L.A. Crompton

Improving the efficiency of energy utilisation in cattle

The efficiency of energy utilisation in cattle is a determinant of the profitability of milk and beef production, as well as their environmental impact. At an animal level, meat and milk production by ruminants is less efficient than pig and poultry production, in part due to lower digestibility of forages compared with grains. However, when compared on the basis of human-edible inputs, the ruminant has a clear efficiency advantage. There has been recent interest in feed conversion efficiency (FCE) in dairy cattle and residual feed intake, an indicator of FCE, in beef cattle. Variation between animals in FCE may have genetic components, allowing selection for animals with greater efficiency and reduced environmental impact. A major source of variation in FCE is feed digestibility, and thus approaches that improve digestibility should improve FCE if rumen function is not disrupted. Methane represents a substantial loss of digestible energy from rations. Major determinants of methane emission are the amount of feed consumed and the proportions of forage and concentrates fed. In addition, feeding fat has long been known to reduce methane emission. A myriad of other supplements and additives are currently being investigated as mitigators of methane emission, but in many cases compounds effective in sheep are ineffective in lactating dairy cows. Ultimately, the adoption of ‘best practice’ in diet formulation and management may be the most effective option for reducing methane. In assessing the efficiency of energy use for milk and meat production by cattle, and their environmental impact, it is imperative that comparisons be made at a systems level, and that the wider social and economic implications of mitigation policy are considered.

Meta-analysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle

Various studies have indicated a relationship between enteric methane (CH4) production and milk fatty acid (FA) profiles of dairy cattle. However, the number of studies investigating such a relationship is limited and the direct relationships reported are mainly obtained by variation in CH4 production and milk FA concentration induced by dietary lipid supplements. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to quantify relationships between CH4 yield (per unit of feed and unit of milk) and milk FA profile in dairy cattle and to develop equations to predict CH4 yield based on milk FA profile of cows fed a wide variety of diets. Data from 8 experiments encompassing 30 different dietary treatments and 146 observations were included. Yield of CH4 measured in these experiments was 21.5 ± 2.46 g/kg of dry matter intake (DMI) and 13.9 ± 2.30 g/kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM). Correlation coefficients were chosen as effect size of the relationship between CH4 yield and individual milk FA concentration (g/100g of FA). Average true correlation coefficients were estimated by a random-effects model. Milk FA concentrations of C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C16:0, and C16:0-iso were significantly or tended to be positively related to CH4 yield per unit of feed. Concentrations of trans-6+7+8+9 C18:1, trans-10+11 C18:1, cis-11 C18:1, cis-12 C18:1, cis-13 C18:1, trans-16+cis-14 C18:1, and cis-9,12 C18:2 in milk fat were significantly or tended to be negatively related to CH4 yield per unit of feed. Milk FA concentrations of C10:0, C12:0, C14:0-iso, C14:0, cis-9 C14:1, C15:0, and C16:0 were significantly or tended to be positively related to CH4 yield per unit of milk. Concentrations of C4:0, C18:0, trans-10+11 C18:1, cis-9 C18:1, cis-11 C18:1, and cis-9,12 C18:2 in milk fat were significantly or tended to be negatively related to CH4 yield per unit of milk. Mixed model multiple regression and a stepwise selection procedure of milk FA based on the Bayesian information criterion to predict CH4 yield with milk FA as input (g/100g of FA) resulted in the following prediction equations: CH4 (g/kg of DMI)=23.39 + 9.74 × C16:0-iso - 1.06 × trans-10+11 C18:1 - 1.75 × cis-9,12 C18:2 (R(2) = 0.54), and CH4 (g/kg of FPCM) = 21.13 - 1.38 × C4:0 + 8.53 × C16:0-iso - 0.22 × cis-9 C18:1 - 0.59 × trans-10+11 C18:1 (R(2) = 0.47). This indicated that milk FA profile has a moderate potential for predicting CH4 yield per unit of feed and a slightly lower potential for predicting CH4 yield per unit of milk.

