L. Cruschelli

Which method for quantifying ?microalbuminuria? in diabetics?: Comparison of several immunological methods (immunoturbidimetric assay, immunonephelometric assay, radioimmunoassay and two semiquantitative tests) for measurement of albumin in urine

We have compared the chemical and clinical characteristics of an immunonephelometric assay (INA), two immunoturbidimetric assays (ITA) and two semiquantitative methods with those of a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) for measurement of urinary albumin (UA) concentration in 136 diabetic patients. INA and RIA had similar accuracy, and provided comparable results. However, RIA has slightly greater sensitivity than INA, which is easier and faster. Good agreement was also found between RIA and the two ITA methods, although one of these overestimated RIA values in the low-medium range (5–30 mg/l) of urinary albumin. ITA seems suitable for initial screening of albuminuria in diabetic patients but more sensitive procedures (such as RIA and INA) seem preferable for measurement of UA concentrations in the normal range. The two semi-quantitative methods showed high sensitivity but poor specificity, because of the large number of false positive results. About 50% of diabetic patients “positive” by these methods did not have microalbuminuria. The utility of these methods is questionable, because many samples from diabetic patients need to be reassayed by a more specific and sensitive assay such as the RIA, INA or ITA methods.

‘Microalbuminuria’ in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with and without retinopathy

SummaryWe investigated the frequency of microalbuminuria (albumin excretion rate, AER>15 µg/min) (‘overnight’ urine collection and radioimmunological evaluation) and its relation to retinopathy (assessed by fluorangiography) in 113 type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects (aged 31±13 years; diabetes duration 11±7 years), all Albustix-negative. Sixty eight patients (60.2%) were free of retinal lesions, 31 (27.4%) had background retinopathy and 14 (12.4%) had proliferative retinopathy. Microalbuminuria was found in 25 patients (22%). Fifteen patients (13%) showed both retinopathy and microalbuminuria. Fifteen % (10/68) of the patients with no retinopathy and sixteen % (5/31) of those with background retinal lesions had microalbuminuria, while 29% (4/14) of the patients with proliferative retinopathy were normoalbuminuric. Among the 29 patients with diabetes for less than five years, 1 had retinopathy and 4 had microalbuminuria. Out of 15 patients with both retinopathy and microalbuminuria, 13 (87%) had had diabetes for more than 10 years. Diabetic retinopathy is more frequent than microalbuminuria (40vs 22%). Although the linkage between retinopathy and microalbuminuria is weak, after ten years of diabetes the two complications may frequently coincide.

Colorimetric versus radioimmunological measurement of glycated and non-glycated serum albumin after affinity chromatography

SummaryAffinity chromatography bym-aminophenylboronic acid has been proposed for routine measurement of glycated albumin. We assayed glycated and non-glycated fractions of serum albumin (HSA) eluted by affinity chromatography columns by both a specific RIA method for the human serum albumin (HSA) and by a colorimetric method. Sixteen diabetic patients presented a significantly higher percentage of glycated-HSA than 7 control subjects with both methods, and a strong correlation was found between the values obtained with the two methods. RIA was able to dectect a significant concentration of glycated-HSA in all normal subjects, while the colorimetric method was not. The accuracy of separation between the glycated and non-glycated fractions of albumin was tested using [14C]glucose as tracer. When [14C]glycated-HSA purified by Sephadex G25 filtration was chromatographed using them-aminophenylboronic acid, only 5.3% of the total14C-radioactivity present in the solution was recovered in the bound fraction, while 44.0% was eluted in non-protein-bound fraction and 54.7% was retained in the column. Our findings confirm that affinity chromatography bym-aminophenylboronic acid can be a useful tool in the monitoring of short glycemic control of diabetic patients. Our data also indicate that the affinity chromatography withm-aminophenylboronic acid does not accurately discriminate between glycated and non-glycated fraction of HSA.