Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L. Joseph Thomas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L. Joseph Thomas.


Operations Research | 1988

The role of work-in-process inventory in serial production lines

Richard W. Conway; William L. Maxwell; John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas

In serial production systems, storage may be provided between processes to avoid interference due to lack of synchronization. This paper investigates the behavior of lines buffered in this way and explores the distribution and quantity of work-in-process WIP inventory that accumulates. We study simple, generic production systems to gain insight into the behavior of more complex systems. The authors are surprised by the sometimes counterintuitive results, but are joined in this surprise by both academics and practitioners with whom the study has been discussed. Results are presented for: identical workstations with and without buffers; balanced lines in which variability of processing times differs between stations; unbalanced lines; and lines with unreliable workstations. In general, buffers between workstations increase system capacity but with sharply diminishing returns. Position as well as capacity of the buffers are important. These results are preliminary, to be confirmed and extended by further study-indeed, a primary purpose of this paper is to stimulate such study. However, even these preliminary results yield design guidelines that should be useful in industrial practice.


Manufacturing & Service Operations Management | 2003

Commissioned Paper: On the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management

John W. Boudreau; Wallace J. Hopp; John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas

Operations management (OM) and human resources management (HRM) historically have been very separate fields. In practice, operations managers and human resource managers interact primarily on administrative issues regarding payroll and other matters. In academia, the two subjects are studied by separate communities of scholars publishing in disjoint sets of journals, drawing on mostly separate disciplinary foundations. Yet, operations and human resources are intimately related at a fundamental level. Operations are the context that often explains or moderates the effects of human resource activities such as pay, training, communications, and staffing. Human responses to OM systems often explain variations or anomalies that would otherwise be treated as randomness or error variance in traditional operations research models. In this paper, we probe the interface between operations and human resources by examining how human considerations affect classical OM results and how operational considerations affect classical HRM results. We then propose a unifying framework for identifying new research opportunities at the intersection of the two fields.


Journal of Operations Management | 2003

Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility

Kenneth L. Schultz; John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas

Abstract Flexible work assignment has great potential to increase productivity. When bottlenecks develop, for example, downstream operations may halt for lack of materials. A flexible worker can prevent this by moving in and increasing capacity temporarily, thereby avoiding work stoppages. In practice, it is not that simple. This paper identifies several “negative side effects” that occur in systems that rely on worker flexibility, effects that may partially or totally offset the advantages. Research has shown that performance feedback and work interruptions are factors that may explain some of these effects. Behavioral theories about those two factors lead to a series of hypotheses and two experiments. The results show that productivity loss due to these behavioral effects can be significant, in both the statistical and managerial sense of the word. Implications for the design and operation of flexible work environments are discussed, including methods for mitigating or eliminating the negative side effects, resulting in a meaningful productivity gain.


Operations Research | 1974

Technical Note-Price and Production Decisions with Random Demand

L. Joseph Thomas

This note studies the problem of setting price and production levels simultaneously in a series of N periods, where price is a parameter in the probability distribution of demand. It develops a simple policy characterized by two stock levels and an optimal price line in the price-inventory plane, gives an algorithm to compute such a policy and check conditions for its optimality, and presents a counterexample to the simple policy, using a small set of allowable prices, along with a discussion of both the counterexample and some characteristics of the model.


Manufacturing & Service Operations Management | 2001

Consequences of Order Crossover Under Order-Up-To Inventory Policies

Lawrence W. Robinson; James R. Bradley; L. Joseph Thomas

Order crossover occurs whenever replenishment orders do not arrive in the sequence in which they were placed. This paper argues that order crossover is becoming more prevalent and analyzes the dangers of ignoring it. We present an exact iterative algorithm for computing the distribution of the number of orders outstanding, and formulae for the inventory shortfall distribution (the quantity of inventory in replenishment at the start of a period) and the more common lead-time demand distribution, which are different when order crossover is possible. The lead-time demand distribution can have much higher variability than the shortfall distribution. We show that basing inventory policies on the lead-time demand distribution--rather than the shortfall distribution--can lead to significantly higher inventory cost, even if the probability of order crossover is small. We give an alternative proof to that of Zalkind (1976), which shows that the variance of shortfall is less than the variance of the standard lead-time demand.


International Journal of Production Economics | 1992

On-the-fly line balancing with very little WIP

John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas; Charles Sox

Abstract Dynamic line balancing (DLB) allows the workers on a production line to help each other with some tasks. However, for buffer capacity of 2 or less per stage, the advantage of DLB appeared to be lost. In this paper we show that DLB can increase efficiency even when buffers are absent. The improvement is a result of using more information when deciding who should do the shared task. The new information is supplied by a more careful measurement of how much unfinished work is represented by the jobs in the system. Previous results are extended to situations where jobs must be done in the order of arrival, which precludes using rules like SPT (shortest processing time) to decide which job to do next. It is shown that DLB offers improved efficiency in this case as well. Furthermore, this additional restriction makes it even more valuable to use additional information in deciding when workers should help each other.


International Journal of Production Research | 1990

The good, the bad and the ugly: Quality on an assembly line

Lawrence W. Robinson; John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas

SUMMARY Firms can handle defects that occur on an assembly line in a number of different ways. Traditionally, defective units were either scrapped or sent to a separate repair station. With the advent of Japanese production methodology in the US, line-stop buttons were introduced to assembly lines; when a defect was discovered, the assembly line was stopped and the defect was repaired immediately (on-line repair). We develop a relatively simple model of the assembly line to compare these alternate strategies and derive some qualitative insights into this problem. Our primary performance measures are the production throughput rate, the work-in-process inventory level (WIP), and the field defect rate. We use both queuing theory and simulation to estimate these measures for the different strategies Of course, not all defects can be detected. The presence of imperfect inspection complicates the analysis, requiring us to determine values for probabilities of defects and inspection errors that are consistent wi...


Operations Research | 1973

Response-Variance Tradeoffs in Adaptive Forecasting

John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas

This paper centers on what happens to an exponential smoothing forecasting system when the smoothing parameters are changed. It gives sufficient conditions under which several proposed models give numerically identical results, and notes a surprising symmetry in one basic model between the smoothing constants for the smoothed average and the smoothed trend. The paper defines smoothing-constant values that cause oscillatory behavior, discusses the difficulties caused by oscillation, and finds that commonly used values of the smoothing constants lie in a region of oscillation of varying period. It uses these results in an analytical study of the tradeoff between responsiveness and variance; some dominant choices emerge. Finally, on the basis of these results, the paper examines several sample sets of data from the literature, and discusses implications for the choice of smoothing constants in complex situations.


Iie Transactions | 1989

Efficient Solutions to a Linear Programming Model for Production Scheduling With Capacity Constraints and No Initial Stock

John O. McClain; L. Joseph Thomas; Elliott N. Weiss

Abstract In this paper we present a decomposition approach to solve large scale linear programming models for production scheduling when there are multiple capacity-constrained facilities. The formulation assumes that there are no initial inventories, and hence is most useful in a planning environment where the current shop status is not the primary concern. The approach can be implemented as an exact procedure or with heuristic stopping rules. We determine problem characteristics for which the decomposition approach is faster than LP, so that very large problems could be solved. Problem difficulty is found to be related to size and tightness of the capacity constraints. Quality-of-solution versus CPU time tradeoffs are given for various stopping rules. Finally, we discuss the potential importance of this formulation and approach in manufacturing problems.


Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science | 1993

Chapter 7 An overview of production planning

L. Joseph Thomas; John O. McClain

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses practical problems related to the use of OR tools for production planning. The chapter reviews production planning, in which at least one of the following three items is viewed in an aggregated manner: production facilities, products, or time unit. There are several plans made at different levels of aggregation, using different planning horizons. Thus, many different models have been discussed. Several different production-planning environments and the type of models that are appropriate have been analyzed. A plethora of recent optimization-type models for production planning has been reviewed. Production planning must determine the planned level of production for each aggregate product category, in each time period during the planning horizon. Hierarchical production planning research analyzes ways to develop a set of models often including an aggregate planning model, so that the output from a higher level model provides good (or even optimal) input to the lower planning level. The three different levels production plannings––production planning, master production scheduling, and material and capacity (detailed) plans––have been discussed in the chapter.

Collaboration


Dive into the L. Joseph Thomas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John O. McClain

Saint Petersburg State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth L. Schultz

Indiana University Bloomington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence W. Robinson

Saint Petersburg State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John W. Boudreau

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter J. Billington

College of Business Administration

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge