Kunio M. Sayanagi
Hampton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kunio M. Sayanagi.
Icarus | 2013
Kunio M. Sayanagi; Ulyana A. Dyudina; Shawn P. Ewald; G. Fischer; Andrew P. Ingersoll; W. S. Kurth; Gabriel D. Muro; Carolyn C. Porco; Robert A. West
Saturn’s quasi-periodic planet-encircling storms are the largest convecting cumulus outbursts in the Solar System. The last eruption was in 1990 (Sanchez-Lavega, A. [1994]. Chaos 4, 341–353). A new eruption started in December 2010 and presented the first-ever opportunity to observe such episodic storms from a spacecraft in orbit around Saturn (Fischer, G. et al. [2011]. Nature 475, 75–77; Sanchez-Lavega, A. et al. [2011]. Nature 475, 71–74; Fletcher, L.N. et al. [2011]. Science 332, 1413). Here, we analyze images acquired with the Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS), which captured the storm’s birth, evolution, and demise. In studying the end of the convective activity, we also analyze the Saturn Electrostatic Discharge (SED) signals detected by the Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) instrument. The storm’s initial position coincided with that of a previously known feature called the String of Pearls (SoPs) at 33°N planetocentric latitude. Intense cumulus convection at the westernmost point of the storm formed a particularly bright “head” that drifted at −26.9 ± 0.8 m s^(−1) (negative denotes westward motion). On January 11, 2011, the size of the head was 9200 km and up to 34,000 km in the north–south and east–west dimensions, respectively. RPWS measurements show that the longitudinal extent of the lightning source expanded with the storm’s growth. The storm spawned the largest tropospheric vortex ever seen on Saturn. On January 11, 2011, the anticyclone was sized 11,000 km by 12,000 km in the north–south and east–west directions, respectively. Between January and September 2011, the vortex drifted at an average speed of −8.4 m s^(−1). We detect anticyclonic circulation in the new vortex. The vortex’s size gradually decreased after its formation, and its central latitude shifted to the north. The storm’s head moved westward and encountered the new anticyclone from the east in June 2011. After the head–vortex collision, the RPWS instrument detected that the SED activities became intermittent and declined over ∼40 days until the signals became undetectable in early August. In late August, the SED radio signals resurged for 9 days. The storm left a vast dark area between 32°N and 38°N latitudes, surrounded by a highly disturbed region that resembles the mid-latitudes of Jupiter. Using ISS images, we also made cloud-tracking wind measurements that reveal differences in the cloud-level zonal wind profiles before and after the storm.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2008
Kunio M. Sayanagi; Timothy Edward Dowling
Three-dimensional numerical simulations of freely evolving stratified geostrophic turbulence on the plane are presented as a simplified model of zonal jet formation on Jupiter. This study samples the parameter space that covers the low, middle, and high latitudes of Jupiter by varying the central latitude of the plane. The results show that robust zonal jets can emerge from initial small-scale random turbulence through the upscale redistribution of the kinetic energy in the spectral space. The resulting flow’s sensitivities to the flow’s deformation radius LD and the two-dimensional Rhines length L U/ (U is the characteristic turbulence velocity and is the meridional gradient of the planetary vorticity) are tested, revealing that whether the outcome of the upscale energy transfer becomes dominated by jets or vortices depends on the relative values of LD and L. The values of L and LD are varied by tuning the -plane parameters, and it is found that the flow transitions from a jet-dominated regime in L LD to a vortical flow in L LD. A height-to-width ratio equal to f /N, the Coriolis parameter divided by the Brunt–Vaisala frequency, has previously been established for stable vortices, and this paper shows that this aspect ratio also applies to the zonal jets that emerge in these simulations.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Raul Morales-Juberias; Kunio M. Sayanagi; Amy A. Simon; Leigh N. Fletcher; Richard G. Cosentino
The Voyager flybys of Saturn in 1980–1981 revealed a circumpolar Hexagon at ~78° north planetographic latitude that has persisted for over 30 Earth years, more than one Saturn year, and has been observed by ground-based telescopes, Hubble Space Telescope and multiple instruments on board the Cassini orbiter. Its average phase speed is very slow with respect to the System III rotation rate, defined by the primary periodicity in the Saturn Kilometric Radiation during the Voyager era. Cloud tracking wind measurements reveal the presence of a prograde jet-stream whose path traces the Hexagons shape. Previous numerical models have produced large-amplitude, n = 6, wavy structures with westward intrinsic phase propagation (relative to the jet). However, the observed net phase speed has proven to be more difficult to achieve. Here we present numerical simulations showing that instabilities in shallow jets can equilibrate as meanders closely resembling the observed morphology and phase speed of Saturns northern Hexagon. We also find that the winds at the bottom of the model are as important as the winds at the cloud level in matching the observed Hexagons characteristics.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2010
