Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L. Locati is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L. Locati.


Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology | 2003

Cancer of the larynx.

L. Licitra; Jacques Bernier; Cesare Grandi; L. Locati; Marco Merlano; Gemma Gatta; Jean-Louis Lefebvre

Abstract In Europe, laryngeal cancer accounts for only 2–5% of all cancers, the incidence being much higher among males than among females. Smoke and alcohol represent the major behavioural risk factors. Several carcinogens, occupations and vitamin deficiencies have been associated with laryngeal cancer. A genetic susceptibility to environmental risk factors and carcinogens is recognized. Hoarseness is the main symptom for which patients call for medical consultation. Mucosa is the most common histologic site of the primary lesions considered in the present chapter. Nodal involvement, the site and volume of the primary tumour, and some genes expression represent the major prognostic factors. A high death rate for not cancer-related events is to be pointed out. The loco-regional extent of the disease determines the success of cure. Surgery and radiotherapy represent the main therapeutic options. The choice between these two procedures is often controversial.


Oral Oncology | 2009

Cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas: A phase II study

L. Locati; Paolo Bossi; Federica Perrone; Paolo Potepan; F. Crippa; Luigi Mariani; Paola Casieri; Marta Orsenigo; Marco Losa; Cristiana Bergamini; C. Liberatoscioli; Pasquale Quattrone; R.G. Calderone; G. Rinaldi; Silvana Pilotti; L. Licitra

EGFR overexpression in salivary gland carcinomas provides the rational for the investigation of anti-EGFR treatments in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland cancers (RMSGCs). The activity of cetuximab in terms of clinical benefit rate (CBR) defined as the occurrence of objective response (CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) for >or=6months was investigated. From April to December 2005, 30 patients [23 adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and 7 non-ACC] were treated with cetuximab at 400mg/m(2)/week followed by 250mg/m(2)/week until progression, major toxicity or voluntary discontinuation. EGFR expression and gene status were retrospectively analyzed by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, respectively. A median of 14 courses of cetuximab (range 5-54) were infused. Skin toxicity was the main adverse event. Cetuximab provides a CBR in 50% (95% CL, 31 to 69%) of cases. None tumor sample showed EGFR gene amplification and an increased EGFR copy number was observed in 12% of samples, all ACC. Skin rash >or=G2, EGFR overexpression and EGFR copy number were not statistically correlated to CB. In RMSGCs further evaluations of EGFR targeting agents are advisable and should take place by appropriate tumor biological selection, differentiating ACC from non-ACC.


Annals of Oncology | 2012

Tumor stage, human papillomavirus and smoking status affect the survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer: an Italian validation study

R. Granata; Rosalba Miceli; E. Orlandi; Federica Perrone; B. Cortelazzi; M. Franceschini; L. Locati; Paolo Bossi; Cristiana Bergamini; A. Mirabile; Luigi Mariani; P. Olmi; G. Scaramellini; P. Potepan; Pasquale Quattrone; K. Kian Ang; L. Licitra

BACKGROUNDnTumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status strongly affects overall survival (OS) of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Recently, three groups with different outcomes were identified based on HPV status, smoking history and tumor stage. Our objective was to validate this model using a single-institutional retrospective database.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients (n=120) diagnosed with OPC at our institution, treated with concomitant cisplatin plus radiotherapy (RT) (n=64), induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation (n=39) or RT alone (n=17), were stratified in three groups with respect to the risk of death (low 26, intermediate 46 and high 49 patients) according to tumor p16 expression as surrogate of HPV status, pack-years of tobacco smoking and nodal/tumor stage. Group-stratified Kaplan-Meier OS curves were estimated and compared using the log-rank test.nnnRESULTSnThe 2-year OS estimates were 100%, 86% and 70%, respectively. The difference between the survival curves was statistically significant (P=0.009). The Harrells concordance index was 0.70. The calibration plot showed a good concordance between our results and those observed in the original study.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis study validates the risk grouping previously identified. Risk-driven clinical decision making and trial designs will help in better defining the most appropriate treatment in OPC patients.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004

Prediction of TP53 Status for Primary Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Chemotherapy in Ethmoid Sinus Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma

