L. Ecotière

Prognostic value of kidney biopsy in myeloma cast nephropathy: a retrospective study of 70 patients

BACKGROUND Light chain myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) is the major cause of renal failure in multiple myeloma and strongly impacts patient survival. The role of kidney biopsy in the management of MCN is unclear. METHODS Renal pathological findings were retrospectively studied in 70 patients with multiple myeloma and MCN. Patients were categorized according to the achievement or not of renal response, as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and/or dialysis independence at 3 months. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (46%) achieved a renal response. In the whole study population, the following parameters differed significantly between patients with and without renal response, respectively: baseline median eGFR (13.3 versus 9.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.017), Acute Kidney Injury Network Stage 3 (68.8 versus 92.1%, P = 0.019), haematological response rate (94 versus 34%, P < 0.0001), median percentage of free light chain (FLC) reduction at Day 21 (92 versus 24%, P = 0.006) and median number of casts/10 fields (14 versus 25, P = 0.005). The extent of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy was similar. In multivariate analysis, only FLC reduction at Day 21 was significantly associated with renal response. However, when considering only the subgroup of haematological responders, both median number of casts [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.88-0.98, P = 0.01] and extent of tubular atrophy (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.52, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of renal response. CONCLUSIONS In MCN, the presence of numerous casts and diffuse tubular atrophy is associated with poor renal prognosis. These data suggest that additional strategies to reduce FLC burden should be considered in patients with extensive cast formation.

Comparison of hemodialysis with medium cut-off dialyzer and on-line hemodiafiltration on the removal of small and middle-sized molecules

BACKGROUND Recent data suggest that the use of medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers in hemodialysis (HD) promotes greater clearance and reduction ratio (RR) for myoglobin and other large-sized molecules than on-line hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF), but its effects on β2-microglobulin are not clear. We compared RR and clearances of small and middle-sized molecules between high-flux ol-HDF and MCO (Theranova) dialyzer in HD (MCO-HD) as well as nutritional parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients treated first with ol-HDF who were thereafter switched to MCO-HD over a 1-year period. Three dialysis sessions in each 6-month period were examined. We calculated RR and clearance of small and middle-sized molecules. RESULTS There was no significant difference between ol-HDF and MCO-HD for median serum albumin and prealbumin level, mean KT/V, mean urea and creatinine RR, mean β2-microglobulin (81 ± 5 vs. 81 ± 6%, p = 0.72) and myoglobin (60 ± 9% vs. 61 ± 7%, p = 0.59), RR or clearances. CONCLUSION The use of MCO (Theranova) dialyzer in HD produces similar removal of urea, creatinine, β2-microglobulin and myoglobin as does ol-HDF, with good tolerance profile and without modification of nutritional status.
.

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation comparing cyclosporine A/azathioprine or cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil bitherapy to cyclosporine A monotherapy: a 10‐year postrandomization follow‐up study

Long‐term outcomes in renal transplant recipients withdrawn from steroid and submitted to further minimization of immunosuppressive regimen after 1 year are lacking. In this multicenter study, 204 low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients were randomized 14.2 ± 3.7 months post‐transplantation to receive either cyclosporine A (CsA) + azathioprine (AZA; n = 53), CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 53), or CsA monotherapy (n = 98). At 3 years postrandomization, the occurrence of biopsy for graft dysfunction was similar in bitherapy and monotherapy groups (21/106 vs. 26/98; P = 0.25). At 10 years postrandomization, patients’ survival was 100%, 94.2%, and 95.8% (P = 0.25), and death‐censored graft survival was 94.9%, 94.7%, and 95.2% (P = 0.34) in AZA, MMF, and CsA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.4 ± 31.1, 60.1 ± 22.2, and 60.1 ± 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively (P = 0.16). The incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection was 1.4%/year in the whole cohort. None of the patients developed polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy. The main cause of graft loss (n = 12) was chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (n = 6). De novo donor‐specific antibodies were detected in 13% of AZA‐, 21% of MMF‐, and 14% of CsA‐treated patients (P = 0.29). CsA monotherapy after 1 year is safe and associated with prolonged graft survival in well‐selected renal transplant recipient (ClinicalTrials.gov number: 980654).