Kurt Weising

Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis

A phylogenetic analysis of Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae was carried out using sequence variation of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Our sampling included 108 species of these two families along with 29 species of Caryophyllales serving as outgroups. Phylogeny inferences with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood indicate that the two families form a well‐supported monophyletic clade that is sister to Achatocarpaceae. Despite extensive sampling, we found that the relationship between Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae remains unclear as a result of short and weakly supported basal branches. The clearly monophyletic Polycnemoideae (traditionally considered a subfamily of Chenopodiaceae) appear as sister to Amaranthaceae sensu stricto. Within Amaranthaceae, most major lineages inferred except Gomphrenoideae and Celosieae do not correspond to recognized subfamilies and tribes. Bosea and Charpentiera branch first in the Amaranthaceae. Within Chenopodiaceae, the genera of Betoideae occur in basal and largely unresolved positions. The remaining Chenopodiaceae are divided into three major clades of unclear relationship: Chenopodioideae (Atripliceae s.str., Chenopodieae I‐III); Corispermoideae (Corispermeae); and Salicornioideae (Haplopeplideae, Salicornieae), Suaedoideae (Suaedeae, Bienertieae), and Salsoloideae (Camphorosmeae, Sclerolaeneae, Salsoleae I‐II). The rbcL tree is discussed also with regard to historical classifications and morphological support for the major clades. The molecular results are used to elucidate the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in the two families. C4 photosynthesis has evolved independently at least three times in Amaranthaceae and at least 10 times in Chenopodiaceae. A survey of C4 leaf anatomy revealed 17 different leaf types that in most cases mark an independent origin of C4 photosynthesis. The application of a molecular clock indicates an age of C4 photosynthesis of 11.5–7.9 Ma in Atriplex (Chenopodioideae) and 21.6–14.5 Ma in subfamily Salsoloideae.

DNA Fingerprinting in Plants : Principles, Methods, and Applications, Second Edition

PREFACE REPETITIVE DNA: AN IMPORTANT SOURCE OF VARIATION IN EUKARYOTIC GENOMES Categories of DNA Sequence Mutations Tandem-Repetitive DNA: The Biology of Mini- and Microsatellites Minisatellites Microsatellites Transposable Elements Class I Transposons Class II Transposons Unclassified Transposons Transposons and Genome Evolution Transposons as Molecular Markers DETECTING DNA VARIATION BY MOLECULAR MARKERS Properties of Molecular Markers Traditional Marker Systems Protein Markers and Allozymes DNA Sequencing Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) Analysis The PCR Generation: Molecular Markers Based on In Vitro DNA Amplification Principle of the PCR Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences PCR with Arbitrary Primers: RAPD and Its Variants Microsatellites Inter-Repeat PCR DNA Profiling of Genic Regions: Resistance Gene Analog Polymorphism, Sequence-Related Amplified Polymorphism, and Target Region Amplification Polymorphism Hybridization of Microsatellites to RAPD and MP-PCR Products AFLP Analysis and Its Variants Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism Analysis and Related Techniques Miscellaneous Techniques LABORATORY EQUIPMENT METHODOLOGY Safety Precautions Isolation, Purification, and Quantitation of Plant DNA Collection and Preservation of Plant Tissue in the Field Plant DNA Extraction: General Considerations CTAB Protocol I CTAB Protocol II SDS-Potassium Acetate Protocol DNA Preparation via Nuclei Quantitation of DNA Basic Molecular Techniques Restriction of DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction DNA Sequencing Agarose Gel Electrophoresis PAA Gel Electrophoresis Detection of DNA in Gels Gel Drying Southern Blotting Generation of Radiolabeled Probes, Primers, and PCR Products Blot Hybridization Signal Detection PCR with Arbitrary Primers Standard RAPD Protocol Influence of Reaction Conditions and Components Modifications Microsatellite-Primed PCR Standard Protocol of Microsatellite-Primed PCR Influence of Reaction Conditions and Components Modifications PCR and Hybridization: Combinatory Techniques Assessing the Genomic Copy Number of PCR Amplicons Testing the Homology of Comigrating Bands Random Amplified Polymorphic Microsatellites Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Standard AFLP Protocol Using Radioisotopes AFLP Protocol Using Fluorescence-Labeled Primers Selective Amplification of Microsatellite Polymorphic Loci and Microsatellite AFLP Protocols Technical Aspects and Modifications Robustness and Reproducibility Generation and Analysis of Microsatellite Markers Microsatellite Analysis Using Radioisotopes Microsatellite Analysis Using Fluorochromes Technical Aspects and Modifications Generating Microsatellite Markers Without Cloning Microsatellite Cloning CAPS Analysis of cpDNA and mtDNA Standard CAPS Protocol Choice of CAPS Primers EVALUATION OF MOLECULAR MARKER DATA Robustness and Reproducibility Reliability Band Homology Band Linkage and Neutrality Fragment Sizing and Matching General Precautions Equipment Multilocus vs. Single-Locus Approaches Multilocus Markers Single-Locus Markers and Polyploids Band Sharing and Genetic Distances Coefficients of Similarity Dissimilarity Coefficients and Genetic Distances Identity and Uniqueness Clonal Structure Ordination, Clustering, and Dendrograms Ordination Techniques Construction of Dendrograms Population Genetic Analysis Measures of Variation Genetic Differentiation between Populations Genetic Distances between Populations Inbreeding Coefficient and Mating Systems Estimation of Relatedness and Paternity Testing Migration and Hybridization Gene Flow, Isolation-by-Distance, and Spatial Structure Phylogeography and Nested Clade Analysis Statistical Testing of Hypotheses: Analytical and Computational Methods APPLICATIONS OF DNA FINGERPRINTING IN PLANT SCIENCES A Brief History of DNA Fingerprinting Minisatellite and Oligonucleotide DNA Probes Detect Genetic Variation PCR-Based Methods Enter the Stage Microsatellite DNA Analyses Yield Codominant Markers Universal Organellar DNA Primers Produce Uniparental Markers Genotype Identification Individual-Specific DNA Fingerprints Cultivar Identification In Vitro-Propagated Plant Material and Somaclonal Variation Sports and Other Mutants Genetic Diversity Variation and Relatedness among Cultivars Analysis of Population Genetic Diversity and Its Distribution Hybridization and Introgression Plant Conservation Germplasm Characterization and Preservation Plant Taxonomy and Systematics Taxonomic Relationships Revealed by Multilocus DNA Methods Microsatellite Markers in Taxonomic Studies Taxonomic Consequences from DNA Profiling Data Phylogeography Phylogeography Based on cpDNA Phylogeography Based on Nuclear Genes LINKAGE ANALYSIS AND GENETIC MAPS Generating High-Density Genetic Maps Selection of Parent Plants Mapping Population Linkage Analysis The Genetic Map Cytogenetic Maps Genetic vs. Physical Maps Synteny: The Comparative Analysis of Genomes Marker-Assisted Selection Molecular Markers and Positional Cloning WHICH MARKER FOR WHAT PURPOSE: A COMPARISON Morphological Characters and Allozymes vs. DNA Markers Different Kinds of DNA Markers Discriminatory Power Genetic Distances Within- and Among-Population Variation Gene Tagging and Genetic Linkage Mapping Costs Conclusions FUTURE PROSPECTS: SNIPS AND CHIPS FOR DNA AND RNA PROFILING Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms What Is a SNiP SNP Discovery DNA Microarrays Expression Profiling and Expression Markers APPENDIX 1: PLANT DNA ISOLATION PROTOCOLS APPENDIX 2: SUPPLIERS AND SELLERS OF REAGENTS AND EQUIPMENT APPENDIX 3: COMPUTER PROGRAMS DEALING WITH THE EVALUATION OF DNA SEQUENCE VARIATION AND MOLECULAR MARKER DATA APPENDIX 4: WEB PAGES OF INTEREST REFERENCES INDEX

Oligonucleotide Fingerprinting Using Simple Repeat Motifs: A Convenient, Ubiquitously Applicable Method to Detect Hypervariability for Multiple Purposes

