L. Chinsoo Cho

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Multiple Organ Sites

INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) uses advanced technology to deliver a potent ablative dose to deep-seated tumors in the lung, liver, spine, pancreas, kidney, and prostate. METHODS SBRT involves constructing very compact high-dose volumes in and about the tumor. Tumor position must be accurately assessed throughout treatment, especially for tumors that move with respiration. Sophisticated image guidance and related treatment delivery technologies have developed to account for such motion and efficiently deliver high daily dose. All this serves to allow the delivery of ablative dose fractionation to the target capable of both disrupting tumor mitosis and cellular function. RESULTS Prospective phase I dose-escalation trials have been carried out to reach potent tumoricidal dose levels capable of eradicating tumors with high likelihood. These studies indicate a clear dose-response relationship for tumor control with escalating dose of SBRT. Prospective phase II studies have been reported from several continents consistently showing very high levels of local tumor control. Although late toxicity requires further careful assessment, acute and subacute toxicities are generally acceptable. Patterns of toxicity, both clinical and radiographic, are distinct from those observed with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy as a result of the unique biologic response to ablative fractionation. CONCLUSION Prospective trials using SBRT have confirmed the efficacy of treatment in a variety of patient populations. Although mechanisms of ablative-dose injury remain elusive, ongoing prospective trials offer the hope of finding the ideal application for SBRT in the treatment arsenal.

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the tolerability of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients included those with Gleason score 2 to 6 with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 20, Gleason score 7 with PSA ≤ 15, ≤ T2b, prostate size ≤ 60 cm(3), and American Urological Association (AUA) score ≤ 15. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and placement of a rectal balloon. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse GI/genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 3). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS Groups of 15 patients received 45 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and 50 Gy in five fractions (45 total patients). The median follow-up is 30 months (range, 3 to 36 months), 18 months (range, 0 to 30 months), and 12 months (range, 3 to 18 months) for the 45 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and 50 Gy groups, respectively. For all patients, GI grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 18% and 2%, respectively, and GU grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 31% and 4%, respectively. Mean AUA scores increased significantly from baseline in the 47.5-Gy dose level (P = .002) as compared with the other dose levels, where mean values returned to baseline. Rectal quality-of-life scores (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) fell from baseline up to 12 months but trended back at 18 months. In all patients, PSA control is 100% by the nadir + 2 ng/mL failure definition. CONCLUSION Dose escalation to 50 Gy has been completed without DLT. A multicenter phase II trial is underway treating patients to 50 Gy in five fractions to further evaluate this experimental therapy.

Predictors of rectal tolerance observed in a dose-escalated phase 1-2 trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE To convey the occurrence of isolated cases of severe rectal toxicity at the highest dose level tested in 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer; and to rationally test potential causal mechanisms to guide future studies and experiments to aid in mitigating or altogether avoiding such severe bowel injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical and treatment planning data were analyzed from 91 patients enrolled from 2006 to 2011 on a dose-escalation (45, 47.5, and 50 Gy in 5 fractions) phase 1/2 clinical study of SBRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS At the highest dose level, 6.6% of patients treated (6 of 91) developed high-grade rectal toxicity, 5 of whom required colostomy. Grade 3+ delayed rectal toxicity was strongly correlated with volume of rectal wall receiving 50 Gy >3 cm(3) (P<.0001), and treatment of >35% circumference of rectal wall to 39 Gy (P=.003). Grade 2+ acute rectal toxicity was significantly correlated with treatment of >50% circumference of rectal wall to 24 Gy (P=.010). CONCLUSION Caution is advised when considering high-dose SBRT for treatment of tumors near bowel structures, including prostate cancer. Threshold dose constraints developed from physiologic principles are defined, and if respected can minimize risk of severe rectal toxicity.

Emergence of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Its Impact on Current and Future Clinical Practice

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is generally a tumor-ablative radiation modality using essential technologies capable of accurately and precisely damaging the target with a high dose while geometrically sparing innocent normal tissues. The intent, conduct, and tissue biology are all dramatically distinct from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy such that new understanding is required for its optimization. It is most practical, tolerable, and tumoricidal in its most potent form treating tumors in the lung and liver. However, it is increasingly being used for tumors adjacent to bowels and nervous tissue, albeit with somewhat less ablative potency. Its strengths include high rates of tumor eradication via a noninvasive, convenient outpatient treatment. Its weakness relates to the possibility of causing difficult-to-manage toxicity (eg, ulceration, stenosis, fibrosis, and even necrosis) that may occur considerably later after treatment, particularly in the vicinity of the bodys many tubular structures (eg, organ hila, bowel). However, clinical trials in a variety of organs and sites have shown SBRT to result in good outcomes in properly selected patients. Given its short course, lack of need for recovery, and favorable overall toxicity profile, there is great hope that SBRT will find a prominent place in the treatment of metastatic cancer as a consolidative partner with systemic therapy. With considerable published experience, available required technologies and training, and many patients in need of local therapy, SBRT has found a place in the routine cancer-fighting arsenal.

