Kuniyasu Irie

Renal Toxicity Associated with Weekly Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Combination Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Objective: A combination of weekly cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a new standard regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). This regimen does not require prolonged hydration schedules; however, the long-time safety profile has not been evaluated so far. In particular, the aim of this study was to evaluate the renal function during this regimen. Methods: We reviewed 79 consecutive patients with BTC who received the weekly cisplatin plus gemcitabine regimen. The incidence of adverse events was evaluated by CTCAE v4.0. Results: A total of 402 courses were administered. The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 250 mg (range: 25-825). The renal function was exacerbated gradually throughout the treatment course. The incidence of a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at <50 ml/min was significantly related to a pretreatment GFR at <80 ml/min and a total dose of cisplatin >400 mg [p = 0.011, odds ratio (OR) 58.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-1334.0 and p = 0.021, OR 18.3, 95% CI: 1.6-215.5]. Conclusions: The combination of weekly cisplatin and gemcitabine for advanced BTC gradually affected the renal function, and it was highly recommended to focus on both the change of GFR and total dose of cisplatin during this regimen.

Duodenal stenting followed by systemic chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer and gastric outlet obstruction

OBJECTIVES Endoscopic duodenal stenting has recently been proposed as a substitute for surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duodenal stenting followed by systemic chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with gastric outlet obstruction. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study, conducted at an academic medical center, of 71 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and gastric outlet obstruction (mean age: 67.6 years; range: 31-92 years) who underwent duodenal stenting with or without subsequent chemotherapy. Overall survival, duration of oral intake of foods, the rate of introduction of chemotherapy, progression-free survival, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS Stent placement was technically successful in 69 (97%) patients. Thirty-six (51%) patients were treated with chemotherapy: 17 with gemcitabine alone, 15 with S-1 alone, 3 with FOLFIRINOX, and 1 with paclitaxel. Median progression-free survival and overall survival after chemotherapy were 2.6 months (95% confidence interval: 1.3-3.9 months) and 4.7 months (95% confidence interval: 2.6-6.8 months), respectively. Cases of grade 3 anemia were frequently observed during chemotherapies following duodenal stenting (32%). Tumor stage, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and introduction of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for survival (hazard ratios of 3.73, 2.21, 2.69, and 1.85 with p-values of <0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that endoscopic duodenal stenting is an advantageous treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer patients with gastric outlet obstruction regarding its safety and smooth conduction of subsequent chemotherapies.

Effects of Vonoprazan Compared with Esomeprazole on the Healing of Artificial Postendoscopic Submucosal Dissection Ulcers: A Prospective, Multicenter, Two-Arm, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Vonoprazan affords more clinical benefits than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) during the healing of gastroduodenal ulcers. However, it remains controversial whether vonoprazan is more effective than PPIs when used to heal artificial ulcers arising after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Aim This study investigated the effects of vonoprazan compared with esomeprazole on the healing of post-ESD artificial ulcers. Methods Sixty patients who underwent gastric ESD between May 2015 and May 2017 were randomized to treatment with vonoprazan (V group) or esomeprazole (E group) for 8 weeks. Upper endoscopy was performed at 4 and 8 weeks after ESD, and drug effects were estimated based on the ulcer healing rates and shrinkage rates. Results Fifty-three patients were analyzed. The respective 4- and 8-week ulcer healing rates did not differ significantly between V and E groups (8.0 versus 11.5%, P = 0.669; 88.9 versus 84.6%, P = 0.420). Similarly, the respective 4- and 8-week ulcer shrinkage rates did not differ significantly between V and E groups (96.8 versus 97.5%, P = 0.656; 100 versus 100%, P = 0.257). Conclusion The healing of artificial ulcers after ESD did not differ using vonoprazan or esomeprazole. Both vonoprazan and esomeprazole were effective when used to promote artificial ulcer healing after ESD.

Short-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-loaded superabsorbent polymer microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with conventional transarterial chemoembolization.

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with epirubicin-loaded superabsorbent polymer embolics (SAP) and conventional TACE in TACE-naïve patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsFifty consecutive patients (mean age, 72.8 years; hepatitis C, 46%; BCLC-A or B, 52% or 48%) treated with TACE with SAP during 2013–2015 and 55 consecutive patients (mean age, 71.8 years; hepatitis C, 40%; BCLC-A or B, 51% or 49%) treated with conventional TACE during 2011–2013 were evaluated. Safety evaluations were based on CTCAE ver. 4.0. Short-term efficacies, i.e., at 1 month after TACE, were assessed using the European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria. Overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Short-term response markers were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the incidence of any grade of adverse events. The objective response rates were 50% and 62% in patients treated with TACE with SAP and with conventional TACE, respectively (P = 0.358). The overall survival rates were not significantly different (P = 0.810); the 1-year survival rates and the median survival time of the patients treated with TACE with SAP and with conventional TACE were 76% and 74%, and 18 months and 21 months, respectively. Overall survival was related to the short-term response. An alpha-fetoprotein level <1,000 ng/mL was a significant short-term response marker on multivariate analysis.ConclusionsFor TACE-naïve patients, TACE with SAP and conventional TACE had comparable safety and short-term efficacies.