Fluctuations in methane emission in response to feeding pattern in lactating dairy cows

Methane from enteric fermentation of organic matter by ruminants is considered a key contributor to climate change. This study examined the effect of feeding a total mixed ration at different intervals, either once, twice or four times daily, on pattern of methane emission by lactating dairy cows and developed a response function based on exponentials to describe the observed patterns of methane emission. The function describes an asymmetrical shape exhibiting a continuous rise to a peak followed by a period of linear decline. There were differences between treatments in terms of total methane output and the pattern of emission, with peaks observed following feedings. The rate of decline in methane production post-prandially was linked to amount of dry matter consumed following each feeding. The simple model fitted the data satisfactorily and provides a biological description for fluctuations in methane release in response to changes in feeding pattern. The response function could be applied more widely as part of methane emission inventories following further work to examine the differences in eating behaviour and methane emission across different production systems.

Effect of plasma insulin and branched-chain amino acids on skeletal muscle protein synthesis in fasted lambs

The increase in fractional rate of protein synthesis (Ks) in the skeletal muscle of growing rats during the transition from fasted to fed state has been explained by the synergistic action of a rise in plasma insulin and branched-chain amino acids (BCAA). Since growing lambs also exhibit an increase in Ks with level of feed intake, the objective of the present study was to determine if this synergistic relationship between insulin and BCAA also occurs in ruminant animals. Six 30 kg fasted (72 h) lambs (8 months of age) received each of four treatments, which were based on continuous infusion into the jugular vein for 6 h of: (1) saline (155 mmol NaCl/l); (2) a mixture of BCAA (0.778 micromol leucine, 0.640 micromol isoleucine and 0.693 micromol valine/min.kg); (3) 18.7 micromol glucose/min.kg (to induce endogenous insulin secretion); (4) co-infusion of BCAA and glucose. Within each period all animals received the same isotope of phenylalanine (Phe) as follows: (1) L-[1-13C]Phe; (2) L-phenyl-[ring 2H5]-alanine; (3) L-[15N]Phe; (4) L-[ring 2,6-3H]Phe. Blood was sampled serially during infusions to measure plasma concentrations of insulin, glucose and amino acids, and plasma free Phe isotopic activity; biopsies were taken 6 h after the beginning of infusions to determine Ks in m. longissimus dorsi and vastus muscle. Compared with control (saline-infused) lambs, Ks was increased by an average of 40% at the end of glucose infusion, but this effect was not statistically significant in either of the muscles sampled. BCAA infusion, alone or in combination with glucose, also had no significant effect on Ks compared with control sheep. Ks was approximately 60% greater for vastus muscle than for m. longissimus dorsi (P<0.01), regardless of treatment. It is concluded that there are signals other than insulin and BCAA that are responsible for the feed-induced increase in Ks in muscle of growing ruminant animals.

Modeling mammary amino acid metabolism

Abstract Milk pricing schemes place economic importance on milk components. Most current nutrient requirement models do not predict milk component yields accurately. Deaggregation of energy and protein terms in those models may improve prediction accuracy. Descriptions of energy metabolism by the major postabsorptive tissues have progressed over the last 20 years. More recent efforts have been directed at representing amino acid metabolism. Mammary amino acid metabolism appears to be a function of amino acid supply and regulatory elements. Regulation of uptake and blood flow occurs and is represented in some models. Intracellular metabolism of amino acids and possibly energy are determinants of removal. Both the rate of amino acid oxidation and use for protein synthesis appear to be functions of intracellular concentrations. Experimental observations suggest that representation of protein synthesis as a linear function of the first-limiting amino acid is inadequate. A multi-substrate Michaelis–Menten equation form is more consistent with experimental observations and appears to yield better predictions as compared to the single-limiting model. Consideration of energy supply as a driver of milk protein synthesis also appears to be warranted. Additional knowledge of the substrate response surface for protein synthesis and how it is regulated is needed.

Hindlimb protein turnover and muscle protein synthesis in lambs: a comparison of techniques.

