Kwok Chi Lam

Lamivudine for the Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Hepatitis B s-Antigen Seropositive Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

PURPOSE For cancer patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well described complication resulting in varying degrees of liver damage. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy of the antiviral agent lamivudine in reducing the incidence of HBV reactivation and diminishing morbidity and mortality of cancer patients with chronic HBV infection during chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two groups were compared in this nonrandomized study. The prophylactic lamivudine group consisted of 65 patients in a phase II study who were treated with lamivudine before and until 8 weeks after discontinuing chemotherapy. The historical controls consisted of 193 consecutive patients who underwent chemotherapy without prophylactic lamivudine. Significant prognosticators for the development of HBV reactivation were determined based on data from the controls. Potential confounding factors were identified between the two groups. The outcomes were compared. RESULTS In the controls, lymphoma and anthracycline usage were factors identified to be associated with reactivation. The two groups were comparable in most baseline characteristics, although in the prophylactic lamivudine group, there were significantly more patients with lymphoma and receiving anthracyclines. In the prophylactic lamivudine group, there was significantly less HBV reactivation (4.6% v 24.4% in the controls; P <.001), fewer incidences of hepatitis (17.5% v 44.6%; P <.0001) that were less severe (4.8% v 18.7%; P =.0005), and less disruption of chemotherapy (15.4% v 34.6%; P =.0029). The reduction in overall mortality was not statistically different. CONCLUSION Prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduced the incidence of HBV reactivation and the overall morbidity of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors associating with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy

For cancer patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy, HBV reactivation is a well-described complication, which may result in varying degrees of liver damage. Several clinical features and the pre-chemotherapy HBV viral load have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of developing the condition: (1) to assess the clinical and virological factors in a comprehensive manner and thereby identify those that are associated with the development of HBV reactivation; (2) to develop a predictive model to quantify the risk of HBV reactivation. In all, 138 consecutive cancer patients who were HBV carriers and undergoing chemotherapy were studied, of which 128 patients had sera available for real-time PCR HBV DNA measurement. They were followed up throughout their course of chemotherapy and the HBV reactivation rate was determined. The clinical and virological features between those who did and did not develop viral reactivation were compared. These included age, sex, baseline liver function tests, HBeAg status and viral load (HBV DNA) prior to the chemotherapy, and the use of specific cytotoxic agents. In all, 36 (26%) developed HBV reactivation. Multivariate analysis revealed pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA level, the use of steroids and a diagnosis of lymphoma or breast cancer to be significant factors. Based on real-time HBV DNA PCR assay, detectable baseline HBV DNA prior to the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy, the use of steroids and a diagnosis of lymphoma or breast cancer are predictive factors for the development of HBV reactivation. A predictive model was developed from the current data, based on a logistic regression method.

New Utility of an Old Marker: Serial α-Fetoprotein Measurement in Predicting Radiologic Response and Survival of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Systemic Chemotherapy

PURPOSE There are limitations in using radiologic evaluation to assess the treatment outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The use of serial alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in monitoring response has not been rigorously evaluated. We aimed to study the clinical value of AFP trend in an attempt to validate AFP as a surrogate serologic end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants from a phase III randomized trial of systemic chemotherapy in HCC were studied. Serum AFP was prospectively collected in parallel with clinical and radiologic outcome. AFP response was defined as a decrease in AFP of more than 20% after a minimum of two cycles of chemotherapy. We studied the relationship between AFP response and treatment outcome in terms of radiologic response and overall survival. RESULTS Of 188 patients, 117 patients with elevated serum AFP (> 20 microg/L) and documented radiologic evaluation had received at least two cycles of chemotherapy. A total of 47 AFP responders were identified. AFP responders had better survival than nonresponders (13.5 v 5.6 months, respectively; P < .0001), and AFP response was strongly associated with radiologic response (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis suggested that AFP response was significantly associated with survival (hazard ratio, 0.413; 95% CI, 0.273 to 0.626; P < .0001). AFP responses were frequently observed in patients with radiologically stable disease (SD) and tended to identify a subgroup of SD patients with better survival. CONCLUSION Serial AFP measurement is useful in prognostication and monitoring treatment response in HCC patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Incorporation of AFP response into the criteria evaluating treatment outcome should be considered in clinical practice and clinical trials of novel agents in HCC.

