L. Stoleru

Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on left ventricular diastolic properties in patients with depressed ejection fraction. SOLVD Investigators.

BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to analyze the changes in left ventricular diastolic function that occur in patients with chronic severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the absence or presence of prolonged therapy with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. METHODS AND RESULTS Left ventricular function data (cineangiography plus Millar, frame-by-frame analysis) and right ventricular volumes (radionuclide angiography) were obtained at baseline and after an average follow-up of 12.4 months in 42 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less. After baseline measurements, the patients were randomized to placebo (n = 16) or enalapril (10 mg BID, n = 26). In the placebo group, the changes in left ventricular function were characterized by increases in end-diastolic (159 +/- 43 to 170 +/- 44 mL/m2) and end-systolic (119 +/- 38 to 128 +/- 49 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a downward and rightward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. In contrast, decreases in end-diastolic (166 +/- 43 to 156 +/- 47 mL/m2) and end-systolic (125 +/- 43 to 111 +/- 42 mL/m2) volumes accompanied by a slight upward and leftward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation were noted in the enalapril group. These changes in left ventricular volumes were significantly different between groups (both P < .005) but were not attended by changes in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, in time constant of isovolumic pressure decrease, or in right ventricular volumes. However, the chamber stiffness constant beta decreased from 0.044 +/- 0.027 to 0.032 +/- 0.019 mL-1/m2 in the placebo group, whereas it increased insignificantly in the enalapril group (0.040 +/- 0.028 to 0.041 +/- 0.028 mL-1/m2). These changes in chamber stiffness constant beta between baseline and follow-up were significantly different between placebo and enalapril groups (P < .05). Another index of chamber compliance, delta V/delta P, also confirmed the presence of opposite changes in left ventricular chamber compliance in the placebo group and in the enalapril group. The mean diastolic wall stress increased with placebo but not with enalapril (+51 versus -13 kdyn/cm2; P < .04) whereas left ventricular mass and the indexes of left ventricular sphericity tended to improve in the enalapril group. The changes in plasma levels of norepinephrine, atrial natriuretic peptide, and arginine vasopressin were, however, comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The data indicate that in patients with severe systolic left ventricular dysfunction, the progressive left ventricular dilatation was accompanied by a decrease in left ventricular chamber stiffness; enalapril therapy was able to prevent or partially reverse these changes and tended to reduce left ventricular mass and ventricular sphericity. Those changes were suggestive of partial reversal of left ventricular remodeling by enalapril administration.

Effects of D-nebivolol and L-nebivolol on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function: comparison with D-L-nebivolol and atenolol.

Summary: (D-L) Nebivolol is a new β1-selective adrenoceptor blocker which in normal individuals preserves rest and exercise hemodynamics. We assessed the effects of the enantiomers (L- and D-nebivolol) on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and compared their effects with those of the racemic mixture. LV angiography (+Millar) was performed before and after intravenous (i.v.) infusion of either D- or L-nebivolol (1.25–2.5 mg, n = 22) in patients with ischemic heart disease and previous myocardial infarction. Neither L- nor D-nebivolol produced significant changes in heart rate (HR), peak (+) dP/dt, (dP/dt) DP40, cardiac index (CI) or ejection fraction (EF). Diastolic distensibility, evaluated from the shift of the pressure-volume data at the time of mitral valve opening, did not improve after D- or L-enantiomers administration. In contrast, both D-L-nebivolol 2.5 mg (n = 9) and atenolol 15 mg (n = 9) significantly reduced HR and peak (+) dP/dt, but in comparison to atenolol D-L nebivolol improved EF (+ 4% after D-L nebivolol vs. −4% after atenolol; p < 0.05 D-L nebivolol vs. atenolol) and maintained cardiac output CO, (+ 2% vs. −21%; p < 0.05 between groups). Moreover, unlike any of the other drugs in the study, the racemate shifted the diastolic pressure-volume data downward, suggesting improved LV distensibility. The beneficial effects of nebivolol on LV systolic and diastolic function appears to require the presence of both D- and L-enantiomers.

Role of Endogenous Endothelin-1 in Experimental Renal Hypertension in Dogs

BACKGROUND Endothelin-1, a vasoconstrictive peptide released by endothelium, may be involved in the pathophysiology of hypertension. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of endogenous endothelin-1 in renal hypertension in dogs. The model of hypertension consisted of silk tissue wrapping of the left kidney, which produced hypertension associated with perinephritis after 6 to 8 weeks. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-two anesthetized open chest dogs were studied randomly: 8 dogs with perinephritic hypertension received the nonpeptidic ETA-ETB receptor antagonist bosentan (group 1); 8 other hypertensive dogs received the vehicle solution (group 2); 8 healthy dogs received bosentan (group 3); and 8 healthy dogs received the vehicle solution (group 4). Bosentan was injected as an intravenous bolus (3 mg/kg) followed by a 1-hour infusion at a rate of 7 mg.kg-1.h-1. In hypertensive dogs, bosentan produced a similar decrease (P = .0001) of both left ventricular systolic and mean aortic pressures, which averaged 38 mm Hg (-22% and -24%, respectively). These parameters remained unchanged with the vehicle solution. Left ventricular end-diastolic and left atrial pressures also declined significantly with bosentan (P = .0005 and P < .05, respectively). Left ventricular lengths tended to decrease. The other cardiovascular parameters (heart rate, peak [+]dP/dt, time constant of relaxation, and coronary vascular resistance) did not change significantly. In healthy dogs, bosentan decreased mean aortic pressure by 19 mm Hg (P = .004). Vehicle solution had no effect. Plasma endothelin-1 levels, similar under basal conditions in healthy and hypertensive dogs, increased 30-fold with bosentan (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS Specific endothelin-1 receptor antagonism markedly lowers blood pressure in experimental hypertension but is less effective on blood pressure of healthy animals. This suggests that endothelin-1 plays a role in the pathophysiology of hypertension but contributes to a lesser extent to the maintenance of normal blood pressure. This role of endothelin-1 is unrelated to its plasma levels. The increase of plasma endothelin-1 with bosentan, due either to a displacement of endothelin-1 from its receptor or to a feedback mechanism, does not prevent this blood pressure reduction.