Randomized trial of vonoprazan-based versus proton-pump inhibitor-based third-line triple therapy with sitafloxacin for Helicobacter pylori : Sitaflaoxacin and H. pylori eradication

This was a prospective, randomized trial of the efficacy of vonoprazan‐based and proton‐pump inhibitor‐based 7‐day triple regimens with amoxicillin and sitafloxacin as a third‐line therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori after failure of clarithromycin‐based and metronidazole‐based first‐line and second‐line therapy.

Activation of Signal Transduction and Activator of Transcription 3 Signaling Contributes to Helicobacter-Associated Gastric Epithelial Proliferation and Inflammation

Background/Aim Although IL-6-mediated activation of the signal transduction and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) axis is involved in inflammation and cancer, the role of STAT3 in Helicobacter-associated gastric inflammation and carcinogenesis is unclear. This study investigated the role of STAT3 in gastric inflammation and carcinogenesis and examined the molecular mechanism of Helicobacter-induced gastric phenotypes. Methods To evaluate the contribution of STAT3 to gastric inflammation and carcinogenesis, we used wild-type (WT) and gastric epithelial conditional Stat3-knockout (Stat3Δgec) mice. Mice were infected with Helicobacter felis and euthanized at 18 months postinfection. Mouse gastric organoids were treated with recombinant IL-6 (rIL-6) or rIL-11 and a JAK inhibitor (JAKi) to assess the role of IL-6/STAT3 signaling in vitro. Results Inflammation and mucous metaplasia were more severe in WT mice than in Stat3Δgec mice. The epithelial cell proliferation rate and STAT3 activation were increased in WT mice. Application of rIL-6 and rIL-11 induced expression of intestinal metaplasia-associated genes, such as Tff2; this induction was suppressed by JAKi administration. Conclusions Loss of STAT3 signaling in the gastric mucosa leads to decreased epithelial cell proliferation, atrophy, and metaplasia in the setting of Helicobacter infection. Therefore, activation of STAT3 signaling may play a key role in Helicobacter-associated gastric carcinogenesis.

Switch to miriplatin for multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin: a prospective study

Objective The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization using miriplatin, a platinum-based anticancer drug, as a retreatment regimen for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) unresponsive to chemoembolization using epirubicin. Methods Between April 2013 and December 2014, we enrolled 57 consecutive chamoembolization-naïve patients with unresectable HCC, and performed chemoembolization with epirubicin. Treatment effect, necrotizing rate of the target nodules, was evaluated at 1-3 months after treatment using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. We subsequently included retreatment chemoembolization with miriplatin for patients whose treatment effect was <50% after chemoembolization with epirubicin. The treatment effect after chemoembolization with miriplatin and the liver function before and after chemoembolization were evaluated. Results Eighteen patients of the 57 showed a treatment effect <50% after chemoembolization with epirubicin, and were switched to chemoembolization with miriplatin. The treatment effect after chemoembolization with miriplatin was ≥50% in four (22%) patients. Four of the remaining 14 (78%) patients who had <50% necrosis exhibited deterioration of the liver function after chemoembolization with miriplatin. Univariate analysis indicated that an alpha-fetprotein-L3 level <10% and a serum albumin level ≥3.6 g/dl were predictive factors of therapeutic response after chemoembolization with miriplatin (P < 0.05). However, there was no predictive factor regarding the deterioration of liver function after chemoembolization with miriplatin. Conclusions In unresectable HCC patients who were unresponsive to chemoembolization with epirubicin, switching the chemotherapeutic regimen to a platinum-based anticancer drug in retreatment chemoembolization should be considered as a treatment option. Trial registration: UMIN 000015887.

Unexpected Side Effects of a High S-1 Dose: Subanalysis of a Phase III Trial Comparing Gemcitabine, S-1 and Combinatorial Treatments for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Objective: In this subanalysis of a phase III trial using three categorized doses of S-1, the influence of the actual doses on safety and efficacy was evaluated. Methods: We compared the efficacy and safety of the S-1 or gemcitabine plus S-1 combination (GS) arm between the top 10% group and the bottom 10% group according to the initial doses of S-1: ≥77.6 versus ≤65.9 mg/m2/day (n = 28 vs. 28) in the S-1 arm, and ≥65.1 versus ≤53.8 mg/m2/day (n = 27 vs. 28) in the GS arm. Results: Overall and progression-free survival were not significantly different between these two groups: hazard ratios of 0.818 and 0.761 with p values of 0.498 and 0.330 in the S-1 arm, and hazard ratios of 0.836 and 0.759 with p values of 0.557 and 0.323 in the GS arm, respectively. Incidences of grade 3-4 hematological toxicities were significantly higher in the top 10% group than in the bottom 10% group: 42.9 versus 14.3 and 85.2 versus 57.1%, with p values of 0.037 and 0.037 in the S-1 and the GS combination arm, respectively. Conclusions: Higher actual doses of S-1 were associated with a higher incidence of hematological toxicity even in the same dose setting.