Lamivudine in the treatment of hepatitis B virus reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been described in cancer patients who received cytotoxic/immunosuppressive therapy and may result in liver damage of varying degrees of severity. There is no known effective treatment. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, has been found to suppress HBV replication and to improve histology in chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus. The outcome of lamivudine therapy (at doses of 100 or 150 mg/day) in eight patients who developed HBV reactivation while receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy is described. Each of the eight patients had >98% suppression of the pretreatment HBV DNA levels. Three of the five patients who were initially HBeAg positive underwent seroconversion. Five patients had normalization of liver function tests and improvement in clinical condition. However, one patient died of hepatic failure due to HBV‐related submassive liver necrosis, and two died of widespread metastases (including liver) from the primary malignancies. It is concluded that early commencement, i.e., at the onset of HBV reactivation before severe hepatic decompensation, of lamivudine may be effective in the control of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy. In Hong Kong, where hepatitis B infection is endemic, we propose to screen all cancer patients for hepatitis B surface antigen before immunosuppressive/cytotoxic therapy, and to closely monitor liver function of those who are found to be HBsAg seropositive. J. Med. Virol. 59:263–269, 1999.

Health-Related Quality-of-Life in a Randomized Phase III First-Line Study of Gefitinib Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Clinically Selected Patients from Asia with Advanced NSCLC (IPASS)

Introduction: Evaluation of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and symptom improvement were preplanned secondary objectives for the overall population and posthoc analyses for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive/negative subgroups in IPASS. Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) and Trial Outcome Index (TOI); symptom improvement by the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS). Improvements defined as: 6 or more (FACT-L; TOI), 2 or more (LCS) points increase maintained for 21 or more days. Results: Overall (n = 1151/1217 evaluable), HRQoL improvement rates were significantly greater with gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel; symptom improvement rates were similar for both treatments. Significantly more patients recorded improvements in HRQoL and symptoms with gefitinib in the EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (n = 259; FACT-L 70.2% versus 44.5%; odds ratio, 3.01 [95% confidence interval, 1.79–5.07]; p < 0.001; TOI 70.2% versus 38.3%; 3.96 [2.33–6.71]; p < 0.001; LCS 75.6% versus 53.9%; 2.70 [1.58–4.62]; p < 0.001), and with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the EGFR mutation-negative subgroup (n = 169; FACT-L 14.6% versus 36.3%; odds ratio, 0.31 [0.15–0.65]; p = 0.002; TOI 12.4% versus 28.8%; 0.35 [0.16–0.79]; p = 0.011; LCS 20.2% versus 47.5%; 0.28 [0.14–0.55]; p < 0.001). Median time-to-worsening (months) FACT-L score was longer with gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel for the overall population (8.3 versus 2.5) and EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (15.6 versus 3.0), and similar for both treatments in the EGFR mutation-negative subgroup (1.4 versus 1.4). Median time-to-improvement with gefitinib was 8 days in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors who improved. Conclusions: HRQoL and symptom endpoints were consistent with efficacy outcomes in IPASS and favored gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors and carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with EGFR mutation-negative tumors.

Use of lamivudine to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

In parts of Asia, about 10% of the population have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and cancer patients who are HBV carriers are frequently complicated by HBV reactivation while receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. The condition may result in varying degrees of liver damage, causing disruption in chemotherapy and compromising the patients’ prognosis. With the increasing use of chemotherapy paralleling the rise in breast cancer incidence, the occurrence of HBV reactivation is likely to further increase. Recent reports have suggested that the anti-viral agent, lamivudine, may reduce HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity. However, most studies are based on small series of lymphoma patients, while information on the other high risk population, namely breast cancer patients, has been lacking. In this study, we studied the role of lamivudine in preventing HBV reactivation and its associated morbidity in breast cancer patients with chronic HBV infection who were planned for chemotherapy. Two groups were studied. One group consisted of 31 patients who received ‘prophylactic lamivudine’ prior to and until 8 weeks after discontinuing chemotherapy. The other comprised of 61 historical controls who underwent chemotherapy without prophylactic lamivudine. The outcomes, in terms of the efficacy of lamivudine in reducing the incidence of HBV reactivation, and diminishing morbidity during chemotherapy were compared. The results revealed that in the prophylactic lamivudine group, despite a significantly higher proportion receiving anthracyclines, there was significantly fewer incidences of hepatitis (12.9 vs. 59.0%, p < 0.001), less HBV reactivation (6.5. vs. 31.1%, p=0.008), and less disruption of chemotherapy (16.1% vs. 45.9%, p=0.006). We conclude that prophylactic lamivudine significantly reduces the incidence of HBV reactivation and the overall morbidity of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Treating Patients With EGFR-Sensitizing Mutations: First Line or Second Line—Is There a Difference?

