L.H. Arroyo

A novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of scleroderma-associated pulmonary complications: safety and efficacy of combination therapy with imatinib and cyclophosphamide

OBJECTIVE Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) has limited therapeutic options due to unclear pathogenesis. Recently, PDGF receptor (PDGFR) amplification has been postulated to cause fibrosis. We hypothesized that a combination of immunosuppressive agents, e.g. cyclophosphamide (CYC) and imatinib (PDGFR inhibitor), might be useful for treating SSc-related ILD. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination therapy in scleroderma-related pulmonary disease. METHODS Five patients with advanced SSc-ILD underwent comprehensive cardiopulmonary evaluation, followed by administration of oral imatinib (200 mg/day) and intravenous CYC (500 mg every 3 weeks). Safety was assessed by close monitoring of complete blood count, liver and cardiac functions. Efficacy was evaluated by measuring pulmonary functions at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS Of the five patients in the study, four had severe and one had mild restrictive lung disease. All patients tolerated the combination treatment without myelosuppression, deterioration of liver functions or cardiac status. Only one patient had mild fluid overload requiring diuretics. Two patients completed 1 yr of treatment. Only the patient with mild restrictive lung disease showed improvement in pulmonary function. CONCLUSION The combination of intravenous CYC and oral imatinib was well-tolerated without major side effects. Clinical improvement was seen in only the patient with mild restrictive disease. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the safety, tolerability and efficacy of imatinib in combination with CYC in scleroderma-related pulmonary disease. Large prospective trials are needed to further determine optimal timing, dose and duration of this regimen.

A prospective, randomized trial of single-drug versus dual-drug immunosuppression in heart transplantation: the tacrolimus in combination, tacrolimus alone compared (TICTAC) trial.

Background— Cardiac transplantation, a procedure nearly abandoned in the 1970s, has evolved into the standard of care for appropriate patients with end-stage heart failure. Much of this success has been due to improvements in immunosuppression, including the introduction of a triple-drug regimen. Retrospective reports suggested that single-drug immunosuppression with tacrolimus was feasible. As such, a prospective, randomized trial was conducted to test this approach. Methods and Results— One hundred fifty adult de novo heart transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing tacrolimus monotherapy (MONO) with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil therapy (COMBO). Corticosteroids were used in the early postoperative period but discontinued in all patients over 8 to 9 weeks. The primary end point was the composite biopsy score at 6 months after transplant. Patients were followed for 1 to 5 years. The composite biopsy score was similar between groups at 6 and 12 months: 6-month MONO, 0.70±0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.80) versus COMBO, 0.65±0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.74; P =0.44). Allograft vasculopathy was assessed by angiography and intravascular ultrasound, with no significant differences noted. Three-year survival was also similar (92.4% MONO versus 97% COMBO; P =0.58, log-rank). Conclusions— Addition of mycophenolate to single-agent immunosuppression did not provide an advantage over single-agent immunosuppression in terms of rejection, allograft vasculopathy, or 3-year survival. Corticosteroids, which have traditionally been a mainstay of therapy, were successfully discontinued in all patients. These conclusions are tempered by the limited statistical power associated with a sample size of only 150 patients. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00299221][1]. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00299221&atom=%2Fcirchf%2F4%2F2%2F129.atomBackground—Cardiac transplantation, a procedure nearly abandoned in the 1970s, has evolved into the standard of care for appropriate patients with end-stage heart failure. Much of this success has been due to improvements in immunosuppression, including the introduction of a triple-drug regimen. Retrospective reports suggested that single-drug immunosuppression with tacrolimus was feasible. As such, a prospective, randomized trial was conducted to test this approach. Methods and Results—One hundred fifty adult de novo heart transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing tacrolimus monotherapy (MONO) with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil therapy (COMBO). Corticosteroids were used in the early postoperative period but discontinued in all patients over 8 to 9 weeks. The primary end point was the composite biopsy score at 6 months after transplant. Patients were followed for 1 to 5 years. The composite biopsy score was similar between groups at 6 and 12 months: 6-month MONO, 0.70±0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.80) versus COMBO, 0.65±0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.74; P=0.44). Allograft vasculopathy was assessed by angiography and intravascular ultrasound, with no significant differences noted. Three-year survival was also similar (92.4% MONO versus 97% COMBO; P=0.58, log-rank). Conclusions—Addition of mycophenolate to single-agent immunosuppression did not provide an advantage over single-agent immunosuppression in terms of rejection, allograft vasculopathy, or 3-year survival. Corticosteroids, which have traditionally been a mainstay of therapy, were successfully discontinued in all patients. These conclusions are tempered by the limited statistical power associated with a sample size of only 150 patients. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00299221.