L.M Rossi-Ferragut

Outcome Of In Vitro Fertilization And Intracytoplasmic Injection Of Epididymal And Testicular Sperm Obtained From Patients With Obstructive And Nonobstructive Azoospermia

PURPOSE We assessed fertilization, pregnancy and miscarriage rates in patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS From June 1996 to March 2000, 166 consecutive patients (198 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles) with azoospermia were studied. Of these 198 cycles 68 were performed due to nonobstructive azoospermia using testicular spermatozoa and 130 were performed due to obstructive azoospermia using epididymal spermatozoa. RESULTS The normal (2 pronuclei) and abnormal (1 plus 3 pronuclei) fertilization rates for obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia were 60.5% and 16.6%, and 54% and 16.4%, respectively (p >0.05). The pregnancy rate per cycle, pregnancy rate per patient and abortion rate were 30%, 39.8% and 28% for obstructive azoospermia, and 22%, 28.3% and 40% for nonobstructive azoospermia (p <0.05). The normal and abnormal fertilization rates were 58.7% and 21.4% for percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), 62.3% and 10.4% for PESA plus testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), and 57.3% and 14.5% for TESA, respectively (p >0.05). The pregnancy rate per cycle, pregnancy rate per patient and abortion rate were 34.6%, 54.5% and 11.1% for PESA, 37.5%, 37.5% and 33.3% for PESA plus TESA, and 26.1%, 31% and 41% for TESA, respectively (PESA versus PESA plus TESA p >0.05, and PESA and PESA plus TESA versus TESA p <0.05). Epididymal or testicular motile sperm resulted in a lower abortion rate than epididymal or testicular immotile sperm (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS No differences were noted in the fertilization and embryo transfer rates irrespective of etiology (obstructive versus nonobstructive) and type of spermatozoa (epididymal versus testicular). Testicular sperm retrieval results in lower fertilization and pregnancy rates as well as higher abortion rates than epididymal sperm retrieval.

Pronuclear and Morphological Features as a Cumulative Score to Select Embryos in ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection) Cycles According to Sperm Origin

AbstractPurpose: To analyze best parameter to select embryos according to sperm origin in ICSI cycles. Methods: One hundred seventy-two ICSI cycles were divided among three different groups: A (ejaculated spermatozoa from nonmale factor infertility), B (ejaculated spermatozoa from oligospermia), and C (spermatozoa from azoospermia). Embryos were divided on Day 1 into two patterns: S0 (pronuclei (PN) aligned and close with normal arrangement of nucleoli) and S1 (when these characteristics were absent) and also on transfer day according to morphological features. Results: Relationships of PN patterns related to sperm origin were noted. More S0 embryos were detected with better sperm quality. Higher number of good quality embryos was obtained when male factor was absent. Ejaculated and epididymal spermatozoa provide better quality embryos than do testicular spermatozoa. Conclusions: PN classification associated with transfer day morphology is valuable additional noninvasive criterion for elective embryo transfer, mainly in the cases with severe male factor.

Testicular sperm results in elevated miscarriage rates compared to epididymal sperm in azoospermic patients

CONTEXT Several sperm retrieval techniques are available for use on azoospeermic men. Comparisons between spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis in relation to pregnancy and miscarriage rates are not well established. OBJECTIVE To compare pregnancy and miscarriage rates using sperm retrieved from the testes and epididymis using intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Furthermore, we evaluated the fertilization and pregnancy rates according to the status of the spermatozoa retrieved (motile or immotile). DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING A private center for assisted fertilization. PARTICIPANTS One hundred and eight consecutive patients who presented with azoospermia were included in our study, on whom a total of 144 retrieval procedures were performed. PROCEDURES Of the 144 retrieval procedures, 104 were testicular sperm aspirations (TESA) and 40 were epididymal sperm aspirations (PESA). PESA was the first approach in obstructive patients (n = 68), whereas TESA was used when the former failed. For non-obstructive patients (n = 40), TESA was the method of retrieval. MAIN MEASUREMENTS Pregnancy and miscarriage rates according to spermatozoa characteristics (motile or immotile). RESULTS The number of cycles performed using spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis was 81 and 30, respectively. Motile spermatozoa had higher fertilization (2PN) and pregnancy rates compared to immotile spermatozoa (p < 0.05). Also, motile spermatozoa had lower miscarriage rates compared to immotile spermatozoa (p < 0.0001). No differences were seen in pregnancy rates with testicular spermatozoa (n = 28) compared to epididymal spermatozoa (n = 13) (p = 0.1). However, the miscarriages rates were higher in spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles (n = 12) compared to epididymis retrievals (n = 1) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Although pregnancy rates were similar when the intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed with spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles and epididymis, the use of testicular spermatozoa yields a significantly higher miscarriage rate. It is possible that the higher miscarriage rate seen in patients using spermatozoa retrieved from the testicles is linked to high genetic sperm abnormalities.

Different Intervals Between Vasectomy and Sperm Retrieval Interfere in the Reproductive Capacity from Vasectomized Men

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the relationship between the postvasectomy period and sperm reproductive capacity after ICSI. Methods: Seventy-seven ICSI cycles with percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) were reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the interval after vasectomy: 0 – 5 years (G1); 6 – 8 years (G2); 9 – 14 years (G3), and >15 years (G4). Results: Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates did not correlate significantly with the time period of vasectomy until 14 years. Although the higher implantation rate observed in G1, no significant differences were noted among Groups 1–3. The miscarriage rates increased from G1 to G4, reaching a statistical significance among G1, G2, and G3 compared with G4. When groups were also divided according to the maternal age, the same results were obtained. Conclusions: The interval between the vasectomy and the sperm retrieval procedure has no effect on the outcome until the interval of 14 years.