Kyohei Yamaji

Mechanisms of Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Background— The pathomechanisms underlying very late stent thrombosis (VLST) after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) are incompletely understood. Using optical coherence tomography, we investigated potential causes of this adverse event. Methods and Results— Between August 2010 and December 2014, 64 patients were investigated at the time point of VLST as part of an international optical coherence tomography registry. Optical coherence tomography pullbacks were performed after restoration of flow and analyzed at 0.4 mm. A total of 38 early- and 20 newer-generation drug-eluting stents were suitable for analysis. VLST occurred at a median of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 3.1–7.5 years). An underlying putative cause by optical coherence tomography was identified in 98% of cases. The most frequent findings were strut malapposition (34.5%), neoatherosclerosis (27.6%), uncovered struts (12.1%), and stent underexpansion (6.9%). Uncovered and malapposed struts were more frequent in thrombosed compared with nonthrombosed regions (ratio of percentages, 8.26; 95% confidence interval, 6.82–10.04; P<0.001 and 13.03; 95% confidence interval, 10.13–16.93; P<0.001, respectively). The maximal length of malapposed or uncovered struts (3.40 mm; 95% confidence interval, 2.55–4.25; versus 1.29 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–1.77; P<0.001), but not the maximal or average axial malapposition distance, was greater in thrombosed compared with nonthrombosed segments. The associations of both uncovered and malapposed struts with thrombus were consistent among early- and newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Conclusions— The leading associated findings in VLST patients in descending order were malapposition, neoatherosclerosis, uncovered struts, and stent underexpansion without differences between patients treated with early- and new-generation drug-eluting stents. The longitudinal extension of malapposed and uncovered stent was the most important correlate of thrombus formation in VLST.

Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observational study.

Objective To evaluate the relation of symptom onset to balloon time and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) having primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Design Observation of large cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Setting 26 tertiary hospitals in Japan. Participants 3391 patients with STEMI who had primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours of symptom onset. Main outcome measures Composite of death and congestive heart failure, compared by onset to balloon time and door to balloon time. Results Compared with an onset to balloon time greater than 3 hours, a time of less than 3 hours was associated with a lower incidence of a composite of death and congestive heart failure (13.5% (123/964) v 19.2% (429/2427), P<0.001; relative risk reduction 29.7%). After adjustment for confounders, a short onset to balloon time was independently associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 0.88; P=0.002). However, no significant difference was found in the incidence of a composite of death and congestive heart failure between the two groups of patients with short (≤90 minutes) and long (>90 minutes) door to balloon time (16.7% (270/1671) v 18.4% (282/1720), P=0.54; relative risk reduction 9.2%). After adjustment for confounders, no significant difference was seen in the risk of the composite endpoint between the two groups of patients with short and long door to balloon time (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98, 0.78 to 1.24: P=0.87). A door to balloon time of less than 90 minutes was associated with a lower incidence of a composite of death and congestive heart failure in patients who presented within 2 hours of symptom onset (11.9% (74/883) v 18.1% (147/655), P=0.01; relative risk reduction 34.3%) but not in patients who presented later (19.7% (196/788) v 18.7% (135/1065), P=0.44; −5.3%). Short door to balloon time was independently associated with a lower risk of a composite of death and congestive heart failure in patients with early presentation (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58, 0.38 to 0.87; P=0.009) but not in patients with delayed presentation (1.57, 1.12 to 2.18; P=0.008). A significant interaction was seen between door to balloon time and time to presentation (interaction P=0.01). Conclusions Short onset to balloon time was associated with better 3 year clinical outcome in patients with STEMI having primary percutaneous coronary intervention, whereas the benefit of short door to balloon time was limited to patients who presented early. Efforts to minimise onset to balloon time, including reduction of patient related delay, should be recommended to improve clinical outcome in STEMI patients.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background—Stent fracture (SF) after drug-eluting stent implantation has recently become an important concern because of its potential association with in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, the incidence and clinical impact of SF after everolimus-eluting stent implantation remain unclear. Methods and Results—A total of 1035 patients with 1339 lesions undergoing everolimus-eluting stent implantation and follow-up angiography 6 to 9 months after index procedure were analyzed. SF was defined as complete or partial separation of the stent, as assessed by plain fluoroscopy or intravascular ultrasound during follow-up. We assessed the rates of SF and major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 9 months. SF was observed in 39 of 1339 lesions (2.9%) and in 39 of 1035 patients (3.8%). Ostial stent location and lesions with hinge motion, tortuosity, or calcification were independent predictors of SF. The rate of myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (5.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.018 and 25.6% versus 2.0%; P<0.001, respectively). Stent thrombosis was more frequently observed in the SF group than in the non-SF group (5.1% versus 0.4%; P=0.018). Major adverse cardiac events within 9 months were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (25.6% versus 2.3%; P<0.001). Conclusions—SF after everolimus-eluting stent implantation occurs in 2.9% of lesions and is associated with higher rate of major adverse cardiac events, driven by higher target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.

