L. Peter Hackett

Studying Drugs in Human Milk: Time to Unify the Approach

The trend globally for mothers to breastfeed has highlighted the need for information on drug transfer into breast milk and the extent to which the suckling neonate may be exposed and affected. This reviewdiscusses robust study methodologies that will yield high-quality information on all aspects of this process. Methods for assessing drug transfer into breast milk are examined. The place of the milk/plasma ratio, the amount of drug in breast milk, and the volume of milk produced are discussed in the context of their utility in estimating both absolute and relative infant dose. The measurement of plasma drug concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects in the breastfed infant exposed to drugs are identified as important factors that can assist in deciding whether drug present in breast milk is a significant risk for the nursing infant.

Quetiapine Poisoning: A Case Series

STUDY OBJECTIVE We describe the effects of quetiapine in overdose. METHODS Quetiapine poisonings were identified from a prospective database of poisoning admissions to a regional toxicology service. Data extracted included details of ingestion, clinical features, investigations (including ECG), and other outcomes (length of stay and ICU admission rate). RESULTS There were 45 cases of quetiapine overdose, of which 18 patients with quetiapine assay results were included. Median length of stay was 35 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 14 to 42 hours) for the 18 patients, and 9 were admitted to the ICU. The median ingested dose was 3.5 g (IQR 1.7 to 6.2 g), and reported ingested dose was highly correlated with estimated peak drug concentration (r(2)=0.84; P<.0001), confirming patient-provided history of ingestion. Seizures occurred in 2 patients, delirium occurred in 3 patients, and mechanical ventilation was required in 4 patients. No arrhythmias or deaths occurred. Six of the 18 patients ingested quetiapine alone, with a median length of stay of 35 hours, and 3 were admitted to the ICU. In 1 patient who ingested 24 g, hypotension and seizures occurred. For 10 patients for whom ECGs were available and who had ingested no cardiotoxic drugs, tachycardia occurred in 8 patients. For these 10 patients, the mean corrected QT (QTc) interval was increased at 487 ms, but the mean uncorrected QT interval was 349 ms. Reported dose and peak quetiapine concentrations were significantly associated with ICU admission and length of stay more than 24 hours. A reported dose less than 3 g and a Glasgow Coma Scale score not less than 15 predicted patients not requiring ICU admission or length of stay more than 24 hours. CONCLUSION Quetiapine overdose causes central nervous system depression and sinus tachycardia. In large overdoses, patients may require intubation and ventilation for associated respiratory depression. Although a prolonged QTc occurs, its clinical significance is unclear because it is most likely caused by an overcorrection caused by the tachycardia. In our experience, a reported dose of less than 3 g for patients who are not drowsy (with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15) at least 4 hours after ingestion and who did not coingest another toxic agent defined a group not requiring ICU admission or inpatient admission greater than 24 hours.

Concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide in serum and cerebrospinal fluid following morphine administration to patients with morphine-resistant pain

&NA; Recent studies have suggested that morphine‐3‐glucuronide (M3G) may antagonize the analgesic effects of morphine and morphine‐6‐glucuronide (M6G). To investigate this hypothesis, steady‐state concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured in 11 patients receiving chronic morphine therapy (9 orally and 2 subcutaneously) for treatment of cancer‐related pain. All patients appeared to have morphine‐resistant pain and had elected to proceed to intrathecal bupivacaine or percutaneous cordotomy. Morphine, M6G and M3G concentrations were measured by high‐performance liquid chromatography. The concentrations (median and range) for morphine, M6G and M3G in serum were 193 (14–1086) nmol/l, 847 (210–4113) nmol/l and 4553 (1324–24035) nmol/l, respectively, while in CSF concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G were 200 (21–1461) nmol/l, 115 (30–427) nmol/l and 719 (249–3252) nmol/l, respectively. Median molar ratios of M6G/morphine and M3G/morphine in serum were 3.79 and 22.1, respectively, while in CSF the same ratios were 0.42 and 2.39, respectively. Median molar ratios of M3G/M6G in serum and CSF were 5.84 and 6.61, respectively. The median molar ratios for CSF/serum distribution of morphine, M6G and M3G were 1.23, 0.12 and 0.14, respectively. Thus, despite their relatively poor ability to penetrate into the CSF, the high serum concentrations of M6G and M3G resulted in substantial concentrations of these metabolites in the CSF. Nevertheless, M3G/M6G ratios in our morphine‐resistant patients were similar to published values in patients with well‐controlled pain, suggesting that the hypothesis that M3G plays a major role in morphine‐resistance is not correct.

A pilot study of newer antidepressant concentrations in cord and maternal serum and possible effects in the neonate

Antidepressants are often used antenatally, and placental transfer may lead to adverse effects (toxicity) in the neonate. Pregnant women taking fluoxetine (n=4), sertraline (n=4), paroxetine (n=2) or venlafaxine (n=1) in the last trimester were studied. Maternal and cord sera were collected at delivery and infant serum on day 5 after birth for measurement of antidepressant concentrations. Neonatal Abstinence Scores (NAS) were measured in the infants on days 13 after birth. In maternal serum, median drug concentrations were: fluoxetine (96 microg/l), norfluoxetine (110 microg/l), sertraline (11 microg/l), desmethylsertraline (38 microg/l), paroxetine (mean 12 microg/l), venlafaxine (220 microg/l), and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (392 microg/l). Corresponding median values in cord serum were: fluoxetine (65 microg/l), norfluoxetine (81 microg/l), sertraline (10 microg/l), desmethylsertraline (27 microg/l), paroxetine (mean 6 microg/l), venlafaxine (232 microg/l), and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (406 microg/l). Corresponding median cord:maternal concentration ratios were 0.67 for fluoxetine and 0.72 for norfluoxetine, 0.67 for sertraline and 0.63 for demethylsertraline, 0.52 (mean) for paroxetine, and 1.1 and 1.0 for venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine respectively. The neonates of two patients taking fluoxetine had high NAS. Only fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were detected in infant serum. Our data show substantial placental transfer of antidepressants, but only fluoxetine persisted in the infants serum. Neonatal toxicity may be associated with serotonin uptake blockade, and also be influenced by neonatal clearance.

Transfer of Risperidone and 9-Hydroxyrisperidone into Human Milk

OBJECTIVE To quantify the transfer of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone into breast milk, estimate the amount the infant receives, measure infant plasma concentrations, and clinically assess the safety of breast feeding during maternal risperidone administration. CASE SUMMARIES The transfer of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone into milk was studied in 2 breast-feeding women and one woman with risperidone-induced galactorrhea. Plasma samples were available from 2 of the women and from both breast-fed infants. The milk/plasma concentration ratio determined in 2 women was <0.5 for both compounds. The calculated relative infant “doses” were 2.3%, 2.8%, and 4.7% (as risperidone equivalents) of the maternal weight-adjusted doses. Risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were not detected in the plasma of the 2 breast-fed infants studied, and no adverse effects were noted. DISCUSSION Risperidone therapy is sometimes necessary in breast-feeding women, raising the issue of safety in the exposed infants. Our study shows that the relative infant dose is lower than the arbitrary 10% level of concern. The data provide clear guidance on infant exposure for the cases presented. CONCLUSIONS Maternal risperidone therapy is unlikely to be a significant hazard for the breast-fed infant in the short term. Nevertheless, decisions on whether a woman may breast-feed should be made as an individual risk-benefit analysis.

Use of nicotine patches in breast‐feeding mothers: Transfer of nicotine and cotinine into human milk

Our objective was to assess the extent of exposure to nicotine and cotinine in breast‐fed infants during maternal smoking and later during maternal use of the nicotine transdermal patch to achieve smoking cessation.

Olanzapine excretion in human breast milk: estimation of infant exposure

Newer antipsychotic drugs offer significant clinical advantages for the treatment of psychosis. In particular for the treatment of postpartum disorders newer agents may be suited due to their favourable side-effect profiles. Of concern is the passage of the drugs into breast milk and what potential risks this poses for an infant who is breastfed. The excretion of olanzapine into the breast milk of five lactating women with postpartum psychosis was examined in this study. Nine pairs of plasma and breast-milk samples were collected and the concentration of olanzapine determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Single-point milk-to-plasma ratios were calculated and ranged from 0.2 to 0.84 with a mean of 0.46. The median relative infant dose was 1.6% (range 0-2.5%) of the weight-adjusted maternal dose. During the study period, there were no apparent ill effects on the infant as a consequence of exposure to these doses of olanzapine. As with other antipsychotic drugs this study demonstrates that olanzapine passes into breast milk. The long-term effects of exposure in infants exposed to olanzapine requires further investigation.