A panel of simple repetitive oligonucleotide probes has been designed and tested for multilocus DNA fingerprinting in some 200 fungal, plant and animal species as well as man. To date at least one of the probes has been found to be informative in each species. The human genome, however, has been the major target of many fingerprinting studies. Using the probe (CAC)5 or (GTG)5, individualization of all humans is possible except for monozygotic twins. Paternity analyses are now performed on a routine basis by the use of multilocus fingerprints, including also cases of deficiency, i.e. where one of the parents is not available for analysis. In forensic science stain analysis is feasible in all tissue remains containing nucleated cells. Depending on the degree of DNA degradation a variety of oligonucleotides are informative, and they have been proven useful in actual case work. Advantages in comparison to other methods including enzymatic DNA amplification techniques (PCR) are evident. Fingerprint patterns of tumors may be changed due to the gain or loss of chromosomes and/or intrachromosomal deletion and amplification events. Locus-specific probes were isolated from the human (CAC)5/(GTG)5 fingerprint with a varying degree of informativeness (monomorphic versus truly hypervariable markers). The feasibility of three different approaches for the isolation of hypervariable mono-locus probes was evaluated. Finally, one particular mixed simple (gt)n(ga)m repeat locus in the second intron of the HLA-DRB genes has been scrutinized to allow comparison of the extent of exon-encoded (protein-) polymorphisms versus intronic hypervariability of simple repeats: adjacent to a single gene sequence (e.g. HLA-DRB1*0401) many different length alleles were found. Group-specific structures of basic repeats were identified within the evolutionarily related DRB alleles. As a further application it is suggested here that due to the ubiquitous interspersion of their targets, short probes for simple repeat sequences are especially useful tools for ordering genomic cosmid, yeast artificial chromosome and phage banks.

Microsatellites for cultivar identification in Pelargonium

Abstract We have isolated and characterised microsatellite loci from Pelargonium sp. to explore the potential of these markers for cultivar identification. Small-insert libraries from a zonal (Pelargoniumxhortorum cv. Isabell) and an ivy-leaved variety (P. peltatum cv. Guenievre gergue) were enriched for d(AG), d(AC), d(CAA), d(GAA) and d(GATA) repeats. Of 141 positive clones sequenced, 133 contained a microsatellite. Primers for PCR amplification were designed to the flanking regions of 57 microsatellites, resulting in interpretable amplification products of the expected size for 29 loci. Seventeen primer pairs amplifying 18 loci were used to fingerprint 44 di- and tetra-ploid Pelargonium accessions representative of commercially available varieties. Multilocus genotypes obtained at 3 loci distinguished among all accessions, except for three known flower colour sports and a fourth, phenotypically very similar, variety. Allelic composition was also identical within two other sport ’families’ typed at the same 18 loci. UPGMA and principal co-ordinate analysis of pairwise distance matrices derived from PCR amplification patterns revealed four distinct assemblages. The first group consisted of tetraploid P.x hortorum varieties; a second group contained diploid P. x hortorum, a third, tetraploid P. peltatum accessions, while a fourth, very distinct, group consisted solely of diploid P. peltatum varieties. Polymorphism in P. peltatum was equal or greater than in P. x hortorum at 17 of the 18 loci, indicating that the analysed P. peltatum varieties form a genetically more variable array.

An integrated molecular and morphological study of the subfamily Suaedoideae Ulbr. (Chenopodiaceae)