Lisa Licitra; Simona Suardi; Paolo Bossi; L. Locati; L. Mariani; Pasquale Quattrone; S. Lo Vullo; Maria Oggionni; P. Olmi; Giulio Cantù; Marco A. Pierotti; Silvana Pilotti

PURPOSEnTo assess the role of TP53 status in predicting pathologic complete remission after primary chemotherapy in patients with ethmoidal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnThirty patients with ethmoidal ITAC enrolled onto a phase II study received chemotherapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (PFL) followed by surgery and radiation. On surgical specimens, absence of viable tumor cells was defined as pathologic complete remission (pCR). TP53 status/p53 function, analyzed on pretreatment biopsies, were retrospectively correlated with pathologic results and patient outcome.nnnRESULTSnTwelve patients achieved a pCR; 18 patients did not (overall response rate, 40%). In patients with wild-type (wt) TP53 or functional p53 protein, the pCRs were 83% and 80%, respectively; in patients with mutated TP53 or impaired p53 protein, pCRs were 11% and 0%, respectively (P < or = .0001). At a median 55-month follow-up, all pCR patients were disease-free; 44% of nonresponding patients experienced relapse (P = .0061).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe results indicate the existence of two genetic ITAC subgroups, defined by differences in TP53 mutational status or protein functionality, that strongly influence pathologic response to primary chemotherapy and, ultimately, prognosis. PFL seems to be highly effective in terms of pCR and disease-free survival in the presence of a wt or a still-efficient p53 protein, even when encoded by a mutated TP53 gene (eg, early-stop codon mutation), but ineffective in ITACs carrying a disabled p53 protein. Whether this model is extensible to other head and neck cancers needs appropriate investigation.


Annals of Oncology | 2014

Treatment-related outcome of oropharyngeal cancer patients differentiated by HPV dictated risk profile: a tertiary cancer centre series analysis

Paolo Bossi; E. Orlandi; Rosalba Miceli; Federica Perrone; Marco Guzzo; L. Mariani; R. Granata; L. Locati; Carlo Fallai; B. Cortelazzi; Silvana Pilotti; Gabriele Scaramellini; Annunziata Gloghini; L. Licitra

BACKGROUNDnTo date, no treatment modality has been identified as more effective for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and no predictive factors are known to guide treatment decision for this disease. This retrospective study evaluates the differential effects of diverse treatment options for OPC according to patient risk profiles.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWe considered two series of locally advanced squamous cell OPC patients treated with either surgery followed by radiotherapy (surgical series) or chemoradiation (CRT) with/without induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (CRT series). Smoking habits, tumor p16 expression/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T and N stage were analyzed to stratify the patients according to Angs risk profile (low, intermediate and high risk). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.nnnRESULTSnGlobally, 171 patients were considered, 56 in surgical and 115 in CRT series. Patients were stratified in low- (20% of surgical and CRT groups), intermediate- (23% and 41%) and high-risk (57% and 39%) groups. In the surgical series, 5-year OS was 54.5%, 46.9% and 40.0% in low, intermediate and high Angs risk profiles, respectively, whereas in the CRT series those were 100%, 78.9% and 46.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, adjusting for inhomogeneity between the treatment group, the CRT effect was significantly higher in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P-value for the interaction treatment risk group = 0.034 in the OS analysis).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this retrospective analysis, low- and intermediate-risk OPC patients had a better survival when treated with CRT compared with open surgery followed by radiation therapy. These data suggest that different treatment approaches might be essential in determining outcome results.BACKGROUNDnTo date, no treatment modality has been identified as more effective for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and no predictive factors are known to guide treatment decision for this disease. This retrospective study evaluates the differential effects of diverse treatment options for OPC according to patient risk profiles.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWe considered two series of locally advanced squamous cell OPC patients treated with either surgery followed by radiotherapy (surgical series) or chemoradiation (CRT) with/without induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (CRT series). Smoking habits, tumor p16 expression/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T and N stage were analyzed to stratify the patients according to Angs risk profile (low, intermediate and high risk). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.nnnRESULTSnGlobally, 171 patients were considered, 56 in surgical and 115 in CRT series. Patients were stratified in low- (20% of surgical and CRT groups), intermediate- (23% and 41%) and high-risk (57% and 39%) groups. In the surgical series, 5-year OS was 54.5%, 46.9% and 40.0% in low, intermediate and high Angs risk profiles, respectively, whereas in the CRT series those were 100%, 78.9% and 46.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, adjusting for inhomogeneity between the treatment group, the CRT effect was significantly higher in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P-value for the interaction treatment risk group = 0.034 in the OS analysis).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this retrospective analysis, low- and intermediate-risk OPC patients had a better survival when treated with CRT compared with open surgery followed by radiation therapy. These data suggest that different treatment approaches might be essential in determining outcome results.


