L. R. Bertolini
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. R. Bertolini.
Animal reproduction | 2017
Cristiano Feltrin; L. H. Aguiar; Carlos Enrique Méndez Calderón; Igor de Sá Carneiro; Felipe de Jesus Moraes Junior; Josiane da Silva Quetz; Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima; Matthew B. Wheeler; Davide Rondina; José Luiz Rodrigues; James D. Murray; Elizabeth A. Maga; L. R. Bertolini; M. Bertolini
The birth of cloned goats has been well documented, but the overall goat cloning efficiency by somatic cell nuclear transfer procedures is still low, which may be further intensified in extreme environments. The aim of this study was to produce cloned goats under the conditions of the Brazilian SemiArid region, in a transgenic program for the expression of human lysozyme in the milk to target childhood diarrhea and malnutrition, comparing the effects of oocyte source, cell type, and embryo reconstruction procedures on in vitro and in vivo embryo survival after cloning by micromanipulation or by handmade cloning. The use of in vitro-matured oocytes resulted in more viable embryos after cloning than in vivo-matured cytoplasts, but no differences in pregnancy rates on day 23 were seen between oocyte sources (77.5 vs. 77.8%, respectively). The presence or absence of the zona pellucida for embryo reconstruction (78.8 vs. 76.0%, respectively) did not affect pregnancy outcome after transfer. However, pregnancy rate on day 23 was higher for embryos chemically activated by a conventional than a modified protocol (88.1 vs. 50.0%), and for embryos reconstructed with mesenchymal stem cells and fetal fibroblasts (100.0 and 93.3%) than with adult fibroblasts (64.7%). Although most pregnancies were lost, the birth of a cloned female was obtained from embryos reconstructed by micromanipulation using non-transgenic control cells and in vitro-matured oocytes with intact zona pellucida, after conventional activation and transfer at the 1-cell stage.
Animal reproduction | 2017
Luís Henrique de Aguiar; Elvis Ticiani; Paula Rodriguez-Villamil; Felipe Ledur Ongaratto; Cícera Regina Lazzarotto; José Luiz Rodrigues; L. R. Bertolini; M. Bertolini
Since the beginning of modern embryology, scientists have wondered about how a small number of totipotent embryonic cells can become an individual with a wide variety of organs and tissues with distinct functions. Also, the idea of generating a cloned animal using a nucleus from a donor cell is not recent. However, it has taken years of research to achieve this goal, especially regarding mechanisms of cell reprogramming required to return a differentiated cell to totipotency. Cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has been a valuable tool to understand epigenetic mechanisms related to cellular reprogramming. However, cloning efficiency is still low, with a low percentage of embryos resulting in healthy animals. The high attrition rate is associated with incomplete or abnormal epigenetic reprogramming, such that many cloned embryos have DNA methylation patterns different than controls, resulting in faulty gene expression and subsequent developmental failures. Attempts to improve genome reprogramming by modulation of oocyte quality and/or somatic cell plasticity, thereby increasing cloning efficiency and preventing detrimental effects on development, have proven ineffective. The recent development of DNA editing techniques may facilitate an improved understanding of cellular reprogramming and the role of DNA methylation in development. These novel tools may lead to new means to modulate epigenetic programming and inheritance, and hold great promise to assist in epigenetic remodeling of the donor nucleus. Such strategies are likely to improve the odds for successful cloning.
Animal reproduction | 2015
J. P. M. Alves; M. Bertolini; L. R. Bertolini; C.M.G. Silva; Davide Rondina
Semina-ciencias Agrarias | 2013
Cláudio Henrique de Almeida Oliveira; Liliane Moreira Silva; Aline Maia Silva; César Carneiro Linhares Fernandes; Karla Leylanne Sousa Góes; Sandra Silva Duarte; Fabiana Vinhas Rodrigues; L. R. Bertolini; Frederico José Bezerra; Manoel Adrião Gomes Filho; Davide Rondina
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2018
L. H. Aguiar; C. E. Méndez-Calderón; Felipe Ledur Ongaratto; R. Rossetto; Davide Rondina; José Luiz Rodrigues; L. R. Bertolini; M. Bertolini
Reproduction, Fertility and Development | 2018
E. Ticiani; C. R. Lazzarotto; R. P. C. Gerger; B. R. Wilhelm; V. H. V. Rodrigues; José Luiz Rodrigues; Maria Angélica Miglino; L. R. Bertolini; M. Bertolini
Animal reproduction | 2017
M. P. Paz; F. G. C. Sousa; Benner Geraldo Alves; C. H. Lobo; A. D. Sales; N. A. R. de Sá; D. D. Guerreiro; C. M. Mielgo; L. R. Bertolini; Vilceu Bordignon; J.R. Figueiredo; Ana Paula Ribeiro Rodrigues
Animal reproduction | 2017
C. E. Méndez-Calderón; L. H. Aguiar; C. R. Lazzarotto; P. Rodríguez-Villamil; Felipe Ledur Ongaratto; L. P. R. Teixeira; M. S. Alves; R. A. A. Dantas; M. Bertolini; L. R. Bertolini
Animal reproduction | 2015
L. R. Bertolini; M. Bertolini
Animal reproduction | 2015
L. R. Bertolini