L Rill

Radiation exposure with use of the mini-C-arm for routine orthopaedic imaging procedures.

BACKGROUND The use of mobile fluoroscopic devices during orthopaedic procedures is associated with substantial concern with regard to the radiation exposure to surgeons and support staff. The perceived increased risks associated with large c-arm devices have been well documented. However, no study to date has documented the relative radiation risk associated with the use of a mini-c-arm device. The purpose of the current study was to determine the amount of radiation received by the surgeon during the use of a mini-c-arm device and to compare this amount with documented measurements associated with the large c-arm device. METHODS With use of a radiation dosimeter, measurements were carried out with tissue-equivalent anthropomorphic phantoms to quantitatively determine exposure rates at various locations and distances from the mini-c-arm for two common upper and lower extremity procedures. RESULTS Regardless of position, distance, or relative duration of exposure, exposure rates resulting from the use of the mini-c-arm device were one to two orders of magnitude lower than those reported in the literature in association with the use of the large c-arm device. CONCLUSIONS The mini-c-arm device should be utilized whenever feasible in order to eliminate many of the concerns associated with use of the large c-arm device, specifically those related to cumulative radiation hazards, positioning considerations, relative distance from the beam, and the need for protective shielding.

Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology

This study compared the imaging performance of a photostimulable phosphor system with E speed film for dental radiography. The response of each imaging system was measured as a function of radiation exposure. Measurements were also made of imaging performance in terms of the limiting spatial resolution and low contrast detectability. Photostimulable phosphors had a wider dynamic range in comparison with film. The limiting spatial resolution of the photostimulable phosphor was approximately 6.5 lp/mm and independent of image magnification. For film, the limiting spatial resolution was in the range 11 to 20 lp/mm depending on image magnification. At the same radiation exposure, low contrast detectability of the photostimulable phosphor was superior to that of film. Major benefits of photostimulable phosphor systems include the elimination of chemical processing and an improved low contrast detectability performance.

Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems

Relative mAs values required to generate a constant plate readout signal for the Kodak Ektascan general purpose (GP-25) and high resolution (HR) photostimulable phosphors were measured as a function of x-ray beam quality and for a range of representative x-ray examinations. The signal intensity was determined from the exposure index (EI) generated during the read out of uniformly exposed phosphor imaging plates. These data were compared to the corresponding relative mAs values required to produce a constant film density of Lanex screen-film combinations with nominal speeds of 40, 400, and 600. The relative detection performance of the photostimulable phosphors generally decreased with increasing kVp and beam filtration. The relative response of GP-25 phosphors was independent of examination type, and modified by approximately 10% when scattered radiation was present. The HR phosphor was more efficient than a Lanex Single Fine extremity screen used with an EM-1 film. These relative response data will be useful for selecting the x-ray technique factors which minimize patient dose in x-ray examinations performed with photostimulable phosphors.

Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography

A Canon CXDI-11 digital radiography (DR) system has been in use at Shands Hospital at the University of Florida for the past 2 1/2 years. A first clinical implementation phase was utilized to develop imaging protocols for adult patients, with a second phase incorporating pediatric chest and abdominal studies a few months later. This paper describes some of the steps taken during the modality implementation stages, as well as the methodologies and procedures utilized to monitor compliance by the technologists. The Canon DR system provides the technologist with an indication of the radiation exposure received by the detector (and thus of the patient dose) by means of an indirect exposure level number called the reached exposure (REX) value. The REX value is calculated by the system based on the default grayscale curve preselected for a given anatomical view and used by the system to optimize the appearance of the image. The brightness and contrast of the image can be modified by the user at the QC/control screen for the purpose of improving the appearance of the image. Such changes modify the actual grayscale curve (position and slope, respectively) and thus the calculated REX value. Thus, undisciplined use of the brightness and contrast functions by the technologist can render the REX value meaningless as an exposure indicator. The paper also shows how it is possible to calibrate AEC (phototimer) systems for use with the Canon DR system, and utilize the REX value as a valuable dose indicator through proper training of technologists and strict, disciplined QC of studies. A team consisting of the site’s medical physicist, radiologists, and technologists, as well as Canon engineers, can work together in properly calibrating and setting up the system for the purposes of monitoring patient doses (especially pediatric) in DR studies performed in a Canon DR system.

Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: Phantoms, image quality and effective dose

Conventional chest radiography is technically difficult because of wide variations in tissue attenuations in the chest and limitations of screen-film systems. Mobile chest radiography, performed bedside on hospital inpatients, presents additional difficulties due to geometric and equipment limitations inherent in mobile x-ray procedures and the severity of illness in the patients. Computed radiography (CR) offers a different approach for mobile chest radiography by utilizing a photostimulable phosphor. Photostimulable phosphors overcome some image quality limitations of mobile chest imaging, particularly because of the inherent latitude. Because they are more efficient in absorbing lower-energy x-rays than rare-earth intensifying screens, this study evaluated changes in kVp for improving mobile chest CR. Three commercially available systems were tested, with the goal of implementing the findings clinically. Exposure conditions (kVp and grid use) were assessed with two acrylic-and-aluminum chest phantoms which simulated x-ray attenuation for average-sized and large-sized adult chests. These phantoms contained regions representing the lungs, heart and subdiaphragm to allow proper CR processing. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements using different techniques were obtained for acrylic and aluminum disks (1.9 cm diameter) superimposed in the lung and heart regions of the phantoms, where the disk thicknesses (contrast) were determined from disk visibility. Effective doses to the phantoms were also measured for these techniques. The results indicated that using an 8:1, 33 lines/cm antiscatter grid improved the SNR by 60-300 % compared with nongrid images, depending on phantom and region; however, the dose to the phantom also increased by 400-600%. Lowering x-ray tube potential from 80 to 60 kVp improved the SNR by 30-40%, with a corresponding increase in phantom dose of 40-50%. Increasing the potential from 80 to 100 kVp reduced both the SNR and the phantom dose by approximately 10%. The most promising changes in technique for trial in clinical implementation include using an antiscatter grid, especially for large patients, and potentially increasing kVp.

View box luminance measurements and their effect on reader performance

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of view box luminance and viewing conditions on low-contrast detection by readers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiographs of a mammographic contrast-detail phantom were examined on 632 view box panels. The luminance of these panels was obtained by using a calibrated meter and ranged from 860 to 3,300 nit. Twelve radiologists reported the number of contrast-detail disks for each size (diameter, 0.3-7.0 mm) deemed to be visible on films with optical densities of 1.00-2.60. Radiologist performance in reading low-contrast phantom images was also studied as a function of room illuminance and image masking. RESULTS Median luminance was 1,700 nit, with 25- and 75-percentile values of 1,450 and 2,150 nit, respectively. Low-contrast visibility generally was independent of view box luminance, regardless of film density or disk diameter. Low-contrast visibility deteriorated when masking around the image was removed and at normal room illuminance. The greatest deterioration in performance occurred at the highest film densities and with the smallest size disks. CONCLUSION Detection of low-contrast features on radiographs is relatively independent of view box luminance, but it is degraded by the presence of stray light and by increased room illuminance.

Determining Organ Doses from CT with Direct Measurements in Postmortem Subjects: Part 1—Methodology and Validation

PURPOSE To develop a methodology that allows direct measurement of organ doses from computed tomographic (CT) examinations of postmortem subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this institutional review board approved study, the x-ray linear attenuation coefficients of various tissues were calculated from the mean CT numbers of images that were obtained in eight embalmed adult female cadavers and compared with the corresponding linear attenuation coefficients calculated from CT images obtained in eight living patients that were body mass index (BMI)-matched. Dosimetry was performed in three of the cadavers by accessing organs of interest and affixing partially sealed vinyl tubes inside them. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) were inserted into the tubes and positioned within the organs of interest and on the skin. OSLDs were read with an InLight MicroStar (Landauer, Glenwood, Ill) reader, and readings were corrected for energy and scatter response. Fifteen tubes containing dosimeters were used, and imaging was repeated twice in each cadaver, for a total of five standard clinical protocols. Average dosimetry values were used for analysis. RESULTS Differences in linear attenuation coefficients between living and embalmed cadaveric tissues were within 3% for the tissues investigated. Measured organ doses for a chest-abdomen-pelvis CT protocol were less than 32 mGy for all organs measured. Organs that were completely irradiated during a given examination received similar doses, whereas organs that were partially irradiated displayed a large variation in measured organ dose. CONCLUSION The anatomic and radiation attenuation characteristics of cadavers are comparable to those of living human tissue. This methodology allows direct measurement of organ doses from clinical CT examinations.

