L.H.M. Mens

Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.

Objectives: To compare the effects of Monopole (Mono), Tripole (Tri), and “Virtual channel” (Vchan) electrode configurations on spectral resolution and speech perception in a crossover design. Design: Nine experienced adults who received an Advanced Bionics CII/90K cochlear implant participated in a crossover design using three experimental strategies for 2 wk each. Three strategies were compared: (1) Mono; (2) Tri with current partly returning to adjacent electrodes and partly (25 or 75%) to the extracochlear reference; and (3) a monopolar “Vchan” strategy creating seven intermediate channels between two contacts. Each strategy was a variant of the standard “HiRes” processing strategy using 14 channels and 1105 pulses/sec/channel, and a pulse duration of 32 &mgr;sec/phase. Spectral resolution was measured using broadband noise with a sinusoidally rippled spectral envelope with peaks evenly spaced on a logarithmic frequency scale. Speech perception was measured for monosyllables in quiet and in steady-state and fluctuating noises. Subjective comments on music experience and preferences in everyday use were assessed through questionnaires. Results: Thresholds and most comfortable levels with Mono and Vchan were both significantly lower than levels with Tri. Spectral resolution was significantly higher with Tri than with Mono; spectral resolution with Vchan did not differ significantly from the other configurations. Moderate but significant correlations between word recognition and spectral resolution were found in speech in quiet and fluctuating noise. For speech in quiet, word recognition was best with Mono and worst with Vchan; Tri did not significantly differ from the other configurations. Pooled across the noise conditions, word recognition was best with Tri and worst with Vchan (Mono did not significantly differ from the other configurations). These differences were small and insufficient to result in a clear increase in performance across subjects if the result from the best configuration per subject was compared with the result from Mono. Across all subjects, music appreciation and satisfaction in everyday use did not clearly differ between configurations. Conclusions: (1) Although spectral resolution was improved with the tripolar configuration, differences in speech performance were too small in this limited group of subjects to justify clinical introduction. (2) Overall spectral resolution remained extremely poor compared with normal hearing; it remains to be seen whether further manipulations of the electrical field will be more effective.

Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.

Objective: To study the effect of two multipolar electrode configurations on speech perception, pitch perception, and the intracochlear electrical field. Study Design: Crossover design; within subject. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Eight experienced adult cochlear implant users. Intervention: Each subject used each of three experimental processors for 3 weeks. The following processors were compared that differed only in electrode configuration: 1) monopolar; 2) hybrid quadrupolar, in which half of the current returned to the extracochlear reference electrode and half to two electrodes immediately to the left and right of the active electrode; and 3) flat tripolar +2, which directed all the current to four reference electrodes (two on each side), separated from the active electrode by two inactive electrodes. All the processors used the standard Advanced Bionics HiRes speech-processing strategy, 12 channels, 1,220 pulses per second per channel, and with a pulse width of 33 (μs/phase). Results: The monopolar processors had the largest stimulation efficiency and the smallest dynamic range in linear current units. The reverse was true of flat tripolar +2 processor, whereas the hybrid quadrupolar processor fell in between. Insufficient loudness growth prevented the use of the flat tripolar +2 processor in three subjects. Word recognition did not differ between the clinically used 16-channel monopolar processor and the experimental monopolar processor, regardless of the differences in the number of channels, pulse rate, and duration of experience. Word recognition with the flat tripolar +2 processor was significantly poorer than with the monopolar and hybrid quadrupolar processors; monopolar and quadrupolar processors did not differ. There was no significant interaction between processor type and competing noise type (stationary or fluctuating), but performance at the higher level of fluctuating noise was best with the hybrid quadrupolar processor in almost all the subjects. Pitch scaling showed ceiling performance in five subjects and differed between processors in the two other subjects with imperfect tonotopy. Intracochlear current spread was considerable with the monopolar configuration; it was reduced with the hybrid quadrupolar configuration and virtually absent beyond the active electrodes with the tripolar configuration. Conclusion: More confined configurations reduced the longitudinal width of the electrical field, which was expected to enhance channel separation, but no improvement in word recognition was found. More research is needed to test confined configurations that have enhanced efficiency and to evaluate the fundamental effects of configuration on channel discriminability.

The risk of vestibular function loss after intracochlear implantation

Sixty patients were selected for cochlear implantation and 50 of them received an intracochlear implant (Nucleus). Vestibular function was evaluated before and after surgery using a caloric test and a velocity step test. Sixteen patients had normal or residual vestibular function before surgery, 11 bilateral and 5 unilateral; in 3 of the latter patients, the ear with vestibular areflexia was elected for implantation, which reduced the number of patients at risk for vestibular dysfunction to 13. Vestibular function was preserved in all of these patients except for 4; the risk of vestibular function loss can therefore be rated at about 31%.

Vestibular Function in Cochlear Implant Patients

Thirty-five patients receiving a cochlear implant were evaluated using vestibular function tests. Twenty-five patients received an intracochlear implant (Nucleus). Three out of 6 patients with normo- or hyporeflexia before implantation showed postoperative vestibular damage. In one case this was iatrogenic. Together with available data from the literature the risk of losing preoperative vestibular function is estimated to be around 60%. Improvement of implantation techniques can probably reduce this risk considerably.

Does intracochlear implantation jeopardize vestibular function

We present the results of the vestibular function tests of 35 patients who were selected for cochlear implantation. Vestibular function was evaluated with a caloric test and a velocity step test. The preimplant data were compared to those in previously reported series. Intracochlear implantation was performed in 25 patients. The vestibular complications encountered in this group are presented and discussed. Six patients had normal or residual (but substantial) vestibular function in the ear eligible for implantation. Vestibular function was preserved in 3 patients and was lost in 3 patients, in 1 case through an iatrogenic cause. We estimate the risk of losing vestibular function as a result of intracochlear implantation as between 50% and 60% on the basis of the present and previously reported data.

