L. Van Nueten

Nebivolol vs atenolol and placebo in essential hypertension: a double-blind randomised trial

A double-blind, randomised, parallel-group trial was conducted in patients with essential hypertension in British general practices, of nebivolol 5 mg, atenolol 50 mg, and placebo each given once daily. Both active drugs, in comparison with placebo, caused highly significant and similar reductions in systolic and diastolic pressures without orthostatic effect, and small significant falls in heart rate. Both active drugs were well tolerated, nebivolol marginally more so. Nebivolol, a long-acting, cardioselective, vasodilating beta-blocker which acts partly via the l-arginine/nitric oxide mechanism, appears potentially valuable for the treatment of hypertension.

Comparative effects of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive subjects with type II diabetes

The aim of this double-blind, parallel group study was to compare the effects of nebivolol and atenolol on blood pressure (BP) and insulin sensitivity in hypertensive patients with type II, non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). After a 4-week run-in period on placebo, 30 patients (14 males and 16 females) aged 43 to 69 years, with stable NIDDM and mild to moderate hypertension (DBP ⩾95 and <116 mm hg) were randomised to receive either nebivolol 5 mg or atenolol 50 mg, both administered once daily for 6 months. at the end of the placebo and the active treatment periods, supine and standing bp was measured, 24-h urinary c-peptide, hba1c, plasma glucose and lipid levels were evaluated and an euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp was performed to evaluate insulin sensitivity: glucose infusion rate during the last 60 min of clamp and total glucose requirements were evaluated. Nebivolol 5 mg once daily was of an equivalent efficacy as atenolol 50 mg once daily at reducing supine and standing systolic and diastolic BP values. Neither β-blocker adversely affected carbohydrate metabolism in terms of insulin sensitivity, whole body glucose utilization, HbA1c and 24-h urinary C-peptide excretion. No significant changes in cholesterol (total, high density and low density lipoprotein) and triglycerides plasma levels were observed with both β-blockers. These findings indicate that, in hypertensive patients with NIDDM, ie, in subjects who have established insulin resistance, treatment with nebivolol and atenolol neither further deteriorated insulin sensitivity nor adversely affected the lipid profile.

Pharmacological properties of nebivolol in man

ObjectivesThe aims of the present study were to determine (1) the β1-blocking potency and (2) the β1 adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol in man after repeated dosing (7 days) compared with that after a single oral intake and with that after atenolol for 7 days. In addition, it was investigated whether (3) nebivolol has α1-blocking properties which might at least in part explain the vasodilating property of the compound.MethodsTwelve healthy subjects were randomized in an open, two-way cross-over study. β1-Blocking potency and β1-adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol 5 mg once daily (o.d.) were compared with those of atenolol at three doses (25, 50 and 100 mg) o.d. Measurements were performed after 1 and 7 days of drug intake. β1Adrenoceptor potency was assessed by the percentage decrease in exercise-induced tachycardia (AEIT) during β-blockade. β1-Selectivity of nebivolol and atenolol were investigated using the heart rate response to isoprenaline at equipotent β1blocking dosages of both drugs. α1-Blockade of nebivolol was measured using the phenylephrine dose-response test.ResultsΔEIT after a single oral dose of nebivolol 5 mg (10%) was significantly smaller than after nebivolol 5 mg o.d. for 7 days (15%). After 1 week of treatment no difference was seen in ΔEIT between nebivolol 5 mg o.d. and atenolol 25 mg o.d. (16%). At these dosages the suppression in isoprenaline-induced tachycardia by both drugs did not differ (CD20 ratio 1.7). In contrast to atenolol 25 mg, after 1 week of nebivolol 5 mg o.d., blood pressure decreased. This decrease averaged 10% and — like in a study with hypertensive patients — was similar with that after atenolol 100 mg o.d. None of the phenylephrine test parameters changed from pre-study values after nebivolol.Conclusionsβ1-Blockade of nebivolol 5 mg is larger after repeated dosing than after a single oral intake. After once daily repeated dosing nebivolol 5 mg and atenolol 25 mg are equipotent in β1-antagonism. No difference in β1-selectivity is observed between the two drugs. Nebivolol has no additional α1-blocking property, which may at least in part explain its vasodilating effect.

Nebivolol vs enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension : a double-blind randomised trial

The efficacy and acceptability of nebivolol 5 mg and enalapril 10 mg, each given once daily, were compared in essential hypertension in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial over 3 months. For the index pre-declared variable, sitting diastolic pressure at trough drug level, nebivolol achieved greater falls in pressure (−12.3 vs −9.9 mm Hg; P = 0.009) and a higher response rate (70% vs 55%; P = 0.002). The trough-to-peak sitting diastolic ratios also favoured nebivolol (84% vs 60%, P = 0.002). Nebivolol, but not enalapril, slightly but significantly lowered heart rate. Both drugs were well-tolerated, although enalapril was accompanied by a significantly higher incidence of coughing.

