L. Imbert
University of Lorraine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. Imbert.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2012
L. Imbert; Sylvain Poussier; Philippe R. Franken; Bernard Songy; Antoine Verger; Olivier Morel; Didier Wolf; Alain Noel; Gilles Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
Differences in the performance of cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras or collimation systems that have recently been commercialized for myocardial SPECT remain unclear. In the present study, the performance of 3 of these systems was compared by a comprehensive analysis of phantom and human SPECT images. Methods: We evaluated the Discovery NM 530c and DSPECT CZT cameras, as well as the Symbia Anger camera equipped with an astigmatic (IQ⋅SPECT) or parallel-hole (conventional SPECT) collimator. Physical performance was compared on reconstructed SPECT images from a phantom and from comparable groups of healthy subjects. Results: Classifications were as follows, in order of performance. For count sensitivity on cardiac phantom images (counts⋅s−1⋅MBq−1), DSPECT had a sensitivity of 850; Discovery NM 530c, 460; IQ⋅SPECT, 390; and conventional SPECT, 130. This classification was similar to that of myocardial counts normalized to injected activities from human images (respective mean values, in counts⋅s−1⋅MBq−1: 11.4 ± 2.6, 5.6 ± 1.4, 2.7 ± 0.7, and 0.6 ± 0.1). For central spatial resolution: Discovery NM 530c was 6.7 mm; DSPECT, 8.6 mm; IQ⋅SPECT, 15.0 mm; and conventional SPECT, 15.3 mm, also in accordance with the analysis of the sharpness of myocardial contours on human images (in cm−1: 1.02 ± 0.17, 0.92 ± 0.11, 0.64 ± 0.12, and 0.65 ± 0.06, respectively). For contrast-to-noise ratio on the phantom: Discovery NM 530c had a ratio of 4.6; DSPECT, 4.1; IQ⋅SPECT, 3.9; and conventional SPECT, 3.5, similar to ratios documented on human images (5.2 ± 1.0, 4.5 ± 0.5, 3.9 ± 0.6, and 3.4 ± 0.3, respectively). Conclusion: The performance of CZT cameras is dramatically higher than that of Anger cameras, even for human SPECT images. However, CZT cameras differ in that spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio are better with the Discovery NM 530c, whereas count sensitivity is markedly higher with the DSPECT.
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2016
L. Imbert; Pierre-Yves Marie
In the past few years, myocardial perfusion imaging has significantly evolved with the development of semiconductor cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras, leading to a technological jump in this setting. The hopes raised by this new technology have been substantial because of the potential to improve energy resolution and image quality, compared to conventional Anger cameras. Unlike the latter cameras, these CZT cameras use a principle of direct detection where the interaction of a gamma photon of 140 keV produces approximately 30,000 electrons, a level 20-fold higher than that produced by a sparkling NaI(Tl) crystal. One of the most significant consequences is that energy resolution is improved by a factor of 2, compared with conventional Anger cameras. However, the new CZT cameras were also designed to optimize the acquisition and reconstruction processes with original software and collimation systems, leading to a marked enhancement in count sensitivity and spatial resolution, as confirmed by the article by Zoccarato et al, in this issue of the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. Two semiconductor cameras are currently commercialized: the Discovery NM530c camera (GE Healthcare, Haifa, Israel) and the D.SPECT camera (Spectrum Dynamics, Caesarea, Israel). Both have a limited field of view, due to the substantial cost of semiconductors, and are thus mainly dedicated to cardiology applications. These two cameras use the same type of squared CZT-pixel detector with a surface area of 2.5 9 2.5 mm and a thickness of 5 mm. Consequently, the energy resolution is the same for both cameras and much better than that of conventional cameras. These CZT detectors provide a dramatic improvement in image quality and, in addition, facilitate dual isotope recordings such as those involving Tl and Tc-labeled tracers. However, the two CZT cameras are based on clearly different collimation systems. This constitutes the main reason why the characteristics of the myocardial perfusion images provided by these two cameras are significantly different, as confirmed by the study of Zoccarato et al. The Discovery NM530c camera is based on a stationary multi-pinhole collimation system. Each