Medium-term effects of beta-blockade on left ventricular mechanics: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of nebivolol and atenolol in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects on left ventricular function and exercise tolerance of a selective beta-antagonist (atenolol) with those of another selective beta 1-antagonist with vasodilator properties (nebivolol) in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction but no overt congestive heart failure. Beta blockers are widely used in ischemic heart disease, but their effects on left ventricular mechanics and exercise tolerance are poorly defined in the subgroup of patients with significant systolic dysfunction but without clinical evidence of ischemia or congestive heart failure. Angiographic and symptom-limited exercise data were obtained at baseline and after an 8-10-week double-blind treatment with placebo (n = 10), 50 mg atenolol daily (n = 10), or 2.5 mg (n = 10) or 5 mg (n = 10) nebivolol daily. When compared to placebo, both atenolol and nebivolol reduced resting heart rate and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (from 33.9 to 39.2% with atenolol and from 36.5 to 40.8% with nebivolol, both P < .05) while lowering mean systolic wall stress. Only nebivolol, however, produced a parallel downward shift of the pressure-volume relationship during early diastolic filling and improved the early peak filling rate when compared to placebo (+ 10%, P < .05). When compared to baseline, maximal exercise duration increased by 7 and 13 seconds with placebo and atenolol, respectively (both NS vs baseline), and increased by 44 seconds with nebivolol (P = .0077 vs baseline). Both atenolol and nebivolol decreased maximal exercise heart rate; the reduction was more pronounced with atenolol. Prolonged beta 1-adrenoceptor blockade leads to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The dissociation between the changes in resting left ventricular function and the changes in exercise duration suggests that in this clinical setting, the changes in systolic function may have less impact on functional capacity than an improvement in diastolic distensibility during the rapid filling phase.

Effects of endothelin-1 at pathophysiologic concentrations on coronary perfusion and mechanical function of normal and postischemic myocardium.

We assess hemodynamic, vascular, and hormonal effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) at pathophysiologic levels on normal and ischemic myocardium. Thirty conscious chronically instrumented dogs were studied before, during, and after a 10-min coronary artery occlusion (CAO) performed either during ET-1 infusion (2.5 ng/ kg min, n = 15) or during placebo infusion (n = 15). ET-1 infusion produced an increase in plasma ET-1 (from 1.3 ± 0.1 to 11.5 ± 1.1 pAf, p < 0.0001) during CAO (pathophysiologic value). Left anterior descending artery (LAD) blood flow (measured by Doppler flow probe) decreased similarly during CAO with ET-1 or placebo (p = 0.0001, NS, ET-1 vs. placebo). Both endocardial and epicardial blood flows in ischemic regions also decreased (p = 0.0001) during CAO but were threefold greater with ET-1 than with placebo (endocardium 42 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 2 ml/min/100 g, p = 0.003). No significant difference in myocardial blood flows between groups was observed in control regions. CAO produced increases (p < 0.005) in heart rate (HR), mean aortic pressure (AOP), and ventricular pressures but no change in atrial pressures. The changes in these parameters were comparable in the ET-1 and placebo groups. Despite the greater residual flow during CAO, however, ET-1 decreased the function of the ischemic zone during reperfusion as assessed by systolic shortening (p < 0.05). Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), unchanged during CAO with placebo, increased from 38.3 ± 6.1 to 53.3 ± 10 pM with ET-1 (p = 0.02). Thus, ET-1, at pathophysiologic levels, increases collateral blood flow in ischemic myocardium without affecting perfusion of normal myocardium. It decreases postischemic myocardial recovery and directly stimulates ANF release.

Effects of octreotide on cardiovascular hormones and haemodynamics in conscious dogs.

Octreotide inhibits the secretion of several hormones and exerts vasopressor effects. To clarify the mechanism of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) secretion and to assess the cardiovascular effects of octreotide in relation to changes in vasoactive peptide secretion, four groups of conscious dogs were studied: group I (n=11) received saline infusion after placebo, group II (n=10), the same infusion after octreotide, group III (n= 10), placebo only and group IV (n =10) octreotide injection only. Saline (10% body wt) was infused over 40 min after subcutaneous injection of placebo or octreotide (1 γ/kg). Saline produced a rise (p<0.001) of plasma ANF from 32.4±4.1 to 59.0±8.5 pM after placebo and from 35.6±5.5 to 77.0±12.6 pM after octreotide. This rise, not significantly different between groups I and II paralleled a 4–5-fold increase (p<0.005) of right and left atrial pressures. With a higher dose of octreotide (4 μg/kg) injected in 4 dogs, plasma ANF increased by 27.5±5 pM. During hypervolemia, plasma endothelial remained unchanged but plasma angiotensin II and epinephrine decreased (p<0.05) approximately by 80% without being affected by octreotide. Octreotide did not influence the basal secretion of ANF, endothelin-1, angiotensin II and catecholamines. However, in basal conditions, octreotide injection resulted in a 9% increase (p<0.005) of left ventricular systolic pressure, unobserved after placebo. Plasma glucose decreased (p<0.005) in groups receiving octreotide. Thus, octreotide does not impair the stretch-mediated release of ANF which implies a release mechanism independent from somatostatin receptors and consequent changes in intracellular c-AMP. Octreotide has also a pressor effect, unrelated to changes in vasoactive peptide production.