Nebivolol: Comparison of the Effects of dl-Nebivolol, d-Nebivolol, l-Nebivolol, Atenolol, and Placebo on Exercise-Induced Increases in Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure

The effects of racemic nebivolol, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg; d-nebivolol, 2.5 mg; l-nebivolol, 2.5 mg; atenolol, 50 mg; and placebo, each given once daily for 7 days, on exercise-induced increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were compared in a seven-way double-blind randomized crossover trial in 14 healthy male volunteers. Observations on these variables were made 3 and 24 hours after dosing on the first and last days of therapy. Similar effects on both exercise-induced tachycardia and increases in systolic blood pressure were seen with nebivolol 5.0 mg and with d-nebivolol 2.5 mg; l-nebivolol 2.5 mg was no different from placebo. These data show that the beta-blocking effects of nebivolol reside in the d-isomer. A dose-related response was evident with racemic nebivolol in inhibiting exercise-induced tachycardia over the range of doses studied. Whereas the effects of atenolol on both exercise-induced tachycardia and increases in systolic blood pressure were fully evident on the first day of treatment, those of nebivolol, especially with regard to heart rate, and, to a lesser degree, systolic pressure, were greater on the final than on the first day. Nebivolol had a clearly superior trough-to-peak efficacy ratio than atenolol.The effects of racemic nebivolol, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg; d-nebivolol, 2.5 mg; l-nebivolol, 2.5 mg; atenolol, 50 mg; and placebo, each given once daily for 7 days, on exercise-induced increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure were compared in a seven-way double-blind randomized crossover trial in 14 healthy male volunteers. Observations on these variables were made 3 and 24 hours after dosing on the first and last days of therapy. Similar effects on both exercise-induced tachycardia and increases in systolic blood pressure were seen with nebivolol 5.0 mg and with d-nebivolol 2.5 mg; l-nebivolol 2.5 mg was no different from placebo. These data show that the beta-blocking effects of nebivolol reside in the d-isomer. A dose-related response was evident with racemic nebivolol in inhibiting exercise-induced tachycardia over the range of doses studied. Whereas the effects of atenolol on both exercise-induced tachycardia and increases in systolic blood pressure were fully evident on the first day of treatment, those of nebivolol, especially with regard to heart rate, and, to a lesser degree, systolic pressure, were greater on the final than on the first day. Nebivolol had a clearly superior trough-to-peak efficacy ratio than atenolol.

Nebivolol in the treatment of cardiac failure: A double-blind controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND Nebivolol is a highly cardioselective long-acting beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, which acts in part via the endothelial L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. As an antihypertensive drug it is effective in once-daily dosage. Nebivolol has previously been shown to improve left ventricular function in patients with cardiac impairment. METHODS AND RESULTS This paper reports a double-blind randomized trial comparing, in patients with heart failure, once-daily nebivolol 2.5 or 5.0 mg (initiated in all at 2.5 mg) with placebo on a constant background of digitalis plus diuretic. There was with nebivolol no overall deterioration of cardiac function or cardiac symptoms, and especially not of exercise capacity, in comparison with placebo. One patient on nebivolol 2.5 mg developed hypotension and pulmonary edema, and one patient on nebivolol 5 mg, bradycardia. All the remaining patients continued with unchanged diuretic and digitalis dosage. Nebivolol was accompanied by a trend toward clinical and functional improvement; rather better results were obtained with 2.5 than 5.0 mg. CONCLUSIONS In view of increasing interest in beta-blockade in heart failure, nebivolol merits further study in this context. The capacity of nebivolol to enhance endothelial nitric oxide production appears potentially attractive.

Efficacy and safety of oral ridogrel in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: two multicentre, randomized, double-blind studies.

Ridogrel at low doses inhibits thromboxane synthase. Oral ridogrel, from 5 mg once daily to 150 mg twice daily, improves the endoscopic appearance of colonic mucosa and clinical manifestations in mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

Progression of prodromal motor and non‐motor symptoms in the premotor phase study – 2‐year follow‐up data

The neuropathological process starts years before the diagnosis of Parkinsons disease (PD). Assessment of prodromal features in healthy individuals may help to define those with high risk for future PD. Our aim was to evaluate the presence and progression of prodromal markers in individuals with low risk [healthy controls (HC), n = 14] and high risk for PD (HR‐PD, n = 34) and early PD (n = 14) patients.