L Anselmi

The role of tumour markers in improving the accuracy of conventional chest x-ray and liver echography in the post-operative detection of thoracic and liver metastases from breast cancer

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the value of a serum tumour marker panel in selecting from among the patients with equivocal chest X-ray (CXR) or liver echography (LE) those with thoracic or liver metastases respectively. Between January 1984 and December 1999, 467 (341 non-relapsed and 126 metastatic) breast cancer patients were followed-up postoperatively. Among the 126 metastatic patients 36 showed thoracic (19 patients) or liver (17 patients) metastases, alone or in conjunction with other organs as the first evidence of distant spread. We focused on this series of 377 patients including 341 non-relapsed plus 36 with liver or thoracic metastases. The patients were followed-up after mastectomy with serial determinations of a panel of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour markers, bone scintigraphy, CXR and LE. Up to December 1999, equivocal CXR occurred in 23 (6.1%) patients of whom 11 (47.8%) developed thoracic metastases; 14 (3.7%) patients showed an equivocal LE of whom 5 developed liver metastases. In the 37 patients with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE prolonged clinical and imaging follow-up over 41 ± 36 months (mean ± SD, range 3–163) was used to ascertain the presence or absence of thoracic or liver metastases. In the 23 patients with equivocal CXR the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel to predict thoracic metastases were 92% and 100% respectively. In the 14 patients with equivocal LE the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel for prediction of liver metastases were 90% and 100% respectively. This study shows that in breast cancer patients the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel has a high value for selecting those patients at high risk of developing clinically evident pulmonary or liver metastases from amongst those subjects with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE.

Treatment of mild non-chemotherapy-induced iron deficiency anemia in cancer patients: comparison between oral ferrous bisglycinate chelate and ferrous sulfate.

In cancer patients mild-moderate non-chemotherapy-induced iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is usually treated with oral iron salts, mostly ferrous sulfate. In this study, we compare efficacy and toxicity of oral ferrous bisglycinate chelate and ferrous sulfate in cancer patients with mild IDA. Twenty-four patients operated on for solid tumors (10 breast, 12 colorectal, 2 gastric), aged 61±10 years (range 45-75), with non-chemotherapy-induced hemoglobin (Hb) values between 10 and 12 g/dL and ferritin lower than 30 ng/mL were randomized to receive oral ferrous bisglycinate chelate, 28 mg per day for 20 days, and then 14 mg per day for 40 days (12 patients) (A group) or oral ferrous sulphate, 105 mg per day for 60 days (12 patients) (B group). Values of hemoglobin and ferritin obtained at diagnosis, 1 and 2 months from the beginning of treatment were compared. Adverse events (AEs) related to the two treatments were recorded. In the 12 patients treated with ferrous bisglycinate chelate, basal hemoglobin and ferritin values (mean±SD) were 11.6±0.8 g/dL and 16.1±8.0 ng/mL. After 2 months of treatment, they were 13.0±1.4 g/dL and 33.8±22.0 ng/mL, respectively (P=0.0003 and P=0.020). In the group treated with ferrous sulphate, hemoglobin and ferritin mean values were 11.3±0.6 g/dL and 19.0±6.4 ng/mL basally, and 12.7±0.70 g/dL and 40.8±28.1 ng/mL (P<0.0001 and P=0.017) after 2 months of treatment. AEs occurred in six cases. In all these six cases, two (17%) treated with ferrous bisglycinate chelate and four (33%) with ferrous sulphate, toxicity was grade 1. In conclusion, these data suggest that ferrous bisglycinate chelate has similar efficacy and likely lower GI toxicity than ferrous sulphate given at the conventional dose of 105 mg per day for the same time.

