L. Early
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. Early.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2002
David Weill; Gerald C Dey; R.Alan Hicks; K. Randall Young; George L. Zorn; James K. Kirklin; L. Early; David C. McGiffin
BACKGROUND Many potential lung donors are excluded on the basis of a positive donor gram stain (DGS). We examined the association between a positive DGS and the probability of post-operative recipient pneumonia in the first 30 days. METHODS Ninety lung transplants (80 with a non-septic pre-transplant diagnosis) from 60 consecutive donors were evaluated for post-operative pneumonia (defined as a compatible clinical syndrome with fever, leukocytosis, chest X-ray abnormalities or histologic evidence obtained by transbronchial biopsy). DGS, white blood cell quantity, CXR and PaO(2)/FIO(2) (P/F) ratio were compared with immediate and 24-hour P/F ratio, length of mechanical ventilation and incidence of pneumonia. All recipients received standard prophylactic anti-bacterial coverage. Patients not surviving 30 days (n = 3) were excluded from this study, but none had evidence of pneumonia either by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), transbronchial biopsy or autopsy. RESULTS Fourteen (16%) of our 87 recipients developed pneumonia in the first 30 days after transplant. Of the 43 patients with a positive DGS, 5 (12%) developed pneumonia, compared to 9 of 44 (20%) with a negative DGS (p = 0.26). The mean post-operative P/F ratio (315 +/- 47 with a positive DGS, p = 0.3) and length of mechanical ventilation (2 days in each group) did not differ significantly between the negative and positive DGS groups. CONCLUSIONS In the current era of lung transplantation, DGS does not predict the development of early post-operative pneumonia and does not affect oxygenation or duration of mechanical ventilation; therefore, its role should be diminished when judging donor lung suitability.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1995
David C. McGiffin; Timo Savunen; James K. Kirklin; David C. Naftel; Robert C. Bourge; Thomas D. Paine; Connie White-Williams; Tero Sisto; L. Early
Coronary artery disease after cardiac transplantation is a major obstacle to long-term survival. The development and progression of coronary artery disease after cardiac transplantation was analyzed in 217 consecutive patients undergoing transplantation. The actuarial freedom from any coronary artery disease (by angiography or autopsy) was 81% at 2 years and 20% at 8 years after transplantation. Coronary artery disease was more prevalent in male than female patients (30% versus 50% free of coronary artery disease at 5 years, p = 0.01). By multivariable analysis, pretransplantation risk factors identified for coronary artery disease included pretransplantation positive cytomegalovirus serologic status of the recipient (p = 0.002) and older donor age (p = 0.07). Progression of coronary artery disease was variable in both time of onset and rate. Earlier detection did not result in more rapid progression. Coronary events severe enough for retransplantation (n = 8) and/or death from coronary artery disease (n = 9) occurred in 15 patients, of whom four underwent retransplantation. The actuarial freedom from coronary events was 88% at 5 years and 79% at 8 years. By multivariable analysis, only male recipient (p = 0.05) was a risk factor for coronary events. Seven of the 15 patients (47%) with coronary events died suddenly of coronary artery disease without prior angiographic evidence of severe coronary disease. Coronary artery disease is progressive. Improved surveillance methods are required to detect the disease and institute timely intervention to prevent the occurrence of unanticipated death.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 2000
William L. Holman; Steven P. Goldberg; L. Early; David C. McGiffin; James K. Kirklin; Derrick H Cho; Albert D. Pacifico
BACKGROUND This report describes technical details of the right thoracotomy approach for mitral surgery, and analyzes our experience with this procedure for patients with a prior sternotomy. Three methods for myocardial management (hypothermic cardioplegic arrest, beating heart, and fibrillating heart) are compared. METHODS Records were abstracted of patients who had a right thoracotomy between January 1, 1992 and July 1, 1999 for mitral surgery after at least one prior sternotomy. Demographic, operative, and outcome data were collected for analysis. Telephone follow-up was used to measure postoperative New York Heart Association functional status. RESULTS Eighty-four patients (mean age 60 +/- 15 years) had reoperative mitral surgery via a right thoracotomy. Myocardial management included ventricular fibrillation in 10 patients, operation on the beating heart in 58 patients, and hypothermic blood cardioplegia arrest in 16 patients. The mean time in the operating room was 185 +/- 73 minutes, and the mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 63 +/- 56 minutes. There were no perioperative strokes and the prevalence of death for patients who received cardioplegic arrest was significantly higher than the prevalence of death for patients who had mitral surgery with perfused fibrillating or beating heart techniques (p = 0.007; Fishers exact test comparing risk-unadjusted mortality). CONCLUSIONS Right thoracotomy provides efficient exposure for reoperative mitral surgery. Mitral valve procedures on the fibrillating or beating heart are feasible in most patients and are at least as safe as surgery using cardioplegic arrest.
American Journal of Transplantation | 2003
David Weill; Brion J. Lock; Donavon L. Wewers; K. Randall Young; George L. Zorn; L. Early; James K. Kirklin; David C. McGiffin
Despite the serious direct and indirect deleterious effects caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unknown. We sought to determine whether combination prophylaxis using intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) and CMV‐IVIG reduced the incidence of CMV compared to GCV alone. Donor CMV positive/recipient negative (D+/R–) patients received GCV (6 weeks i.v. + 6 weeks oral) and CMV‐IVIG (every 2 weeks for 7 doses), while R+ patients received GCV (2 weeks i.v. + 4 weeks oral) and CMV‐IVIG (every 2 weeks for 3 doses). The group receiving combination prophylaxis (GpA) was compared to a historical, case‐controlled group receiving GCV alone (GpB). Groups were matched by CMV donor/recipient serology, pretransplant diagnosis, age, and sex in reverse chronological order. Cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone were used in both groups. Additionally, GpA received daclizumab induction therapy. Groups were compared as to the incidence of CMV disease, CMV infection, and acute rejection (AR). In GpA, 38 patients were evaluable and matched to 48 patients in GpB. Three GpA patients (8%) (2 D+/R–) developed CMV disease vs. 16 patients (33%) in GpB, p = 0.0077, Fishers exact. There was also a trend toward a delay in CMV onset (148 days in GpA vs. 92 days in GpB, p = 0.07, Mann–Whitney). CMV infection did not occur in GpA, and one case occurred in GpB. There was no difference in the incidence of AR (66% in GpA vs. 79% in GpB, p = 0.22, Fishers exact) or the need for cytolytic therapy between groups. Despite the use of daclizumab induction therapy, combination prophylaxis with GCV and CMV‐IVIG reduced the incidence and probably delayed the onset of CMV infection compared to GCV alone. Longer follow‐up will be needed to evaluate the impact of combination therapy on the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS).
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1997
David C. McGiffin; Andrew J. Galbraith; Mark F. O'Brien; Geoffrey J. McLachlan; David C. Naftel; Peter Adams; Seenu Reddy; L. Early
Biologic valve re-replacement was examined in a series of 1343 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, with a cryopreserved or 4 degrees C stored allograft valve or a xenograft valve. A parametric model approach was used to simultaneously model the competing risks of death without re-replacement and re-replacement before death. One hundred eleven patients underwent a first re-replacement for a variety of reasons (69 patients with xenograft valves, 28 patients with 4 degrees C stored allograft valves, and 14 patients with cryopreserved allograft valves). By multivariable analysis younger age at operation was associated with xenograft, 4 degrees C stored allograft, and cryopreserved allograft valve re-replacement. However, this effect was examined in the context of longer survival of younger patients, which increases their exposure to the risk of re-replacement as compared with that in older patients whose decreased survival reduced their probability of requiring valve re-replacement. In patients older than 60 years at the time of aortic valve replacement, the probability of re-replacement (for any reason) before death was similar for xenografts and cryopreserved allograft valves but higher for 4 degrees C stored valves. However, in patients younger than 60 years, the probability of re-replacement at any time during the remainder of the life of the patient was lower with the cryopreserved allograft valve compared with the xenograft valve and 4 degrees C stored allografts.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 2000
David Weill; David C. McGiffin; George L. Zorn; C. Bruce Alexander; L. Early; James K. Kirklin; K. Randall Young
BACKGROUND Most pulmonary complications associated with lung transplantation have non-specific clinical characteristics. Furthermore, common diagnostic modalities, including bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy (TBB), often do not render a definitive diagnosis. In this study, we reviewed our experience with open lung biopsy (OLB) following lung transplantation, specifically regarding its ability to safely provide clinically relevant information that affects therapeutic decisions. METHODS From October 1989 to March 2000, 202 patients underwent lung transplantation at our institution. We reviewed the clinical course of the 42 patients who received 48 OLBs. Of these patients, we determined the pre-operative clinical condition, preceding TBB histologic information, OLB histology, treatment changes, and procedural complications as a result of the OLB. RESULTS A new, clinically unsuspected diagnosis was made in 14 biopsies (29% of all OLB), and all of these resulted in therapy changes. Thirty-two biopsies (67% of all OLB) confirmed our clinical suspicions, and new therapy was initiated in 30 of these patients. Two patients (4% of all OLB) had non-diagnostic OLB. Four biopsies (8% of all OLB), including the 2 non-diagnostic OLBs, did not result in any therapy changes or initiation of new therapy. Complications occurred in 3 patients, all of whom had an air leak for >7 days. CONCLUSION Open lung biopsy in lung transplant patients renders a new, unsuspected diagnosis in nearly one third of patients and leads to specific, directed therapy in the vast majority of patients. Open-lung biopsy can be performed safely and should be considered when diagnosis is uncertain in clinically deteriorating patients.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 1997
R. M. Mills; David C. Naftel; James K. Kirklin; A. B. Van Bakel; B. E. Jaski; E. K. Massin; H. J. Eisen; F. A. Lee; D. P. Fishbein; Robert C. Bourge; David C. McGiffin; T. Weiss; A. Crosswyt; B. Austin; L. Early; P. Holmes; M. Veazey; P. Sims; K. Hubbard; J. Brush; Marc Pritzker; K. D. Lake; M. O'Kane; Scott A. Chapman; F. Hoffman; N. Seimers; C. Jorgensen; W. Pedersen; L. Joyce; F. Eales
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 1994
James K. Kirklin; David C. Naftel; T. B. Levine; Robert C. Bourge; G. B. Pelletier; J. O'Donnell; L. W. Miller; Marc Pritzker; David C. McGiffin; Connie White-Williams; G. Caddell; L. Early; A. Graham; P. Holmes; M. Veazey; P. Sims; K. D. Lake; J.B Young; J. A. Farmer
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1993
David C. McGiffin; Mark F. O'Brien; Andrew J. Galbraith; Geoffrey J. McLachlan; E. G. Stafford; M. A. H. Gardner; Peter G. Pohlner; L. Early; L. Kear
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation | 1997
R. M. Mills; David C. Naftel; James K. Kirklin; A. B. Van Bakel; B. E. Jaski; E. K. Massin; H. J. Eisen; F. A. Lee; D. P. Fishbein; Robert C. Bourge; David C. McGiffin; T. Weiss; A. Crosswyt; B. Austin; L. Early; P. Holmes; M. Veazey; P. Sims; K. Hubbard; J. Brush; Marc Pritzker; K. D. Lake; M. O'Kane; Scott A. Chapman; F. Hoffman; N. Seimers; C. Jorgensen; W. Pedersen; L. Joyce; F. Eales