L. S. Danu
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. S. Danu.
Physical Review Letters | 2011
Bhushan N. Joshi; Arun K. Jain; Y. K. Gupta; D. C. Biswas; A. Saxena; Bency John; L. S. Danu; R. P. Vind; Rajani Kant Choudhury
The heavy cluster knockout reaction (16)O((12)C,2(12)C)(4)He performed for the first time, reveals the true nature of the (12)C-(12)C interaction. The observed cross section is enhanced by almost 2 orders of magnitude over the conventional zero range distorted wave impulse approximation (DWIA) predictions. An attractive (12)C-(12)C optical potential, as obtained in the folding model, does not explain the enhanced cross section in the finite range (FR) DWIA framework. The inclusion of a hard core of fairly long range ∼3.65 fm explains the data. The present investigation of (16)O((12)C,2(12)C)(4)He along with the (12)C-(12)C elastic scattering also proves beyond doubt that the folding models deep attractive heavy ion potentials are unsuitable to describe the highly overlapping heavy ions. The application of FR-DWIA opens up new avenues to use the heavy core knockout for the detailed investigation of heavy as well as Borromean halo nuclei.
Physical Review C | 2011
S. Appannababu; P. K. Rath; S. Mukherjee; R. G. Thomas; L. S. Danu; Y. K. Gupta; Bency John; B. K. Nayak; D. C. Biswas; Atul Saxena; R. K. Choudhury
Fission fragment angular distributions have been measured for a {sup 9}Be + {sup 232}Th system at four different beam energies around the Coulomb barrier. The experimental results on fission fragment anisotropies have been compared with predictions of the standard statistical saddle-point model (SSPM) and the preequilibrium fission (PEQ) model including projectile ground-state spin. It is observed that both SSPM and the PEQ model fail to reproduce the experimental results, indicating that projectile breakup may affect the fission fragment anisotropies.
FUSION08: New Aspects of Heavy Ion Collisions Near the Coulomb#N#Barrier | 2009
L. S. Danu; B. K. Nayak; A. Saxena; D. C. Biswas; Bency John; R. G. Thomas; Y. K. Gupta; R. K. Choudhury
The quasi-elastic scattering measurements for {sup 18}O+{sup 58,62}Ni systems have been carried out at {theta}{sub lab} = 150 deg. around Coulomb barrier energies to investigate the effect of nuclear shell closure on the barrier distributions. The {sup 18}O+{sup 58}Ni system leads to N = 40 neutron shell closure and {sup 18}O+{sup 62}Ni system is having N = 44 in the compound system. It is observed that target 2{sup +} and 3{sup -}, projectile 2{sup +} inelastic and 2n-transfer couplings are required in coupled-channels fusion model (CCFULL) calculations to get good comparison with the experimental barrier distribution of {sup 18}O+{sup 62}Ni system, whereas projectile 2{sup +} inelastic state coupling is not required for {sup 18}O+{sup 58}Ni system. However, the low energy structure observed in the barrier distribution of {sup 18}O+{sup 58}Ni system is not reproduced by coupled-channels calculations. This suggests, a possible additional effect due to N = 40 shell closure in the compound system not accounted for in coupled-channels calculations.
Physical Review C | 2012
S. Mukhopadhyay; D. C. Biswas; A. Goswami; L.A. Kinage; R. K. Choudhury; P.N. Prashanth; A. Chatterjee; L. S. Danu
Physical Review C | 2011
N. N. Deshmukh; S. Mukherjee; D. Patel; N. L. Singh; P. K. Rath; B. K. Nayak; D. C. Biswas; S. Santra; E. T. Mirgule; L. S. Danu; Y. K. Gupta; A. Saxena; R. K. Choudhury; R. Kumar; J. Lubian; C. C. Lopes; E. N. Cardozo
Physical Review C | 2010
L. S. Danu; D. C. Biswas; A. Saxena; A. Shrivastava; A. Chatterjee; B. K. Nayak; R. G. Thomas; R. K. Choudhury; R. Palit; I. Mazumdar; P. Datta; S. Chattopadhyay; S. Pal; S. Bhattacharya; S. Muralithar; K. S. Golda; R. K. Bhowmik; J. J. Das; R. P. Singh; N. Madhavan; J. Gerl; S. K. Patra; L. Satpathy
Physical Review Letters | 2011
Bhushan N. Joshi; Arun K. Jain; Y. K. Gupta; D. C. Biswas; A. Saxena; Bency John; L. S. Danu; R. P. Vind; Rajani Kant Choudhury
Physical Review C | 2014
L. S. Danu; B. K. Nayak; E. T. Mirgule; R. K. Choudhury; U. Garg
Physical Review C | 2014
D. Patel; S. Mukherjee; B. K. Nayak; S. V. Suryanarayana; D. C. Biswas; E. T. Mirgule; Y. K. Gupta; L. S. Danu; Bency John; A. Saxena
Pramana | 2017
Bhushan N. Joshi; Arun K. Jain; D. C. Biswas; Bency John; Y. K. Gupta; L. S. Danu; R. P. Vind; G K Prajapati; S Mukhopadhyay; A. Saxena