Intensive Risk-Adjusted Follow-up With the CEA, TPA, CA19.9, and CA72.4 Tumor Marker Panel and Abdominal Ultrasonography to Diagnose Operable Colorectal Cancer Recurrences: Effect on Survival

HYPOTHESIS Intensive risk-adjusted follow-up leads to improved resectability of tumor recurrences and better overall survival among patients who have undergone surgery for colorectal cancer. DESIGN Long-term observational single-center study. SETTING University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. PATIENTS One hundred eight disease-free patients who had undergone surgery for colorectal cancer were submitted to long-term follow-up with the serum CEA, TPA, CA19.9, and CA72.4 tumor marker (TM) panel and abdominal ultrasonography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivities and specificities of TMs, abdominal ultrasonography, and abdominal and chest computed tomography (CT); the median survival among patients operated on and those not operated on and the cumulative 5-year overall survival among the entire group. RESULTS Twenty-two patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer recurred 32 times. The CEA, TPA, CA19.9, CA72.4, and TM panel sensitivities were 46.9%, 34.4%, 9.4%, 9.4%, and 81.0%, respectively, and the mean (SD) lead times before confirmation of recurrence were 4.3 (4.8), 4.1 (4.7), 8.3 (10.9), 5.0 (7.0), and 5.3 (5.8) months, respectively. Abdominal and chest CT sensitivities were 100.0%. Among 86 patients without recurrence, specificities of the TM panel and all panel markers were 100.0%, while specificities of abdominal ultrasonography, abdominal CT, and skeletal CT were 99.9%, 99.0%, and 100.0%, respectively. The median survival after first recurrence was 16 months (range, 3-48 months) for 8 patients with recurrence who did not undergo second-line surgery. Among 14 remaining patients who underwent metastasectomy, the median survival after first recurrence was 37 months (range, 12-187 months; P = .03). Among the entire group of 108 patients, the cumulative 5-year overall survival was 88.7%. CONCLUSIONS Long-term intensive risk-adjusted monitoring using the CEA, TPA, CA19.9, and CA72.4 TM panel and abdominal ultrasonography allows early detection of most recurrences. Patients can then undergo radical metastasectomy, with potentially improved overall survival.

Immunological and side effects of low sc recombinant interleukin-2 dose in addition to conventional treatment in relapsed breast and colorectal cancer patients

Thirteen relapsed cancer patients, four of them operated for colorectal and the nine remaining for breast cancer, were cyclically given low subcutaneous (sc) recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) doses in addition to chemo- or hormone therapy. Cycle intervals were 2 or 6 weeks in length, and the number of cycles ranged from one to 14 and from one to six respectively. Tolerance assessed by clinical and laboratory data, eosinophils, lymphocytes (total number), T subpopulations, B lymphocytes and NK cells were the evaluated parameters. One (7.6%) of the 13 studied patients interrupted the first low dose sc rIL-2 cycle due to a hypersensitive reaction. This case showed relapse from breast cancer. During further cycles, three patients (25%), one operated on for colorectal and two others for breast cancer of the 12 remaining cases who completed all rIL-2 cycles showed an increase in glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT), gamma-gt, and creatininemia without any clinical symptoms. A slight influenza-like syndrome and 10-20 mmHg decrease in blood pressure sporadically occurred in all patients under rIL-2 therapy. In both cancer types, a significant (P < 0.05 - P < 0.001) increase in lymphocytes, eosinophils. T4 and T3 subpopulations but not in T8 subpopulations and NK cells occurred at the end of the rIL-2 cycles. In 11 of the 13 patients responsive to conventional therapy, a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) in all parameters apart from B lymphocytes and T4/T8 ratio was observed, while in three cases which were no longer responsive and in another case which had never been responsive to conventional therapy, a slightly significant increase in eosinophils only occurred (P < 0.05). Three colorectal cancer patients showed a partial response and the last a complete response to conventional therapy. In these four patients, time to progression during rIL-2 cycles ranged from 2.5-5 months and the duration of response ranged from 8-19 months. In seven of the eight breast cancer patients who completed all rIL-2 cycles, the response ranged from 3-51+ months and in the last case, which was not responsive to conventional therapy, the disease progressed in spite of the addition of rIL-2. These data suggest that: a) rIL-2 is likely to constitute a well-tolerated and suitable home therapy even when cyclically given for a prolonged period; b) following rIL-2 administration, eosinophils and lymphocytes increase in addition to the T subpopulations.