Kunio M. Sayanagi; Raul Morales-Juberias; Andrew P. Ingersoll
Voyager observations of Saturn in 1980–81 discovered a wavy feature engirdling the planet at 47°N planetographic latitude. Its latitude coincides with that of an eastward jet stream, which is the second fastest on Saturn after the equatorial jet. The 47°N jet’s wavy morphology is unique among the known atmospheric jets on the gas giant planets. Since the Voyagers, it has been seen in every high-resolution image of this latitude for over 25 years and has been termed the Ribbon. The Ribbon has been interpreted as a dynamic instability in the jet stream. This study tests this interpretation and uses forward modeling to explore the observed zonal wind profile’s stability properties. Unforced, initial-value numerical experiments are performed to examine the nonlinear evolution of the jet stream. Parameter variations show that an instability occurs when the 47°N jet causes reversals in the potential vorticity (PV) gradient, which constitutes a violation of the Charney–Stern stability criterion. After the initial instability development, the simulations demonstrate that the instability’s amplitude nonlinearly saturates to a constant when the eddy generation by the instability is balanced by the destruction of the eddies. When the instability saturates, the zonal wind profile approaches neutral stability according to Arnol’d’s second criterion, and the jet’s path meanders in a Ribbon-like manner. It is demonstrated that the meandering of the 47°N jet occurs over a range of tropospheric static stability and background wind speed. The results here show that a nonlinearly saturated shear instability in the 47°N jet is a viable mechanism to produce the Ribbon morphology. Observations do not yet have the temporal coverage to confirm the creation and destruction of eddies, but these simulations predict that this is actively occurring in the Ribbon region. Similarities exist between the behaviors found in this model and the dynamics of PV fronts studied in the context of meandering western boundary currents in Earth’s oceans. In addition, the simulations capture the nonlinear aspects of a new feature discovered by the Cassini Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS), the String of Pearls, which resides in the equatorward tip of the 47°N jet. The Explicit Planetary Isentropic Coordinate (EPIC) model is used herein.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2018
Jacob L. Gunnarson; Kunio M. Sayanagi; John J. Blalock; Leigh N. Fletcher; Andrew P. Ingersoll; Ulyana A. Dyudina; Shawn P. Ewald; Robert L. Draham
Our data are available in the supporting information. Supporting Information: • Supporting Information SI • Movie S1 • Movie S2 • Data Set S1 • Data Set S2
Experimental Astronomy | 2012
C. S. Arridge; Craig Bruce Agnor; N. André; Kevin H. Baines; Leigh N. Fletcher; Daniel Gautier; Mark Hofstadter; G. H. Jones; L. Lamy; Y. Langevin; Olivier Mousis; Nadine Nettelmann; C. T. Russell; Tom Stallard; Matthew S. Tiscareno; Gabriel Tobie; Andrew Bacon; C. P. Chaloner; Michael Guest; Steve Kemble; Lisa Peacocke; Nicholas Achilleos; Thomas P. Andert; Donald J. Banfield; Stas Barabash; Mathieu Barthelemy; C. Bertucci; Pontus C Son Brandt; B. Cecconi; Supriya Chakrabarti
Experimental Astronomy | 2012
Jason W. Barnes; Lawrence G. Lemke; Rick Foch; Christopher P. McKay; Ross A. Beyer; Jani Radebaugh; David H. Atkinson; Ralph D. Lorenz; Stephane Le Mouelic; Sebastien Rodriguez; Jay Gundlach; Francesco Giannini; Sean Bain; F. Michael Flasar; Terry Anthony Hurford; Carrie M. Anderson; Jon Merrison; Máté Ádámkovics; Simon A. Kattenhorn; Jonathan L. Mitchell; Devon M. Burr; Anthony Colaprete; E. L. Schaller; A. James Friedson; Kenneth S. Edgett; Angioletta Coradini; A. Adriani; Kunio M. Sayanagi; Michael Malaska; David D. Morabito
Experimental Astronomy | 2012
Bruno Christophe; Linda J. Spilker; John D. Anderson; N. André; Sami W. Asmar; Jonathan M. Aurnou; Donald J. Banfield; Antonella M. Barucci; Orfeu Bertolami; R. Bingham; P. Brown; B. Cecconi; Jean-Michel Courty; Hansjörg Dittus; Leigh N. Fletcher; Bernard Foulon; Frederico Francisco; P. J. S. Gil; Karl-Heinz Glassmeier; William M. Grundy; Candice J. Hansen; Jörn Helbert; Ravit Helled; Hauke Hussmann; Brahim Lamine; Claus Lämmerzahl; L. Lamy; Rolland Lehoucq; Benjamin Lenoir; Agnès Levy
Icarus | 2007
Kunio M. Sayanagi
Annales Geophysicae | 2014
G. Fischer; S.-Y. Ye; J. B. Groene; Andrew P. Ingersoll; Kunio M. Sayanagi; J. D. Menietti; W. S. Kurth; D. A. Gurnett