Annals of Oncology | 2011

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin in locally advanced EBV-related nasopharyngeal cancer

Paolo Bossi; E. Orlandi; Cristiana Bergamini; L. Locati; R. Granata; A. Mirabile; D. Parolini; M. Franceschini; C. Fallai; P. Olmi; Pasquale Quattrone; P. Potepan; A. Gloghini; Rosalba Miceli; F. Mattana; G. Scaramellini; L. Licitra

BACKGROUNDnThis monocentric study evaluates the activity and tolerability of docetaxel (Taxotere), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrent with high-dose cisplatin in Epstein-Barr virus -related locally advanced undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnWe retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who received induction docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day (96-h continuous infusion). Following induction, patients received full doses of IMRT concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days for three cycles.nnnRESULTSnThirty patients received three TPF cycles (median). Induction was well tolerated; the main toxicity was neutropenia (33%, grade 3-4). During chemoradiotherapy, neutropenia (40%) and mucositis (43%) were the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events. Mean dose of IMRT was 68.8 Gy. Worst late toxicity was xerostomia. Complete response rate was 93%. At 35 months, two patients had locoregional recurrence, three had distant metastases, and one had both. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64% to 94%] and 87% (95% CI 74%- to 100%), respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIn this high-stage nonendemic cancer population, TPF followed by high-dose cisplatin IMRT was promising; this treatment approach deserves evaluation in randomized trials.


Annals of Oncology | 2008

Optimizing approaches to head and neck cancer. Metastatic head and neck cancer: new options

L. Licitra; L. Locati; Paolo Bossi

In 2002 there were about 144 000 new cases of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) in Europe and 69 000 deaths, making it the seventh leading cause of cancer death [1]. HNSCC arise from the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract. They include cancers of the oral cavitiy, the pharynx (naso-, oroand hypopharynx), the larynx and the paranasal sinuses. The head and neck region includes different tissues so that other kinds of neoplasms occur there, such as cancer of the salivary glands and rare histotypes of the paranasal sinuses and thyroid cancer. In this paper we will focus on HNSCC.


Annals of Oncology | 2014

Preoperative chemotherapy in advanced resectable OCSCC: long-term results of a randomized phase III trial

Paolo Bossi; S. Lo Vullo; Marco Guzzo; L. Mariani; R. Granata; E. Orlandi; L. Locati; Gabriele Scaramellini; Carlo Fallai; Lisa Licitra

BACKGROUNDnData on preoperative chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer are conflicting. We present the long-term results of a randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnA randomized, parallel, multicentre trial evaluated the impact of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 (120-h infusion administered every 21 days) in stage T2-T4, N0-N2, previously untreated patients with advanced disease. Control group received upfront surgery. Postoperative radiation was offered to both arms when pathologic risk features were identified. The co-primary end points were the occurrence of locoregional or distant tumour relapse, and death.nnnRESULTSnAmong the 198 enrolled patients, with a median follow-up of 11.5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of locoregional relapse between chemotherapy and control group (P=0.6337), nor in distant metastasis development (P=0.1527). There was also no difference between groups in overall survival (P=0.3402). Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) had higher probability of survival than those without (10-year OS: 76.2% versus 41.3%, P=0.0004). Late toxicities in patients with a minimum follow-up of 60 months (42 in each group) were similar between arms, except from fibrosis (cumulative incidence 40% versus 22% in chemotherapy arm) and grade 2 dysphagia (14% versus 5%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnLong-term follow-up of this randomized trial confirmed the absence of survival benefit with preoperative chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer. Late toxicity was similar in the two arms except for fibrosis and dysphagia, which were less in the chemotherapy arm. The survival benefit for patients achieving a pCR was maintained.


Oral Oncology | 2017

Systemic therapy in metastatic salivary gland carcinomas: A pathology-driven paradigm?

Salvatore Alfieri; R. Granata; Cristiana Bergamini; Carlo Resteghini; Paolo Bossi; L. Licitra; L. Locati

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) represent one of the most complex tumors from a pathological point of view. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2005), twenty-four malignant histotypes are recognized, almost all characterized by specific morphological and genetic features as well as by particular clinical behavior. Loco-regional relapse and distant metastases are quite common. Distant metastases are diagnosed in 25-55% of the patients and only 20% of them are alive after 5years. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the most common (60%) malignant histotype observed in patients with metastatic disease, whilst the other histotypes such as mucoepidermoid carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS), and myoepithelial carcinoma are rarer. The most common therapeutic approach in cases of metastatic disease is systemic chemotherapy, although the results with this type of approach are poor both in terms of response rate and overall outcome. No consensus has yet been reached on what the standard regimen of chemotherapy should be in this setting. New therapies are under investigation e.g. antiangiogenic agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and hormonal deprivation treatment. We have focused our review on systemic treatments in ACC and in non-ACC tumors, including in this latter group all SGC histotypes other than ACC.


European Journal of Cancer | 2016

A phase II study of sorafenib in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas: Translational analyses and clinical impact.

L. Locati; Federica Perrone; Barbara Cortelazzi; Cristiana Bergamini; Paolo Bossi; Enrico Civelli; Carlo Morosi; S. Lo Vullo; M. Imbimbo; Pasquale Quattrone; Gianpaolo Dagrada; R. Granata; C. Resteghini; A. Mirabile; S. Alfieri; E. Orlandi; L. Mariani; G. Saibene; Silvana Pilotti; L. Licitra

BACKGROUNDnPre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests a rationale for the use of anti-angiogenic agents, including sorafenib, in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (RMSGCs). This study evaluates the activity of sorafenib in patients with RMSGCs and also investigates whether the activity of sorafenib could be related to its main tailored targets (i.e. BRAF, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR2], platelet-derived growth factor receptor α [PDGFRα] and β, RET, KIT).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients received sorafenib at 400xa0mg BID. The primary end-point was response rate (RR) including complete response or partial response (PR); secondary end-points included RR according to Choi criteria, disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).nnnRESULTSnThirty-seven patients (19 adenoid cystic cancers, ACC) were enrolled. Six PRs were recorded. RR was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6-32; 11% in ACC and 22% in non-ACC). Choi criteria could be applied in 30 out of 37 cases with a RR of 50% (95% CI: 31-69%); DCR was 76% (95% CI: 59-88%). Incidence of ≥G3 adverse events was 29.7%. Median PFS and OS for the entire population were 5.9 months and 23.4 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 8.9 and 26.4 months for ACC versus 4.2 and 12.3 months for non-ACC patients. All the cases showed expression of PDGFRβ in the stroma and VEGFR2 in endothelial cells; PDGFRα positivity was found in the stroma of four (27%) cases. All except for two cases showed no PDGFRβ, VEGFR2 and PDGFRα expression in the tumour cells. KIT expression was restricted to ACC and a weak RET expression was limited to one adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS). No BRAF mutation was found. No correlation was observed between the sorafenib activity and the expression of its markers although all six responders (two ACC, one adenocarcinoma, NOS, one salivary duct cancer [SDC], one high-grade mucoepidermoid [HG-MEC] and one poorly-differentiated cancer) are enriched in the stromal component showing a PDGFRβ immunodecoration.xa0In ACCs, immunohistochemistry revealed MYB protein expression in 15/16 cases (94%) and the MYB-NFIB fusion oncogene was observed in 9/14 (64%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnSorafenib is the first anti-angiogenic agent to demonstrate activity in RMSGC patients, particularly in some histotypes such as HG-MEC, SDC and adenocarcinoma, NOS. The PDGFRβ-positive rich stromal component characterising these histotypes and the lack of correlation between the activity of sorafenib and its targets suggests anti-angiogenic effect as the prevalent mechanism of action of sorafenib in SGCs.

Collaboration


Dive into the L. Locati's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Orlandi

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Mariani

European Institute of Oncology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge