Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where L. Todor is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by L. Todor.


Physical Review C | 2012

Final analysis of proton form factor ratio data at Q2 = 4.0, 4.8, and 5.6 GeV2

A. Puckett; E. Brash; O. Gayou; M. K. Jones; L. Pentchev; Charles F. Perdrisat; V. Punjabi; K. A. Aniol; T. Averett; F. Benmokhtar; W. Bertozzi; L. Bimbot; J. R. Calarco; C. Cavata; Z. Chai; C.C. Chang; T. H. Chang; J. P. Chen; E. Chudakov; R. De Leo; S Dieterich; R. Endres; M. B. Epstein; S. Escoffier; Kevin Fissum; H. Fonvieille; S. Frullani; J. Gao; F. Garibaldi; S. Gilad

Precise measurements of the proton electromagnetic form factor ratio R = mu(p)G(E)(p)/G(M)(p) using the polarization transfer method at Jefferson Lab have revolutionized the understanding of nucleon structure by revealing the strong decrease of R with momentum transfer Q(2) for Q(2) greater than or similar to 1 GeV2, in strong disagreement with previous extractions of R from cross-section measurements. In particular, the polarization transfer results have exposed the limits of applicability of the one-photon-exchange approximation and highlighted the role of quark orbital angular momentum in the nucleon structure. The GEp-II experiment in Jefferson Labs Hall A measured R at four Q(2) values in the range 3.5 GeV2 <= Q(2) <= 5.6 GeV2. A possible discrepancy between the originally published GEp-II results and more recent measurements at higher Q(2) motivated a new analysis of the GEp-II data. This article presents the final results of the GEp-II experiment, including details of the new analysis, an expanded description of the apparatus, and an overview of theoretical progress since the original publication. The key result of the final analysis is a systematic increase in the results for R, improving the consistency of the polarization transfer data in the high-Q(2) region. This increase is the result of an improved selection of elastic events which largely removes the systematic effect of the inelastic contamination, underestimated by the original analysis. (Less)

Collaboration


Dive into the L. Todor's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Puckett

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Brash

Christopher Newport University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Chudakov

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

F. Benmokhtar

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Gao

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. P. Chen

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. R. Calarco

University of New Hampshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. A. Aniol

California State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge