L. Porcelli
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. Porcelli.
International Conference on Space Optics 2014 | 2018
S. Dell’Agnello; A. Boni; C. Cantone; M. Tibuzzi; R. Vittori; G. Bianco; C. Mondaini; P. Tuscano; E. Ciocci; M. Martini; G. Patrizi; G. Delle Monache; Douglas G. Currie; N. Intaglietta; L. Salvatori; C. Lops; S. Contessa; L. Porcelli; M. Maiello; Bruno Cugny; Zoran Sodnik; Nikos Karafolas
The SCF_Lab (Satellite/lunar/gnss laser ranging and altimetry Characterization Facility Laboratory) of INFNLNF is designed to cover virtually LRAs (Laser Retroreflector Arrays) of CCRs (Cube Corner Retroreflectors) for missions in the whole solar system, with a modular organization of its instrumentation, two redundant SCF (SCF_Lab Characterization Facilities), and an evolutionary measurement approach, including customization and potentially upgrade on-demand. See http://www.lnf.infn.it/esperimenti/etrusco/ for a general description.
Proceedings of the MG14 Meeting on General Relativity | 2017
E. Ciocci; M. Martini; Simone dell’Agnello S. Contessa; G. Delle Monache; A. Boni; L. Porcelli; G. Patrizi; M. Tibuzzi; C. Lops; N. Intaglietta; P. Tuscano; L. Salvatori; M. Maiello; C. Mondaini; J. F. Chandler; Douglas G. Currie; G. Bianco
Since 1969, Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) to the Apollo Cube Corner Retroreflectors (CCRs) has supplied almost all significant tests of General Relativity (GR). When first installed in the 1970s, the Apollo CCRs geometry contributed only a negligible fraction of the ranging error budget. Today, because of lunar librations, this contribution dominates the error budget, limiting the precision of the experimental tests of gravitational theories. The new MoonLIGHT-2/LLRRA-21 (Moon Laser Instrumentation for General relativity High-accuracy Tests) apparatus is a new-generation LLR payload made of a single large CCR unaffected by librations. Thanks to this new design, MoonLIGHT-2/LLRRA-21 can increase the precision of the measurement of the lunar geodetic precession up to a factor 100, compared to the Apollo CCRs. To optimize the MoonLIGHT2/LLRRA-21 design and its lunar deployment, we performed both experimental tests of MoonLIGHT-2 thermal properties in simulated space condition and GR test simulations using the Planetary Ephemeris Program software, developed by the Center for Astrophysics (CfA). The experimental test shown the expected thermal properties and will provide useful to optimize the payload for the launch while the GR simulations suggest that MoonLIGHT-2 measurements are practically independent from Moon librations (providing a significant improvement in GR test) and that the absence of a sunshade does not have a relevant impact on the precision of GR tests.
ieee aerospace conference | 2010
Simone DellAgnello; Douglas G. Currie; Giovanni O. Delle Monache; C. Cantone; M. Garattini; M. Martini; N. Intaglietta; C. Lops; Riccardo March; Roberto Tauraso; Giovanni Bellettini; M. Maiello; S. Berardi; L. Porcelli; Marina Ruggieri; A. Boni; R. Vittori; G. Bianco; Bradford Behr; David W. Carrier; Gia Dvali; Arsen R. Hajian; T. J. Murphy; Ken Nordtvedt; David Parry Rubincam
Over the past forty years, Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) to the Apollo Corner Cube Reflector (CCR) arrays has supplied almost all of the significant tests of General Relativity, and provided significant information on the composition and origin of the Moon. These arrays are the only experiment of the Apollo program still in operation. Initially the Apollo Lunar arrays contributed a negligible portion of the error budget used to achieve these results. However over the decades, the performance of the ground stations has been greatly upgraded so that the ranging accuracy has improved by more than two orders of magnitude. Now, after forty years, because of the lunar librations, the existing Apollo retroreflector arrays contribute a significant fraction of the limiting errors in the range measurements. University of Maryland (UMD) and INFN/LNF are now proposing a new approach to the Lunar Laser Ranging Array technology, the experiment MoonLIGHT12. The new arrays will support ranging observations that are a factor 100 more accurate, reaching the micron level. The new fundamental physics and lunar physics that this new Lunar Laser Ranging Retroreflector Array for the 21st century (LLRRA-21) can provide, will be briefly described. The new lunar CCR housing has been built at the INFN/LNF3. In the design of the new array there are three major challenges: 1) validate that the specifications of the CCR required for the new array, which are significantly beyond the properties of current CCRs, can indeed be achieved, 2) address the thermal and optical effects of the absorption of solar radiation within the CCR, reduce the transfer of heat from the hot housing to the CCR and 3) define a method of emplacing the CCR package on the lunar surface such that the relation between the optical center of the array and the center of mass of the Moon remains stable over the lunar day/night cycle. Its evolutionary design may be suitable for future GNSS constellations guaranteeing ranging accuracy improvement (the concept of a single reflector introduces no laser pulse spreading at all angles), weight and area saving (being its absolute optical cross section equal to a large number of the CCRs that will be used for the upcoming GNSS constellations)4.
