L. O'Dowd

Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial.

AbstractBackground: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the preferred maintenance therapy for adults and children with mild, moderate and severe persistent asthma, with the addition of a long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist to ICS therapy recommended for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. The efficacy and safety of the combination of budesonide and formoterol delivered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) is well documented. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI; Symbicort™ pMDI, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) with budesonide pMDI (Pulmicort® pMDI, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), formoterol DPI (Oxis® Turbuhaler®, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), budesonide plus formoterol in separate inhalers (budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI) and placebo. Study design: This was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study. Setting: This multicentre study was conducted in the respiratory specialty clinical practice setting. Patients: The study included 596 patients ≥12 years of age with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving ICSs. Interventions: After 2 weeks on budesonide pMDI 80µg × two inhalations (160μg) twice daily, patients received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160μg/4.5μg × two inhalations (320μg/9μg); budesonide pMDI 160μg × two inhalations (320μg) + formoterol DPI 4.5μg × two inhalations (9μg); budesonide pMDI 160μg × two inhalations (320μg); formoterol DPI 4.5μg × two inhalations (9μg); or placebo twice daily. Main outcome measures: There were two prespecified primary efficacy variables: mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), obtained approximately 12 hours after the most recent administration of study medication at home and immediately before the next administration of study medication at the clinic; and mean change from baseline in 12-hour FEV1, assessed as the average change in FEV1 from serial spirometry over the 12-hour period after administration of the morning dose of study medication at the clinic. Results: Mean changes from baseline in morning predose FEV1 at end of treatment were greater (p ≤ 0.049) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.19L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.10L), formoterol DPI (−0.12L) and placebo (−0.17L). Mean changes from baseline in 12-hour FEV1 were greater (p ≤ 0.001) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI after 1 day (0.37L), 2 weeks (0.34L) and at end of treatment (0.37L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.11, 0.15 and 0.15L) and placebo (0.09, −0.03 and −0.03L), and after 2 weeks and at end of treatment versus formoterol DPI (0.19 and 0.17L). Fewer (p ≤ 0.025) patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus monoproducts or placebo met worsening asthma criteria. Results were similar in the budesonide/formoterol pMDI group and the budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI group on all measures. All treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles. Conclusions: In this population, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI provides asthma control significantly greater than the monocomponents or placebo and comparable with budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI. Safety profiles were similar for all treatments.

Effect of budesonide aqueous nasal spray on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in children with allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND Intranasal corticosteroids are safe and effective for treating allergic rhinitis in adults. Since children may receive more systemic corticosteroid on a dose-per-weight basis than adults, the safety of corticosteroid therapy in pediatric patients is an important issue. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of treatment with budesonide aqueous nasal spray using the recommended once-daily dose for adults and children 6 years and older on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS In a 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 78 patients aged 2 to 5 years with allergic rhinitis were treated with budesonide aqueous nasal spray (64 microg/d) or placebo. Mean change in morning plasma cortisol levels from baseline to study end 0, 30, and 60 minutes after low-dose (10-microg) cosyntropin stimulation and mean change in the difference from 0 to 30 minutes and from 0 to 60 minutes after cosyntropin stimulation were used to evaluate HPA axis function. RESULTS Mean change from baseline to study end in plasma cortisol levels 0, 30, and 60 minutes after cosyntropin stimulation and the difference from 0 to 30 minutes and from 0 to 60 minutes were not significantly different between the treatment and placebo groups (P > .05 for all). At the end of the study, 3 budesonide aqueous nasal spray and 6 placebo patients were classified as having subnormal HPA axis function. The safety and tolerability profile of budesonide aqueous nasal spray was comparable to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS Administration of budesonide aqueous nasal spray for 6 weeks was well tolerated and safe and had no measurable suppressive effects on HPA axis function in patients aged 2 to 5 years with allergic rhinitis.

Growth velocity in children with perennial allergic rhinitis treated with budesonide aqueous nasal spray

BACKGROUND Recent guidelines recommend intranasal corticosteroids as first-line treatment for managing persistent symptoms of moderate to severe allergic rhinitis (AR). However, in children, long-term continual treatment with corticosteroids has raised concerns about potential growth suppression. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of the recommended once-daily dose of budesonide aqueous nasal spray on growth velocity, as measured with stadiometry, in children with perennial AR. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 229 prepubertal children (mean age, 5.9 years; age range, 4-8 years) with perennial AR were randomized (2:1) to receive budesonide aqueous nasal spray, 64 microg (32 microg per nostril) once daily, or placebo for 1 year. The change from baseline in growth velocity, height after treatment, and the percentage of patients whose percentile for height decreased from baseline to the end of treatment were evaluated. RESULTS Growth velocity was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The least-squares mean +/- SE growth velocity during treatment was 5.91 +/- 0.11 cm per year for children receiving budesonide and 6.19 +/- 0.16 cm per year for those receiving placebo. The mean difference in growth velocity between the 2 groups was 0.27 +/- 0.18 cm per year (95% confidence interval, -0.07 to 0.62 cm per year). After treatment, the mean +/- SD height was 128.8 +/- 8.7 cm for children receiving budesonide and 128.2 +/- 8.8 for those receiving placebo. The percentage of children whose percentile for height decreased during treatment was not significantly different between the 2 groups (budesonide, 59%, placebo, 54%; P = .64). The incidence and types of adverse events and the mean 24-hour urinary cortisol-creatinine ratio were similar for the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with budesonide aqueous nasal spray, 64 microg once daily, for 1 year did not suppress growth velocity compared with placebo and was well tolerated in prepubertal children with perennial AR.

The effect of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurized metered-dose inhaler on patient-reported outcomes in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the effects of budesonide and formoterol administered via one pressurized metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and to determine the contributions of budesonide and formoterol to those effects in adults with asthma. Research design and methods: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in 480 patients aged ≥ 12 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period during which current asthma therapy was discontinued, patients were randomized to receive two inhalations twice daily of budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 μg (160/9 μg), budesonide pMDI 80 μg (160 μg), formoterol via dry powder inhaler (DPI) 4.5 μg (9 μg), or placebo. Main outcome measures: Analyses included a subpopulation of 405 patients aged ≥ 18 years. PROs included the standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, the Patient Satisfaction with Asthma Medication (PSAM) questionnaire, and asthma control variables (recorded via electronic diaries), such as asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, and nighttime awakenings due to asthma. Patient and physician global assessments were collected at the end of the study. Results: Patients aged ≥ 18 years receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI reported significantly greater improvements from baseline in AQLQ overall and domain scores, MOS Sleep Scale domain scores, and asthma control variables than patients receiving placebo ( p ≤ 0.033). Improvements from baseline in AQLQ(S) overall and domain scores, daily asthma symptoms scores, percentage of symptom-free days, percentage of rescue medication-free days, and percentage of asthma control days were significantly greater in patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus formoterol DPI ( p ≤ 0.042). Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI reported significantly greater PSAM scores than did patients in all other treatment arms ( p ≤ 0.004). Study limitations may include the fact that the formoterol-alone arm used a different device and formulation than the other active arms as well as the absence of a treatment arm with budesonide and formoterol administered concomitantly in separate inhalers. In addition, these results may not be generalized to all patients with asthma, as this analysis included only patients aged ≥ 18 years. Conclusions: Patients receiving treatment with budesonide/formoterol pMDI experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline in asthma-related quality of life, quality of sleep, and asthma control and greater satisfaction with treatment than patients receiving placebo. The combination of budesonide and formoterol in one pMDI is beneficial in improving how a patient feels and functions as a result of treatment.

The safety and clinical benefit of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler versus budesonide alone in children.

Few studies have evaluated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist combination therapy in asthmatic children. This study was designed to evaluate the safety (primary) and clinical benefits (secondary) of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) versus budesonide dry powder inhaler (DPI) in children with persistent asthma. This was a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label U.S. study of 187 children 6-11 years of age previously receiving ICS. After 1 week of usual ICS therapy, subjects received twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 micrograms x 2 inhalations (320/9 micrograms; n = 124) or budesonide DPI 200 micrograms x 2 inhalations (400 micrograms [320 micrograms delivered ex-mouthpiece]; n = 63). Budesonide/formoterol and budesonide were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events (AEs) (84.6% and 85.7%, respectively), most of mild or moderate intensity. Treatment-related AE incidence was low (5.4%) and similar across groups (budesonide/formoterol, 4.9%; budesonide, 6.3%). No clinically important treatment differences were observed for 12-lead electrocardiograms, hematology, serum glucose and potassium, and 24-hour urinary cortisol. Compared with budesonide, budesonide/formoterol decreased health care use (urgent care visits and interference with daily activities [child] or work [caregiver]; p < or = 0.012) and improved health-related quality of life (Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [standardized] and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire overall scores; p < or = 0.006) and pulmonary function (predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced expiratory flow during the middle half of exhalation; p < or = 0.007). In this 26-week study of asthmatic children (6-11 years), safety profiles were similar and clinical benefits were greater with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide.

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler: randomized controlled trial comparing once- and twice-daily dosing in patients with asthma.

Asthma guidelines recommend titrating maintenance medications to the lowest effective dose. This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of reducing the frequency of dosing in patients previously controlled with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) to once-daily regimens of BUD/FM pMDI or BUD pMDI. This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo (PBO)/active-controlled, multicenter study (N = 752) of patients aged > or =16 years with mild to moderate asthma. After 4-5 weeks on single-blind BUD/FM pMDI 160/9 micrograms twice daily (320/18 micrograms daily), patients with stable asthma received BUD/FM pMDI 160/9 micrograms twice daily (320/18 micrograms daily; morning and evening), BUD/FM pMDI 320/9 micrograms once daily (evening), BUD/FM pMDI 160/9 micrograms once daily (evening), BUD pMDI 320 micrograms once daily (evening), or PBO. BUD/FM (once or twice daily) was more effective (p < or = 0.003) than BUD and PBO on evening peak expiratory flow (primary variable), morning pulmonary function assessments, daily symptoms, and nighttime rescue medication use. Twice-daily BUD/FM was more effective (p < or = 0.05) than both once-daily doses for evening pulmonary function assessments and daytime rescue medication use. All treatments were well tolerated. Once- or twice-daily BUD/FM showed better efficacy than BUD once daily or PBO; results generally were more favorable with twice-daily dosing compared with both once-daily dosing regimens, which had one-half the daily FM dose.