Radiobiology of stereotactic body radiation therapy/stereotactic radiosurgery and the linear-quadratic model

Received Feb 26, 2013, and in revised form Mar 11, 2013. Accepted for publication Mar 12, 2013The validity of the linear-quadratic (LQ) model for calculatingisoeffect doses in radiation therapy has been intensivelydebated in recent issues of the International Journal of Radi-ation Oncology, Biology, Physics (1-3).TheLQmodelissimple and convenient, and by far it has been the most usefulmeans for isodose calculation in treating tumors with conven-tional fractionated radiation therapy (2-4). The LQ modelsolely depends on the expected incidence of direct interactionsof radiation with specific cellular targets (ie, DNA strands).Because the LQ survival curve continuously bends downwardwith increasing radiation dose, many assume that the LQcalculation will inherently overestimate cell death caused byhigh-dose-per-fraction radiation therapy. Interestingly, however,clinical results have shown that the LQ model actually under-estimates tumor control by stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (5), indicating thatmechanism(s) in addition to DNA strand breaks and/or chro-mosome aberrations may be involved in response of tumors toSBRT or SRS. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that SBRTor SRS may cause significant vascular damage in tumors,leading to indirect cell death (5, 6). We have recently reviewedprevious studies on the radiation-induced vascular damage intumors and pointed out the potentially important role of indi-rect/necrotic cell death due to the vascular damage in tumorcontrol with SBRT and SRS (7). We further discussed theradiobiological principles of SBRT and SRS in relation toradiation-induced vascular damage and resultant indirect celldeath (8). Interestingly, some 35 years ago we (C.W.S. andS.H.L.) realized that irradiation of rodent tumors with 10-20Gy in a single dose caused severe vascular injury, leading tonecrotic cell death in significant fractions of tumor cells 2 to 3days after the treatment (9, 10). Figure 1 summarizes theobservations we made on the effects of 10 Gy (1000 rads) ofx-rays in a single dose on the clonogenic surviving cells inWalker 256 rat tumors (10). The surviving cell fraction, asmeasured with an in vivoein vitro excision method, wasapproximately 2.6 10

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer - Results from a multi-institutional clinical trial

BACKGROUND We report the outcome of a phase I/II clinical trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for low (LR) and select intermediate risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients included men with prostate adenocarcinoma with Gleason score 6 with PSA ≤ 20 or Gleason 7 with PSA ≤ 15 and clinical stage ≤ T2b. For the phase I portion of the study patients in cohorts of 15 received 45, 47.5, or 50 Gray (Gy) in five fractions. Since the maximally tolerated dose was not met in the phase I study, an additional 47 patients received 50 Gy in five fractions in the phase II study. Toxicity using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0, quality of life, and outcome data was collected. RESULTS A total of 91 patients are included for analysis; 63.7% had NCCN IR and 36.3% had LR PCa. At a median follow up of 54 months the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure was 100% at 3 years and 98.6% at 5 years. Actuarial distant metastasis free survival was 100% at 3 and 5 years. Overall survival was 94% at 3 years and 89.7% at 5 years with no deaths attributed to PCa. Acute and late urinary grade ≥ III toxicity occurred in 0% and 5.5% of patients, respectively. Gastrointestinal (GI) acute and late toxicity of grade ≥ III occurred in 2% and 7% of patients, respectively. A total of four men experienced grade IV toxicity (three GI, one genitourinary). CONCLUSION SBRT treatment results in excellent biochemical control rates at 5 years for LR and IR PCa patients although doses greater than 47.5 Gy in five fractions led to increased severe late toxicity.

Indirect Tumor Cell Death After High-Dose Hypofractionated Irradiation: Implications for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Radiation Surgery.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to reveal the biological mechanisms underlying stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS FSaII fibrosarcomas grown subcutaneously in the hind limbs of C3H mice were irradiated with 10 to 30 Gy of X rays in a single fraction, and the clonogenic cell survival was determined with in vivo--in vitro excision assay immediately or 2 to 5 days after irradiation. The effects of radiation on the intratumor microenvironment were studied using immunohistochemical methods. RESULTS After cells were irradiated with 15 or 20 Gy, cell survival in FSaII tumors declined for 2 to 3 days and began to recover thereafter in some but not all tumors. After irradiation with 30 Gy, cell survival declined continuously for 5 days. Cell survival in some tumors 5 days after 20 to 30 Gy irradiation was 2 to 3 logs less than that immediately after irradiation. Irradiation with 20 Gy markedly reduced blood perfusion, upregulated HIF-1α, and increased carbonic anhydrase-9 expression, indicating that irradiation increased tumor hypoxia. In addition, expression of VEGF also increased in the tumor tissue after 20 Gy irradiation, probably due to the increase in HIF-1α activity. CONCLUSIONS Irradiation of FSaII tumors with 15 to 30 Gy in a single dose caused dose-dependent secondary cell death, most likely by causing vascular damage accompanied by deterioration of intratumor microenvironment. Such indirect tumor cell death may play a crucial role in the control of human tumors with SBRT and SRS.

Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for macroscopically multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancers

BACKGROUND The presence of macroscopically multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (MMIIBC) has been considered a contraindication for breast conservation. Early series reported high rates of local recurrence. A treatment regimen was developed to accommodate patient requests for breast conservation in MMIIBC. METHODS We reviewed medical records of the 15 MMIIBC patients who underwent partial mastectomy followed by radiation between 1989 and 1997. All patients had 2 or more separate macroscopic tumors greater than 2 mm in diameter. After tumor excision, all specimens were evaluated; the protocol required surgical margins of at least 2 mm. RESULTS As of June 2000 (median follow-up 76 months), 14 patients (93%) were alive without evidence of disease. One patient died of systemic disease without local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In selected cases, the combination of breast conservative surgery and radiation therapy with systemic therapy results in acceptable local-regional control. Patients who present with MMIIBC with clear surgical margins should be considered for breast conservation.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Review of Experience of a Multicenter Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Study

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an area of active investigation for treatment of prostate cancer. In our phase I dose-escalation study, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, and subsequently phase II study has been completed. The purpose of this article is to review our experiences of dose-escalated SBRT for localized prostate cancer. Methods and materials: Patients enrolled to phase I/II study from 2006 to 2011 were reviewed. Prescription dose groups were 45, 47.5, and 50 Gray (Gy) in five fractions over 2.5 weeks. Toxicity and quality of life questionnaire data were collected and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were obtained in the form of means, medians, and ranges for the continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for the categoric variables. Results: Ninety-one patients were enrolled from five institutions. Median follow-up for prostate specific antigen (PSA) evaluation was 42 months. PSA control remains at 99%. While the MTD was not reached in the phase I study, excess high grade rectal toxicity (10.6%) was noted in the phase II study. The 13 patients treated to 50 Gy in the phase I study that did not have high grade rectal toxicity, in retrospect met these parameters and have not had further events on longer follow-up. Conclusion: Prostate specific antigen control rate, even for patients with intermediate risk, is thus far excellent at these dose levels. This study provides a platform for exploration of SBRT based clinical trials aimed at optimizing outcome for intermediate and high risk patients. High grade toxicities specifically related to the rectum were observed in a small but meaningful minority at the highest dose level. Dose constraints based on physiologic parameters have been defined to mitigate this risk, and strategies to minimize rectal exposure to such doses are being explored.

Efficacy of High Dose Per Fraction Radiation for Implanted Human Prostate Cancer in a Nude Mouse Model

PURPOSE SBRT is a new therapeutic paradigm using large dose per fraction treatments (aggressive hypofractionation). While SBRT has shown efficacy for treating patients with lung, liver and spine tumors, to our knowledge there have been no preclinical studies evaluating the efficacy of this treatment for prostate cancer. We investigated the dose-response characteristics of SBRT for treating human prostate cancer in a nude mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nude mice were injected subcutaneously into the right flank with C4-2 prostate cancer cells grown in culture. A dose escalation trial was performed to assess toxicity and response. Tumor bearing animals were radiated with 3 fractions (1 per week) for a total dose of 15 Gy in 11, 22.5 Gy in 9 and 45 Gy in 10, while 8 untreated animals served as controls. The mice were weighed, and tumor volume and PSA measurements were performed at baseline and weekly until 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS There was no treatment related toxicity. There was a significant difference in the tumor response to higher radiation doses. In the 15 and 22.5 Gy groups mean tumor volume decreased to 58% and 90% of the original volume, respectively, but the rats experienced progressive tumor regrowth within 1 week after the completion of therapy. The 45 Gy group had a mean tumor volume and PSA decrease of greater than 90%, which was sustained 1 month after treatment in all except 2 mice. CONCLUSIONS SBRT dose level treatments were able to significantly decrease tumor volume and PSA. However, using 15 and 22.5 Gy durable responses were not achieved except in a few mice. The 45 Gy group demonstrated sustained PSA and tumor volume decreases in most mice. These results clearly show an increasing dose-response relationship for a range of hypofractionated dose levels, as used in SBRT.