pinhole has an effective aperture diameter of only 5.1 mm that is likely to advantage spatial resolution and to disadvantage count sensitivity. However, a high count sensitivity may be achieved in this instance, by the simultaneous recording of the heart area through the 19 pinhole-detector blocks. The D.SPECT camera uses a very different system of rotational parallel-hole collimation. It involves 9 rotating columns associated with a wide-angle squarehole tungsten collimator. This collimator is likely to advantage count sensitivity although a high level of spatial resolution can be reached owing to an original reconstruction method. In addition to energy resolution, the main parameters allowing to characterize a gamma camera are (1) Reprint requests: Laetitia Imbert, PhD, CRAN, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine CNRS, 54500 Vandoeuvre, France; l.imbert@nancy. unicancer.fr J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:894–6. 1071-3581/
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2018
Julien Salvadori; Yolande Petegnief; Remi Sabbah; Olivier Morel; Hatem Boulahdour; G. Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie; L. Imbert
34.00 Copyright 2015 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
Medecine Nucleaire-imagerie Fonctionnelle Et Metabolique | 2017
H. Tissot; Olivier Morel; L. Imbert; M. Claudin; M. Perrin; A. Verger; G. Karcher; P.-Y. Marie
This phantom-based study was aimed to determine whether cardiac CZT-cameras, which provide an enhanced spatial resolution and image contrast compared to Anger cameras, are similarly affected by small cardiac motions. Translations of a left ventricular (LV) insert at half-SPECT acquisitions through six possible orthogonal directions and with 5- or 10-mm amplitude were simulated on the Discovery NM-530c and DSPECT CZT-cameras and on an Anger Symbia T2 camera equipped with an astigmatic (IQ.SPECT) or conventional parallel-hole collimator (Conv.SPECT). SPECT images were initially reconstructed as currently recommended for clinical routine. The heterogeneity in recorded activity from the 17 LV segments gradually increased between baseline and motions simulated at 5- and 10-mm amplitudes with all cameras, although being higher for Anger- than CZT-cameras at each step and resulting in a higher mean number of artifactual abnormal segments (at 10-mm amplitude, Conv.SPECT: 3.7; IQ.SPECT: 1.8, Discovery: 0.7, DSPECT: 0). However, this vulnerability to motion was markedly (1) decreased for Conv.SPECT reconstructed without the recommended Resolution Recovery algorithm and (2) increased for DSPECT reconstructed without the recommended cardiac model. CZT-cameras and especially the DSPECT appear less vulnerable to small cardiac motions than Anger-cameras although these differences are strongly dependent on reconstruction parameters.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2015
Mathieu Perrin; W. Djaballah; Frédéric Moulin; Marine Claudin; Nicolas Veran; L. Imbert; S. Poussier; Olivier Morel; Cyril Besseau; Antoine Verger; Henri Boutley; G. Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
Introduction Radionuclide ventriculography provides a reproducible measurement of the left ventricular fraction ejection (LVEF) but with a significant body radiation (effective dose of 5,9 mSv for the injection of 850 Mbq of 99mTc). The highly sensitive semi-conductor (CZT) cameras could allow decreasing the injected activity by a factor 3, similarly to that of myocardial perfusion imaging. Our study was aimed to determine whether the LVEF measurement provided by radionuclide ventriculography on the CZT D-SPECT camera is impacted by a 70% reduction in recorded counts.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2013
Antoine Verger; Wassila Djaballah; Nicolas Fourquet; François Rouzet; Grégoire Koehl; L. Imbert; Sylvain Poussier; Renaud Fay; Dominique Le Guludec; Gilles Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2014
Antoine Verger; L. Imbert; Yalcine Yagdigul; Renaud Fay; W. Djaballah; François Rouzet; Nicolas Fourquet; S. Poussier; Dominique Le Guludec; G. Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2018
Marine Claudin; L. Imbert; W. Djaballah; Nicolas Veran; S. Poussier; Mathieu Perrin; Antoine Verger; Henri Boutley; G. Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2017
L. Imbert; Véronique Roch; C. Merlin; W. Djaballah; F. Cachin; Mathieu Perrin; Marine Claudin; Antoine Verger; Henri Boutley; G. Karcher; Pierre-Yves Marie
Clinical and Translational Imaging | 2016
L. Imbert; Mathieu Perrin; Antoine Verger; Pierre-Yves Marie