Determining Organ Doses from CT with Direct Measurements in Postmortem Subjects: Part 2—Correlations with Patient-specific Parameters

PURPOSE To generate empirical sets of equations that can be used to calculate patient-specific organ doses resulting from a group of computed tomographic (CT) studies by using data from direct dose measurements performed within a human body. MATERIALS AND METHODS Organ dose measurements were obtained in eight postmortem female subjects. A chest-abdomen-pelvis protocol was used for this study. The relationships among measured organ doses, body mass index, effective diameter (D(eff)), and volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) were investigated. Organ dose equations were developed by means of linear regression from organ dose data, with CTDI(vol) and D(eff) as variables, by using Pearson correlation coefficients and P values to determine correlation strength of fit. Measured organ doses were compared with corresponding size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs). RESULTS The central-section D(eff) presented similar correlations with organ doses to those from D(eff) measured at specific organ locations. The strongest correlations were observed between the central-section D(eff) and CTDI(vol)-normalized organ doses (R(2): 0.478-0.941). The average of measured organ doses for each subject resulted in an average difference of only 5% from SSDE-calculated doses; however, individual organ doses differed from +31% to -61% from the calculated SSDE. CONCLUSION The organ dose equations developed represent a method for organ dose estimation from direct organ dose measurements that can estimate organ doses more accurately than the calculated SSDE, which provides a less-specific patient dose estimate.

Workflow Efficiency Comparison of a New CR System with Traditional CR and DR Systems in an Orthopedic Setting

Workflow efficiency is a crucial factor in selecting computed radiography (CR) versus digital radiography (DR) systems for digital projection radiography operations. DR systems can be more efficient, but present higher costs and limitations in performing some radiographic exams. A newly developed CR system presents a good alternative with its faster line-by-line instead of pixel-by-pixel image plate-scanning technology and a more efficient workstation. To evaluate workflow characteristics, a time–motion study was conducted to compare radiographic exam times of the new CR system with traditional CR and DR systems in a high-volume orthopedic operation. Approximately 200 exams for each modality were documented from the moment when a patient entered the X-ray room to the moment when all images were sent to the PACS archive using a timer and speech-recognition software. Applying Welch ANOVA and Tamhane’s T2 tests, average exam times for the new CR system were significantly faster (18–42%; P ≤ 0.025) than for the traditional CR system. Average exam times for the DR system were also faster than for the new CR system by 22–36% (P < 0.001) with one exception. In the case where the new CR system was located outside the X-ray room, using a one-technologist workflow model, average single-study exam times were not significantly different from those found when using DR. Therefore, the new CR system may be comparable in efficiency with the DR system for this particular setting and operation.

SU-F-I-46: Optimizing Dose Reduction in Adult Head CT Protocols While Maintaining Image Quality in Postmortem Head Scans

PURPOSE To optimize adult head CT protocol by reducing dose to an appropriate level while providing CT images of diagnostic quality. METHODS Five cadavers were scanned from the skull base to the vertex using a routine adult head CT protocol (120 kVp, 270 mA, 0.75 s rotation, 0.5 mm × 32 detectors, 70.8 mGy CTDIvol) followed by seven reduced-dose protocols with varying combinations of reduced tube current, reduced rotation time, and increased detectors with CTDIvol ranging from 38.2 to 65.6 mGy. Organ doses were directly measured with 21 OSL dosimeters placed on the surface and implanted in the head by a neurosurgeon. Two neuroradiologists assessed grey-white matter differentiation, fluid space, ventricular size, midline shift, brain mass, edema, ischemia, and skull fractures on a three point scale: (1) Unacceptable, (2) Borderline Acceptable, and (3) Acceptable. RESULTS For the standard scan, doses to the skin, lens of the eye, salivary glands, thyroid, and brain were 37.55 mGy, 49.65 mGy, 40.67 mGy, 4.63 mGy, and 27.33 mGy, respectively. Two cadavers had cerebral edema due to changing dynamics of postmortem effects, causing the grey-white matter differentiation to appear less distinct. Two cadavers with preserved grey-white matter received acceptable scores for all image quality features for the protocol with a CTDIvol of 57.3 mGy, allowing organ dose savings ranging from 34% to 45%. One cadaver allowed for greater dose reduction for the protocol with a CTDIvol of 42 mGy. CONCLUSION Efforts to optimize scan protocol should consider both dose and clinical image quality. This is made possible with postmortem subjects, whose brains are similar to patients, allowing for an investigation of ideal scan parameters. Radiologists at our institution accepted scan protocols acquired with lower scan parameters, with CTDIvol values closer to the American College of Radiologys (ACR) Achievable Dose level of 57 mGy.