L. W. H. Peters
University of Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by L. W. H. Peters.
BMC Public Health | 2009
L. W. H. Peters; Gerjo Kok; Geert ten Dam; Goof Buijs; Theo Paulussen
BackgroundMost school health education programs focus on a single behavioral domain. Integrative programs that address multiple behaviors may be more efficient, but only if the elements of change are similar for these behaviors. The objective of this study was to examine which effective elements of school health education are similar across three particular behavioral domains.MethodsA systematic review of reviews of the effectiveness of school-based health promotion programs was conducted for the domains of substance abuse, sexual behavior, and nutrition. The literature search spanned the time period between 1995 and October 2006 and included three databases, websites of review centers and backward search. Fifty-five reviews and meta-analyses met predetermined relevance and publication criteria and were included. Data was extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. A standardized data extraction form was used, with detailed attention to effective elements pertaining to program goals, development, content, methods, facilitator, components and intensity. Two assessors rated the quality of reviews as strong, moderate or weak. We included only strong and moderate reviews in two types of analysis: one based on interpretation of conflicting results, the other on a specific vote-counting rule.ResultsThirty six reviews were rated strong, 6 moderate, and 13 weak. A multitude of effective elements was identified in the included reviews and many elements were similar for two or more domains. In both types of analysis, five elements with evidence from strong reviews were found to be similar for all three domains: use of theory; addressing social influences, especially social norms; addressing cognitive-behavioral skills; training of facilitators; and multiple components. Two additional elements had positive results in all domains with the rule-based method of analysis, but had inconclusive results in at least one domain with the interpretion-based method of analysis: parent involvement and a larger number of sessions.ConclusionFive effective elements of school health promotion were found to be similar across the three behavioral domains examined (substance abuse, sexual behavior, nutrition). An integrative program that addresses the three domains seems feasible. The five elements are primary candidates to include in programs targeting these behaviors.
Prevention Science | 2006
Carin H. Wiefferink; L. W. H. Peters; Femke Hoekstra; Geert ten Dam; Goof Buijs; T. Paulussen
Characterizing school health promotion is its category-by-category approach, in which each separate health-related behavior is addressed independently. Such an approach creates a risk that extra-curricular activities become overloaded, and that teaching staff are distracted by continuous innovations. Within the health promotion sector there are thus increasing calls for an integrative approach to health-related behaviors. However, a meaningful integrative approach to different lifestyles will be possible only if there is some clustering of individual health-related behaviors and if health-related behaviors have a minimum number of determinants in common. This systematic review aims to identify to what extent the four health-related behaviors smoking, alcohol abuse, safe sex and healthy nutrition cluster; and how their determinants are associated. Potentially modifiable determinants that offer clues for an integrative approach of school health-promotion programs are identified. Besides, the direction in which health educators should look for a more efficient instructional design is indicated.
Health Education Research | 2008
L. W. H. Peters; Carin H. Wiefferink; Femke Hoekstra; Goof J. Buijs; Geert ten Dam; T. Paulussen
Schools are overloaded with health promotion programs that, altogether, focus on a broad array of behavioral domains, including substance abuse, sexuality and nutrition. Although the specific content of programs varies according to the domain focus, programs usually address similar concepts: knowledge, attitudinal beliefs, social influences and skills. This apparent conceptual overlap between behaviors and programs provides opportunities for a transfer-oriented approach which will stimulate students to apply the knowledge and skills they have learned in one domain (e.g. skills for resisting tobacco use) to other domains (e.g. alcohol, sex). A requirement for such an approach is that behaviors share at least some determinants. This review addresses this issue by examining similarities between domain-specific determinants of smoking, drinking, safe sex and healthy nutrition among adolescents. Recent empirical studies and reviews were examined. The results show that the following determinants are relevant to all four behaviors: beliefs about immediate gratification and social advantages, peer norms, peer and parental modeling and refusal self-efficacy. Several other determinants have been found to relate to at least two behaviors, e.g. health risk beliefs and parental norms. These results can be used for the development of a transfer-oriented school health promotion curriculum.
Psicologia-reflexao E Critica | 2017
Gerjo Kok; L. W. H. Peters; Robert A. C. Ruiter
This paper discusses the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol for planning theory- and evidence-based behavior change interventions. IM has been developed in the field of health promotion in 1998 and has mostly been applied in that field, but applications in other fields are emerging. IM can be used for any intervention that involves changing behavior. The paper discusses the protocol and its basic issues and presents in-depth examples of its use in- and outside the health promotion field: Empowerment, return to work, safety interventions, implementation, energy conservation, and academic performance. IM is characterized by three perspectives: a social ecological approach, participation of all stakeholders, and the use of theories and evidence. Through a series of six iterative steps - from needs assessment to implementation and evaluation - which are each broken down into specific tasks, correct application of the protocol is meant to produce behavior change interventions that fit into the local context and that have the best chances of effectiveness. IM helps intervention planners develop the best possible interventions targeting health behaviors, but also targeting behaviors related to other societal issues, such as environmental concerns, safety and discrimination.
Promotion & Education | 2004
Gerard R. M. Molleman; Machteld A. Ploeg; Clemens Hosman; L. W. H. Peters
Preffi is a set of guidelines with items relevant to the effectiveness of health promotion projects, reflecting scientific and practical knowledge. Preffi is used to assess quality at various stages of an intervention, either to critically evaluate ones own project or to comment on projects proposed by others. This article describes the Preffi model, its scoring method and the systematic, seven-step development process that led to its second version: Preffi 2.0. The draft version of Preffi 2.0 was tested for usefulness among 35 experienced Health Promotion specialists. They gave the instrument an average overall score of 7.7 on a scale of 10. The large majority of them evaluated it as valuable, complete, clear, well-organised and innovative. Users have commented that applying Preffi to a project yields a balanced and useful assessment, as well as a clear overview of points in the project that could be improved.
Health Education Research | 1993
Herman P. Schaalma; Gerjo Kok; L. W. H. Peters
Health Education & Behavior | 1996
Herman P. Schaalma; Gerjo Kok; Roel J. Bosker; Guy S. Parcel; L. W. H. Peters; Jos Poelman; Jo Reinders
Health Education Research | 2005
Gerard R. M. Molleman; L. W. H. Peters; Clemens Hosman; Gerjo Kok; Paul Oosterveld
Health Education Research | 2005
Gerard R. M. Molleman; L. W. H. Peters; Clemens Hosman; Gerjo Kok
Health Promotion International | 2015
L. W. H. Peters; Geert ten Dam; P.L. Kocken; Goof J. Buijs; E. Dusseldorp; T. Paulussen