A combination of arterio-venous difference, kinetic isotope transfer and blood flow rate techniques were used to measure tyrosine metabolism across hindlimb tissues of nine growing lambs (average live weight 36.5 kg) fed on a range of dry matter intakes. Muscle protein synthesis was measured using a continuous infusion technique and compared with simultaneous estimates of hindlimb protein turnover calculated from the values for tyrosine metabolism. When the specific radioactivity (SRA) of tyrosine in the arterial plasma free pool was assumed to be the same as the SRA of tyrosine in the direct precursor pool of protein synthesis, hindlimb protein synthesis (ksav; 3.66 (SEM 0.50) %/d) was significantly (P < 0.001) higher (68%) than muscle protein synthesis (ksp; 2.18 (SEM 0.31) %/d) but was similar to the value for muscle protein synthesis calculated using the homogenate free tyrosine SRA (ksh; 3.35 (SEM 0.42) %/d). Hindlimb and muscle protein synthesis (y) were both significantly related to dry matter intake (chi) (ksav, r2 0.667, P = 0.007; ksh, r2 0.968, P < 0.001) and there was no significant difference between the slopes (P = 0.532) and intercepts (P = 0.945) of the two regression lines. The results demonstrate that hindlimb protein turnover cannot be quantitatively compared with muscle protein synthesis, probably due to high protein metabolic activity in non-muscular tissues within the hindlimb, although similar responses in protein synthetic rate to the level of feed intake were observed between hindlimb and muscle tissues.

Effects of diet forage source and neutral detergent fiber content on milk production of dairy cattle and methane emissions determined using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques

Strategies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from dairy cattle are unlikely to be adopted if production or profitability is reduced. The primary objective of this study was to examine the effects of high maize silage (MS) versus high grass silage (GS) diets, without or with added neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on milk production and methane emission of dairy cattle, using GreenFeed (GF) or respiration chamber (RC) techniques for methane emission measurements. Experiment 1 was 12wk in duration with a randomized block continuous design and 40 Holstein cows (74d in milk) in free-stall housing, assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments (n=10 per treatment), according to calving date, parity, and milk yield. Milk production and dry matter intake (DMI) were measured daily, and milk composition measured weekly, with methane yield (g/kg of DMI) estimated using a GF unit (wk 10 to 12). Experiment 2 was a 4×4 Latin square design with 5-wk periods and 4 dairy cows (114d in milk) fed the same 4 dietary treatments as in experiment 1. Measurements of DMI, milk production, and milk composition occurred in wk 4, and DMI, milk production, and methane yield were measured for 2d in RC during wk 5. Dietary treatments for both experiments were fed as total mixed rations offered ad libitum and containing 500g of silage/kg of dry matter composed (DM basis) of either 75:25 MS:GS (MS) or 25:75 MS:GS (GS), without or with added NDF from chopped straw and soy hulls (+47g of NDF/kg of dry matter). In both experiments, compared with high GS, cows fed high MS had a higher DMI, greater milk production, and lower methane yield (24% lower in experiment 1 using GF and 8% lower in experiment 2 using RC). Added NDF increased (or tended to increase) methane yield for high MS, but not high GS diets. In the separate experiments, the GF and RC methods detected similar dietary treatment effects on methane emission (expressed as g/d and g/kg of DMI), although the magnitude of the differences varied between experiments. Overall methane emission and yield were 448g/d and 20.9g/kg of DMI for experiment 1 using GF and 458g/d and 23.8g/kg of DMI for experiment 2 using RC, respectively.

Effect of monensin sodium on lactational performance of autumn- and spring-calving cows

Monensin sodium is widely used to manipulate ruminal fermentation (Bergen & Bates, 1984), with the aim of increasing energy supply to the animal. Monensin has been most widely used in diets of beef cattle and young growing dairy cattle, particularly in confinement management systems, where the ionophore can be mixed directly into the ration. Accurate daily dosing of grazing ruminants with small quantities of rumen modifiers, such as ionophores, proved particularly labour-intensive and expensive until the development of the controlled-release capsule (CRC; Laby et al. 1984). Subsequently a commercially available CRC containing monensin sodium was developed (Elanco Animal Health, Cambridge, NZ) facilitating its use in grazing animals. It has also been tested as a method of reducing the incidence of bloat in lactating dairy cows grazing pastures containing legumes.

Influence of ruminal methane on digesta retention and digestive physiology in non-lactating dairy cattle.