Advances in Space Research | 2011
S. Dell’Agnello; G. Delle Monache; Douglas G. Currie; R. Vittori; C. Cantone; M. Garattini; A. Boni; M. Martini; C. Lops; N. Intaglietta; Roberto Tauraso; D.A. Arnold; M. Pearlman; G. Bianco; Susanna Zerbini; M. Maiello; S. Berardi; L. Porcelli; C. O. Alley; J.F. McGarry; C. Sciarretta; V. Luceri; T.W. Zagwodzki
Experimental Astronomy | 2011
Simone Dell’Agnello; C. Lops; Giovanni O. Delle Monache; Douglas G. Currie; M. Martini; R. Vittori; Angioletta Coradini; Cesare Dionisio; M. Garattini; A. Boni; C. Cantone; Riccardo March; Giovanni Bellettini; Roberto Tauraso; M. Maiello; L. Porcelli; S. Berardi; N. Intaglietta
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2012
Simone DellAgnello; M. Maiello; Douglas G. Currie; A. Boni; S. Berardi; C. Cantone; G. Delle Monache; N. Intaglietta; C. Lops; M. Garattini; M. Martini; G. Patrizi; L. Porcelli; M. Tibuzzi; R. Vittori; G. Bianco; Angioletta Coradini; Cesare Dionisio; Riccardo March; Giovanni Bellettini; Roberto Tauraso; J. F. Chandler
Advances in Space Research | 2017
S. Dell’Agnello; G. Delle Monache; L. Porcelli; A. Boni; S. Contessa; E. Ciocci; M. Martini; M. Tibuzzi; N. Intaglietta; L. Salvatori; P. Tuscano; G. Patrizi; C. Mondaini; C. Lops; R. Vittori; M. Maiello; Enrico Flamini; E. Marchetti; G. Bianco; R. Mugnuolo; C. Cantone
Advances in Space Research | 2017
E. Ciocci; M. Martini; Stefania Contessa; L. Porcelli; Marco Mastrofini; Douglas G. Currie; Giovanni O. Delle Monache; Simone Dell’Agnello
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics | 2015
G. Delle Monache; R. Vittori; A. Boni; C. Cantone; E. Ciocci; M. Martini; G. Patrizi; M. Tibuzzi; G. Bianco; Douglas G. Currie; N. Intaglietta; L. Salvatori; C. Lops; S. Contessa; L. Porcelli; C. Mondaini; P. Tuscano; M. Maiello; Agenzia Spaziale
Advances in Space Research | 2016
S. Dell’Agnello; A. Boni; C. Cantone; E. Ciocci; S. Contessa; G. Delle Monache; C. Lops; M. Martini; G. Patrizi; L. Porcelli; L. Salvatori; M. Tibuzzi; N. Intaglietta; P. Tuscano; C. Mondaini; M. Maiello; D. Doyle; R. García-Prieto; D. Navarro-Reyes