Late Adverse Events After Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Bare-Metal Stent Long-Term (5–7 Years) Follow-Up of the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2

Background—Late adverse events such as very late stent thrombosis (VLST) or late target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation have not been yet fully characterized at long term in comparison with those after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. Methods and Results—Among 13 058 consecutive patients undergoing first percutaneous coronary intervention in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2, 5078 patients were treated with SES only, and 5392 patients were treated with BMS only. During 7-year follow-up, VLST and late TLR beyond 1 year after SES implantation occurred constantly and without attenuation at 0.24% per year and at 2.0% per year, respectively. Cumulative 7-year incidence of VLST was significantly higher in the SES group than that in the BMS group (1.43% versus 0.68%, P<0.0001). However, there was no excess of all-cause death beyond 1 year in the SES group as compared with that in the BMS group (20.8% versus 19.6%, P=0.91). Cumulative incidences of late TLR (both overall and clinically driven) were also significantly higher in the SES group than in the BMS group (12.0% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001 and 8.5% versus 2.6%, P<0.0001, respectively), leading to late catch-up of the SES group to the BMS group regarding TLR through the entire 7-year follow-up (18.8% versus 25.2%, and 10.6% versus 10.2%, respectively). Clinical presentation as acute coronary syndrome was more common at the time of late SES TLR compared with early SES TLR (21.2% and 10.0%). Conclusions—Late catch-up phenomenon regarding stent thrombosis and TLR was significantly more pronounced with SES than that with BMS. This limitation should remain the target for improvements of DES technology.

Bare Metal Stent Thrombosis and In-Stent Neoatherosclerosis

Background— Very late stent thrombosis (VLST) was reported to occur even in patients with bare metal stent (BMS) implantation, although the annual incidence of VLST after BMS was much lower than that after drug-eluting stent implantation. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of VLST after BMS implantation remain largely unknown. Methods and Results— From September 2002 to February 2010, we identified 102 patients with definite stent thrombosis (ST) of BMS and 42 control patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) unrelated to ST who underwent thrombus aspiration with histopathologic evaluation. There were 40 patients with early ST (EST, within 30 days), 20 patients with late ST (LST, between 31–365 days), and 42 patients with VLST (>1 year). Evidence for fragments of atherosclerotic plaques, such as foamy macrophages, cholesterol crystals, and thin fibrous cap, was more commonly seen in patients with EST (23%) and VLST (31%), whereas these findings were rarely observed in patients with LST (10%). Atherosclerotic fragments were predominantly seen in patients who had EST within 7 days or VLST beyond 3 years. The aspirated thrombi harvested from patients with ST and those with ACS were histologically indistinguishable from each other. Eosinophils were very rarely observed. Plasma level of total cholesterol and triglyceride were significantly higher in VLST cases with atherosclerotic fragments as compared with those without. Conclusions— Fragments of atherosclerotic plaque were highly prevalent in patients with VLST beyond 3 years. Disruption of in-stent neoatherosclerosis could play an important role in the pathogenesis of VLST of BMS occurring beyond 3 years after implantation.

Impact of multiple and long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 3-year clinical outcomes in the j-Cypher Registry.

OBJECTIVES Our aim was to study the relationships between total stent length (TSL) and long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. BACKGROUND SES compared with bare-metal stent use for long lesion treatment is associated with reduced restenosis rates. METHODS Three-year follow-up data were available for 10,773 patients (14,651 lesions) that had been treated with only SES (Cypher, Cordis Corp., Warren, New Jersey) in the j-Cypher registry. Patients and lesions were divided into quartile groups: TSL per patient (Q1: 8 to 23 mm, Q2: 24 to 36 mm, Q3: 37 to 54 mm, Q4: 55 to 293 mm), and TSL per lesion (QA: 8 to 18 mm, QB: 19 to 23 mm, QC: 24 to 33 mm, QD: 34 to 150 mm). RESULTS In per-lesion data, longer TSL increased target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates but did not increase stent thrombosis rates (p = 0.2324). In per-patient data, the incidences of TLR remarkably increased with increasing TSL. Incidence of composite of death and myocardial infarction also increased with increasing TSL; however, after adjustment for baseline differences, there was no statistical significance. Definite stent thrombosis rate in group Q4 was significantly higher than in other groups, both unadjusted (hazard ratio: 1.770, p = 0.0081) and adjusted (hazard ratio: 1.727, p = 0.0122) for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS TSL per lesion and patient had significantly impacts on TLR rates. Longer TSL per patient was associated with increased incidence of stent thrombosis through 3 years.

