L.H.V. van der Woude

Short-term adaptations in co-ordination during the initial phase of learning manual wheelchair propulsion

The purpose of this study was to analyse adaptations in kinematics and muscle activity/co-contraction in novice able-bodied subjects during the initial phase of learning hand rim wheelchair propulsion. Nine able-bodied subjects performed three 4-min practice blocks on a wheelchair ergometer. The external power output and velocity were constant for all blocks, respectively 0.25 W x kg(-1) and 1.11 m x s(-1). Electromyography of 16 arm, shoulder, back and chest muscles and kinematics were measured. Some small changes in the segmental movement pattern were seen during the practice period. Moreover, an increase in muscle activity and co-contraction of several muscles was found over time. The hypothesis that subjects instinctively search for an optimum frequency, in which the recovery phase is related to the eigenfrequency of the arms and, therefore, the least muscle activity, could not be supported. Since co-contraction of antagonist pairs remained the same or even increased, the hypothesis that there would be a decrease in muscle co-contraction as a result of practice, was not confirmed. This study was probably too short for the novice subjects to explore this new task of wheelchair propulsion completely and reach an optimum in terms of cycle frequency and muscle activity/co-contraction.

Hand rim configuration: effects on physical strain and technique in unimpaired subjects?

OBJECTIVEnHand rim wheelchair propulsion is inefficient and physically straining. To evaluate the possibly advantageous role in this respect of three different prototype hand rim configurations (a rubber foam-coated cylindrical (II) hand rim and two profiled rubber foam-coated hand rims (wide and narrow: III, IV)), a group of 10 unimpaired subjects conducted four submaximal discontinuous wheelchair exercise tests on a computer-controlled wheelchair ergometer, thus allowing a comparison with a standard hand rim (chromium-plated round hand rim (I)).nnnMETHODSnApart from physiological measures (oxygen uptake, heart rate (HR), ventilation, mechanical efficiency (ME)), a subjective score for the rating of each of the hand rims was determined, as well as characteristics of the force application in the propulsion phase during each test condition. Timing parameters of the push and recovery phase were determined. Each exercise test was conducted with one of the four hand rim configurations in a counter-balanced order.nnnRESULTSnAnalysis of variance with repeated measures (hand rim configuration, power output) revealed no significant effects (P>0.05) on any of the physiological parameters and force application characteristics for the main factor hand rim configuration. Only the subjective score (scale 0-10) for rating of the hand rims proved significantly different between the round rubber (7.5+/-0.53) coated hand rim-receiving the highest score-versus the narrow rubber-coated flat profiled hand rim (5.5+/-1.72).nnnDISCUSSIONnIn this subject group and under the selected tasks and submaximal conditions of wheelchair propulsion, the studied hand rim configurations did not introduce critical shifts in the technique of (de-)coupling and power production in the push phase. As a consequence, no systematic shifts in ME are found among the different hand rim configurations. It is suggested that the biological constraints of the task overrule the possible effects of small design variations of the different hand rim configurations within the studied subject group and under the limited test conditions. The hand rim design characteristics may however be much more critical in (1) experienced wheelchair users, (2) especially those subjects with a limited hand-arm and/or trunk function and/or (3) under much more extreme conditions of daily wheelchair ambulation (i.e. turning, stopping/starting, negotiating a slope) or during peak performance. These issues clearly require continued future research. As such, the current results can be viewed as preliminary results only.

Load on the shoulder complex during wheelchair propulsion and weight relief lifting

BACKGROUNDnThis study focuses on the relationship between overuse in association with wheelchair activities of daily living and risks for osteoarthrosis in the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. The aim is to quantify the joint moments and joint reaction forces in all three joints of the shoulder complex during wheelchair-related activities of daily living.nnnMETHODSnA convenience sample of 17 subjects performed two tasks (wheelchair propulsion and weight relief lifting). Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were measured and position and force data were used as input for a musculoskeletal model of the arm and shoulder. Output variables of the model were the moments and the joint reaction forces on the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joints.nnnFINDINGSnMoments on the sternoclavicular joint were higher than on the acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint, but the joint reaction forces on the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints were only one third of those on the glenohumeral joint (peak forces around 96N compared to 315N for wheelchair propulsion and around 330N compared to 1288N for weight relief lifting).nnnINTERPRETATIONnBased on the results found in this study, net joint moments are likely a better measure to describe the load on the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints due to the passive stabilization. Prospective studies on wheelchair overuse injuries should also look at the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints since the load of wheelchair tasks might be a risk factor for osteoarthrosis in these joints.

The effect of crank position and backrest inclination on shoulder load and mechanical efficiency during handcycling

Handbikes come in different models and setups, but only limited knowledge is available on the handbike‐user interface. The aim of this study was to identify optimal handbike setups, assuming that in such a setup mechanical efficiency is high, while shoulder load is low. Thirteen subjects with a spinal cord injury (paraplegia) performed handcycling with different handbike setups at constant power output: four crank positions (two distances, two heights) and four backrest inclinations. The O2‐consumption, kinetics, and kinematics were measured to calculate mechanical efficiency and shoulder load (glenohumeral contact force, net shoulder moments, and rotator cuff force). The analysis showed that more upright backrest positions resulted in lower shoulder load compared with the most reclined position [glenohumeral contact force (260 vs 335u2009N), supraspinatus (14.4% vs 18.2%), and infraspinatus force (5.4% vs 9.8%)], while there was no difference in efficiency. Except for a reduction in subscapularis force at the distant position, no differences in shoulder load or efficiency were found between crank positions. Recreational handbike users, who want to improve their physical capacity in a shoulder‐friendly way, should set up their handbike with a more upright backrest position and a distant crank placement.