First-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR TKI) is a standard treatment for patients with activating EGFR mutations. Six randomized studies have demonstrated consistent improvement in tumor response rate and progression-free survival over platinum-based combination chemotherapy. The only reason to consider EGFR TKI as second-line therapy is that none of the six comparative studies has shown improvement in overall survival, which can be explained by the high proportion of patients from the chemotherapy arm crossing over to the EGFR TKI arm on progression. It is true that patients with EGFR mutations may benefit from second-line EGFR TKI therapy, but we cannot conclude that the benefit is either equal to or inferior to first-line EGFR TKI therapy. To date, there are no direct comparative data between first- and second-line EGFR TKI in patients with activating EGFR mutations. Tumor response rates to second-line EGFR TKI have been inconsistent, which could potentially be explained by the impact of first-line chemotherapy on the abundance of tumor cells with activating EGFR mutations. However, numerous arguments, including assurance on drug exposure, improvement in quality of life, better tolerance by patients with poor performance status, and deferral of whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastasis, support the general application of first-line EGFR TKI.

Multimodality treatment of primary lymphoepithelioma‐like carcinoma of the lung

Lymphoepithelioma‐like carcinoma (LELC) of the lung occurs at a higher frequency in Asian compared with Western patients. Its association with Epstein‐Barr virus varies among different ethnic groups.

Targeted therapy: An evolving world of lung cancer

Lung cancer remains one of the most fatal illnesses. Recent development in cancer genomics and molecular targeted therapy leads to a paradigm shift in management of advanced‐stage non‐small cell lung cancer. Patients with activated mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) responded dramatically to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib or erlotinib. Multiple randomized studies have showed EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to be superior to standard first‐line chemotherapy in this biomarker‐selected population. As the vasculature is considered to be the ‘Achillus heel’ of the tumour, anti‐angiogenic treatment is considered to be a suitable target. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor may improve the efficacy of chemotherapy, although a practical biomarker has not been identified. We have entered an era of personalized therapy for lung cancer and this evolvement holds great promises for better treatment in future.

Chemotherapy Response in East Asian Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Wild-Type or Activating Mutation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors

Introduction: Previous exploratory analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutational status in tumor samples from randomized clinical studies suggested that patients with activating mutation of the EGFR had better survival than those harboring wild-type EGFR. Methods: We analyzed the EGFR sequence of tumor samples from advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients previously participated in treatment clinical trials. Responses to chemotherapy and survival of EGFR mutation-positive or -negative patients were compared. Results: Tumor samples from 122 patients were available for analysis. EGFR mutation was present in 58 patients (47.5%). In 105 stage IIIB/IV patients, there was a nonstatistically significant trend toward a higher chemotherapy response rate of patients with mutated EGFR than those with wild-type EGFR (44.6% versus 30.6%, p = 0.162). Female, never-smoking, and adenocarcinoma patients lived longer than male (p = 0.0139), smoking (p = 0.0045), or nonadenocarcinoma (p = 0.0151) patients. There was no difference in the survival of patients with mutated or wild-type EGFR (p = 0.2159). There was no difference in progression-free survival of first-line chemotherapy between patients with wild-type or mutation in EGFR (6.6 months versus 6.1 months). Conclusion: There is a nonstatistically significant trend toward a higher chemotherapy response rate in patients with mutated EGFR than those with wild-type EGFR. EGFR gene mutation is not a predictive biomarker for progression-free and overall survival to cytotoxic chemotherapy in East Asians with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.