Kyungmoo Ryu

Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia

Over 7 million people worldwide die annually from erratic heart rhythms (cardiac arrhythmias), and many more are disabled. Yet there is no imaging modality to identify patients at risk, provide accurate diagnosis and guide therapy. Standard diagnostic techniques such as the electrocardiogram (ECG) provide only low-resolution projections of cardiac electrical activity on the body surface. Here we demonstrate the successful application in humans of a new imaging modality called electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), which noninvasively images cardiac electrical activity in the heart. In ECGI, a multielectrode vest records 224 body-surface electrocardiograms; electrical potentials, electrograms and isochrones are then reconstructed on the hearts surface using geometrical information from computed tomography (CT) and a mathematical algorithm. We provide examples of ECGI application during atrial and ventricular activation and ventricular repolarization in (i) normal heart (ii) heart with a conduction disorder (right bundle branch block) (iii) focal activation initiated by right or left ventricular pacing, and (iv) atrial flutter.

Epicardial Mapping of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Preliminary Observations

Background—The mechanisms of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) are not well understood. We performed epicardial mapping of chronic AF in patients undergoing open heart surgery to test the hypothesis that chronic AF is due to a left atrial “driver” with a regular, short cycle length, resulting in fibrillatory conduction to the rest of the atria. Methods and Results—Nine patients with chronic AF (1 month to >15 years’ duration) were studied at open heart surgery, 8 before and 1 during cardiopulmonary bypass. During AF, atrial electrograms (AEGs) were recorded for 1 to 5 minutes from 404 epicardial electrodes arranged in bipoles along with ECG lead II or ventricular electrogram. Four-second segments of each bipolar AEG were also subjected to fast Fourier transform analysis. Two patterns of atrial activation were present during AF. In pattern 1 (7/9 patients), AEGs from parts of the atria demonstrated a short, regular cycle length with identical beat-to-beat morphology, and the rest of the atria were activated irregularly, and AEGs that demonstrated constant morphology and cycle length were localized to parts of the left atria (5/7), the right atria (1/7), or both atria (1/7). In pattern 2 (2/9 patients), AEGs showed no evidence of regular activation or constant morphology. Conclusions—In 9 patients with chronic AF, the commonest recorded AEG pattern showed an area of regular, rapid rhythm, consistent with the possibility that a driver causing fibrillatory conduction is one mechanism of AF in these patients.

Mapping of Atrial Activation During Sustained Atrial Fibrillation in Dogs with Rapid Ventricular Pacing Induced Heart Failure: Evidence for a Role of Driver Regions

Introduction: Dogs with rapid ventricular pacing (RVP)‐induced congestive heart failure (CHF) have inducible atrial tachycardia, flutter, and fibrillation (AF). We tested the hypothesis that rapid atrial activation in multiple regions and at different rates is responsible for sustained AF in this CHF model.

Selective aldosterone blockade suppresses atrial tachyarrhythmias in heart failure

Introduction: Renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system activation may be involved in the pathogenesis of atrial arrhythmias in congestive heart failure (CHF). The effects of aldosterone blockade on atrial tachyarrhythmias have not been evaluated. This studys aim was to determine whether selective aldosterone blockade suppresses atrial tachyarrhythmia inducibility and modifies atrial electrical and/or structural remodeling in a canine model of rapid ventricular pacing (RVP)‐induced CHF.

Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients

BACKGROUND Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. OBJECTIVE To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients. METHODS Forty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention. RESULTS Evaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P < .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing -dP/dtmin (-13.5% ± 10.2% vs -10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (-7.5% ± 9.0% vs -4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (-18.2% ± 22.4% vs -8.7% ± 21.4%; P < .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention. CONCLUSIONS CRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.

Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead.

AIMS Pacing from multiple sites in the left ventricle (LV) may bring about further resynchronization of the diseased heart compared with biventricular (BiV) pacing. We compared acute haemodynamic response (LV dP/dtmax) of multisite and BiV pacing using a quadripolar LV lead. METHODS AND RESULTS In 21 patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy, a quadripolar LV lead and conventional right atrial and ventricular leads were connected to an external pacing system. A guidewire pressure sensor was placed in the LV for continuous dP/dt measurement. Four multisite pacing configurations were tested three times each and compared with BiV pacing using the distal LV electrode. Nineteen patients had useable haemodynamic data. Median increase in LV dP/dtmax with BiV vs. atrial-only pacing was 8.2% (interquartile range 2.3%, 15.7%). With multisite pacing using distal and proximal LV electrodes, median increase in LV dP/dtmax was 10.2% compared with atrial-only pacing (interquartile range 6.1%, 25.6%). In 16 of 19 patients (84%), two or more of the four multisite pacing configurations increased LV dP/dtmax compared with BiV pacing. Overall, 72% of all tested configurations of multisite pacing produced greater LV dP/dtmax than obtained with BiV pacing. Pacing from most distal and proximal electrodes was the most common optimal configuration, superior to BiV pacing in 74% of patients. CONCLUSION In the majority of patients, multisite pacing improved acute systolic function further compared with BiV pacing. Pacing with the most distal and proximal electrodes of the quadripolar LV lead most commonly yielded greatest LV dP/dtmax.

Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study

BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. METHODS Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. RESULTS Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P = .33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P = .03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001). CONCLUSION Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.

A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study

AIMS Alternative forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), including biventricular endocardial (BV-Endo) and multisite epicardial pacing (MSP), have been developed to improve response. It is unclear which form of stimulation is optimal. We aimed to compare the acute haemodynamic response (AHR) and electrophysiological effects of BV-Endo with MSP via two separate coronary sinus (CS) leads or a single-quadripolar CS lead. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifteen patients with a previously implanted CRT system received a second temporary CS lead and left ventricular (LV) endocardial catheter. A pressure wire and non-contact mapping array were placed into the LV cavity to measure LVdP/dtmax and perform electroanatomical mapping. Conventional CRT, BV-Endo, and MSP were then performed (MSP-1 via two epicardial leads and MSP-2 via a single-quadripolar lead). The best overall AHR was found using BV-Endo pacing with a 19.6 ± 13.6% increase in AHR at the optimal endocardial site over baseline (P < 0.001). There was an increase in LVdP/dtmax with MSP-1 and MSP-2 compared with conventional CRT, but this was not statistically significant. Biventricular endocardial pacing from the optimal site was significantly superior to conventional CRT (P = 0.039). The AHR achieved when BV-Endo pacing was highly site specific. Within individuals, the best pacing modality varied and was affected by the underlying substrate. Left ventricular activation times did not predict the optimal haemodynamic configuration. CONCLUSION Biventricular endocardial pacing and not MSP was superior to conventional CRT, but was highly site specific. Within individuals, however, different methods of stimulation are optimal and may need to be tailored to the underlying substrate.

Prednisone Prevents Inducible Atrial Flutter in the Canine Sterile Pericarditis Model

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common following cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity. We tested the hypothesis that suppression of the inflammatory response with steroids would significantly modify the inducibility of postoperative AF/AFL in the canine sterile pericarditis model.

Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves acute LV function. We hypothesized that multipoint pacing (MPP) can improve midterm echocardiographic and clinical response compared with conventional CRT.