Ten-year clinical outcomes of first-generation drug-eluting stents: the Sirolimus-Eluting vs. Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization (SIRTAX) VERY LATE trial

AIMS Compared with bare metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with an increased risk of late restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST). Whether this risk continues or attenuates during long-term follow-up remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We extended the follow-up of 1012 patients [sirolimus-eluting stent (SES): N = 503 and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES): N = 509] included in the all-comers, randomized Sirolimus-Eluting vs. Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization (SIRTAX) trial to 10 years. Follow-up was complete in 895 patients (88.4%) at 10 years. At 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up, rates of ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) were 8.1%, 14.6% and 17.7%, respectively, and rates of ST were 1.9%, 4.5% and 5.6%, respectively. The annual risks of ID-TLR and definite ST were significantly higher between 1 and 5 years as compared with the 5- to 10-year period [ID-TLR: 1.8% vs. 0.7%/year, hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 0.21-0.62, P < 0.001; definite ST: 0.67% vs. 0.23%/year, HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.75, P = 0.01]. The attenuation of the risk of ID-TLR and ST beyond 5 years was independent of age. Major adverse events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ID-TLR) occurred in 33.7% of SES- and 33.8% of PES-treated patients (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS During long-term follow-up through 10 years, the annual risks of ID-TLR and definite ST significantly decreased beyond 5 years after first-generation DES implantation. These findings may have important implications for secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention with first-generation DES including long-term antiplatelet therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00297661.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2)

The long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) remains to be investigated. We identified 1,005 patients with ULMCAD of 15,939 patients with first coronary revascularization enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2. Cumulative 3-year incidence of a composite of death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke was significantly higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (22.7% vs 14.8%, p = 0.0006, log-rank test). However, the adjusted outcome was not different between the PCI and CABG groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 2.15, p = 0.30). Stratified analysis using the SYNTAX score demonstrated that risk for a composite of death/MI/stroke was not different between the 2 treatment groups in patients with low (<23) and intermediate (23 to 33) SYNTAX scores (adjusted HR 1.70, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.76, p = 0.19; adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.99, p = 0.72, respectively), whereas in patients with a high SYNTAX score (≥33), it was significantly higher after PCI than after CABG (adjusted HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.16, p = 0.006). In conclusion, risk of PCI for serious adverse events seemed to be comparable to that after CABG in patients with ULMCAD with a low or intermediate SYNTAX score, whereas PCI compared with CABG was associated with a higher risk for serious adverse events in patients with a high SYNTAX score.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After the Nobori Biolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation

Background Stent fracture (SF) after drug‐eluting stent implantation has become an important concern. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of SF after biolimus‐eluting stent. Methods and Results A total of 1026 patients with 1407 lesions undergoing the Nobori biolimus‐eluting stent implantation and follow‐up angiography within 9 months after index procedure were analyzed. SF was defined as complete or partial separation of the stent, as assessed by using plain fluoroscopy, intravascular ultrasound, or optical coherence tomography during the follow‐up. We assessed the rate of SF and the cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization and definite stent thrombosis within 9 months. SF was observed in 58 (4.1%) of 1407 lesions and 57 (5.5%) of 1026 patients. Lesions with hinge motion (OR 8.90, 95% CI 3.84 to 20.6, P<0.001), tortuosity (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.75 to 9.88, P=0.001), and overlapping stents (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.95 to 6.10, P=0.06) were predictors of SF. Cumulative incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 9 months was numerically higher in the SF group than that in the non‐SF group (12.0% versus 1.0%). Cumulative incidence of definite stent thrombosis within 9 months tended to be higher in the SF group than that in the non‐SF group (1.7% versus 0.5%). Conclusions SF after biolimus‐eluting stent occurs in 4.1% of lesions and appears to be associated with clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial

Aims The Ultimaster bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) is a newly developed drug-eluting stent (DES) that consists of a thin-strut, cobalt chromium with bioresorbable polymer coated only albuminally. We sought to compare tissue coverage in coronary lesions treated with BP-SES with the XIENCE permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods and results A total of 36 patients participated in the CENTURY II trial in our institution and were randomly assigned to BP-SES (n = 15) and PP-EES (n = 21). Of these, 27 patients (13 BP-SES and 14 PP-EES) underwent OCT at 9-month follow-up. Tissue coverage and apposition were assessed on each strut, and the results in both groups were compared using multilevel logistic or linear regression models with random effects at three levels: patient, lesion, and struts. A total of 6450 struts (BP-SES, n = 2951; PP-EES, n = 3499) were analysed. Thirty and 79 uncovered struts (1.02 and 2.26%, P = 0.35), and 3 and 4 malapposed struts (0.10 and 0.11%, P = 0.94) were found in BP-SES and PP-EES groups, respectively. Mean neointimal thickness did not significantly differ between both groups (110 ± 10 vs. 93 ± 10 µm, P = 0.22). No significant differences in per cent neointimal volume obstruction (13.2 ± 4.6 vs. 10.5 ± 4.9%, P = 0.14) or other areas-volumetric parameters were detected between both groups. Conclusion BP-SES shows an excellent vascular healing response at 9-month follow-up, which is similar to PP-EES.