L. Rosier
University of Paris
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. Rosier.
Physical Review C | 1997
F. de Oliveira; A. Coc; P. Aguer; G. Bogaert; J. Kiener; A. Lefebvre; Vincent Tatischeff; J.-P. Thibaud; S. Fortier; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard; J. Vernotte; S. Wilmes; Peter Mohr; V. Kölle; G. Staudt
A disagreement between two determinations of Gamma_alpha of the astro- physically relevant level at E_x=4.378 MeV in 19F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes et al. and de Oliveira et al. In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value Gamma_alpha=(1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.8})10^-9eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei Gamma_gamma(19F) approx Gamma_gamma(19Ne), theta^2_alpha(19F) approx theta^2_alpha(19Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in 19Ne and on the 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne rate.A disagreement between two determinations of {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} of the astrophysically relevant level at E{sub x}=4.378 MeV in {sup 19}F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes {ital et al.} and de Oliveira {ital et al.} In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} = (1.5{sub {minus}0.8}{sup +1.5}){times}10{sup {minus}9} eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei {Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}F){approx}{Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}Ne), {theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}F){approx}{theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in {sup 19}Ne and on the {sup 15}O({alpha},{gamma}){sup 19}Ne rate. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
Nuclear Physics | 1996
F. de Oliveira; A. Coc; P. Aguer; C. Angulo; G. Bogaert; J. Kiener; A. Lefebvre; V. Tatischeff; J.P. Thibaud; Suzanne Fortier; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard; J. Vernotte; M. Arnould; A. Jorissen; N. Mowlavi
Abstract Nucleosynthesis of fluorine in the context of helium burning occurs through the 15 N(α,γ) 19 F reaction. At temperatures where fluorine formation takes place in most astrophysical models, the narrow resonance associated with the 4.378 MeV level of 19 F is expected to dominate the reaction rate, but its strength is not known. We used a 15 N confined gas target to study this level by means of the transfer reaction 15 N 7 Li,t) 19 F at 28 MeV. Reaction products products were analysed with a split pole magnetic spectrometer and the angular distributions for the first 16 levels of 19 F were extracted. These distributions are fairly well reproduced by FR-DWBA calculations in the framework of an α-cluster transfer model with a compound-nucleus contribution obtained by Hauser-Feshbach calculations. α-spectroscopic factors were deduced and, for unbound levels, the α-widths were determined and compared with the existing direct measurements. The α-width of the level of astrophysical interest ( E x = 4.378 MeV) was found to be Γ α = 1.5 × 10 −9 eV, a value 60 times smaller than the commonly used one. The astrophysical consequences for 19 F production in AGB stars are discussed.
Physical Review C | 1997
F. de Oliveira; A. Coc; P. Aguer; G. Bogaert; J. Kiener; A. Lefebvre; Vincent Tatischeff; J.-P. Thibaud; S. Fortier; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard; J. Vernotte; S. Wilmes; Peter Mohr; V. Kölle; G. Staudt
A disagreement between two determinations of Gamma_alpha of the astro- physically relevant level at E_x=4.378 MeV in 19F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes et al. and de Oliveira et al. In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value Gamma_alpha=(1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.8})10^-9eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei Gamma_gamma(19F) approx Gamma_gamma(19Ne), theta^2_alpha(19F) approx theta^2_alpha(19Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in 19Ne and on the 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne rate.A disagreement between two determinations of {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} of the astrophysically relevant level at E{sub x}=4.378 MeV in {sup 19}F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes {ital et al.} and de Oliveira {ital et al.} In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} = (1.5{sub {minus}0.8}{sup +1.5}){times}10{sup {minus}9} eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei {Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}F){approx}{Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}Ne), {theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}F){approx}{theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in {sup 19}Ne and on the {sup 15}O({alpha},{gamma}){sup 19}Ne rate. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
