Kyle MacDonald
Stanford University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kyle MacDonald.
Cognitive Psychology | 2017
Kyle MacDonald; Daniel Yurovsky; Michael C. Frank
Because children hear language in environments that contain many things to talk about, learning the meaning of even the simplest word requires making inferences under uncertainty. A cross-situational statistical learner can aggregate across naming events to form stable word-referent mappings, but this approach neglects an important source of information that can reduce referential uncertainty: social cues from speakers (e.g., eye gaze). In four large-scale experiments with adults, we tested the effects of varying referential uncertainty in cross-situational word learning using social cues. Social cues shifted learners away from tracking multiple hypotheses and towards storing only a single hypothesis (Experiments 1 and 2). In addition, learners were sensitive to graded changes in the strength of a social cue, and when it became less reliable, they were more likely to store multiple hypotheses (Experiment 3). Finally, learners stored fewer word-referent mappings in the presence of a social cue even when given the opportunity to visually inspect the objects for the same amount of time (Experiment 4). Taken together, our data suggest that the representations underlying cross-situational word learning of concrete object labels are quite flexible: In conditions of greater uncertainty, learners store a broader range of information.
Royal Society Open Science | 2018
Tom E. Hardwicke; Maya Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C. Banks; Mallory C. Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton; Erica J. Yoon; Michael Henry Tessler; Richie L. Lenne; Sara Altman; Bria Long; Michael C. Frank
Access to data is a critical feature of an efficient, progressive and ultimately self-correcting scientific ecosystem. But the extent to which in-principle benefits of data sharing are realized in practice is unclear. Crucially, it is largely unknown whether published findings can be reproduced by repeating reported analyses upon shared data (‘analytic reproducibility’). To investigate this, we conducted an observational evaluation of a mandatory open data policy introduced at the journal Cognition. Interrupted time-series analyses indicated a substantial post-policy increase in data available statements (104/417, 25% pre-policy to 136/174, 78% post-policy), although not all data appeared reusable (23/104, 22% pre-policy to 85/136, 62%, post-policy). For 35 of the articles determined to have reusable data, we attempted to reproduce 1324 target values. Ultimately, 64 values could not be reproduced within a 10% margin of error. For 22 articles all target values were reproduced, but 11 of these required author assistance. For 13 articles at least one value could not be reproduced despite author assistance. Importantly, there were no clear indications that original conclusions were seriously impacted. Mandatory open data policies can increase the frequency and quality of data sharing. However, suboptimal data curation, unclear analysis specification and reporting errors can impede analytic reproducibility, undermining the utility of data sharing and the credibility of scientific findings.
Developmental Science | 2018
Kyle MacDonald; Todd LaMarr; David P. Corina; Virginia A. Marchman; Anne Fernald
When children interpret spoken language in real time, linguistic information drives rapid shifts in visual attention to objects in the visual world. This language-vision interaction can provide insights into childrens developing efficiency in language comprehension. But how does language influence visual attention when the linguistic signal and the visual world are both processed via the visual channel? Here, we measured eye movements during real-time comprehension of a visual-manual language, American Sign Language (ASL), by 29 native ASL-learning children (16-53 mos, 16 deaf, 13 hearing) and 16 fluent deaf adult signers. All signers showed evidence of rapid, incremental language comprehension, tending to initiate an eye movement before sign offset. Deaf and hearing ASL-learners showed similar gaze patterns, suggesting that the in-the-moment dynamics of eye movements during ASL processing are shaped by the constraints of processing a visual language in real time and not by differential access to auditory information in day-to-day life. Finally, variation in childrens ASL processing was positively correlated with age and vocabulary size. Thus, despite competition for attention within a single modality, the timing and accuracy of visual fixations during ASL comprehension reflect information processing skills that are important for language acquisition regardless of language modality.
Cognitive Development | 2013
Kyle MacDonald; Mariah G. Schug; Elizabeth Chase; Hilary Barth
Cognitive Science | 2017
Kyle MacDonald; Aviva Blonder; Virginia A. Marchman; Anne Fernald; Michael C. Frank
Cognitive Science | 2016
Kyle MacDonald; Michael C. Frank
Archive | 2018
Tom E Hardwicke; Maya Mathur; Kyle MacDonald; Gustav Nilsonne; George C. Banks; Mallory C. Kidwell; Alicia Hofelich Mohr; Elizabeth Clayton; Erica J. Yoon; Michael Henry Tessler; Richie L. Lenne; Sara Altman; Bria Long; Michael C. Frank
Archive | 2018
Kyle MacDonald; Elizabeth Swanson; Michael C. Frank
Archive | 2017
Kyle MacDonald; Michael C. Frank
Archive | 2017
Tom E. Hardwicke; Kyle MacDonald; Bria Long; Michèle B. Nuijten; Emily Hembacher; Manuel Bohn; Erica J. Yoon; Michael C. Frank