Clinical use of tumor markers in the postoperative management of breast cancer patients: new concepts

The rationale for the postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients using traditional means is not clear. In fact, history and serial physical examinations during follow-up proved helpful in the early detection of local recurrences and new cancers (1, 2), and when prospective randomized trials were designed to compare intensive clinical and conventional instrumental followup with only intensive clinical monitoring, the assumption that asymptomatic cases are detected earlier than sympomatic cases, even at distant sites of metastatic spread, was fully confirmed (3, 4). Nevertheless, so far, an earlier diagnosis using conventional means has not been demonstrated to significantly prolong the overall survival (OS) (3, 4-6). Thus most studies failed to prove any important benefit and the findings of increased survival in some retrospective studies could be explained by the lead-time bias or the length biased sampling (2, 3, 7-9). Without proven clinical benefit, postoperative breast cancer monitoring is useless. In addition, the cost to benefit ratio is strongly unfavorable. In fact, many of the conventional radiological examinations such as bone scintigraphy (BS), chest and skeletal X-rays, liver ultrasound, and computed tomography (CT) are expensive and not harmless. Therefore, on the basis of the above mentioned studies, the authors conclude that periodic intensive follow-up with conventional means should be discouraged as a routine policy (3).

Long-term monitoring of cell-mediated immunity in disease-free breast cancer patients: a preliminary retrospective study

In 102 N- and 44 N+ disease-free breast cancer patients, lymphocytic populations and skin reaction of delayed hypersensitivity (SRDH) were monitored up to 266 months after mastectomy to find out whether they were similar or different from control values. In two selected groups of 34 N- and 11 N+ breast cancer patients, the whole 10 year follow-up was divided into three subintervals, each of them lasting 40 months and the time course of lymphocytic populations was evaluated. In the 102 N- patients, mean CD4+, CD8+, CD3+ values were lower (P < 0.01, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, respectively) while CD4+/CD8+ ratio was higher (P < 0.05) than in controls. Fifteen N- breast cancer patients (16%) were anergic compared to 30(32%) of controls (P < 0.05). In the 34 selected N- breast cancer patients soon after mastectomy the mean value of CD4+, CD8+, CD3+ T subpopulations was lower (P < 0.01, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, respectively) than in controls. Successively their mean value increased so that in the last subinterval they were not or were only slightly lower (P n.s., P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively) than in controls. In the 44 N+ patients, mean CD4+, CD8+, CD3+ values were lower (P < 0.001, v < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively) and CD19+ lymphocytes higher (P < 0.001) than in controls. Five N+ breast cancer patients (13%) were anergic compared to 32% of controls (P < 0.05). In the 11 selected N+ breast cancer patients soon after mastectomy, the mean value of CD4+, CD8+ T subpopulations and CD16+56+ cells was significantly lower (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, respectively) than in controls. Successively their mean value constantly increased so that in the last subinterval, no or slight (P n.s., P < 0.05, P n.s., respectively) significant difference compared to controls occurred. The mean CD4+/CD8+ ratio value of N- patients was significantly higher than in controls. However in the last subinterval, the significance was lower than in the first one (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). In the N+ patients, the mean value of CD4+/CD8+ ratio was constant, although not significantly, lower than in controls; however it progressively increased from the first to the last subinterval. Therefore the significance of the difference of the mean CD4+/CD8+ ratio between N- and N+ patients strongly decreased from the first to the last subinterval (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). These data indicate that in breast cancer patients, following mastectomy, a significant activation of memory and CD4+ T cells and long-term decrease of the circulating immunocompetent CD4+, CD8+ and CD16+56+ cells occurs. The prolonged disease-free interval observed in the 34 N- and 11 N+ breast cancer patients can be correlated with the restoration of the normal state of cell-mediated immunity.