Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L.D. Muller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L.D. Muller.


Livestock Production Science | 2004

Effects of fat supplementation on milk production and composition by dairy cows on pasture: a review

G.F. Schroeder; G.A. Gagliostro; F. Bargo; J.E. Delahoy; L.D. Muller

Abstract Eighteen experiments involving 25 comparisons were reviewed to describe the main effects of fat supplementation on milk production and composition with grazing dairy cows. Results were analyzed comparing the fat supplemented and the control groups without supplemental fat, and were segmented according to the stage of lactation (early- or mid-lactation) and the degree of saturation of the fat supplement (unsaturated or saturated). Fat supplements, both saturated and unsaturated, did not affect ruminal fiber digestion. Pasture and total dry matter intake were not consistently affected by fat supplementation. Milk and 4% fat-corrected milk production were increased by 0.97 and 1.05 kg/cow per day with fat supplementation. Milk response to fat supplementation was higher in mid-lactation cows and when saturated fat sources were fed. Milk fat concentration was increased 5.1% with saturated fat supplementation and decreased 8.0% with unsaturated fat supplementation when compared to control groups. Feeding unsaturated fats increased long-chain unsaturated fatty acids in milk fat including conjugated linoleic acid. Milk protein concentration was reduced by feeding unsaturated fat supplements, although milk protein yield was not affected. The experimental results reviewed suggest that fat supplementation to the diet of dairy cows grazing high-quality pastures generally increases milk production although the effects on milk composition depend on the degree of saturation of the fat supplement.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 1993

A Survey of Dairy Farms in Pennsylvania Using Minimal or Intensive Pasture Grazing Systems

W.J. Parker; L.D. Muller; S.L. Fales; W.T. McSweeny; L. Guthrie; L. Bush

Abstract A survey of Pennsylvania dairy farmers using (n = 77, PASTURE group) or not using (n = 70, CONFINED group) intensive grazing was conducted in November 1990. The questionnaire was mailed to 147 dairy farmers, of whom 64% responded. Final data analysis was performed on the 79 farms with P


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2007

Use of Partial Total Mixed Rations on Pasture-Based Dairy Farms in Pennsylvania and New York

K.J. Soder; L.D. Muller

ABSTRACT A study was conducted on the use of a partial total mixed ration (pTMR) on 13 pasture-based dairy farms in New York and Pennsylvania. The objectives of the study were to monitor and summarize management decisions made in relation to pTMR formulation throughout the grazing season and to develop recommendations for use of a pTMR in a pasturebased system. In general, haylage or silage replaced pasture in the pTMR diet. The pTMR protein level was often decreased with high pasture protein content; however, total dietary protein still exceeded protein requirements by an average of 39% over NRC requirements on most farms. In some cases, nutritionists or producers underestimated the nutritional quality of pasture. All farms appeared to be feeding adequate levels of energy in relation to NRC requirements. Few farms analyzed pastures for nutrient content, even though forage testing of stored forages was common. The amount of pTMR fed was frequently adjusted on most farms based on bulk milk tank readings, changing pasture availability, and pTMR refusal rates. Outside factors (i.e., water supply on pasture, heat, time on pasture, pasture condition) also have significant impacts on animal productivity and health and must be considered in a whole-farm approach. Flexibility is key in utilizing a pTMR on pasture-based operations to respond to changing pasture quality and quantity and to formulate least-cost rations. The basic principles of nutrition still apply — monitor dry matter intake, forage to concentrate ratios, and milk production.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 1987

Branched Chain Fatty Acids (Isoacids) And Valeric Acid For Ruminants12

L.D. Muller

Summary Branched chain fatty acids and valeric acid (isoacids) are either required by, or stimulate growth of, many rumen organisms and are required for cellulose digestion. Added isoacids provide a carbon skeleton for synthesis of branched chain amino acids valine, leucine, and isoleucine. Isoacids may stimulate bacterial protein synthesis, increase nitrogen retention, and enhance cellulose digestion. In lactating dairy cattle, addition of isoacids to the diet has the potential to increase milk production by 5 to 10%. This response may not occur under all dietary and management conditions, and may differ according to age of cows. The improved response occurs primarily in early lactation. Results with the addition of isoacids to diets of growing animals have been promising and warrant additional studies.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2006

Monensin for Grazing Dairy Cows

L.D. Muller; Fernando Bargo; I.R. Ipharraguerre

Abstract The results of 14 research studies indicated that grazing dairy cows fed monensin respond similarly in milk yield and milk composition to dairy cows fed in confinement. When compared to controls, grazing cows receiving monensin averaged 0.9 kg/cow per d greater milk production. Milk fat percent was 0.1% less and milk protein percent was 0.05% less; however, daily yield of milk fat and milk protein were slightly greater for grazing cows fed monensin compared with controls. Results from a study in which pasture was supplemented with a partial total mixed ration (TMR) suggest the effects of feeding monensin pre-calving carry over post-calving in early lactation. Feeding monensin increased yields of milk and protein without affecting 3.5% fat-corrected milk production, reduced the loss of body condition score, and improved percentage of pregnancy. The effects of monensin may be related to an improved energy balance of lactating dairy cows fed pasture supplemented with a TMR. Monensin was initially approved for dairy cows in the United States only when included in a TMR. Monensin is now approved for component feeding systems in which cows are fed in a tie stall barn or milking parlor, or as a top dress, and thus can be fed to dairy cows on a grazing system.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2004

