L.N. Boucher

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not impair liver regeneration following hepatectomy or portal vein embolization for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Treatment strategies for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) such as major hepatectomy and portal vein embolization (PVE) rely on liver regeneration. We aim to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration occurring after PVE and after major hepatectomy.

Portal Vein Embolization in the Setting of Staged Hepatectomy with Preservation of Segment IV ± I Only for Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases: Safety, Efficacy, and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSEnTo assess frequency of adverse events, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases undergoing staged hepatectomy with preservation of segment IV ± I only.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnRetrospective analysis was performed of 40 consecutive patients who underwent right PVE after successful left lobectomy between 2005 and 2013. Rates of adverse events, future liver remnant (FLR) > 30% compared with baseline liver volume, clinical success (completion of staged hepatectomy with clearance of liver metastases), and overall survival were analyzed.nnnRESULTSnPVE was performed using polyvinyl alcohol particles (n = 7; 17.5%), particles plus coils (n = 23; 57.5%), and N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue plus ethiodized oil (n = 10; 25%). Technical success was 100%. After PVE, 20% (n = 8) of patients exhibited portal venous thrombosis, ranging from isolated intrahepatic portal branch thrombosis to massive thrombosis of the main portal vein (n = 3) and responsible for periportal cavernoma and portal hypertension in 5 patients. Of patients, 23 (57.5%) had FLR ≥ 30%, and 21 (52.5%) had clinical success. Six patients had significant stenosis or occlusion of the left portal vein or biliary system after original left lobectomy, which was independently associated with FLR < 30% (R2 = 0.24). Clinical success was the only independent variable associated with survival (R2 = 0.25).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPVE for staged hepatectomy with preservation of segment IV ± I only is technically feasible, leading to adequate hypertrophy and clinical success rates in these patients with poor oncologic prognosis. Portal venous thrombosis is greater after the procedure than in the setting of standard PVE.

Can magnetic resonance spectroscopy differentiate malignant and benign causes of lymphadenopathy? An in-vitro approach

Lymphadenopathy continues to be a common problem to radiologists and treating physicians because of the difficulty in confidently categorizing a node as being benign or malignant using standard diagnostic techniques. The goal of our research was to assess whether magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy contains the necessary information to allow differentiation of benign from malignant lymph nodes in an in-vitro approach using a modern pattern recognition method. Tissue samples from a tissue bank were analyzed on a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer. A total of 69 samples were studied. The samples included a wide variety of malignant and benign etiologies. Using 45 samples, we initially created a model which was able to predict if a certain spectrum originates from benign or malignant lymph nodes using a pattern-recognition technique which takes into account the entire magnetic spectrum rather than single peaks alone. The remaining 24 samples were blindly loaded in the model to assess its performance. We obtained an excellent accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant lymphadenopathy using the model. It correctly differentiated as malignant or benign, in a blinded fashion, all of the malignant samples (13 of 13) and 10 out of the 11 benign samples. We thus showed that magnetic spectroscopy is able to differentiate benign from malignant causes of lymphadenopathy. Additional experiments were performed to verify that the differentiating abilities of our model were not due to differential tissue decay in between benign and malignant tissues. If future experiments demonstrate that a similar approach could be executed with standard MR imaging, this technique could be useful as a problem-solving tool when assessing lymphadenopathy in general. Alternatively, our in-vitro technique could also be useful to pathologists faced with indeterminate pathologies of the lymph nodes after validating our results with a larger sample size.

Impact of arm selection on the incidence of PICC complications: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Introduction The aim of this study is to determine if right arm peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) experienced fewer complications while controlling for gender, hand dominance, history of malignancy, dwell time and catheter size. Methods This was an intention-to-treat randomized controlled trial conducted in an academic medical center on two different sites between September 2012 and September 2015. All patients older than 18 years or age without known history of previous central line, contraindication to the use of a specific arm or hospitalized in the intensive care unit regardless of coagulation status, were considered for the study. Participants were randomized to the left or right arm group and were followed until catheter removal. Data collected included: PICC characteristics, insertion details, gender, arm dominance, history of malignancy, reason for insertion/removal, incidence of a complication and total dwell time. One-tailed hypothesis testing using a univariate logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) calculation was used to analyze the results. There were 202 patients randomly assigned, totaling 7657 catheter-days; 103 patients to the right-side group and 99 patients to the left-side group. Results Participants in both groups were statistically equivalent for right handedness, gender, oncologic status, average dwell time and total catheter days. The overall incidence of complications on the right side was 23% versus 34% on the left side, confirming the hypothesis that right-sided insertions led to fewer complications (p = 0.046). The risk of a complication was reduced by 40% with right-sided insertion (OR 0.58 (CI: 0.31-1.09). Conclusions This study indicated fewer complications with right-sided insertion irrespective of hand dominance.