L. M. Sarro
National University of Distance Education
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. M. Sarro.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011
P. Dubath; L. Rimoldini; Maria Süveges; J. Blomme; M. López; L. M. Sarro; J. De Ridder; J. Cuypers; L. P. Guy; I. Lecoeur; K. Nienartowicz; A. Jan; M. Beck; Nami Mowlavi; P. De Cat; Thomas Lebzelter; Laurent Eyer
We present an evaluation of the performance of an automated classification of the Hipparcos periodic variable stars into 26 types. The sub-sample with the most reliable variability types available in the literature is used to train supervised algorithms to characterize the type dependencies on a number of attributes. The most useful attributes evaluated with the random forest methodology include, in decreasing order of importance, the period, the amplitude, the V − I colour index, the absolute magnitude, the residual around the folded light-curve model, the magnitude distribution skewness and the amplitude of the second harmonic of the Fourier series model relative to that of the fundamental frequency. Random forests and a multistage scheme involving Bayesian network and Gaussian mixture methods lead to statistically equivalent results. In standard 10-fold cross-validation (CV) experiments, the rate of correct classification is between 90 and 100 per cent, depending on the variability type. The main mis-classification cases, up to a rate of about 10 per cent, arise due to confusion between SPB and ACV blue variables and between eclipsing binaries, ellipsoidal variables and other variability types. Our training set and the predicted types for the other Hipparcos periodic stars are available online.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2013
Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones; R. Andrae; Bernardino Arcay; T. L. Astraatmadja; I. Bellas-Velidis; A. Berihuete; A. Bijaoui; Claire Carrion; Carlos Dafonte; Y. Damerdji; A. Dapergolas; P. de Laverny; L. Delchambre; P. Drazinos; R. Drimmel; Y. Frémat; Diego Fustes; M. García-Torres; C. Guede; Ulrike Heiter; A.-M. Janotto; A. Karampelas; Dae-Won Kim; Jens Knude; I. Kolka; E. Kontizas; M. Kontizas; A. Korn; Alessandro C. Lanzafame; Yveline Lebreton
The Gaia satellite will survey the entire celestial sphere down to 20th magnitude, obtaining astrometry, photometry, and low resolution spectrophotometry on one billion astronomical sources, plus radial velocities for over one hundred million stars. Its main objective is to take a census of the stellar content of our Galaxy, with the goal of revealing its formation and evolution. Gaias unique feature is the measurement of parallaxes and proper motions with hitherto unparalleled accuracy for many objects. As a survey, the physical properties of most of these objects are unknown. Here we describe the data analysis system put together by the Gaia consortium to classify these objects and to infer their astrophysical properties using the satellites data. This system covers single stars, (unresolved) binary stars, quasars, and galaxies, all covering a wide parameter space. Multiple methods are used for many types of stars, producing multiple results for the end user according to different models and assumptions. Prior to its application to real Gaia data the accuracy of these methods cannot be assessed definitively. But as an example of the current performance, we can attain internal accuracies (RMS residuals) on F,G,K,M dwarfs and giants at G=15 (V=15-17) for a wide range of metallicites and interstellar extinctions of around 100K in effective temperature (Teff), 0.1mag in extinction (A0), 0.2dex in metallicity ([Fe/H]), and 0.25dex in surface gravity (logg). The accuracy is a strong function of the parameters themselves, varying by a factor of more than two up or down over this parameter range. After its launch in November 2013, Gaia will nominally observe for five years, during which the system we describe will continue to evolve in light of experience with the real data.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2009
J. Debosscher; L. M. Sarro; M. López; M. Deleuil; Conny Aerts; Michel Auvergne; A. Baglin; F. Baudin; M. Chadid; S. Charpinet; J. Cuypers; J. De Ridder; R. Garrido; A.-M. Hubert; E. Janot-Pacheco; L. Jorda; A. Kaiser; T. Kallinger; Z. Kollath; C. Maceroni; P. Mathias; E. Michel; Claire Moutou; Coralie Neiner; M. Ollivier; R. Samadi; E. Solano; Christian Surace; B. Vandenbussche; W. W. Weiss
Context: Aims: In this work, we describe the pipeline for the fast supervised classification of light curves observed by the CoRoT exoplanet CCDs. We present the classification results obtained for the first four measured fields, which represent a one-year in-orbit operation. Methods: The basis of the adopted supervised classification methodology has been described in detail in a previous paper, as is its application to the OGLE database. Here, we present the modifications of the algorithms and of the training set to optimize the performance when applied to the CoRoT data. Results: Classification results are presented for the observed fields IRa01, SRc01, LRc01, and LRa01 of the CoRoT mission. Statistics on the number of variables and the number of objects per class are given and typical light curves of high-probability candidates are shown. We also report on new stellar variability types discovered in the CoRoT data. The full classification results are publicly available. The CoRoT space mission, launched on 27 December 2006, has been developed and is operated by the CNES, with the contribution of Austria, Belgium, Brazil , ESA, Germany, and Spain. The full classification results will be only available in electronic form at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/506/519
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2018
X. Luri; A. G. A. Brown; L. M. Sarro; F. Arenou; Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones; A. Castro-Ginard; J. H. J. de Bruijne; T. Prusti; C. Babusiaux; H. E. Delgado
The second Gaia data release (GDR2) provides precise five-parameter astrometric data (positions, proper motions and parallaxes) for an unprecedented amount of sources (more than
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2015
H. Bouy; E. Bertin; L. M. Sarro; D. Barrado; Estelle Moraux; J. Bouvier; Jean-Charles Cuillandre; A. Berihuete; J. Olivares; Y. Beletsky
1.3
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2016
G. Clementini; V. Ripepi; S. Leccia; Nami Mowlavi; I. Lecoeur-Taibi; M. Marconi; László Szabados; Laurent Eyer; L. P. Guy; L. Rimoldini; G. Jevardat de Fombelle; B. Holl; G. Busso; Jonathan Charnas; J. Cuypers; F. De Angeli; J. De Ridder; J. Debosscher; D. W. Evans; P. Klagyivik; I. Musella; K. Nienartowicz; D. Ordonez; S. Regibo; M. Riello; L. M. Sarro; Maria Süveges
billion, mostly stars). The use of this wealth of astrometric data comes with a specific challenge: how does one properly infer from these data the astrophysical parameters of interest? The main - but not only - focus of this paper is the issue of the estimation of distances from parallaxes, possibly combined with other information. We start with a critical review of the methods traditionally used to obtain distances from parallaxes and their shortcomings. Then we provide guidelines on how to use parallaxes more efficiently to estimate distances by using Bayesian methods. In particular also we show that negative parallaxes, or parallaxes with relatively larger uncertainties still contain valuable information. Finally, we provide examples that show more generally how to use astrometric data for parameter estimation, including the combination of proper motions and parallaxes and the handling of covariances in the uncertainties. The paper contains examples based on simulated Gaia data to illustrate the problems and the solutions proposed. Furthermore, the developments and methods proposed in the paper are linked to a set of tutorials included in the Gaia archive documentation that provide practical examples and a good starting point for the application of the recommendations to actual problems. In all cases the source code for the analysis methods is provided. Our main recommendation is to always treat the derivation of (astro-) physical parameters from astrometric data, in particular when parallaxes are involved, as an inference problem which should preferably be handled with a full Bayesian approach.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2009
L. M. Sarro; J. Debosscher; M Lopez; Conny Aerts
The DANCe survey provides photometric and astrometric (position and proper motion) measurements for approximately 2 millions unique sources in a region encompassing
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2012
L. Rimoldini; P. Dubath; Maria Süveges; M. López; L. M. Sarro; J. Blomme; J. De Ridder; J. Cuypers; L. P. Guy; Nami Mowlavi; I. Lecoeur-Taibi; M. Beck; A. Jan; K. Nienartowicz; D. Ordóñez-Blanco; Thomas Lebzelter; Laurent Eyer
\approx
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2011
J. Blomme; L. M. Sarro; Francis T. O’Donovan; J. Debosscher; Timothy M. Brown; M. López; P. Dubath; L. Rimoldini; David Charbonneau; Edward W. Dunham; Georgi Mandushev; David R. Ciardi; J. De Ridder; Conny Aerts
80deg
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2013
L. M. Sarro; J. Debosscher; C. Neiner; A Bello-Garcia; Ana González-Marcos; B Prendes-Gero; J Ordieres; G Leon; Conny Aerts; B. de Batz
^{2}