Physical Review C | 1997
F. de Oliveira; A. Coc; P. Aguer; G. Bogaert; J. Kiener; A. Lefebvre; Vincent Tatischeff; J.-P. Thibaud; S. Fortier; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard; J. Vernotte; S. Wilmes; Peter Mohr; V. Koelle; G. Staudt
A disagreement between two determinations of Gamma_alpha of the astro- physically relevant level at E_x=4.378 MeV in 19F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes et al. and de Oliveira et al. In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value Gamma_alpha=(1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.8})10^-9eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei Gamma_gamma(19F) approx Gamma_gamma(19Ne), theta^2_alpha(19F) approx theta^2_alpha(19Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in 19Ne and on the 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne rate.A disagreement between two determinations of {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} of the astrophysically relevant level at E{sub x}=4.378 MeV in {sup 19}F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes {ital et al.} and de Oliveira {ital et al.} In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} = (1.5{sub {minus}0.8}{sup +1.5}){times}10{sup {minus}9} eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei {Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}F){approx}{Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}Ne), {theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}F){approx}{theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in {sup 19}Ne and on the {sup 15}O({alpha},{gamma}){sup 19}Ne rate. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
Physical Review C | 1997
F. de Oliveira; J.-P. Thibaud; J. Vernotte; G. Bogaert; S. Wilmes; V. Kölle; A. Coc; S. Fortier; J. Kiener; Peter Mohr; G. Rotbard; G. Staudt; A. Lefebvre; L. Rosier; P. Aguer; J.M. Maison; Vincent Tatischeff
A disagreement between two determinations of Gamma_alpha of the astro- physically relevant level at E_x=4.378 MeV in 19F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes et al. and de Oliveira et al. In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value Gamma_alpha=(1.5^{+1.5}_{-0.8})10^-9eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei Gamma_gamma(19F) approx Gamma_gamma(19Ne), theta^2_alpha(19F) approx theta^2_alpha(19Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in 19Ne and on the 15O(alpha,gamma)19Ne rate.A disagreement between two determinations of {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} of the astrophysically relevant level at E{sub x}=4.378 MeV in {sup 19}F has been stated in two recent papers by Wilmes {ital et al.} and de Oliveira {ital et al.} In this work the uncertainties of both papers are discussed in detail, and we adopt the value {Gamma}{sub {alpha}} = (1.5{sub {minus}0.8}{sup +1.5}){times}10{sup {minus}9} eV for the 4.378 MeV state. In addition, the validity and the uncertainties of the usual approximations for mirror nuclei {Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}F){approx}{Gamma}{sub {gamma}}({sup 19}Ne), {theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}F){approx}{theta}{sub {alpha}}{sup 2}({sup 19}Ne) are discussed, together with the resulting uncertainties on the resonance strengths in {sup 19}Ne and on the {sup 15}O({alpha},{gamma}){sup 19}Ne rate. {copyright} {ital 1997} {ital The American Physical Society}
Physical Review C | 1993
J. Vernotte; G. Berrier-Ronsin; S. Fortier; E. Hourani; J. Kalifa; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard; B. H. Wildenthal
Physical Review C | 1994
J. Vernotte; G. Berrier-Ronsin; S. Fortier; E. Hourani; J. Kalifa; Khendriche A; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; G. Rotbard
Physical Review C | 2017
A. Belhout; S. Ouichaoui; H. Beaumevieille; A. Bouchemha; G. Bogaert; S. Fortier; J. Kiener; A. Lefebvre-Schuhl; J.M. Maison; L. Rosier; J. Rotbard; Vincent Tatischeff; J.-P. Thibaud; J. Vernotte
Archive | 2000
F. Cappuzzello; A. Cunsolo; Suzanne Fortier; Alessandro Foti; H. Laurent; Horst Lenske; J.M. Maison; A. L. Melita; C. Nociforo; L. Rosier; C. Stephan; L. Tassan-Got; J. S. Winfield; Hermann H. Wolter
Nuclear Physics | 1998
A. Lefebvre; S. Vouzoukas; P. Aguer; G. Bogaert; Alain Coc; Andrea Denker; F. de Oliveira; S. Fortier; J. Görres; J. Kiener; J.M. Maison; M.-G. Porquet; L. Rosier; Vincent Tatischeff; J.-P. Thibaud; M. Wiescher