Milk Production of Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations After a Grazing Period

F. Bargo; J.E. Delahoy; L.D. Muller

Twenty multiparous Holstein cows were used in a completely randomized design with repeated measures to study milk production of cows supplemented or not supplemented with concentrate when they were switched to a total mixed ration (TMR) after grazing. In one group, cows grazed an or-chardgrass/bromegrass pasture and were assigned to one of two treatments: 1) unsupplemented (U; 1 kg/d mineral mix) or 2) concentrate supplemented (CS; 1 kg corn-based concentrate/4 kg milk). Total DMI was greater (26.5 vs 22.0 kg/d), but pasture DMI was less (16.8 vs 21.2 kg/ d), for CS cows because of the substitution rate of 0.49 kg pasture/kg concentrate. Overall, CS cows had greater 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) (32.9 vs 26.5 kg/d), but less milk urea N (MUN; 9.6 vs 14.7 mg/dL) and milk fat (3.13% vs 3.88%), than U cows. Milk response to supplementation averaged 1.08 kg milk/kg concentrate. Cows assigned to both treatments lost BW (-17 kg/d) and body condition score (BCS) (-0.33). At the end of the 6-wk grazing period, all cows were switched to a TMR fed in confinement for 11 wk. Overall, DMI (24.3 kg/d), 3.5% FCM (30.6 kg/d), milk fat (3.26%), milk true protein (2.87%), and MUN (12.7 mg/dL) did not differ between treatments. Cows gained BW (53 kg) and BCS (0.33). A significant treatment × time interaction was found for milk yield. During the first day of TMR feeding, milk yield was greater (30.9 vs 19.3 kg/d) for CS cows. After 10 d on a TMR, milk yields between cows that had previously been on the U or CS treatments did not differ (35.5 kg/d). When cows were switched from only pasture to a TMR, milk yield was comparable with that of cows fed CS after 10 d. Lack of carry-over effects of previous treatments and increased production suggest improvement in nutrition and the potential for greater animal well-being for cows housed in a tiestall barn and fed a nutritionally complete TMR.


The Professional Animal Scientist | 2003

Milk Response to Bovine Somatotropin of High Producing Dairy Cows with Three Different Feeding Systems Combining Pasture and Total Mixed Rations

F. Bargo; L.D. Muller; Naomi Altman

Forty-five Holsteins cows (15 primiparous; 30 multiparous) were used to evaluate the milk response to bovine somatotropin (bST) injections with three feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed ration (TMR) in a 21-wk repeated measures experiment. The three treatments were 1) pasture plus concentrate (PC), 2) pasture plus TMR (pTMR), and 3) TMR (non-pasture). Mean total DMI, estimated using chromic oxide as a fecal marker, was 21.6, 25.3, and 26.8 kg/d for cows fed PC, pTMR, and TMR, respectively. Milk production was greatest for cows fed TMR (38.1 kg/d), least for cows fed PC (28.5 kg/d), and intermediate for cows fed pTMR (32.0 kg/d). Cows fed pTMR and TMR had greater milk fat (3.33% vs 3.13%) and true protein (2.97% vs 2.82%) percentage than cows fed PC. Cows on PC gained less BW and lost more body condition than cows on pTMR and TMR. Ten bST injections were administered during the 21-wk trial. Cows had a milk peak different (P<0.05) from d 1 (injection day) for six of the injections on the PC treatment, for four of the injections on the pTMR treatment, and for nine of the injections on the TMR treatment. Day of peak milk yield postinjection and milk response per day were d 6.4 and 2.6 kg for the cows on the PC treatment, d 7.3 and 2.4 kg for cows on the pTMR treatment, and d 7.1 and 4.0 kg for cows on the TMR treatment, respectively. Overall, milk response to bST was greater for cows on the TMR treatment than for cows on the PC and pTMR treatments (344 vs. 259 kg per cow).


Journal of Dairy Science | 2003

INVITED REVIEW: PRODUCTION AND DIGESTION OF SUPPLEMENTED DAIRY COWS ON PASTURE

F. Bargo; L.D. Muller; E.S. Kolver; J.E. Delahoy


Journal of Dairy Science | 1998

Effect of Intake of Pasture on Concentrations of Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Milk of Lactating Cows

M.L. Kelly; E.S. Kolver; Dale E. Bauman; M.E. Van Amburgh; L.D. Muller


Journal of Dairy Science | 2002

Milk Response to Concentrate Supplementation of High Producing Dairy Cows Grazing at Two Pasture Allowances

F. Bargo; L.D. Muller; J.E. Delahoy; T.W. Cassidy

Collaboration


Dive into the L.D. Muller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G.A. Varga

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Bargo

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.E. Delahoy

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.C. Griel

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T.F. Sweeney

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.A. Rogers

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E.S. Kolver

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L.A. Holden

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul J. Wangsness

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R.S. Kensinger

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge