterial hypertension is important in this group of patients and can potentially reduce the complication rates of the hip replacement surgery.