Abstract.As part of an ongoing project on the phylogeny and taxonomy of Chenopodiaceae with emphasis on the evolution of photosynthetic pathways, we sequenced the nuclear ribosomal ITS region and two chloroplast DNA regions (atpB-rbcL and psbB-psbH) of 43 taxa belonging to subfamily Suaedoideae (Chenopodiaceae). Our sampling covered 41 of c. 82 known species and subspecies of Suaeda, beside several taxa not yet described, the monotypic genera Bienertia and Borszczowia as well as some representatives of Salicornioideae that served as outgroups. In addition, we carried out morphological and leaf anatomical studies on an extended sampling set, also including the monotypic genus Alexandra. Phylograms resulting from maximum parsimony analyses of separate and combined data sets share several common features. (1) Suaeda is monophyletic if Borszczowia is included. (2) The position of Bienertia is ambiguous, being sister to Suaeda in both chloroplast trees, but showing affinities to Salicornioideae in the ITS tree. (3) Suaeda deeply divides into two well-supported clades. One clade (Brezia clade) solely consists of the annual C3 species of sect. Brezia. The second clade (Suaeda clade) includes all other sections. (4) The subclades of the Suaeda clade are in general agreement with currently accepted sections. A reassessment of morphological and anatomical characters on the background of the molecular trees resulted in the recognition of pistil morphology and leaf type as key characters. All major molecular clades are precisely defined by characteristic combinations of pistil and leaf types. The following taxonomic conclusions are drawn: the status of Bienertieae Ulbr. is confirmed; Suaeda is subdivided into the new subgenera Brezia (Moq.) Freitag & Schütze and Suaeda;Borszczowia is recombined into Suaeda and given sectional rank; within Suaeda, sects. Brezia, Schanginia, Borszczowia, Suaeda, Physophora, Schoberia and Salsina are recognized with some changes in circumscription; Alexandra is maintained at generic level because of the lack of molecular data and its striking morphological differences from Suaeda. A conspectus of Suaedoideae containing recognized species and all supraspecific taxa is given. The molecular results confirm that C4 photosynthesis has evolved independently four times in the subfamily.

DNA fingerprinting in botany: past, present, future.

Almost three decades ago Alec Jeffreys published his seminal Nature papers on the use of minisatellite probes for DNA fingerprinting of humans (Jeffreys and colleagues Nature 1985, 314:67–73 and Nature 1985, 316:76–79). The new technology was soon adopted for many other organisms including plants, and when Hilde Nybom, Kurt Weising and Alec Jeffreys first met at the very First International Conference on DNA Fingerprinting in Berne, Switzerland, in 1990, everybody was enthusiastic about the novel method that allowed us for the first time to discriminate between humans, animals, plants and fungi on the individual level using DNA markers. A newsletter coined “Fingerprint News” was launched, T-shirts were sold, and the proceedings of the Berne conference filled a first book on “DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications”. Four more conferences were about to follow, one on each continent, and Alec Jeffreys of course was invited to all of them. Since these early days, methodologies have undergone a rapid evolution and diversification. A multitude of techniques have been developed, optimized, and eventually abandoned when novel and more efficient and/or more reliable methods appeared. Despite some overlap between the lifetimes of the different technologies, three phases can be defined that coincide with major technological advances. Whereas the first phase of DNA fingerprinting (“the past”) was dominated by restriction fragment analysis in conjunction with Southern blot hybridization, the advent of the PCR in the late 1980s gave way to the development of PCR-based single- or multi-locus profiling techniques in the second phase. Given that many routine applications of plant DNA fingerprinting still rely on PCR-based markers, we here refer to these methods as “DNA fingerprinting in the present”, and include numerous examples in the present review. The beginning of the third phase actually dates back to 2005, when several novel, highly parallel DNA sequencing strategies were developed that increased the throughput over current Sanger sequencing technology 1000-fold and more. High-speed DNA sequencing was soon also exploited for DNA fingerprinting in plants, either in terms of facilitated marker development, or directly in the sense of “genotyping-by-sequencing”. Whereas these novel approaches are applied at an ever increasing rate also in non-model species, they are still far from routine, and we therefore treat them here as “DNA fingerprinting in the future”.

A chloroplast genealogy of myrmecophytic Macaranga species (Euphorbiaceae) in Southeast Asia reveals hybridization, vicariance and long‐distance dispersals

Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) includes about 280 species with a palaeotropic distribution. The genus not only comprises some of the most prominent pioneer tree species in Southeast Asian lowland dipterocarp forests, it also exhibits a substantial radiation of ant‐plants (myrmecophytes). Obligate ant‐plant mutualisms are formed by about 30 Macaranga species and 13 ant species of the genera Crematogaster or Camponotus. To improve our understanding of the co‐evolution of the ants and their host plants, we aim at reconstructing comparative organellar phylogeographies of both partners across their distributional range. Preliminary evidence indicated that chloroplast DNA introgression among closely related Macaranga species might occur. We therefore constructed a comprehensive chloroplast genealogy based on DNA sequence data from the noncoding ccmp2, ccmp6, and atpB‐rbcL regions for 144 individuals from 41 Macaranga species, covering all major evolutionary lineages within the three sections that contain myrmecophytes. A total of 88 chloroplast haplotypes were identified, and grouped into a statistical parsimony network that clearly distinguished sections and well‐defined subsectional groups. Within these groups, the arrangement of haplotypes followed geographical rather than taxonomical criteria. Thus, up to six chloroplast haplotypes were found within single species, and up to seven species shared a single haplotype. The spatial distribution of the chloroplast types revealed several dispersals between the Malay Peninsula and Borneo, and a deep split between Sabah and the remainder of Borneo. Our large‐scale chloroplast genealogy highlights the complex history of migration, hybridization, and speciation in the myrmecophytes of the genus Macaranga. It will serve as a guideline for adequate sampling and data interpretation in phylogeographic studies of individual Macaranga species and species groups.

Abundance and polymorphism of di-, tri-and tetra-nucleotide tandem repeats in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

The abundance and polymorphism of 38 different simple-sequence repeat motifs was studied in four accessions of cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by in-gel hybridization of synthetic oligonucleotides to genomic DNA digested with 14 different restriction enzymes. Among 38 probes tested, 35 yielded detectable hybridization signals. The abundance and level of polymorphism of the target sequences varied considerably. The probes fell into three broad categories: (1) probes yielding distinct, polymorphic banding patterns; (2) probes yielding distinct, monomorphic banding patterns, and (3) probes yielding blurred patterns, or diffused bands superimposed on a high in lane background. No obvious correlation existed between abundance, fingerprint quality, and the sequence characteristics of a particular motif. Digestion with methyl-sensitive enzymes revealed that simple-sequence motifs are enriched in highly methylated genomic regions. The high level of intraspecific polymorphism detected by oligonucleotide fingerprinting suggests the suitability of simple-sequence repeat probes as molecular markers for genome mapping.

Abundance and polymorphism of simple repetitive DNA sequences in Bmssica napus L.

SummaryThe Brassica napus genome has been investigated by DNA fingerprinting with six synthetic oligonucleotide probes complementary to simple repetitive sequences, namely (GATA)4, (GACA)4, (GGAT)4, (CA)8, (CT)8 and (GTG)5. While all sequence motifs were found to be present in the B. napus genome, their organization and abundance varied considerably. Among the investigated probes, (GATA)4 revealed the highest level of intraspecific polymorphism and distinguishes not only between cultivars but even between different individuals belonging to the same cultivar. In contrast, (GTG)5, (GACA)4 and (GGAT)4 produced relatively homogeneous fingerprint patterns throughout different cultivars, while hybridization to (CT)8 and (CA)8 resulted in only a few weak bands superimposed on a smear. The isoschizomeric pair Hpa II and Msp I revealed the presence of methylated cytosines in the vicinity of (GATA)m repeats. The applicability of simple repetitive sequence polymorphisms as molecular markers for Brassica species is discussed.

DNA fingerprinting of Ascochyta rabiei with synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides

SummaryThe ascomycete fungus Ascochyta rabiei, an important pathogen of the grain legume crop chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in the Mediterranean region, has not been adequately characterized in molecular terms. We therefore used DNA fingerprinting, with synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides complementary to simple repetitive sequences, to pathotype different isolates of the fungus. Six single-spored A. rabiei isolates were first categorized using a host differential set of nine chickpea genotypes. Seedlings were inoculated under controlled environmental conditions, and disease severity was recorded 9 days after inoculation. DNA was extracted from in vitro-grown mycelia of the six purified fungal isolates, restricted with EcoRI, HinfI, MboII and TaqI, and fingerprinted with radiolabeled (GATA)4, (GTG)5, (CA)8, and (TCC)5, respectively. High levels of polymorphism were detected with optimal enzyme/probe combinations that allow one to discriminate between the isolates. The potential of DNA fingerprinting with simple repetitive sequences can thus be expanded to the identification of fungal races and pathotypes. The characterization of the geographic distribution and genetic variability of pathotypes will facilitate the selection of suitable host cultivars to be grown in specific regions.