Identifying electrode failures with cochlear implant generated surface potentials

A procedure for measuring surface potentials called electrode-by-electrode (E-E) mapping is described that can detect the nonintermittent malfunctioning of the implanted receiver and electrode array of multichannel cochlear implants, such as the Cochlear (Nucleus) device. E-E mapping is based on the sequential stimulation of all paired combinations of electrodes. The recorded waveforms were averaged and all peak-to-peak amplitudes were combined into one graph for a comprehensive check on open circuit or short-circuited electrodes. Normative data from 21 patients are given. E-E mapping detected electrode failure in three patients whose behavioral thresholds were in agreement with hardware problems, including one case of overstimulation at high stimulus levels. In one patient who was suffering from overstimulation without any deviant thresholds, no failure could be detected. The procedure takes about a quarter of an hour and the stimulus amplitude needed is below threshold for most patients, which makes it especially useful in children. An informative partial E-E map can be made during implantation and requires virtually no extra theater time.

Results from Four Cochlear Implant Patients with Usher's Syndrome

Individual results are presented of 4 patients with Ushers syndrome type 1 who received a cochlear implant. Both single-channel and multichannel implants were used. Because of implant failure, one of the single-channel systems was replaced by a Nucleus multichannel system. Results are compared to the results of 5 other prelingually deaf cochlear implant users. The performance of the patients with Ushers syndrome on suprasegmental and segmental speech perception tests and on a connected discourse tracking task did not differ significantly from the performance of the other prelingually deaf patients. A significant improvement over time was found at the suprasegmental level for the combined group of Ushers and other patients. No obvious differences were found between the scores from the patients with a single-channel and the patients with a multichannel device. The rehabilitation of the Ushers patients required very little extra effort in comparison with that of the other prelingually deaf patients; all patients reported considerable advantages in hearing abilities and social life.

Cochlear implantation in 3 patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: imaging, surgery and programming issues.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heterogeneous disease of the connective tissue caused by a defective gene that is responsible for the production of collagen type I, leading to defective bone matrix and connective tissue. Hearing loss affects 35–60% of the patients and will progress to deafness in 2–11% of OI patients for whom cochlear implantation may become the only remaining treatment option. Three patients with OI were retrieved from the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Centre’s database. Most of the specific observations in ear surgery on patients with OI, such as brittle scutum, sclerotic thickening of the cochlea, hyperplastic mucosa in the middle ear and persistent bleeding, were encountered in these 3 patients. In case 3, with severe deformities on the CT scan, misplacement of the electrode array into the horizontal semicircular canal occurred. In all 3 cases, programming was hindered by nonauditory stimulation. Even after reimplantation, nonauditory sensations lead to case 3 becoming a nonuser. Averaged electrode voltages in case 3 were deviant in accordance with an abnormally conductive otic capsule. Spatial spread of neural excitation responses in cases 1 and 2 suggested intracochlear channel interaction for several electrodes, often in combination with facial nerve stimulation (FNS). In case 1, the estimated pitch of the electrodes that caused FNS varied consistently. Despite the electrophysiological changes, after 1-year follow-up, open set phoneme scores of 81% and 78% were reached in cases 1 and 2, respectively. When aware and prepared for the specific changes of the temporal bone in OI, cochlear implantation can be a safe and feasible procedure. Preoperative imaging is recommended to be fully informed on the morphology of the petrosal bone. In case of severe deformities on the CT scan, during counseling the possibility of misplacement should be mentioned. Rehabilitation is often hindered by FNS requiring frequent refitting.

The Clarion Electrode Positioner: Approximation to the Medial Wall and Current Focussing?

In order to establish whether the electrical field created by a cochlear implant electrode is more focussed in a perimodiolar than in a medial position, voltages at non-stimulated electrodes were collected from the Clarion 1.2 implant before and after insertion of the Clarion Electrode Positioning System. The positioner is inserted lateral to the electrode array and is intended to bring the array close to the medial wall of the scala tympani. These intracochlear electrode voltages (IEVs) were collected in 9 surgeries with the HiFocus I electrode array with positioner. Stapedius reflex thresholds were decreased after insertion of the positioner on 20 out of 22 electrodes. Electrode impedances did not increase significantly. IEVs increased slightly for all stimulated electrodes. However, the positioner did not significantly affect the slope of the IEVs for any of the stimulated electrodes. Individual differences between patients in the mean IEV amplitude were considerable; 2 patients deafened by otosclerosis showed particularly low amplitudes. Thus, IEVs provided no evidence of a focussing of the electrical field by introducing the positioner. Possible benefits of a perimodiolar position regarding efficiency and channel separation are discussed in terms of a reduced distance between electrodes and neural elements.

Stapedius reflex and EABR thresholds in experienced users of the nucleus cochlear implant

Evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) and stapedius reflex thresholds were established in 7 experienced users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Even using biphasic 400 microseconds/phase clicks for the EABR, responses were observed in only 5 patients; no stapedius reflex (SR) was seen in 3 patients, 2 of whom had a history of middle-ear disorder. The EABR threshold varied widely between subjective threshold and uncomfortable loudness level (ULL) for the same stimulus. The average SR threshold was found somewhat more consistently at 66% of the dynamic range between threshold and ULL, but grossly overestimated the most comfortable level (MCL) in most cases. To obtain equal loudness at the same current level we suggest that broad clicks (300 microseconds/phase) be used for EABR measurements, thus compensating for the lower repetition rate of EABR stimulus compared with the device fitting stimulus.