Enteric methane (CH4) production is a side-effect of herbivore digestion, but it is unknown whether CH4 itself influences digestive physiology. We investigated the effect of adding CH4 to, or reducing it in, the reticulorumen (RR) in a 4×4 Latin square experiment with rumen-fistulated, non-lactating cows, with four treatments: (i) control, (ii) insufflation of CH4 (iCH4), (iii) N via rumen fistula, (iv) reduction of CH4 via administration of bromochloromethane (BCM). DM intake (DMI), apparent total tract digestibility, digesta mean retention times (MRT), rumen motility and chewing activity, spot breath CH4 emission (CH4exhal, litre/kg DMI) as well as CH4 dissolved in rumen fluid (CH4RRf, µg/ml) were measured. Data were analysed using mixed models, including treatment (or, alternatively, CH4exhal or CH4RRf) and DMI relative to body mass0·85 (rDMI) as covariates. rDMI was the lowest on the BCM treatment. CH4exhal was highest for iCH4 and lowest for BCM treatments, whereas only BCM affected (reduced) CH4RRf. After adjusting for rDMI, CH4RRf had a negative association with MRT in the gastrointestinal tract but not in the RR, and negative associations with fibre digestibility and measures of rumination activity. Adjusting for rDMI, CH4exhal had additionally a negative association with particle MRT in the RR and a positive association with rumen motility. Thus, higher rumen levels of CH4 (CH4exhal or CH4RRf) were associated with shorter MRT and increased motility. These findings are tentatively interpreted as a feedback mechanism in the ruminant digestive tract that aims at mitigating CH4 losses by shortening MRT at higher CH4.

Effects of forage source and extruded linseed supplementation on methane emissions from growing dairy cattle of differing body weights

Changes in diet carbohydrate amount and type (i.e., starch vs. fiber) and dietary oil supplements can affect ruminant methane emissions. Our objectives were to measure methane emissions, whole-tract digestibility, and energy and nitrogen utilization from growing dairy cattle at 2 body weight (BW) ranges, fed diets containing either high maize silage (MS) or high grass silage (GS), without or with supplemental oil from extruded linseed (ELS). Four Holstein-Friesian heifers aged 13 mo (BW range from start to finish of 382 to 526 kg) were used in experiment 1, whereas 4 lighter heifers aged 12 mo (BW range from start to finish of 292 to 419 kg) were used in experiment 2. Diets were fed as total mixed rations with forage dry matter (DM) containing high MS or high GS and concentrates in proportions (forage:concentrate, DM basis) of either 75:25 (experiment 1) or 60:40 (experiment 2), respectively. Diets were supplemented without or with ELS (Lintec, BOCM Pauls Ltd., Wherstead, UK; 260 g of oil/kg of DM) at 6% of ration DM. Each experiment was a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 33-d periods, with measurements during d 29 to 33 while animals were housed in respiration chambers. Heifers fed MS at a heavier BW (experiment 1) emitted 20% less methane per unit of DM intake (yield) compared with GS (21.4 vs. 26.6, respectively). However, when repeated with heifers of a lower BW (experiment 2), methane yield did not differ between the 2 diets (26.6g/kg of DM intake). Differences in heifer BW had no overall effect on methane emissions, except when expressed as grams per kilogram of digestible organic matter (OMD) intake (32.4 vs. 36.6, heavy vs. light heifers). Heavier heifers fed MS in experiment 1 had a greater DM intake (9.4kg/d) and lower OMD (755 g/kg), but no difference in N utilization (31% of N intake) compared with heifers fed GS (7.9 kg/d and 799 g/kg, respectively). Tissue energy retention was nearly double for heifers fed MS compared with GS in experiment 1 (15 vs. 8% of energy intake, respectively). Heifers fed MS in experiment 2 had similar DM intake (7.2 kg/d) and retention of energy (5% of intake energy) and N (28% of N intake), compared with GS-fed heifers, but OMD was lower (741 vs. 765 g/kg, respectively). No effect of ELS was noted on any of the variables measured, irrespective of animal BW, and this was likely due to the relatively low amount of supplemental oil provided. Differences in heifer BW did not markedly influence dietary effects on methane emissions. Differences in methane yield were attributable to differences in dietary starch and fiber composition associated with forage type and source.