Drowsiness and Poor Feeding in a Breast-Fed Infant: Association with Nefazodone and its Metabolites

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether adverse effects in a premature neonate could be attributed to nefazodone exposure via breast milk. CASE SUMMARY: The breast-fed white infant (female, 2.1 kg, 36 weeks corrected gestational age) of a 35-year-old woman (60 kg) taking nefazodone 300 mg/d was admitted to the hospital because she was drowsy, lethargic, unable to maintain normal body temperature, and was feeding poorly. A diagnosis of exposure to nefazodone via breast milk was considered only after other more likely diagnoses had been excluded. After breast feeding was discontinued, the infants symptoms resolved slowly over a period of 72 hours. The maternal plasma and milk concentration—time profiles for nefazodone and its metabolites, triazoledione, HO-nefazodone, and m-chlorphenylpiperazine, were quantified by HPLC. The calculated infant dose for nefazodone and its active metabolites (as nefazodone equivalents) via the milk was only 0.45% of the weight-adjusted maternal nefazodone daily dose. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest a putative association between maternal nefazodone ingestion and adverse effects in a premature breast-fed neonate. The measured amount of drug exposure would normally be considered safe in a full-term infant. However, there was a temporal relationship between resolution of adverse effects in the infant and cessation of breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the importance of individualizing the risk—benefit analysis for exposure to antidepressants in breast milk, especially when dealing with premature neonates.

The Amount of Fluvoxamine in Milk Is Unlikely to Be a Cause of Adverse Effects in Breastfed Infants

The aim of this study was to characterize milk/plasma (M/P) ratio, as well as relative infant dose and well-being, in 2 breastfeeding women taking fluvoxamine. The women (37 and 34 years old) and their infants (26 and 0.75 months old) were studied over a 24-hour dose interval at steady state. Fluvoxamine concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Infant exposure was measured as concentration in milk multiplied by an estimated milk production of 0.15 L/kg/d and normalized to the weight-adjusted maternal dose. M/P values of 1.34 and 1.21 were calculated for subjects 1 and 2, respectively, and relative infant doses were estimated to be 1.38% and 0.8%, respectively. No adverse effects in the infants were detected by the mother or on clinical examination, and fluvoxamine was not detected in the infants’ plasma (limit of detection 2 µ g/L). These limited data support the prescription of fluvoxamine to breastfeeding mothers after a careful, individual risk/benefit analysis is undertaken.

Use of Duloxetine in Pregnancy and Lactation

Objective: To report a case of a woman who used duloxetine during pregnancy and breast-feeding. Case Summary: A 29-year-old woman was treated with duloxetine for depression during the second half of an uncomplicated gestation. She gave birth at term to a healthy female infant. A cord blood sample was obtained at birth. The mother continued the antidepressant while exclusively breast-feeding her infant. One month later, we collected blood and milk samples from the mother and a single blood sample from the infant. All samples were analyzed for the presence and concentrations of duloxetine. Discussion: Duloxetine crosses the placenta at term and is excreted into breast milk. No evidence of developmental or other type of toxicity was observed in the infant at birth or during the first 32 days after birth. The published literature detailing human pregnancy experience with this antidepressant is limited to 11 cases in which women became pregnant while taking duloxetine. In 10 cases, the drug was discontinued when pregnancy was diagnosed and no outcome data were reported. In the eleventh case, an infant exposed to duloxetine 90 mg/day developed neonatal behavioral syndrome. One study examined the excretion of duloxetine into breast milk, but the mothers discontinued nursing for the study. In the present case, no adverse effects from exposure to the drug in milk were noted in the exclusively breast-fed infant. The possibility of functional/neurobehavioral deficits appearing later in life cannot be excluded because long-term follow-up has not been conducted in infants exposed to duloxetine in utero or during nursing. Conclusions: No developmental toxicity or other signs of toxicity were observed in an infant exposed to duloxetine during the second half of gestation and during breast-feeding in the first 32 days after birth. However, the possibility of functional/neurobehavioral deficits appearing later in life cannot be excluded.